Right-wing and nationalism

Right-wing and nationalism

1) Keep your right-wing strong

"Keep your right-wing strong", is the quote, what the main architect of the World War I Marshall Alfred von Schlieffen said when he died in 1913. In this case, he meant the force, which would be used to attack France and Belgium. But there is one other mean, what this quote has been translated to mean. That is that emperor Wilhelm should support the right-wing people or right-wing radicals, who would own their companies, and if Wilhelm has the support of those key persons, that would guarantee the majority of support for the leaders of the state.

In Wilhelm's world, the state was made for war. The army or military forces was a synonym for the state. The reason why Wilhelm had police was that the officers of the army wanted to keep away from the streets and shooting the own citizens left to the police, what mission was to scatter riots, what was targeted to him.

The reason, why Wilhelm supported right-wing economics is that he needed bumper between government and people. Wilhelm was a judge, man who was above politics. This is the thing in many far-right movements. They are seeing the thing that their ideology is something bigger than politics.

The idea of this kind of policy is that by getting support from the owners of the companies, that thing would minimize the stress, what the control of people causes to the emperor. In that model, the owners of the companies would select the people in their factories, who would please them, but if those people would resist Wilhelm, that means that they would be kicked off from work. So the idea was that the people would be kept in order by using the industrial leaders for that purpose.

2) What is the right-wing?

2.1) Why workers hated the peasants?

Sometimes there has been asked, why some political parties are called the "right-wing" and "left-wing" movements? The thing is that when the suggestion came to King's table, that thing was put on the left if that suggestion wanted to abandon. So the role of the King in the feudal system was that he accepted or abandoned the law, and this hides his power.

Every nobleman and priest were accepted by that man, and he had to say, what "majesty" says. If those persons would say "no", that could mean that he was executed for rebellion because every nobleman was an officer.

The role of peasants in this system was that they worked as bumpers and gave orders to the workers. Peasant was the level in society, which was the key to higher rank noblemen or priests offices, and in this stage those people made themselves hated because the workers see that they just gave orders. Every work in that system made for the house, and if the work didn't please the controller, that meant that the worker was kicked off. And that thing guaranteed that peasants were not liked.

2.2) Right-wing is not an only militaristic actor in the political field

But when we are thinking about right-wing, that thing means for the most of us the nationalism and militarism. And at the same time, we are forgetting that communist governments are also nationalistic and militaristic. So this means that if we are thinking about things like right-wing people and militarism, we must say that also states like the Soviet Union were right-wing governments.

When we are thinking about corporatism, the model, where workers of the company are also getting shares of their working place, and that thing is sometimes sold to us as a "democratic" economical model", we must remember that this model is created by Mussolini. The idea of this model was that workers of the company owned the third of the shares of the company. Third of those shares were given to owners and the third of those shares were given to "surveillance system". In this system words, priesthood and noblemen were replaced by "owners" and "surveillance system".

Feudal system

Noblemen
Priesthood
Peasantry

Mussolini's system (Corporatism) 

Owners
Surveillance officers
Workers

That thing seems very good, and it gives the workers access to see things, what is going on in the back-office. But the thing is that this model has been copied from the feudal system, where three castes are making decisions. Those castes were noblemen, priesthood and peasantry. The thing was that when the peasants made the offer, that thing could be smashed by votes of noblemen and priesthood, which just covered that authoritarian. The thing was that in the office of priest could be accessed by everybody, but the payments of the studies were so high, that only noblemen could pay that price.

In fascistic Italy, the idea was that the workers were not noticed, that the "surveillance system" was controlled by the same people, who were "owners". So the same people were sitting in two chairs and controlled the companies.

3) The Cold War was a war between two economical system

The cold war was a war between two economical systems, communist utopia, and capitalist reality. But was that thing actually like we want to believe? When we are thinking about the economical systems, where the government controls everything, we are facing the thing, what is called bureaucracy.

People believe that there is the possibility to make the government, which serves everybody. But the problem is that the government is a group of people, who have all different backgrounds and different ways to see things. At this point, we must realize, that there is not pure capitalism or pure socialism anywhere. Every state is parts, which are controlled by the government, and there are parts, that are controlled by private people.

Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Brandenburgertor_SN.jpg