Newton's fractal and the origin of the universe

Above this text is the so-called "Newton's fractal". And now you might ask, what connections with some fractal has with the universe. The fractal is the geometrical form that is repeating forever. And if we can make the right fractal we could make the model of the entire universe. So if we could make the model of the galaxies or interplanetary nebulas. That means we could make the model of the direction of the energy flow. 

Or if that thing is not possible. We could make a model of how the galaxies and universe are advancing. Also, the fractals can be used for modeling weather or movements of gas masses in the atmosphere. But the more accurate models can make by using extremely large gas masses like entire galaxies. When the mass of the gas is rising. The accuracy of predictions of the movement of that gas is rising. 

But could "Newton's fractal" be the calculation that models the origin of the universe? That is a coincidence.

 But it's an interesting coincidence. Newton didn't know anything about this fractal. And still, that is giving many ideas about the origin of the material. 

When we are looking at that fractal there is the shape that seems coming from one point. There are two crossing forms. And that thing brings to my mind that could the origin of the universe be the two crossing wave movement areas?

Maybe, in the beginning, was formed expanding quantum field. That pushed the wave to move away from the point where it formed. And that thing caused the Big Bang. 

 In that scenario, the crossing wave movement turned to a "ball-shaped form", but what kind of wave movement it was? The wave movement before the universe or material entirety that we call the universe formed was not a waving movement. It was a straight moving wave movement. Those energy lines crossed and that caused the detonation. Sir Roger Penrose noticed that the black holes brought radiation from the ancient universes. And maybe that wave movement was coming from the universe that was gone. 

But what was the origin of the crossing wave movement? The simplest answer is that came from another dead universe. The wave-particle duality means that the material is particles but also they have wave movement form. Sharply saying protons and neutrons are part of the subgroup of hadrons called baryons. They are a group of quarks and gluons. So they are particle groups. 

There is one thing that we must remember. The wave-particle duality means that only elementary particles can change their form between particle and wave movement. So quarks, electrons, and other subatomic particles can turn to wave movement. But the quantum groups like protons and neutrons cannot do that thing. 

So if we want to send a qubit through the black hole we must try to make it by using quarks or electrons for that thing. The requirement is that the information could return.  Is that the form of the transmitter can return to its original form. And the elementary particles will not break when they are falling across the event horizon. The idea that a black hole crushes information includes many theories. But one is that the gravitation will break the protons and neutrons. In another version when the particles are coming out from the hypothetical wormhole. They are slowing. And that thing crushes the information. 

The hadrons like protons and neutrons are not like "balls" they might look a little bit like small bags where are balls inside them. Those "balls" are quarks". Or maybe if we are increasing accuracy that thing causes that we might see that even the quarks are not balls. They might look like waves if we are using enough high accuracy.

If we are looking at the impact theory where two crossing wave movements caused the reaction called Big Bang the wave-particle duality turned those wave movements to the material. Quarks were the first stable particles in the universe. Or the very first particles might be Higgs bosons or some even more high-energetic particles. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Are the gravitons primordial black holes inside protons, neutrons and electrons?

Above: "Three colored balls (symbolizing quarks) connected pairwise by springs (symbolizing gluons), all inside a gray circle (symbolizing a proton). The colors of the balls are red, green, and blue, to parallel each quark's color charge. The red and blue balls are labeled "u" (for "up" quark) and the green one is labeled "d" (for "down" quark)". Wikipedia/Quarks)

If we want to guess the certain place of the hypothetical graviton in the material there are two possible places. The place where the researchers can find hypothetical graviton is the center point of the proton and neutron. Or another possible place is in the middle of the quarks. In that version, the quarks are like the ball of yarn, like electrons. And they are formed when superstrings are forming the ball around the extremely small primordial black hole. The quantum gravity of that primordial black hole would pull the protons and neutrons together. 

Can the graviton be found just in the middle of the proton and neutron? The idea is that when gluons are jumping in the proton and neutron. By using the trajectory that looks like a triangle. That thing can from the primordial black hole in the proton and neutron. That means the graviton could be the thing that formed from the wave movement. 

So does graviton even have the physical form? Is it the primordial black hole? The extremely small-size primordial black hole is more like a power field than some kind of particle. That power field is turned to the package like a particle or ball of yarn. 

So is the annihilation the impact of two primordial black holes that are locating in protons or neutrons? In that idea, the electrons are the balls of the superstrings. That is forming a ball around the primordial black hole. In that case, the superstring is denying the eruption of the black hole.

And that extremely small black hole will get its energy from the spin of electrons. In that case, the size of the black hole is so small, that it cannot curve the wave movement inside it. Or the superstrings are forming the ball near that miniature singularity. That is smaller than any particle in the world. The same thing that is written about electrons can transform into quarks. 

If the graviton is the primordial black hole inside the proton or neutron that could explain, why it's so hard to detect. The primordial black hole requires energy pumping all the time. And in this scenario. The primordial black hole that is smaller than quarks or gluons is getting its energy from the movement of the gluons. If that movement is stopping the primordial black hole vaporizes immediately. 

Can we find graviton in the place where nobody predicts to find that kind of particle? The idea is that in the protons and neutrons is the group of quarks. And between those quarks are traveling particles called gluons. The gluons are something like electrons, but their size and effective range are different. The gluon is the transmitter particle of the strong nuclear force. 

So in the cores of protons and neutrons is the "quantum flashes of lightning" between quarks that are forming a similar effect with lightning. But in the smaller distances. When the gluon is traveling it sends energy waves both ways. The energy that the gluon gets is similar to kinetic energy with the balls that people are throwing. 

But the scale of this thing is extremely small. Gluons are jumping inside protons and neutrons. And then the Law of Energy Indecision means that the gluon must take energy load from somewhere or they will stop and material is disappearing. So is the energy source of the gluons some kind of primordial black hole? And is that black hole the graviton hypothetical transportation particle of the gravitation. 

The movement energy of gluons travels outer ways or to the core of protons and neutrons. And also the part of the energy that is stored in muons while they are jumping between the quarks is traveling in the middle point of the proton or neutron. So there is the possibility that there is graviton in the middle of protons and neutrons. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Image: ()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The speed of light is a relative constant.

The speed of light is constant. But it is also relatively constant because the speed of photons is different in different mediums. The curving photon comes to goal after the photon that travels by using straight trajectories. 

And the thing that causes the curving of trajectories of photons is the quantum fields. Outside the universe is no quantum fields. And that means light or photon is traveling there using a straight trajectory. That means two photons can travel in the same direction. But if the other photon travels with a more curving trajectory than the other. That means the other photon that travels less curving trajectory can reach the goal sooner than another photon. 

One interesting thing about the photon or the speed of light is that the gravitation affects the photons. That means that the photon that travels to the center of gravitation travels faster than the photon. That travels away from that point. 

The speed of light in a vacuum is 299792458 meters per second (approximately 300000 km/s, or 186000 mi/s). But the thing that makes the speed of a photon interesting. Is that the speed of light or photons in a medium like water or atmosphere is much lower. Then the speed of a photon is in a vacuum. 

And that thing is seen as the blue light around the nuclear reactors. The blue light is called "Cherenkov' radiation". The origin of "Cherenkov' radiation is in the particles. When those particles travel with the speed of light in a vacuum and hit the water. 

Water decreases the particle's speed to the speed of light in water. The energy cannot disappear and while the particle is slowing, it must transfer the kinetic energy to somewhere. When the particle slows its speed it must pump its energy to somewhere. 

And the energy that is released during the slowing process is visible as the blue light around the nuclear reactors. The same "Cherenkov radiation" causes the blue sky effect. And the blue flash of the particle that slows its speed is used in neutrino detectors. The flash of the light is also used in the free-electron lasers. When the electron is curving it releases the movement energy by sending photons. 

The thing that limits the speed of the light (or the speed of photons) is the scattering. The other photons that impact the photons are slowing their speed. But also the quantum fields around the atoms and other particles cause that the trajectory of those photons is not straight. Because the trajectory of the photon is curving that thing slows the speed of light. 

Outside the universe is no quantum fields. That means photons are traveling faster outside the material bubble called the universe. In that case, the "faster photon" means that the photon that travels by using the straight trajectory is at the goal before the photon that uses a curving trajectory.  

When we are thinking that the universe is the bubble where all material that we know exists. We might think that photons travel faster outside the universe. The reason for that is there are no quantum fields outside the universe. That means the photon can travel by using a straight trajectory. And that means the light travels faster outside the universe. 

The speed of light is not always been the same in the universe. In the young universe, the speed of light was lower than in the modern universe. The reason for that was that the scattering in the young universe was stronger than in the universe today. Youn universe was full of wave movement and traveling electrons where photons impacted. And the trajectories of the photons were more curving than today. 

What if we can create the straight-moving light? The reason why we cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Is that we cannot create exhaust gas that crosses the speed of light. 

Sometimes there is introduced a simple way to make the rocket that travels faster than light. The researchers must just make the light where photons are traveling with straight trajectories. Straight moving photons are faster than the photons that are moving curving trajectories. 

And theoretically, it's enough that the system removes quantum fields around the light source. That thing can make the photons travel faster than they are traveling in regular space. In regular space, quantum fields are making photons curving. And that slows the speed of light or photons.

()https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/10/could-we-ever-travel-faster-than-light-9632400/ 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

Image()https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/10/could-we-ever-travel-faster-than-light-9632400/

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

God, alien and peace on Earth

God, alien and peace on Earth

We must realize, that we must solve our problems ourselves(1)

When we are thinking about God and aliens, we have forgotten one thing. If we are not alone in the universe, that means that we are not unique, but then we must realize that even if we get in contact with civilization, what is about 200 lightyears away from Earth, we must remember that we are unique for ourselves.  

We are the main role in our own life, and we must solve our problems peacefully without the help of humanoids or God, and that thing is a cold reality. So if there are some other civilizations, we must realize, that we cannot ask their help in every situation, that something goes wrong. 

So is "alien" the new term for "God"?

And then we must ask is God some kind of alien? Why we cannot realize, that there are many things, that we can do wrong in attempting to communicate with humanoids. And we can think that the humanoids and Gods are synonyms. So what could be the worst mistake, what we can do? The worst mistake is acting like a child, who has a mobile telephone. 

That child can always ask parents, where is spaghetti, or how to warm pizza? That thing would sometimes feel a little bit embarrassing. So what would you think, that some aliens would think if humans ask them all the times, what we should do with the climate changing? If the aliens would have the serving telephone line, they might be boring about questions, what they expect that other species should know themselves. 

"Black Forest theories" of UFO:s and aliens

There are many or at least two UFO theories, which are named "Black Forest Theories" (2). The first one is written by some Chinese person, and that theory is that there are many civilizations in the Universe, but they would ever answer to the SETI-messages, and the reason is that they are afraid of the war between civilizations and in this theory is connected with the thing, that there are two kinds of transmitting two space. 

The transmitting, what is sent to another star in purpose, and transmitting what is sending without purpose. The second one consists of the TV and other data transmitting, which is meant for the communication between humans. That means that we are yelling our existence with a really loud voice, and if the aliens would look or TV broadcasts, would they want to contact us?

The second "dark forest theory" is that some UFO dropped in Germany sometime in the late 1920s. And the super secret "Vril" society has used that craft for the modeling the V-5 Flying Saucer, what was equipped with radial jet engines, and one jet engine that would make that craft flying also very fast in the horizontal and vertical tracks. Was that thing ever fly is a mystery, but there might be drawings and plans about that thing. 

(1)

https://bigthink.com/videos/michael-shermer-why-believing-in-aliens-is-religion-in-disguise

(2)

https://bigthink.com/scotty-hendricks/the-dark-forest-theory-a-terrifying-explanation-of-why-we-havent-heard-from-aliens-yet

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_UFOs

The holographic reality

The holographic reality

Anyone who isn't shocked by quantum physics has not understood it.
-Niels Bohr-

And when we are looking at this quote, we must ask, does Niels Bohr himself understood quantum physics? Or is there anybody else, who understands this kind of thing? Or when Bohr created the idea of the Quantum theories, did he understand how fundamental his ideas were?

When we are talking about quantum physics, we are talking also about the very fundamental area of science, what is full of colorful people, who were and who are looking for thig, what is the final truth or definition about truth. Sometimes we are thinking that many things, what we see or what we are making is true, and we are forgetting that there are always exceptions about that kind of thing. And one thing, what we cannot ever understand is the reality.

What is the description of reality? For us, the reality is the thing, what we can taste, feel or see. And that's it. But then we must remember that we always see reality from a different point of view. That means that there is no absolute reality, and we can take one example of this thing. The thing is that when a person, who would not see colors looks at the traffic lights and says that they are red doesn't mean that this person sees colors. That person sees that the highest light is on, and that makes this person say, that the traffic light is red.

The possibility that we are meeting a person, who cannot see colors is very small, but in the world, it must be that kind of person. So should we think about this thing, when we are asking the color of the traffic light? I think that this thing doesn't affect the real life of most of the people. The probability that the absolute color-blind people come in front of us is very small. But when we are going to think the thing, that reality could be an illusion or some kind of hologram, we must remember that there are many people, who are writing many articles about this thing.

The Danish physician Niels Bohr explained that the universe is the hologram, what has sucked from some greater entirety. The thing that Niels Bohr precisely said was "subatomic particles only come into existence in the presence of an observer, then it is meaningless to speak of a particle's properties and characteristics as existing before they are observed"(1).

The thing, that Bohr pointed out was that the subatomic particles are forming the atomic particles, what are forming molecules, what are forming things, what we are calling as the reality. The thing was that this thing has been connected to the de Broglie's theory, that every single particle in the universe has the wave and particle mode, or the wave-particle duality (2).

So this thing has been created an idea, that the universe has been crushed through the wormhole to space, what we are calling as the universe. The thing is that when Bohr said that particles come into existence in the presence of an observer, he meant that the observer makes things real. Or he meant that the observer sees things, they have existed. If we are not seeing things they have not existed. And our consequence makes things real. And what this thing means? We know that quarks and Higg's boson are real, but at the same time, we cannot feel, see or taste them. So what makes this thing holographic?

In this case, we need the middleman to tell us that the thing is real. The thing is that we see the articles, which are written about those things, but we cannot see them ourselves. Or we see quarks when they are part of the bigger entirety. We see concrete walls, but we cannot see quarks inside it. So can the particle or object be real, before we see it? That is a really good question. The existence of an object is depending, that we realize that thing has existed. And is the wave movement or waveform of the material existed?

If you will touch powerful laser ray, that thing exists, because it burns our hand regardless of the form of light. And that means that the wave movement also exists. But what if we are looking at the radio waves, we are facing things that the machine or radio would need to transmit the radio waves to us. And are radio waves real? We know that they are real because in some books is written that the phenomenon that is called the radio waves is transmitting data, which can be analog or digital through the air. So in this kind of case, we need a tool to find out the reality.

(1)
https://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/398/print/

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

The models of alien civilizations could be the civilization of humans in the distant future.

The models of alien civilizations could be the civilization of humans in the distant future. 

During the interstellar flight, evolution has time to work

When we are creating models of an alien civilization, we are also creating models, what our civilization might look like tomorrow, and if we are thinking about the possibility to create stable colonies in our solar system and farther in the universe. The thing is that sooner or later every each of the stars spends its nuclear fuel and if the star is like our sun, it would end it's life as a nova, which means that the end is as the white dwarf. 

The bigger star would end it's life as a supernova. And if we are thinking this kind of thing at the point of view of evolution, that means that the citizens must flee from its planet or it must be terminated. In many models, the civilization can advance only in the planets, what is orbiting the yellow stars, what can live long enough. So the model could be wrong because there is a possibility that even the short-living blue star might have the planet, where is intelligent life-form. 

And if the intelligent life form is curious and it observes it's a star, it might notice that the end is near, and start to create the giant space arks, what it can use for evacuating. During this process, the civilization would terminate the non-wanted genetic material, and that means that the controlled evolution would make them different than they were at the beginning of the process. If that kind of civilization would put all its knowledge, and intelligence to that operation, it can survive. And when the entire civilization moves to the artificial planets, what the giant spacecraft are, there are not similar problems than in conventional space journeys. The scale of those projects is so huge, that we cannot even think that we would do that in modern days. 

But maybe in the distant future, we or our descendants are facing the situation, that they must leave this planet. And at least, when our star the sun would be ending its life as a star when it explodes as a nova, the civilization must leave the solar system to finding new energy sources. In some theories, the civilization would move to farther planets, when the star is growing, and in those scenarios, we have forgotten, that there is a possibility that solar system might have only one planet. 

But this kind of thing is pure speculation. There are many other models about civilization and the thing is that we could be that "alien civilization" in the day tomorrow. If we are thinking the hypothetical space civilization, that civilization might use 100 % of the energy of some star by simply closing the red dwarf in the giant ball, what is covered by using the silicon panels, and that giant structure can send energy to the alien crafts by using very powerful masers or electron cannons. 

There are many forms of the theoretical alien civilizations

Could the hypothetical alien civilization consist of two groups of aliens? The planetary and space race. The other group lives in planets, and other group lives in spacecraft, and they would ever land to the planets. There is a possibility, that the aliens could hybridize with their spacecraft. If the aliens would have a collective mind or consequence that means that it would eliminate the rebellion or violence. The thing is that the collective mind would benefit the community. 

But individual intelligence could danger the mission. This is the paradox of the hypothetical extremely long term missions, which could take even millenniums. One of the things, that we must realize when we are thinking about the hypothetical alien civilization, what might be traveled between the stars, is that those creatures might not make that thing for fun. They must have a reason for those journeys, which will take even millenniums. That thing means that the crew of those crafts might face the evolution, what we cannot even imagine. 

When we are thinking about things like the physiology or brain capacity of aliens, we must realize, that those creatures might be intelligent as a group. This means that the creatures might have microchips in their brains, and those microchips make them the ability to communicate with the computer of their craft, and in this case, they could have collective knowledge in their craft. The central computer would have the role, that it connects the nervous systems of those hypothetical humanoids, but the individuals would be like handicapped. 

The hybridization with spacecraft

Or there is a possibility that the evolution in the bodies of those creatures would make their nervous system communicate spontaneously with the wireless data system of their craft. That means that those creatures would be hybridized with their craft. At this moment many of you will say, that the evolution would need a very long time to modify their bodies. But if the journey will take tens of thousands of years that means, that evolution would have the time to make those modifications. 

And there is created a model, that the evolution of that crew would be controlled. In this scenario, the aliens would first travel a long time near their home star, and in that period the controlled evolution would hide the origin, where those creatures would have left for protecting their species. That's why they had to modify their bodies for hiding their origin. But this is only a hypothesis, nothing more or less. Just hypothesis, but the hypothesis is the road to theory, and theory is the road to a practical solution. That means in the future, we might be that alien civilization, what travels in the stars. 

https://wallpaperaccess.com/full/1443314.jpg

How fast is the growing speed of the Universe?

How fast is the growing speed of the Universe?

The shape of the universe.

What is the shape of the universe? (1) This is a very good question because that speed can explain, why we cannot see the location of the big bang. In somewhere past the cosmologists got a fascinating idea that galaxies would be in the layer of the ball, what is called as the universe, and then by searching the directions of the galaxies, the researchers could define the point, where the big bang happened, and then the telescopes would be turned to the "south pole" of the galaxy.

One of the things is that I'm talking here the direction of the galaxy, what is to the direction of the point, where the big bang happened as the "south pole", and in fact, the black holes might have polar like planets and stars. The idea was simply the position of the galaxy is telling, where the big bang was, and then the telescopes would easily find that point.

And then the astronomers were looking at the stars more and more effective telescopes, and they noticed that there were many galaxies in location, what supposed to be in the direction of the big bang. But as you see the scientists must sometimes adjust their theories, because observations are chancing our knowledge.

The idea of a two-dimensional ball-layer changed to the combination of the multiple models, and the thing, what kind of model of the universe is used depends on the scale. as you might know, the Universe is very big, and if we would look at things by using the very large scale model, we would think that the universe is the straight layer, and that model could be suitable in the local galaxy group.

But then the thing, what is called "U-shaped" or saddle from would turn to dominate, if the scale is smaller, and the observed area, of the universe, is getting bigger. Then the universe is turning to the ball, if the area, what observer sees is big enough. And here I must say, that the observer is always hypothetical. I have thought the universe as the 3D ball-layer, where the galaxies are in the different locations and positions, and the width of this layer is extremely large.

Why the expansion speed of the Universe is slower than it should (2)

By using the most modern telescopes, we can see the distances of billions of light-years. That means that we can see objects from that distance. The distance of a farthest known galaxy is 13 billion light-years and the size of the universe is 46 billion light-years. So we see things, what is happening in the 13 billion years ago.

But when we are thinking that we cannot see the big bang, there is one very interesting theory, and that thing is that the beginning of the existence of the expanding speed of the universe was near the speed of light. And then it started to slow. There should be something, that slows that speed, and that would mean that there is a massive black hole in the place, where the big bang has happened.

The real number of expanding the speed of expanding the universe is about 67 meters per second, and that means that there is something, that would break the expansion speed. That thing could be the mutual gravity of the galaxies, the dark material, and the last hypothesis is that in the center of the universe is the giant black hole, what is larger than any galaxy, and that thing would pull the galaxies to it. This thing makes science very nice before we can create and confirm the models of everything, we must realize, that everything is possible in the world, where black holes are dominating their environment, and massive eruptions are disturbing the harmony.
(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe
(2)
https://www.avaruus.fi/uutiset/kosmologia-ja-teoreettinen-fysiikka/maailmankaikkeuden-laajenemisnopeus-ei-tasmaa-olemme-jattaneet-jotain-huomioimatta-kosmologisessa-mallissa.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

Image:

https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/2014/compactgalax.jpg

A couple of words of time travel

A couple of words of time travel

Hypothesis about the briefcase men from the future.

Have you seen time-machine movies? Do you know what those fictional heroes make with those crystal sticks? Those crystals are oscillating with the same frequency with crystal, which is in the leaving point and helps to adjust the time machine. In theory, the time machine is possible, and we would want to go to the past. But if we would want to get back, there would be problems.

And sometimes the theorists or science fiction writers have created the model, where the person leaves the message to the descendants for sending the ideas and innovations from the future. This kind of time loop, where the astronaut from tomorrow would pump the data of the solutions of the future would help some hypothetical society to get ultimate power, even if those time travelers could travel only in one direction. That hypothetical future technology would give great benefit for people, who have it in their hands.

The theory behind the hypothesis of time travel

We know that we can stop time if we are moving fast enough, and there is introduced an idea that in someday, we would create the giant particle accelerator, where the small craft will accelerate to the speed of light, and that thing would cause that we will start to travel in time, and this makes possible to travel to future. But how we would travel to the past? This is a really interesting question?

When we would slow time in capsule, let's say about 50 %, which means that one year in the capsule would be two years outside. The thing, that we must do for creating that effect is to travel the speed, which is 50% of the speed of light. But how we would make the time travel faster in the craft? This is the problem in the theories of time travel. In theories, what is far from real life there could be organisms, what has so advanced nanotechnology, that they could be nanomachines in their body, what rotates the extreme small plates near the speed of light, and that thing would stop the time in their bodies.

But we don't have a chance to create that system in real life, because we cannot create structures, what would stand this kind of speed. And in real life, this kind of disk would be broken because of the centrifugal force, and that's why this kind of thing is pure theoretical level.

One version is that we would send the spacecraft in the black hole, and hope that there would be the space, where time would travel backward. And if we cannot go back to the point, where we have left, the time-traveling has no sense. The idea of time machine would be simple, and there is needed the plate, what rotates near the speed of light, and that's why the principle of the H.G Wells time machine is right, as we might so often say in theory. But how we could travel back in time? The idea of time slowing is that the energy level of the particle would increase.

And if we would create the opposite effect, and pump the energy out of the particle, we could make time moving backward, because, in the capsule, the time travels faster. In this case, we would need to create something, what we ever imagine is possible. We must create a particle where the movement is absolute zero. And we cannot create absolute stability, because the universe is moving, and this will put limits to create a time machine.

But let's think, that we could pull the entire energy off the craft, and we could create the space, where time moves faster, that thing would make the craft where is one cabin inside other. That means that when we are creating this hypothetical time machine we must make the structure, where are two hypothetical time machines one inside other. But as you see those systems are only theoretical research.

There is one little problem that we haven't even think about while we are thinking about this kind of technology. And that is, what if the "spin" of the nuclear particles of the time machine would turn, and the entire craft would turn to antimatter. This kind of technology would be dangerous because that allows some states to travel to the past, and start the battles by using modern military technology. And those things are, of course, very big moral and ethic questions. But who knows, what we would do in a distant future? Maybe there this kind of technology would be possible, but there would be many technical problems with materials and other kinds of things before this technology is coming to true.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipMwrcvukpU&feature=youtu.be

What means superior, when we are talking about biological creatures?

What means superior, when we are talking about biological creatures?

The thing is that even some creature would not self operate on the surface of some planet, it can operate in extreme hostile areas by using remote-controlled systems. We must understand that humans use remote-controlled robots on the surface of Mars, and also underwater areas can research by using remote-controlled submarines and other underwater robots. Also on the battlefields are starting to operate the more or less independent operating robots.

What kind of alien could be superior to humans? That is the question, what we must think before we can give any kind of answers for the form of hypothetical aliens. The key question is, what we mean superior in that case.

Are we mean the muscles or some other physical strength, or simply the creature, what is more, intelligent than we are. So when we are starting to think that question, we must realize that human brains are very effective, and if we are thinking about aliens, their brains must work more effectively, if they are more intelligent than we are.

So there is one thing, that might make almost every creature more intelligent than humans are, and that is the superconducting brains.  This means that the alien would be creature, what lives on the planet, where the temperature would be extremely low, and the alien itself would be the Helium 3 based life form, which would have an extremely slow metabolism.

And that would mean, that the creature would be otherwise extremely slow. Even traveling about meter would take even years for that alien. But its nervous system would be extremely effective. Those creatures could live only in the planets, which is extremely cold.  Those super neural systems would work only in the superconducting conditions.

The other one would be the alien, which has just more neurons than humans. If we would increase the number of neurons in the brains, we would face the thing that the head would become heavy, and that's why those creatures must live in the artificial worlds, or in space stations, where the weak gravity allows this kind of advantage of skull and brains.

That kind of big-head alien would be the race, what has advanced in the space colonies, where the gravity is extremely low. They could be the post-planetary civilization, and when their home planet has been destroyed, those hypothetical aliens would move to space, and start to live in giant spacecraft.

If we think that kind of cases of evolution, the changes in the genomes or genetic material happen slowly, and it takes generations, that this causes visible changes for a look of the body of an alien. But in the case, that the entire civilization would start to travel in the space for looking at the new planets, the time has no mean. Evolution has time in that kind of situation, and if the entire civilization travels in space, that means that the travel can make by using slow spaceships, what can travel in the speed, what the only couple of percent of the speed of the light.

And those spacecraft can form artificial gravity by using the rotation movement. Travel to other solar systems takes thousands of years, and then at that time, evolution can cause transformations for the structures of genomes. In the low gravity field, the weak muscles can support the head, and the limit of that alien would be that it needs a weak gravity field for surviving. If that creature would land on some planets, it would be crushed because of gravity. That kind of thing would live only in some big artificial world.

The robot suit or hollow robot

The robot suit or hollow robot

Have you seen movies, where the "bad guy" comes in place, and we see only the shadow inside the clothes? So that thing has brought one thing in my mind. We can create spacesuit-type clothes, which can walk autonymously on the streets. In this scenario, the HULC-type robot would be installed to the spacesuit, and then that hollow robot can walk on the streets. The thing is that this kind of robots might have faces, which makes them look like a normal person, but the size of that kind of robots would be big.

And there is one thing, what people normally don't mention when they are thinking about this kind of robot, and those things are connected to the legend of "Slenderman". The thing is that if the robot has enough big size, and the ability to open itself, it can take the person inside it, and then the laughing gas would be given to the victim, and this robot can just walk away with a captured person inside it, and nobody knows a thing about this kind of cases.

So the thing is that if we would want to make this kind of robot, we might make the man-shaped thing, which can open itself at the waist. Then it would take the person inside it, and then walk away. This kind of systems can be used as the rescue systems in the very hard conditions, and if the own troopers have been captured or injured, this kind of walking "ambulance" can take the person inside it, and then walk to the place, where the helicopter can arrive.

Or that robot can also use the jetpack to fly to cargo plane, and this might be a good advantage in the many operations. In some visions, that kind of robot can also capture terrorists and other criminals and take them to base for interrogation, and there might be much use for that kind of system in the hard and difficult areas. That capsule might be equipped with a robot medical system, which could fix the injuries. In some visions, this kind of robot can also operate in the Mars flights as the support of the crew. In some visions far in the future, this kind of terminator or the man-shaped robots would carry the frozen fetuses in some distant planet.

If we would want to travel to other solar systems and colonize them, and we cannot create a craft, what can travel faster than the speed of light, we could send morulas, what are stored in temperature, what is near the absolute zero kelvin. Then the craft is landed after the flight, what has taken maybe even thousands of years, those robots would take care of that population, and they might protect and teach them.

And the fetuses might be packed inside the human-looking robots, what would carry the freezers, and that would make sure that the mission would be successful. Those robots would be controlled by highly sophisticated artificial intelligence, and it will make this kind of missions possible.

Virtual wormholes, multiverse theories, and supermassive black holes

Virtual wormholes, multiverse theories, and supermassive black holes

Could there be two types of wormholes? The "real wormholes", what could be the gates to other dimensions. And the "virtual wormholes" what are making objects the giant qubits. The thing is that some scientists have created an idea that the center of the galaxy is a supermassive black hole, which adjusts the other black holes with it.

And that theory goes that the supermassive black hole would suck all material from other black holes to the center of the galaxy, which means that the wormholes would send the material to the one direction journey. And then the supermassive black holes would create a similar network, where the material travels to the most powerful black hole. Then it travels to another universe, and after that, it would go to the top universe. So universes would act like black holes in this strange theory.

So when we are thinking the form of the "real wormhole", we must connect it to the paralleled universe or multiverse theory. In that theory, there are more universes, which are like galactic supergroups but those structures are bigger than any supergroup of galaxies. There are theories that the real wormholes can form only between universes, and the local versions of wormholes would be the channels, which is forming between supermassive or massive black holes in the same universe could be the virtual wormholes.

The form of wormholes is a very important thing when we are thinking or research the possibility to use that thing for interstellar traveling. When we want to create a stable wormhole between two points in the universe, we need to create a very high yield of energy. If we want to send the manned spacecraft through the wormhole, we need so huge energy levels, which can form only in the supernova explosions. Or actually, even the exploding stars can't always create so huge energy levels that they can create a wormhole through space.

Theory about wormholes begins the thing that the size of black holes is not growing, and that means that the material would go somewhere from those supermassive objects. We cannot even say does the black hole suck anything inside it. There is thought that the material would close the black hole to its equator, or in the point between the poles and travel to the poles, and then accelerates to the universe as the jettisons, what we can see leaving from galaxies.

In this version, the black hole would be only the supermassive neutron star that has a very big effect on the universe around it. There are thoughts that the wormholes could be the gates between two objects in the universe or even in time. But there is another explanation about that phenomenon, and that is that the black hole would pack to the particles so much kinetic energy, that the time would go slower in those objects.

The idea is that when the black hole would oscillate with another black hole, it can form the channel between those objects, what can make possible to travel between those black holes without getting older, and in some theories, the travel through the wormhole would take only a couple of seconds, if we would sit in the craft. But we must find out two things before we can even think about the possibility to create a wormhole between our solar system and some distant black hole.

The first thing is that what the wormhole is? There is a possibility that the wormhole is the "only" some kind of lightning between the black holes. That would make possible to travel between those black holes, but the idea is that the time simply stops inside the spacecraft.

We actually cannot imagine, what that thing feels, but if the time moves very slow inside the capsule, that would mean that the time to another distance would take as long as there are light years between those objects. So even if the journey would feel a couple of seconds in the capsule, that would mean that outside the capsule the centuries and millenniums are flowing. In this case, the craft is acting like a giant qubit. This is calling as the "virtual wormhole-effect". The difference between a virtual wormhole and "real wormhole" is that the journey to the Gliese-581 system, which is 20 light-years away from Earth would take 20 years. But the crew would be ordering only maybe hours.

The second thing about wormhole is could it form between normal black holes, or is that effect possible only between supermassive black holes. in some cases, the supermassive black holes are only enough stable objects, that they can form the electromagnetic bridge between them. In some theories, the normal black hole would be so hot, that the spacecraft would vaporize before the singularity, and that means that wormholes can benefit only if they are forming between supermassive black holes.

So why people are interested in this mystic phenomenon, is that if we want to travel between the stars, we must realize that somehow, we must win the problem with time. If we would send the crew to another solar system, what might be Gliese 581, the journey to that solar system and back would take 40 years, and that would be the final goodbye for those people, who will send to that journey, and everybody on Earth would get elder 40 years, if we could create that craft.

Are nano-sized black holes one form of the dark material?

Are nano-sized black holes one form of the dark material?

So what is the dark material? This is the question of the day. Normally we are forgetting one simple thing, what can form material, what we cannot observe. That thing is the singularity, the nano-sized black holes, which are smaller than the electrons or quarks, and that thing can explain the dark material. But as you see this is the philosophical writing without any scientific proof. 

Today I have a day when I think very much dark material, and this day could be named as the "day of dark material". And at least I will write about the form of dark material, and what it can be. So is the answer to that question, what is the form of this very interesting material simple the singularity, what is forming inside the nucleus of atoms, or in theory nono-size, black holes can form also inside protons and neutrons, and even inside electrons. 

In this case, electromagnetic radiation that hits single atoms can cause that their electric capacity would rise. And when the capacity is high enough that energy is forming the tiny black hole inside the particles of an atom. And this thing would explain the dark material or at least part of this strange material, what existence we know, but we cannot observe it. 

Are the steaming or exploding nano-size black holes causing the forming of dark energy? Are the most of the material of universe tie in the black holes, what are smaller than electrons? And would that thing explain everything about dark material? Here I just want to say, that this writing is only hypothetical thought about theoretical materials and research. 

But what that means in real life, if part of dark material is in the tiny black holes? That means that the universe would be full of very small black holes, which are traveling in the universe, but this thing feels impossible. The small size singularity would be steamed in very little time. So could those steaming small black holes causing the effect, what we are known as dark energy. 

This thing opens the one small thing in my mind, and that is could we someday form this kind of material. In theory, everything seems very easy. The system must just create tiny black holes inside the nucleus of the atoms or particles of atoms. And could that thing do simply by targeting high-energy radio waves to the thing, what we want to turn to dark material? 

If we are thinking the spacecraft what have the form of the saucer, in the middle of that craft could be set the high-power radio transmitter. When that system would start to act, it can create the black holes in the nucleus of atoms. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLUzJeto0Wo

One philosophical writing about the energy transformation to material

One philosophical writing about the energy transformation to material

As I have written material can transform into energy and energy can take the material form, that thing has brought one interesting thought about UFO:s and that thing is that what if the craft is made by using the dark material, what can transform straight to energy, and of course it can make this thing backward, and transform from energy to material, that thing would open new and extremely interesting points of view about the material, and how we understand material and energy.

In this text, I will use the term "UFO" about the form of technology, which is unknown to us, but it would be possible if the maker of that creature would able to make dark material. But before we could make this kind of thing, we must capture the dark material, and we have not a single piece of that mysterious thing. We cannot even prove that dark material exists, except we know that the universe is too heavy.

So if we could create dark material, and then turn that material to energy and backward, that would allow creating the item, what has the astral- or energy form, and the physical form. That thing would bring fascinating things in the mind of theoretical material research. So if we could create the layer, what consists of the dark material, that thing would allow us to create the real UFO, what could do things, what we cannot even think.

There is a little possibility, that some kind of aliens would handle technology, which allows creating the dark material and give it the physical form that thing would explain many things about the UFO-observations and especially the flash of light, what causes that item disappearing. But would there be a real possibility to create that kind of material?

This is the major question because there is a possibility, that the dark material would explain many things like angels, or creatures that are standing in the middle of people, and suddenly disappear. If those creatures would forming from the dark material, that thing would give them the possibility to transform to energy and backward. But as you know, this is only philosophical writing about theoretical material research.

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

The grand idea of physicists is to create a theory, that contains every particle of the area of physics. And the problem of this thing is that other theories would not find harmony with new theories. The thing is that Einstein's and Newton's theories have conflict, and because of the theory of Special Relativity cannot fit the quantum theory, which means that the world of those people is collapsed. If they cannot create the formula, which contains everything in the Universe, that thing would mean that everything cannot be introducing with mathematics. So this is the problem with theoretical and practical science.

At this point, we must say that Einstein created his famous formula for about ten years. People think that creating some formulas is a very easy job, and they might be really interesting things, but then the mathematical formulas must fit the observations and don't worry, that thing is the most fascinating and at the same time difficult part of science. So what the scientists wait, when they are using some instrument.

Could photon captured inside the quark?

They might wait years the situation, that the photon would impact with another photon or quark in some laser ray, that thing could ever happen, but some people believe that kind of possibility, where photon goes inside the quark like in pocket. The thing would be extremely short projection, where photons would capture inside the quark.  There is a strange theory that photons can merge with other photons or quark. That theory is one of the most fascinating and at the same time unbelievable claim in history. There is not single prove that photons can capture by quark, but if that thing is possible that could revolutionize many things.

The thing what scientist could wait is a theoretical thing, what is called as the photon fusion, there is a little possibility, that the photons can merge, but that reaction cannot even prove. The reason for that theory is that because almost everything in the universe can be impact together, so why photons can merge or quarks, as well as quarks and atoms,  do together, do in the high-energy reactions.

But there is no way that we could prove that thing because for that thing would need the photon or quark, what has extremely high energy, or what comes in the right direction. That thing would prove that photon has mass or there could be some reactions between photons, what we will not know. And the people, who are making those investigations would just in that time cut the electricity off from laser when the suitable photon or quark comes to atmosphere.

That thing would cause this kind of reaction, which is impossible at this moment ever detected. This thing is the most incredible scenario. Just at the moment, when some theories can be proven that the system would turn off in a couple of seconds. But the extremely long laser rays have confirmed the thing, what is called as the gravity wave true.

Gravity waves

LIGO-system has detected those waves at the moment when two black holes have collided and in this kind of case the gravity wave would cause that the laser ray would be flattened like some kind of tube, and that thing would not seem like some kind of seismic action. But for hunting those gravity waves the laser ray must be extremely long, and the length of that laser ray in LIGO is over 3000 kilometers. That distance makes possible to see, how the laser ray would be flattened.

But if we would want to create a more sensitive sensor, we would need longer laser rays. In some scenarios to the edge of the solar system would send two or three probes, where is laser systems. Those lasers would form the sensor, what size is the same as the solar system, and those laser rays could measure weaker gravity waves than any system before it.