Could the god create the stone, what he cannot raise?

Could the god create the stone, what he cannot raise?


In the headline is the question, what  I sometimes have read from some book. The thing brought me one question about what has ever asked in public speeches. That is why omnipotent and powerful God just cannot destroy Satan?  That question has caused a philosophical idea that the human mind and the entire universe could be the computer simulation, and in this case, Satan would be the computer program that has a too strong firewall, what denies it destruction.

This so-called "humoristic" idea has been used sometimes as an example of the case, where the person makes something, what will cause regret. There is another version of this tale, that in the future if the human nervous system would be connected to the Internet, Satan would be artificial intelligence what would infect people by using brain core stimulation. The connection of the human brains with the computers would happen with brain core stimulation, and that means that in those cases the computer virus can cause very terrifying effect, and in this case, the smile of Mona Lisa can be coagulated.

In this point of the text, we must say, that God means character, who has created something, and that's the reason, God knows the weakness of creature, and that's why he can destroy everything that he has created. This is the thing, what has ever been mentioned when we are telling about our relationship with God

And the question is that could God create the character what he cannot control. This question has come in our mind, because of the research what is connected with artificial intelligence. The artificial intelligence is the computer program, which can be destroyed by the users or privileged users. In that case, the existence of artificial intelligence depends on the will of the creators or programmers, who created that thing. But could the god create something, what limits his power, like stone what is too heavy for him? Or otherwise could god create the thing, what is too omnipotent to himself?

This is the great weakness of the theological idea of the limitless God if God just doesn't want to pick the stone doesn't mean that he could not pick it.  Willing and ability are a little bit different things.  But at the same time, this is one of the most interesting questions, what theology has ever established.  The thing is that could God create the stone, what denies the omnipotence of God, but if God cannot do that thing, that means that there is a thing, what even the omnipotent God cannot create, and also that paradox denies the omnipotence of the God.

This is one of the most interesting things in theology, and that thing is telling, that there would be something, what we must think carefully. The paradox of the omnipotence would cause the thing, what we ever imagine. And that thing is that is it possible that God creates the character, what would be more than the God himself. So if there would be the character, what is more, omnipotent than the God, that thing would make the end of one of the greatest strongholds in the theology. 

If we would think that God couldn't create character what is the above himself, there is a possibility that there is a paradox in the holy texts. This thing is really interesting topics while we are thinking about God and creation. We might think one thing, and that is that if we are thinking about artificial intelligence we are the creators of those things, and when we are thinking the artificial intelligence in the point of view of this way to think, we can ask one question, are we creating the character, what we cannot control?

One very strange name for the book: Lord of the flies (What is written by William Golding)

One very strange  name for the book: Lord of the flies (What is written by William Golding)

Here I don't write about the book itself, what is the very famous psychological isolation novel.  The name of that book is fascinating, and this thing is, that is it possible that the man could communicate or order flies? Or why the name is so far away from the normal books?

When I'm looking at the name, that has been given thoughts about some kind of brain implants, what are used to control the drones, but that is not topics of that book. The thing what sticks to the eye in this name is the word "flies", what has a double meaning. That world means animal or sharper to say bug, but it has one another meaning, what can involve in the sentence "Man who flies", and that is the common-mode about the word "fly".

Topics are that 13 years old schoolboys are turning to the animals or just lost their touch to reality. And this is the thing, what has been as the main topics in the Agatha Christies book Ten Little Niggers / And then there were none, where the group of the people is also in the airplane, what drops from the skies near the island where is alone mansion. The thing is that if that kind of place exists, that means that those people would not be far away from civilization.

The mansions are not made for fun, and that means that those people would be rescued anyway. But why Agatha Christie gave that name for this book? The name has been changed because it has been claimed racist, and that thing is a little bit interesting because none of the characters of that book is a black man or woman. This thing means that is the real thing, what Christie thought the aircraft accident? 

Christie's book was accomplished and published in 1939 when the Second World War just began.  But the thing is that Agatha Christie started writing before that. And the thing, what makes this book so interesting, is that Agatha Christie didn't use her regular characters in this book. So the thing is that is it possible that in Africa happened something, what that woman wanted to tell, but what was the thing?

So the novels are full of symbols, and the empty mansion would mean story, what everybody has heard, but there is no evidence about this thing exists. The Lord of Flies published in 1960 and that story has been inspired by the tale, what has been written, Agatha Christie. And the thing what makes the name interesting is that the book tells the story about the boys, who turned to animals.