A new way to control electrons opens new roads.

"Two twisted boron nitride layers (blue and pink) create a crystal lattice at a distance in which electrons (gold) can arrange themselves in a regular pattern. Credit: Natasha Kiper / ETH Zurich"

"Researchers at ETH Zurich have developed a new technique to better understand how electrons interact within materials. By using a moiré material — created by twisting ultra-thin atomic layers — they generated an artificial crystal lattice in a nearby semiconductor, allowing for more precise studies of electron behavior."

"Scientists have devised a method to create artificial crystal lattices with a large lattice constant in semiconductor materials."

"The increased lattice constant reduces the electrons’ motional energy, making their interactions more prominent."

"This technique will help researchers study electron interactions across different materials."

"A better understanding of these interactions could explain how certain insulators transition into superconductors when extra electrons are introduced"

(ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Found a Mind-Bending Way to Control Electrons)

**************************************************************

The ability to control electrons is one of the things that can boost electronics. The system can use the crystal lattice to trap and control electrons using light. The laser beam can affect lattice atoms' conductivity, and that helps to control the electrons in the lattice. In a modified tunneling microscope. 

The system operates as tweezers. It can put those electrons into their positions. In the new types of memories and quantum systems, data can be stored in electrons. If researchers want to keep data in the form of electrons they must avoid the situation where electron touches the layer. 

Theoretically, the same things that can control electrons can control positrons or antiprotons. The same system that can hover electrons in layers can make the same thing with antiprotons. In antimatter, particles have opposite polarity. And if the system uses electromagnetic force to keep them away from the layer the same system that keeps electrons away from the layer can keep antiprotons away. 

That makes it possible to control electrons and antimatter particles with very high accuracy. The system requires ion layers that can push the positron away from the lattices. The ability to store positrons in crystals and graphene can boost antimatter technology. The system must hover antimatter particles between the carbon net structures. Antimatter can have many weapons, and engine solutions. The antimatter can act as a super-power turbo-boost in chemical and ion rockets. 

It can make it possible to create extremely small ammunition. One gram of antimatter can destroy Earth. This means. A pistol-bullet-sized antimatter capsule can destroy an entire planet. The antimatter can also be used for data storage. Anti-electrons can store data and when the photonic system reads the anti-electron can be destroyed. There is the possibility to use the anti-electron-electron pair in superpositions in quantum computers. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-discovered-a-hidden-superpower-in-microscopes-thanks-to-ai/

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-found-a-mind-bending-way-to-control-electrons/

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Antimatter might have a bigger role in the material than we have thought.

Artistic rendering of quarks in deuterium. Credit: Ran Shneor (Image: I) 

The antimatter is the thing that is the most high-energetic in the world. When an antimatter particle impacts its mirror particle the result is an extremely high energetic annihilation. In an annihilation reaction, those particles turn to energy. Or if we are very accurate when the antimatter hits material it pulls the strings that are forming particles open. And the extremely high energetic radiation would start to travel through the space. 

So why the annihilation releases so much energy? Some people are saying that the energy impulse is releasing when the superstrings are open. Is like the slam of the whip but the size of the actors is smaller. The thing is that when the wave movement that formed the particles is moving ahead with extremely high speed. The head of the string can move faster than the ball-shaped photon. 

The reason for that is. The head of the wave movement is fitting between quantum fields easier than a ball-shaped photon.

The wave movement form of the light is the flat photon. So the speed of a flat photon is higher than the ball-shaped photon until it hits the quantum field and turns to particle form. 

But the thing is that annihilation is possible only between mirror-particles. So the anti-electron or positron would not annihilate with the proton. And one of the most interesting things in the world is that inside the proton are antimatter particles. Those particles are inside the quantum field of the proton. And there is an asymmetry in the antimatter quarks. The thing is that the antimatter quarks are between normal quarks.

But the anti-down quark between the up-quarks should not cause an annihilation reaction. When the proton is destroying or split one of the reasons for that is that the quantum fields around them are turning too big. The gluons cannot keep those mirror particles separated. So the antiquarks will touch each other and then the internal annihilation destroys the proton. The thing that makes quantum annihilation interesting.  

Adjustment of the quark annihilation is more accurate than annihilation between higher particles. That thing means that quark-antiquark annihilation can use the energy supply for nanomachines. Or that reaction can destroy cancer cells from the body. 

https://www.britannica.com/science/annihilation

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

(Image I) https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Does the anti-version of dark matter exist?

Does the anti-version of dark matter exist?

Could there be a possibility for the existence of an anti version of the dark matter(1)? And would that thing offer the solution for the mystery of dark energy(2)? That means that the particles of the anti-dark material and dark matter would also annihilate, but the annihilation would be very slow. In some ideas, there could be three versions of the dark matter, the normal cold dark matter, the anti-dark matter and the bridge version of those hypothetical particles, what would be something between antimatter and material.

The idea of this thing is coming from the theory that the black hole (3) is connected to the particle, what is locating in the other dimension, and is called as "white hole"(4). So if the black hole is pulling in it mainly the dark matter, that means that the "white hole" would also pull particles from its dimension and send them to our universe.

And those particles would be anti-dark particles. Here I use words anti-dark material, for highlighting that those particles would be mirror particles for the particles of dark matter the same way as positrons are mirror particles for electrons.

When I'm writing this text, I will start to think that maybe the particles of dark matter is similar to other material. But the reactions between those particles would be extremely slow because the only interaction between those particles would happen by gravity. And this is the thing, that we must remember when we are thinking about the hypothetical slow annihilation between those particles. The reason for annihilation is that there is annihilation, which means both particles of anti- and normal material are transforming to energy, and that's why the anti-dark and dark matter must react similar way.

Could anti-dark matter be the key to dark energy?

If we are thinking about the possibility to find the anti version of the dark matter, we must remember that every other particle in the universe has a mirror particle, and that means that the dark matter particles must have that kind of pair. But what that thing means in the normal universe. The thing is that those anti-dark matter particles would also annihilate with the dark matter, and that thing would be the key element for the creation of dark energy.

So if the dark matter particles are annihilating with its mirror particle the annihilation reaction releases lower energy levels than the annihilation between normal particles or material and antimatter. That means that the "slow annihilation" would be the solution for dark energy. And if we would think that the slow annihilation would cause the forming of dark energy, we might think that the slow annihilation can benefit in the pinhead-sized nuclear reactors, which could theoretically offer the energy source somewhere at future.

The normal annihilation would release too much energy, and that means, that a portable antimatter reactor is hard to build. But could slow annihilation offer the energy source of tomorrow? That is a very good theoretical question.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole

Could light sometimes fill the universe?

Could light sometimes fill the universe?

When we are thinking the form of the universe and the thing that the universe is a ball, where galaxies are on the layer, what is looking like a giant bubble, we must realize, why we are researching quasars. There is an interesting idea that in the center of this giant ball, which is called as "universe" is the quasar, what is alone in the middle of everything, and that quasar would be the place, where "big bang" happened.

The thing is that when we are thinking about the Universe, and it's a relationship with photons, we are looking at the darkness. The universe is dark because light or photons have existed only limited time, and that means the light has not filled the entire universe. Then there has been one interesting idea in my mind, what is connected to the form of the universe, and that thing is the that is someday possible that the ball, what is our universe would be filled with photons.

That means that the light would fill entire existence. But that thing is the thing, which is very unlikely because the universe is expanding all the time so that means that the universe ever fills with the light. When we are thinking about the universe, what shape is the ball, we must ask, what happens, if we would travel away from that ball, would we face another ball, what we would call as another universe? And would that universe form by antimatter?

Could there somewhere be the universe, what is forming by antimatter, or could there be the galaxy or single solar system, what is formed by antimatter? The material between the galax groups is so thin, that the antimatter could get a stable form, and form the solar systems or even galaxies, what is forming by antimaterial. Sometimes the antimaterial particles are coming to the atmosphere on Earth, and the source of those particles could be a galaxy or solar system, what is forming by antimaterial. Or could those strange particles come from another bubble, what is called as another universe?

That is a really interesting thing. When we are thinking about the most interesting theories like dark matter, or so-called cold dark matter, we are facing the thing that this matter doesn't react at all with other material. That dark material is the form of material, what is unknown to us. Some people believe that dark material is the key to the answer the question, why the great inflation started before the big bang. And actually during the big bang happened two inflations, where the material was getting the form, as we know it.

Before the hot or visible big bang the thing, what was in the place of the big bang started to erupt, and then happened the big bang. And then happened thing, that material and antimaterial was forming at the same time. In the beginning, antimaterial and material were existing at the same time, until the annihilation destroyed most of the antimaterial. There might be existing antimaterial in the universe, and sometimes the antimatter particles are coming in the atmosphere. So where are those particles coming? That is a good question.

The strange thing about the Water tower of Hanko

The strange thing about the Water tower of Hanko

Hanko is the most southern city in Finland, and there are nice old houses, what you might want to see if you visit in Southern Finland, and there is a very interesting building, at the next of Church of Hanko, and that thing is the water tower. Sometimes I have thought that the architect, who has drawn that building, thought the spacecraft, while that person made the work. But who knows about this kind of persons?

The water tower looks like being the model for some futuristic SciFi comics in the 1950s, and it looks just like some old school futuristic spacecraft. And sometimes I have thought that is some drawers of those cartoons being Finnish or visited in Finland. When we are thinking about the form of the antimatter- or positron-electron based antimatter rocket, it might look like this.

The system what has the positron accelerator might be in the middle of the structure, and the electron cannons could surround that accelerator. This thing brings in my mind one thing, the designer can hide the other things in the drawings, what are introduced people to portray something else. When we are thinking about the location of this water tower on the hill, there was one other interesting detail in that place.

There were seedlings of yellowwoods on that hill, and there were no adult trees, which means that somebody has brought the seed to that place, and for some reason, those seedlings were at the shoulder of a small road, what rises to that hill. This means that somebody would throw those seeds to that place, and the missing adult trees are waking interesting thought in my mind.

The seeds of yellowwood are looking like a little helicopter and the rotating movement has brought the idea of the helicopter to the mind of some inventors, like Leonardo da Vinci. But those seeds are not seized in the clothes, and that's why those seeds must be taken to that place by some other way. And the question is where those seeds are coming from. This is not a criminal investigation, and that's why I write about that kind of things.

Somebody might think that those things feel boring, but otherwise, other people might think that thing feels interesting because somebody would like to write a novel about that thing. But that kind of things is only academic thinking. Maybe they were in the pocket of some person, who throw them away, who knows the truth. The thing in the writings and ideas is that the imagination is always free.

But the human mind needs something, what to grind, and in the beginning, is the vision of something. That vision might come from nature or sometimes from some magazine or photograph. Then the mind starts to work with those things and the normal places and buildings are starting to transform into the rocket or computer.

The most important and difficult thing for creating ideas of something is to get an idea or the spark for innovation. That means that innovation is the way to transforming imagination into the drawings and plans, and maybe the antimatter rocket is a fully functional system. But does that happen during our lifetime is the different thing.

Every single particle in the universe has pair as the anti-particle except photon, and the question is: is the antiphoton also existed?

Every single particle in the universe has pair as the anti-particle except photon, and the question is: is the antiphoton also existed?

Almost every single particle in the universe has a pair. That pair is the anti-particle. Only photons have not noticed to have this kind of pair. Electrons antiparticle is positron, what has the same role in the world of antimatter what electrons have in regular material. The protons pair in antimatter is antiproton and neutrons pair is antineutron. The last one just rotates in the opposite direction than"normal" neutron.

And this thing has brought in my mind one very interesting question about particles. This thing is, is it possible that also photon has a pair in the group of antiparticles? Could there be possible to find anti-light in the universe?  Photon is the particle what forms the light, and this thing makes it a very special thing because it's only known particle, what can reach the speed of light.

When particle pairs like electron and positron would touch together, this thing causes very high energy reactions, what is called as the annihilation. This reaction is one type of lightning, which is released because the charges or polarities of those particles are neutralizing. Because every known particle or at least stable particles have pair, what is an anti version of this particle like an electron has anti-version the positron, the question is can the photon has the anti pair?

But what kind of thing would be the antiphoton? This thing is connected to the one theoretical particle, what is known as "Tachyon". This hypothetical particle could travel faster than light, and if there is a possibility to create "Tachyon" artificially, those particles could revolutionize the space travel, but only in the case that those particles exist. The reason why those particles have been believed is the theory that they are simply too fast to react with other particles.

This is one version of the explanation, why we cannot observe or capture those particles, what might be extremely lightweight, but at the same time very high-energy particles. In those theories, tachyons would be transferrer particles as another hypothetical particle what is called as the graviton. The graviton would take so-called fiber to the target, and then gravity would pull the particles together with structures, what are called as super springs.

Those energy formations would form the things like quarks, and the idea would be that the tachyon would act like the graviton, but the influence of that particle would happen between the dark matter or dark particles.  But why some engineers and researchers are interesting about the tachyons. The idea would be using tachyon as the propellant for the rocket engines because the rockets cannot travel faster than their exhaust gasses.

So if the exhaust gas would reach the speed of light the spacecraft would also reach that speed. This is why the scientists are interested in things like the photon rocket. The thrust of those machines would be extremely weak, and if this solution is wanted to use, the acceleration for the speed of light should use some other kinds of engines. The antimatter engine would be a very interesting solution. But if we would like to create a rocket, what will cross the speed of light we should create the new type of technology. And the success of those systems is not sure.

The thing what we should keep in mind when we are thinking about the ultimate spacecraft, what would take sometimes people to the other star systems is that the technology, what will be used in those missions is only theoretical level. And if we would create something like WARP or photon rocket, we must realize that this kind of systems is the most interesting, but in the same way dangerous. If something goes wrong, the best thing what we can hope is that the craft would not move.

But then the scenario, what we can face is that the antimatter would explode near the sun. If we think the situation that the about 100 grams of antimatter impact the sun or some planet, that would cause terrifying detonation and impulses, what might affect the entire solar system. One gram of antimatter would destroy the entire Earth and transform our home planet as the interplanetary nebula.

So the one hundred grams would have one hundred times bigger effect than one gram of that material, and that mass could destroy even entire Jupiter. When we would return to the hypothetical particle antiphoton, we might think that if that particle would annihilate with the photon, would that impact release the tachyon beam, what will work like any other propellant in the spacecraft.

So the antiphoton would be like anti-light. Something, what people would think one of the most fantastic versions of dark matter. When the photon would impact with anti photon it would create tachyons or gravitons, what might be the same particles. But we ever have seen one single tachyon or either graviton.

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor

Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft

Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space.

There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatter would also produce in the spacecraft itself, but there is need the enormous systems to create the thing.

The producing the antimatter would happen the same way, what it is made in the CERN or other particle accelerators. And there might be used the anti-electrons or positrons in this kind of system. Positrons would produce in the particle accelerator, and then they would conduct to the particle, what is made by normal material, and they can create a huge punch for the spacecraft.

Antimatter would store in the superconducting magnetic balls. 

But if we would not want to make spacecraft, what has the ability to create the antimatter itself, we can play with some balls. If those balls are extremely low temperature, they would be superconducting, and that antimatter storage would not need an external power source.

This system has given an idea for "Teller's bomb". The satellite, what will store the ball, which involves the antimatter in the thermos bottle, and then it will shoot that ball to the target. When the ball will impact, the core will turn to pancake, and then the antimatter would contact the material.

The antimatter would be stored in the magnetic balls at the place, where it will produce, and then those balls will transfer to the spacecraft, and after that, it will just break. And that would make the antimatter contact with the material, and sometimes there have been plans to use the abrasive blast to that thing.

The sand or snow or another kind of dust would target the magnetic ball, what is made by using iron, and at the first laser or some other electromagnetic radiation would break the core of that ball, and then the dust will blow to the antimatter. The thing is that the magnetic iron ball would keep the anti-matter ions away from the core of that ball.

Theory of relativity and space travel

Theory of relativity and space travel

The fish-example 

Einstein's theory of relativity is one of the most interesting and remarkable theories in history. And there is one connection to the example of the flowing river. That thing is that if the fish would swim against the flowing water with very big power, would it face the flowing water with faster speed than in the places, where water is standing still.

So if the speed of the fish is 20 kilometers per hour and the water would flow against it with the speed of 20 kilometers per hour, the impact speed with water is 40 kilometers in an hour. The example is taken from the examine, where the impact speed of the cars is asked when they are hitting against together while both of them have a speed of 40 kilometers per hour. That means that the impact speed is the addition, where the speeds of both particles are sum together.

Ability to travel faster than the light

When we are thinking about the first paragraph, we might ask, what would that thing do with the space traveling and the interstellar spaceflights. In fact, there is a possibility to create the spacecraft, what would cross the cosmic speed limit, what is called as the speed of the light. In this system would the ions pull towards the spacecraft with very powerful magnets.

Those magnets would create the impact area, where the impact speed of the spacecraft would be higher than the speed of light. And maybe that kind of things could make the hyperdrive possible, and in the future, we could use this version of the hyperdrive in the distant future for traveling between the stars.

In this case, the rockets what use antimatter as fuel would accelerate the spacecraft to the speed, what is about the 50-90% of the speed of the light. And then the system can pull the ions to the accelerator channel, what would accelerate them to the speed of light. If the particle accelerator would suck the particles in the accelerator channel by the speed of the light, or something like 80% of the speed of the light, would the impact speed of the spacecraft and the particles about 1,5 times of the speed of the light.

In that point, the spacecraft would fly faster than the speed of light. The reason for that is that slowing the mass cannot slow by unlimited speed and the thing causes that the spacecraft would travel faster than light in the short moment because the speed of the light is slower in water than in the air. And then when the electron is hitting to the water, would that cause the thing, what is called the "border layer crossing".

This phenomenon is visible in the neutrino detectors, where the electron is hitting in the water pool, and that thing causes the blue light shock-wave. This means that the speed of the electron crosses the speed of the light in a very short time period. And when the electron is slowing, it must release its energy, what is seen as the blue light shock wave.

Could this be the hyperdrive?

The idea is that the particle pulling is turned off, and maybe the spacecraft would jump forward with the speed, what is higher than the speed of the light.  The idea is similar when the fish what would travel upwards to the river in 20 kilometers per hour because it must fight against the flowing water, and then the fish would face the stream pool, and suddenly it's speed would increase to very high.

In this hypothetical case, the starship would pull the particles against it, and the impact speed with those particles would be something like 1,5 times the speed of the light, and then the particle accelerator would shut down. By using this technology, the hypothetical spacecraft would jump forward like rabbit of the fish in the example. So that can be one version of the hyperdrive.