One interesting detail in the name of Abraham Lincoln

One interesting detail in the name of Abraham Lincoln

Have you noticed that the name of the president of the United States Abraham Lincoln is the same as the ancestor of the Hebrew villain Abraham, the creature of the Old Testament? When we are thinking about the similarities of Abraham Lincoln and the Old Testament's Abraham, those persons are both the creators of something great.

Abraham Lincoln was the creator of the modern United States of America and the father of the modern presidency, which means that this man was one of the best leaders of the United States. So if I have said that he was more about the "man of the south" than Wilson, that thing is not seen in the policy, what this man selected.

As you see, there is a little possibility, that this president has been changed, because of the noses of the people, who are introduced as president Lincoln has been changed. But the thing is not proven, and if we are thinking about the letters and photographs that are taken during people living, we must realize that those photographs are faked in the 19th century as well as the modern time.

The thing is that there was a theory, that Abraham Lincoln was grown as the candidate for the presidential election. But when we are thinking about the assassination of Lincoln, there is a possibility that the man, who shot by John Wilkes Booth was the body double, whose mission was to play Lincoln in that evening, because Lincoln was in the dentist, and that allowed Lincoln step away from the position as the President of the United States of America.

The civil war was a really bad thing in the history of America, and that thing might cause that Lincoln was afraid of the new conflict. And when we are observing things like freedom of slaves, that thing solved one very interesting problem in the USA. That means that the possibility to agitate slaves for rebellion against the USA was whipped away. This was one of the reasons, why the USA went to civil war. The slaves could be a good target for agitators if they want to raise a rebellion.

And that's why they have formed a threat to national security. This thing was problematic in the 19th century because slavery was prohibited in Great Britain and France, and if those nations would agitate slaves as the rebellion, that could be the catastrophe. And that was one reason, why Lincoln was supporting Union in that war. But there were many other reasons, why civil war began. Even if the person's personal opinions would be something else, we must estimate them by using sources, what is possible to get. And publically Lincoln was against slavery, what should be enough for critics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ro0SlVPlWE&t=49s

More about meetings and how to behave during them?

More about meetings and how to behave during them?

During the meeting, everybody should allow speaking. And if somebody sits without saying the single word, we might ask, why that person ever asked to participate that meeting? Those people must have something else to do than sitting and listen to other participants and their speeches.

If we are asking help or advise, we can always ask them. But if we don't listen or read those advises, we are just wasting time. And the thing is that if some meeting is planned to take an hour, that means that the hour is reserved for a meeting. When we want to show interest and look active in those meetings, we can put our laptops and other devices away and use pen and paper to make notes.

That thing might seem like some "return to school stuff", but the thing is that active member, who makes notes by using some other things than mobile computer seems very interesting when we are starting to talk about promotions. In that case, the person would not use Facebook or play some games during the meeting. How the chairman or leader of the meeting could know what other people do when they are keeping their laptops open?

Are they playing some games, keeping notes, or filling their Facebook. The observation of other people during the meeting is important. If somebody is starting to sleep, we might surprise that person by asking some questions about the opinions of that kind of thing, which is involving in the meetings.

Before the meeting, we must make sure, that everything is fine and the battery of the laptop is loaded. But that kind of device should be opened only if the chairman permits that or orders to give some presentations or otherways says, that the laptops are needed in the meeting and the same things are considered tablets or mobile telephones.

The golden rule in the meetings is that nobody should punch right away when some opinions are asked. When we are asking about opinions other people have the right to expect that we will listen to those opinions, and that's why we should make very good documentation for the superiorities about meetings. The thing is that when some person doesn't do anything that kind of thing can be covered by sitting quietly or dominating others. And in that case, the person speaks all the time, but things are far away from the things, what we or team should handle in those meetings.

If we are thinking that somebody has problems with workmates that thing causes very bad problems in the atmosphere of a workgroup. But the truth is that in the real world people just cannot always choose workmates, who are pleasing the, or somehow feel perfect.

The world is quite small, and sometimes we must face the truth, that we are meeting people, who found in our bed after the parties, or our ex-spouses new husband or wife is sitting in the same table as we. And sometimes there is a bigger leader, what we are, who says that the things, what you have done in the free time should stay outside the meetings, or both of those persons are free to leave.

This is the rule in real life, we have not always get workmates, who are pleasing us, and there might be the same kind of things in other people's minds. That means that some people might believe that we have some features, which are not pleasing others. And the conclusion is that sometimes other people don't like us, even we would like to think about other ways.

And here is one problem with team-leading. If we are the bosses, other people would not always or this thing happens very often, that they don't like something, what we are saying or something, what we are doing. But at the same time, we must ask do we tell our superiorities, that we don't like their slips or they way to speak. That thing normally left from talking, what we are using in meetings and private discussions with bosses. But why we dare to tell those things to henchmen? That's a really good question.

When we are asking about the opinion, we should also listen to those arguments, and even play the interesting. If we are looking at the telephone or computer screen at the same time, when another person is speaking, we might ask ourselves, why we wanted to waste the time of both of us? Why we don't just tell, what to do, and that thing would be easier for both of us?

If we ask reports, what are not even wanted to read, we are wasting time. Those people can always make some Excel-diagrams while they are doing reports, which is not even meant for anything else than put in the garbage can. When we are making a meeting, we must remember that also other people are getting salaries from that time. And that means that we don't have to spend an hour if we just are wanted to tell people, what are their next missions.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.


When we are looking at social relationships with people and social media, what connects many people around the world, we are facing the thing, that our social networks are constructed by people, who are similar what we are. If we are living in our own house, most of our social connections are living in their own houses, because we are meeting and familiarize with other people in the meetings, what is touching something that we have, and if we own house, we might meet people is the garden masses. And there we are meeting other house owners.

One side information in this example is the thing might make us believe that most of the people are living in their own houses, and this thing is feed by Hollywood, where every so-called normal person is living in their own house. And when we are meeting other people, we are asking them to grill parties, where we are making things like skewers or sausages.

Those people are living also in their own houses, and we are talking about things like lawnmowers and another kind of common things. This is a very good example of the homogeneous social relationships in the persons own network. If we think more carefully, we must think, that people would not live in the house, they are living in a flat, if we are living in a flat.

Lack of social diversity kills real discussions

Social diversity is the same thing as biodiversity. We don't have to call people, who have different opinions than we have to visit our home. That is sad because different opinions can enrich discussions. We have right to close every person, who have different opinions away from our social network because we have the right to hear only people, who have the same way to think and similar opinions what we have.

And why we would ask some person, who thinks a different way to our house or home? We have the right to filter those things away from our parties and private life, and then we can hear only things, what is pleasing us, and supports our point of view things.

I have the right to choose my company and news myself, and I can leave things, which are uncomfortable for us without notice

Social diversity guarantees that we would get information from multiple sources, and then we might see, that everything, what we are reading or what we are looking has many kinds of truths. Actually, there are many versions of the truth, and most of the people want to tell things, by using the way, what seems to show that person in the best point of view.

Let's take one example of that thing. When we are facing things that some policeman or reporter asks about guns from some street or MC-gang, whose headquarters is full of weapons, those people might say, that everybody carries guns. This might be true,  in their case, because every people, wh they know might carry guns. And of course, they are told stories, that somebody has shot them or their friends, but there is always forgotten the very interesting part of those cases. That is who began to shoot in that area? Who opened fire against other gangs?

Did people tell truth, the whole truth and nothing more than the truth?

And what happened before that? In those stories, they own part of those cases is always forgotten, and everything happens to some friends, and when the person sits in jail, they will tell, how some person, without reasons, just pull the pocket knife out the pocket, and then this person shot 15 round magazine to that inmate in panic of course. If somebody asks, why there was no knife, that person tells that somebody took it from the crime scene, and police hate that innocent person, who is, of course, faced racial prejudice from the policemen, who were white or black, depending on the color of the skin of the suspect, and policeman has always prejudice against normal people, who like s big cars and who are different than they are.

And of course that the reason for the meeting was the drug deals because the car is full of crack ampules, but those things are always someone else, who lend the car. And every time that kind things are always forgotten to tell in the court. How that man, who looks like some kind of rap-artist can even think violent things, and the sub-machine gun in the car is only for the self-defense, because people hate Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado, what that kind of people are driving. And this 41 years old person lives with mother, so what happens if that inmate would go to jail? Who takes care of the old woman?

The lack of social diversity in the social relationship makes people happy, because everybody, who people know have similar backgrounds, but it kills the ability to hear things, what we don't want to hear. We always want to be right, and that's why we are surrounding us with people, who have similar opinions about the things, what we have. And then we will cheer together when we are getting, what we want.

Social media and the Internet gives billions of choices to share and get information, but we always choose the simplest. We are looking for homepages, which pleases us and talk with people, who have the same opinions as us. And the thing is that we are facing the situation, that we are reading and looking at information, which supports our own opinions.