Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

When physics make something, that person is connected to the observations, what has been made. That means physics must make every decision by using the tools like particle accelerators and prove every single word, what that person says, and the thing, what makes the life of physics sometimes really boring is that they must reserve those physical tools for their tests. And every part of the life of physics is connected to the material and nothing else can exist than material. The thing, what makes the life of physics so stiff is the need to prove those things.

But here we must say that the philosopher must also prove the things, what that person claims. But the proof must be done by using the rhetoric method. In real life philosophy or pure philosophy, the philosopher must use language and rhetorics to make the opponent become convicted that the thing, what the philosopher says is the truth. So the philosopher should not make empiric tests in the work. In some claiming physics just conducts things what that person sees to the form of doctoral dissertation.

So what is the doctor of philosophy?

Philosopher has the freedom to take also other dimensions in the work than physics. That means that the philosopher would take the spiritual aspect along with material if that person can convict people that the thing, what philosopher claims is true by using rhetoric way to confuse people. So that's why the philosophy is a more flexible thing than some kind of physics.

 When we are thinking about the doctoral degree of philosophy, we must understand that the doctors of mathematics and many other abstract sciences are actually the doctors of philosophy. And here we can think that mathematics is so-called empiric science, but it is actually also the part of philosophy or abstract science. When we are thinking about the doctoral thesis about mathematics, we are facing thing, that the word of mathematics is an abstract word.

Every single part of that thesis must be made by using the methodology, what mathematics has been accepted. And every single part of mathematics bases the thing, that we have ten fingers. That thing has brought us the numeric system, where we are using the decimal system, what bases the number ten. And somebody has thought that what if the Sumerian high priest, what has accepted the numeric system would be lost one finger. Would that mean that we would have a decimal system, what bases the number 9?

Or what if some mathematicians would create an idea that the calculations would go linear way. That means that the brackets would not have mean, and the multiplication would not have a special place in the formula? So what kind of world would be in that kind of cases? Would it somehow different than it is today?

Of course, there are numbers, what has no opponent in the normal life. Those numbers are called as the complex numbers, and that thing is a little bit interesting. The complex numbers have two points in coordinates. And that means that we cannot use them in real life.

The real number is the thing, what we can calculate normally, but the complex part, what is above the coordinates of Y-axel is impossible to model in some shops. But that kind of numbers is the product of very clever mathematicians use of brains. Those things are a really interesting way to think.

The thoughts about scientific research

The thoughts about scientific research

Only empiric research give results, what can be accepted scientifically

Scientific research means empiric testing, what is made in the controlled space, and when the simultaneously made last, where is used the same equipment and arrangement. When the tests would give the same result every time, is theory turned to the scientific truth. But before that, we must make some theory, what should prove by using some test series.

When we are testing non-living particles like stones or chemicals, we are facing the thing, that the tested particles are passive, and they would not say a thing about the test. But when we are testing things like humans, we are facing the object, who has own will and what can also tell lies for hiding something, what that inmate would not want to tell other people. And this makes human tests, where is tested the psychological things like learning or ability to observe something.

Humans are the most unpredictable objects for research, because we have own will, and we can give the wrong information. The reason for that could be that person fears to uncover something, what causes discrimination. 

This kind of things is really hard to make because the test persons would be hard to recruit if the tests are made for testing some kind of abnormalities or persons, who are different than other people. People are afraid to be different than others, and that means that sometimes coming to the tests is really difficult for people, who are some kind of different than other people, because they are afraid of being marked in the eyes of society.

But let's go back to scientific testing. Before the tests have ever been made, normally scientists would not able to say anything about the thing. So there is not "of course there is" or "of course there is is not" answers for some questions. One of those questions is, that is traveling faster than the speed of the light possible?

Before research is done, there is no way to say "yes" or "no" to some theories.

When we are thinking the gravity, we are facing the physical principle that the particle is dropping in the center of gravity in the speed what is the same what is the escaping velocity from the object. And if the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light, the object would drop in the gravity field faster than the speed of light.

This makes that the object will suck even the light in it. That thing, that even the light cannot resist the gravity is visible in the Black Holes, the supermassive objects on Universe, where even the light cannot escape from that particle. Black Holes are giving the impulse for the researchers and developers, who are creating spacecraft, what can travel faster than the speed of the light.

When we are creating theories and hypothesis, we forget that something that is impossible on Earth might be possible in the space there is no free oxygen on the atmosphere. In those conditions, the materials like gasoline would warm in extreme high temperature, without the risk that the hydrocarbon would start to burn. In the chambers, where is used the specially controlled gas mixtures, are possible the special catalytic processes, what are impossible in the space, where is the oxygen.