The thing, what somebody doesn't you want to know about Satan

The thing, what somebody doesn't you want to know about Satan

Satan is a creature, that is one of the most mysterious in history. The question is, why God doesn't destroy Satan? And some persons would suspect, that God is not omnipotent, because of that character was not able to destroy Satan. But then we can see things another way, and that way was the Satan has something to do with the Catholic Church and the early ages of Christianity.

That means that the way how Catholic Church deal with things that were against its policy were far away from the mercy. Inquisition was a really powerful tool when people were burned in bonfires because they have spoken something, what the Catholic Church didn't want to accept. This kind of action was totally against the letter of the Holy Bible. And people, of course, asked, what went wrong?

Why church, what promised mercy turned against the normal people, who it promised to defend? Why did the church turn to defend noblemen and warlords? And the most important question in this series is, that why the Catholic Church started to support kings and rulers by using the argument, that they got their power and authority from God?

Did some of the Apostles were body double? That means that there could be an undercover Roman agent in the nucleus of the proto-church.

That might open the road to the answer to the question, what somebody didn't want people to know bout Satan? There is a thing, what we haven't ever thought before. And that thing is that what if some Apostles were changed by Romans? That means that the Romans could assassinate one of the Group, what Jesus taught, and then that person could use the position for getting benefit to the leaders, who ruled that person. Or maybe they changed some other person. Here we must say, that there is a possibility, that some person, near Jesus or his group, could be the body double. Person, who took the place of some other person, and played that individual.

If we are thinking about things, like Apostle Paul's letters, we must understand, that some of those letters might be written by other persons. Or they might be faked by Romans. When we are thinking about the apostles and the leaders of the early ages of Christianity, which means the time before Christianity came to the official religion of the Roman Empire, there is a possibility, that there were some Roman spies or provocateurs hidden in the proto-church, and maybe some of them has been body switches. If some of them took the place as the leader or another high-ranking member of Christianity, that person might be used the Church as the tool for agitation.

About the church of Scientology

About the church of Scientology

Under this text is a link to the article, what is telling about the escaping from the headquarters of Scientology. The story is very nice to read, and it's written in Finnish, and that's why you can use some translation program to find out the thing, what makes this kind of communities very dangerous. The thing is that the Scientology is the religion in the USA gives it freedom from paying taxes. 

If we think that religious societies are sharing manipulated data to their members, the purpose of that data might make the members more pledged. That means that those people might call the president as the "Jesus", and if somebody would have different opinions, that means punishment. And of course, that title is used also outside the society. 

This thing causes cheating at schools, and the members will leave education, which will raise the power of the leaders of the group. And this is a good way to isolate children from other people. The effect of these methods is that there are always two or three members of these societies, and they would report if a person uses another name of their leaders. And of course, the relationships to outsiders are prohibited. But I will return those things at the end of this text. 

But the problem is that this kind of societies, what is guarded by riflemen are always giving topics for urban legends, and even if those people are uneducated, the thing is that there is something scary in this article. The question is how people, who might not have more than base education can hack things? The answer would be in the methodology, what is called the "precision learning".  

This methodology is basing the idea, that person can learn things like programming languages very good if the schools are teaching only just those things. That means that if we would tech programming very effectively, we can simply make school, where every part of learning and teaching are orbiting around the programming. And that kind of things is really scary. Because if a person learns something very deeply, but doesn't know where to use those things, that makes people dangerous. 

And the second way to make a person dangerous is to teach that some leader is like Jesus in their society. This kind of thing seems extremely common in religious societies, but then the reality is that those societies had ever been so much technology in their hands than today. And the most interesting thing is that those societies have the right to maintain their homepages. The thing is that those homepages give a similar effect than banderoles gave in the 1970s. 

Those movements can share the information of themselves on the Internet, but they can also deny their members to take information, which is not accepted by the leaders of society. And there are rumors that some of those religious societies have the intranet-based system, what is used as the Internet. But the homepages, what is shared in those closed networks are only the duplicates, and also the information, what is shared by using those pages is manipulated. That means that some presidents might be called by using religious terms.

 And the thing is that kind of actions has a purpose. Its mission is to isolate the youngsters of those societies. They might seem a little bit funny at schools if they are calling the president of the nation as "Jesus". That thing might be used for the isolation process because of the cheating would be an effective method, to make those children leave school and pledge the community. 

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10982531

What is so special with this creature?

What is so special with this creature?

Picture I

When we are looking at this sculpture or creature, what is made on the wall of the bell tower of the church of Vähäkyrö, Finland (Picture I), we must notice, that there is something interesting about that man-shaped creature. Another leg of that inmate seems to be bigger than other, and that thing brings in my mind the medieval image of the monopod from Nuremberg chronicles, who has only one extremely large leg (Picture II). When we are thinking about medieval art, there is one thing, what we must remember.


That thing is that the monopod would be actually the caricature, what gave the anthropologists instructions, what they must be looking for in some special situations. But why the bigger leg is so interesting? Was it the mark of belonging of some royal families, or is there something deeper meaning? When we are thinking about the anthropological characteristics, that kind of things was a very good note, when the criminals were searching from the forests.

Picture II

There is one very interesting detail of those very mysterious figures. The people, who have faced abductions are claimed to see some kind of handicapped people, who have grotesque figures, and who were communicating with the abductors. There is possible that this thing has been caused by extreme stress or something, what we don't know.  But we know that there is something special of that kind of images because it was made on the wall of church's bell tower.

Nobody makes those things for fun, and there is a detail, that this creature may ask for money or something else. The clothes of that character are clean, and that would not seem like a poor man, which makes this thing very interesting. So this image is not made for causing pity, and this man seems like really hard.

And there must be some reason, why that character has been made in this particular place. Was it really made for remembering, that somebody need help, or for some kind of warning, that there would be some kind of problem if somebody will hurt that person? And there is not any kind of cup, where that character would collect the money. So who or what that character was? That is a really good question for thinking on a bright summer day in the year 2019.

(Picture II) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nuremberg_chronicles_-_Strange_People_-_Umbrella_Foot_(XIIr).jpg

Why people have intelligence?

Why people have intelligence?

Almost every day we are facing thing, that somebody claims that some writers are just stupid, and they don't understand things. This was the attitude in the medieval period. And then somebody asked, "why those people burned in the bonfire"? The reason was the thing, which is called the blasphemy. Those people were talked or wrote something, what was against the opinion of the Catholic and Protestant church. In fact, the only thing, what first changed in the Protestant church was the language, what was used in the church.

And of course, priests were allowed to get married, and that thing was used to show that the priest was not Catholic. But otherwise the law was the same, and in the Lutheran and other protestant countries, the place of the pope was given to King, whose criticism would mean the blasphemy because the king ruled because of the will of God. The ruler of England Henry VIII persecuted protestants first, but when he turned to protestant, that man started to persecute Catholics.

The reason for that was turning was that he needed a divorce from his wife. The way how Henry VIII handled the problems in marriage was straight, he executed all his wives except one.  That kind of thing caused little bit embarrassing situation because people started to think, that if somebody needed to die because of writings and speeches that thing had influence for somebody, who had something to hide. The official attitude of the pope and other rulers was that the normal people were like children, and then somebody must die. That thing was meant that the things were not influential.

Another version about this kind of question is "why we have brains"? In the begin of the empiric research, somebody asked why we just cannot just be, and leave the thinking to god? The people, who made the research answered the person, who made that question by saying God has given us brains, so why would we not use them? In fact, at that time everything what people said and what they had done must have the reason, what should be found from the Holy Bible. In modern time there are people, who are really thinking, that they are somehow wise because they don't write or say a thing, and they just want to be.

This is one version of the wise people, that they are doing nothing, and that thing denies them to make mistakes. If the person does nothing or tries the now things, life would be safe, but then we must realize that there must be really something if we ever try new things. Because if the fear of mistakes makes the person just laying without making anything, would that support the things like predestination and descending of the position. In that model, the persons, who have not born in wealthy families are not allowed to go to higher class education, because they are born in some less wealthy families. I just wrote this thing in the last writing, but I like it very much, so I write it again, and that is that if we would be very wise, we would live on the trees and eat a banana.

I haven't created that quote myself, I have read it from some book, and I always been very sad about that, because that means that I cannot get my own quote in the history, what the wise men would use in their texts. That quote about the wisdom of living on trees and eating bananas has been written by Douglas Adams in the "Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy", and it has rotated in my head very often.

Sometimes we are facing the thing, that somebody says that the wise men ever get in the trouble. So, in this case, that kind of person would tell that people are better to be without own ideas because that thing would make other people laugh. This is the thing, what somebody would repeat and repeat endlessly. And that kind of ideas is supporting one-man leadership. In this kind of cases, the thing is that we should think carefully, why somebody wants to support that kind of things?

When we are thinking about the questions, what we should ask in those cases, we might ask what is the position of that person, who wants to support the leaders? Where that person is in the hierarchy?  If we would think about the case. that somebody, who writes about something, is just stupid, we must also think something else. Why that thing is mentioned on the front page of the biggest daily newspaper? If somebody is stupid and the writings of some person have no influence, why this thing must comment?