Spiritualism and extraordinary people

Niels Bohr and his blackboard

Spiritualism and extraordinary people

The question about spiritualism is very interesting. When we are thinking about neural electricity and the "magic merchandise", we must understand that if we are touching the object, what contains the electromagnetic energy, or electricity that thing is always affecting to our nervous system.

If the single touch to that artifact doesn't transform the electric functions of the nervous system, we must realize that if we would touch some object thousands or millions of times we would face the situation, that the electric stimulation starts to affect our nervous system. This kind of thing caused thoughts, that is it possible that some people have some extraordinary spiritualistic abilities.

Or do those people need some extraordinary neural abilities at all? When we are thinking about things like extraordinary skills like standing on the finger, that kind of skill needs learning and practicing. Also, things like making fire by using two wood bites, which are just rubbing against together, and then the friction causes the fire has caused an idea, that this thing would be possible by using toothpick is possible if the person has got enough practice.

As you know, these kinds of things are interesting to think about, and we must remember that there are people, who can move the hand so fast, that people cannot see that thing. But when we are starting to observe and handle the world of monks and normal people, we must remember that the first ones are living in the spiritual world.

They are not normal people, who live in the normal world and go to work and then after the work is done to the home. Joining to the monks was not a thing, what happened after a short discussion. That thing needs full devoting to the rules and orders of those orders and fully work in the spiritual world of religion and other things.

The same way we can think about Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. Those people are not regular people at all. Their work has been brought the new kind of things in front of the people, but the thing what that kind of people need to make their formulas and theories is fully devocation to their work. They paid the price of their addiction in the field of science.

People like Einstein and Bohr lost their marriages, but the world would remember them as the most brilliant masterminds in the field of science. They are the men, whose names we see whenever we are looking at the history of physics and science. Sometimes I have wondered, why we always remember negative things? We remember Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr by their work in the field of nuclear physics. And we remember their role in the creation of the atom bomb. We don't even know what else those men made during their careers in the world of science.

The world is full of people, who know the Manhattan project, but they don't know about quantum theories. They know the formula E=Mc² but they don't know what those letters E, M, and c mean.  E=Energy M=mass, and c=the speed of the light. One remarkable thing about the Manhattan project is that any other project in history has so many intellectual resources than the Manhattan project.

Why we are looking up to people who have crush armies and cities? We remember the bomber and fighter pilots, but we don't remember a single name of the people, who are building those cities. We remember Julius Caesar, but we don't remember people, who build the roads, what his legions used. Is that funny thing? We remember only things, what are negative.

We cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

We cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

The idea of the virtual crossing the speed of the light is similar to the impact of the cars. (Speed of car 1 +  Speed of car 2)

The idea of the virtual crossing the speed of light is the key to the WARP-drive (1). The thing is that if the impact speed of the gas or ions, what is coming against the particle is the combined speed of the particles and gas (Speed of particle + Speed of gas). And that makes this kind of thing possible. Does that thing have some kind of meaning in spaceflights is a secondary thing? The thing is that we cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

The virtual crossing the speed of light is possible if the spacecraft would travel to the gas, which is coming to the spacecraft at high speed. The idea of the virtual crossing the cosmic speed limit the speed of the light is similar to the impact of two cars. If the impact speed of both sides of the clump is 80 kilometers per hour, the impact speed of both sides of the accident is 160 kilometers per hour (80km/h+80km/h).

So if the gas is traveling through the spacecraft with the speed the impact speed of the spacecraft and this gas is the speed of the spacecraft and speed of the gas. There is one thing, that might interest people, who are interested in the interstellar spaceflight, and that thing is that the black holes or other whirls in the universe can benefit in the extremely long-term spaceflights by using them as the assistance of the virtual crossing the speed of light.

What if we would fly against the rotation direction of the galaxy by the speed of 99% of the speed of the light? What is the impact of speed between the spacecraft and gas?

So could we travel to stars by using the existing rocket technology? The thing is that we could create the giant particle accelerator to space, which accelerates the hydrogen ions to the speed of light, and then the rocket will launch against that flow of particles. The impact would cause the situation, that the impact speed between particles and the rocket is crossing the speed of light.

And if we would transfer this thing to the normal space, we could create the photon rocket what will get the speed of 99% of the speed of light. If the spacecraft would travel against the rotation direction of the galaxy, that thing could make the dream of crossing the cosmic speed limit possible. The thing is that the same effect would make WARP drive possible.

(1)

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/technology/warp/warp.html

Even Einstein was human

Even Einstein was human

The problem with Albert Einstein is that he and his ideas are so fantastic and the same time so massive, that we cannot question them. So when we are thinking about Einstein's theories, what was fundamental in his lifetime, or when he introduced them to the world, we must remember two things. 

Einstein didn't have supercomputers, and when he introduced the Theory of Special Relativity in 1905 and Theory of Common Relativity in 1915, those theories became two of the most awesome and well-known formulas. But we don't know why Einstein created those formulas? Who ordered that man make those theories, and what was hypothesis when that job was given to Einstein? 

So there is another thing, what we are many times forget to ask, and that thing is "what were the values, what Einstein used? Did he use the theoretical speed of light, what is 300 000 m/s or did he used the value, what was metered by Michelson, and what is approximately 299 792 458 m/s? The thing is that there are differences with those numbers. And when we are thinking about the time, what Einstein used for creating those formulas, he made excellent work. But he 'forgot that the space is never straight. 

When we are calculating things by using extremely long decimal numbers, we can say that Einstein's formulas are not matching with reality. That means that those famous formulas are working in the common and enough large scale, but when we are going to the very small areas there are mistakes. So Einstein's theories work with entirety, but unique details are problems. This is the problem with physics and every other formula in the world. 

Those formulas are made in the time, there were no supercomputers and float number algorithms, which can handle extremely long decimal numbers, which gives enough accuracy for calculations. Sometimes people have asked, what if the value for the speed of light, what was reported by Michelson was wrong? In that case, every single laser ranger in the world would show the wrong numbers. 

This would open the route for very interesting philosophical discussions about things, what might be wrong, but commonly thought to be right. And if we would someday meter the different value for the speed of light, what would we do? Would we replace the speed of light and other meterings, where were used the laser meter again? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov98y_DCvRY

Einstein-Rosen bridge or "wormhole"

Einstein-Rosen bridge or "wormhole"

In the beginning, I must say that even a couple of years ago black holes were just theory. In the 1970s the things like supercomputers were worse than modern pocket calculators, and things like quantum physics and quantum mechanics were pure theory. So there has been time before quantum and the Internet, and in the modern world, people can read many things straight from the internet.

Einstein-Rosen bridge is the theoretical phenomenon, which bases that two black holes are starting to resonate with each other. That thing causes the effect that between those black holes is forming the "bridge", but what would cause that resonation? One of the theories is that another black hole is sending the X-ray or some other radiation impulse to the direction of another black hole. 

And that radiation burst would cause the oscillation of another black hole would turn to the same frequency with each other. That thing is one of the most fascinating phenomena, which can form in the Universe. The reason why this theory is forming has been that the size of the black holes is not growing, and that means that the material is going to somewhere. Then telescopes noted that giant gas jettisons were leaving from the nucleus of galaxies. 

If those jettisons would travel inside the X-ray radiation of the black hole, that would make them at least the virtual wormhole possible, and that thing is actually the situation, where the particle is turning to quantum teleportation because the radiation from the black hole along with huge speed would make time moving slower in the jettison, and then another black hole would catch that jettison, and turn it direction stable, or open the virtual wormhole between those objects. But I will return to that version later. 

Einstein-Rosen bridge or the "wormhole" is one of the most fascinating theories in the world. And the thing what makes this theory so interesting is that thing allows human or some other species travel to another star or even in time. But the form of Einstein-Rosen bridge is conflicted. 

That means that two types of phenomena are far from each other, even they are looking at the same thing. In this case, I mean physical traveling between two points in the extremely long distance. The first version is that this bridge or wormhole would send the spacecraft through the tunnel across the fourth dimension, and that would mean that the form of travel is "interactive". 

The effect that allows the long journey is slowing the time and in the first version the people who are standing outside the vehicle would see that vehicle is coming from the "bridge" a couple of minutes after the craft is left to journey. And this effect allows the two-side traffic between long distances, and that thing is normally introduced in the SciFi movies.

But another version of this effect is the "virtual wormhole", which means that the mass of the craft would turn extremely high, and the time inside it would turn slow. The travel that feels probably a couple of hours in the mind of the travelers would take hundreds or even thousands of years. 

And that means that this kind of wormhole would be a "one-way" version of the wormhole. That thing is possible, because that craft, what travels through the wormhole would turn to the quantum teleportation system, where the time is slowing inside that thing, what is hoped also solve problems of quantum computers. 

But when we are thinking about the advantage of science, this kind of theory is the newest way to think. That kind of thought is connected to black holes. When the idea of the objects, what would have so strong gravity field that even the light cannot escape introduced about 200 years ago, those objects were only thoughts in the head of some philosophers. 

And then the evidence about the existence of that kind of object has been got after long-time research. But now the existence of black holes is confirmed, and those extreme objects are captured to film. The case of black holes can be thought of as the school example of the advantages of science and equipment, which can handle data. 

https://physics.aps.org/story/v15/st11

https://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.

When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.

That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.

In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?

The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.

What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.

But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.

When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.

The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.

In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.

The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.

But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.

So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.

There are two wormhole theories

Image I

There are two wormhole theories

1. The virtual wormhole bases Einstein's Theory of Relativity, that gravity or very high speed slows the time. That means that the time is a relative thing, what can be stopped by traveling by the speed of light. 

In the first version, the crossing the speed of light is only virtual. The idea is that the black hole would be used as the gravity sling, which would increase the speed of the particle near the speed of the light.

And the slowing the time in the particle would cause the virtual effect when the hypothetical astronaut would see that the travel between stars would feel to take only minutes. The time to start, what is at the 150 light-years away from the Earth would take 150 years.

The "virtual wormhole" bases Einstein's theory about that the time would slow in the gravity field or when the particle moves with very high speed. And in this theory, the energy is slowing time, because gravity is one version of energy, like kinetic or movement energy is?

The wormhole would be the effect when the particle is traveling in the space by the speed of 99,99% of the speed of light. And that causes the effect, that the time goes very slow or time stops inside the particle.

In this theory, the lightspeed would not be crossed, and the travel to the star what is as an example the 150 light-years away from the beginning point of the wormhole would take 150 years, as I wrote before, but inside the particle, the travel would feel to take the only couple of minutes. In this version, the lightspeed would be the cosmic speed limit and the wormhole would be only the virtual effect, what is possible only in the speed, what is near the speed of light.

2. The craft would jump to the fourth dimension

That theory bases the idea that the cosmic speed limit is the level of energy, where the three-dimensional universe can keep the particle inside it. And if the particle would face or cross that speed, the kinetic energy transforms it as the black hole, and the particle drops out of our universe.

We don't know is the travel to the fourth dimension possible, and if the particle would transform into a black hole, there is a possibility that it would explode immediately. That means that the black hole would be filled, and it would be destroyed, because of Hawking's radiation, what escapes from the black hole would cause that the black hole would vanish or be streamed to quark steam. But if it would jump to the fourth dimension, it would open interesting visions.

Why some people are talking about the fifth dimension? And is the fourth dimension only space, what is behind the event horizons of black holes?  Or is it some kind of energy level?

Somewhere is claimed, that the wormhole itself would be the fourth dimension. And the fifth dimension is the space, where the wormhole takes the particle. Some cosmologists are thinking that the fourth dimension is the space inside the event horizon.

And if the wormhole could take particles only to the gravitational center of the network of black holes, the fourth dimension would be the supermassive black hole in the center of Galaxy. So the fifth dimension is in this theory route back from those particles

Or some other theories are claiming, that the "fourth dimension" is the energy level, and when the energy would be pumped away, the particle could return from that space to our universe. And the wormhole, what brings particles back from the fourth dimension is the fifth dimension.

Dropping out of universe means the particle would travel to space, which is known as the "fourth dimension". That thing is an interesting space, because of the particle would be out of our universe. But how we can prove that thing? The problem with that thing is that we don't know, how to return the particle from the fourth or fifth dimension.

Image:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/cena/cena.jpg