Occultism and symbolism

Occultism and symbolism

The things that other persons see, might be different, what the creator of the work means. That thing must understand when we are thinking about art and symbols. The ancient statue of Greece had symbol-function, and there were secret codes inside the forms of the statues, and one was what was the most powerful family in the city. Others were things like were the war against some other city allowed or was the reason for war accepted.

Each of those statues had a purpose, and that purpose was telling people, how to contact the group. The symbols like gifts were told, that if the other side of the war were ready for peace, and the discussions of the peace were made in the Olympia holy land. There is one little coincidence between those ancient peace conferences and modern times. The Olympic games were the place, where the moment when the war was ended and the new wars began.

The four years period made possible that the reason for war was lost from the mind of people, and sometimes the nasty coincidence is that things like the Second World War took about five years. There is one maybe hoax explanation for the time, what the Second World war took, and it was the numeric thematic.

Some people have tried to say, that they have seen the things, what have happened during that period, and after the war, some fortunetellers claimed that they have predicted every case, what has happened during the war, but those people have of course not heard. And sometimes that thing has tried to explain some kind of connection with some pseudosciences.

The thing is that the active war period between the main sides of this war was four and a half years, and the war between Germany and the Soviet Union lasted four years. That was explained by some thematic, but here I must say that this thing is the coincidence nothing more. But the world is full of hoax theories.

But the thing is that the 666 is the number of the beast might be caused that the judge must remember the number of the case, where he has given the predicted judgment. But I don't know about the lasting of the Second World war connections with the occultism. The fact is that some people in the high-ranking positions have been members of that kind of society. In those societies, things like using drugs and hypnosis with deep suggestions could cause the change of the behavior.

And maybe those things were tested people, who had no education or responsibility for that kind of thing.  This might cause a change in the identity of the person. But were those people just kept secret meetings, or were there some other dimensions in those meetings, is the question, where are no answers. So were some people, who were known as very interesting persons believed things like ghosts and connections with spirits is a mystery.

The short story of Machu Picchu

The short story of Machu Picchu

Machu Picchu (Wikipedia)

Why Machu Picchu built?

Machu Picchu is one of the most brilliant historical monuments on Earth, and it is a very outstanding fortress in the world. The building of that fortress began about the year 1440, about 50 years before Columbus, and in that building were not used mortar. Stones that are used for that project were put in their place very sharp, and this keeps the walls in cohesion.

That means that clothes or other things were not uncovered the construction work, which could be uncovered because of the dust of mortar. And if one sack of the cement would be dropped to some river, or leak to the road would that uncover the building site. And the question is, why that place was kept in secret? The construction began 50 years before Columbus, which means that it would not be made against Spanish.

That thing is telling that maybe Machu Picchu was kept secret even from Incas, and the location of that fortress is near Cuzco. The name of the place is telling, that maybe there were two usages for that place, the first was "Machu" and other was "Picchu", which means that there was the role, what was told to the people, who were working in that area. Actually, this was only thought, but Machu Picchu means "High mountain", and that thing might mean, that it was used to train the highest rank Inca officials.

And the second one, what was reserved to people, who were highest grade priests or Inca officials. In fact, the term "priest" could mean the personnel, who have orders to keep silent about their work, and the thing why those Indians were used to sacrifice humans in their rituals was to isolate the priests and high-rank officials from the regular people. When we are thinking about the society of Machu Picchu, children were very good tools for uncovering secrets, what those workers talked.

The purpose of human sacrifices was to isolate priests from normal society

The workers were needed to plant the food to the people, who were living in that fortress. And children would tell the things to the Inca priests. Maybe the purpose of Machu Picchu was to produce children, who were grown in the fortress couple of years, and then they slipped in the families, which was suitable for growing those people. And then they were called back to Machu Picchu.

When we are thinking about human sacrifice, that ritual might be a good way to cause hate against those people, who delivered that child to priests. And another thing was guaranteed that the people, who were chosen as the priests, who were the ruling class of the Inca state didn't tell anything about their work to regular people. Identities of the priests were covered, which meant that the regular people couldn't threaten them by giving some poisonous food to priests.

The interesting question is: Did some Incas move to Spain?

When Spanish came, the Inca resistance was collapsed at least in the year 1572, and sometimes I have thought that maybe some of those Incas moved to Spain where they were not recognized. In fact, I must say that maybe the high-class Incas were not very popular in their state, and when we are thinking really careful, we must ask, where the acts of revenge would not look for those men and women?

The appearance of Incas was not different from Spanish, and if they were learning to speak Spanish, they might be moved to the place, where their enemies would not even think to look at them. And that place was next to the castle of the King of Spain, and that might be a good topic for some book, but there is no physical evidence that some Incas were moved to Europe, and that's why this is only the writing or thinking, how would you want to say that. 

Social media and the changing role of journalists

Social media and the changing role of journalists

In the point of view of journalists, social media has made their work easier, but otherwise, it has been removed the glory from the reporter's work. In old good times, reporters must move themselves to the place, where something has happened, and wait for the press conference. And after that, they spent their night at the hotel.

This is the thing, what made the work of the reporter so interesting. Today the reporter must just open Twitter, and then that person sees, what some leaders have to tell people, and this is the thing, what makes journalism of today different. Also, normal people can see themselves, what some president has to say, and this is bad for newspapers.

The thing is that in the past the journalists were filtered the information, what was sent to people, and the thing is that the news agencies like Reuters and Tass were in the key role of the business of information sharing. If some journalist made people in the news agencies angry, that could mean that there were no call to press conferences. And this was an excuse for the censorship.

The thing was that both sides must be heard in every case, and if something made somebody angry, that meant that the neutrality of the information was disturbing. Modern social media has brought in front of the people another reality, and that is that many people read things, what they want to read. This is a selective way to use sources. We all make this thing and leave the things, what are supporting our own interest or opinion without notice. But when we are looking at people like journalists, we must remember that they are humans too.

Some propagandists are not governmental 

There is no way to be the absolute neutral while we are writing something or handling data. If we would have political or some other attitudes for some case, we would automatically see things, as we want to see them. And this is the thing, what we must realize. If we are thinking about the political attitudes of the reporters, we must realize, that they also have political and cultural emotions. This means that also so-called professional journalists would have written stories, what is more, or less against the things, what really happened.

Here I must say that the press is a good tool for lobbying things. When we are thinking about the cases, where some reporter has faced the attempts to influence the things, what that inmate has been written, we can remember the cases, where the MC-clubs like Hell's Angels have offered the meal for the reporters, that they would give nicely image to those persons, who are driving with motorbikes with the logo of the club on the back of the vests. That kind of things was really good advertisements for those clubs, and the reporters have faced many times another kind of attempts to influence the information, what they are sharing.

One version is the expensive car, what some "firms" are offered the reporter for the working tool. The car has always been marked that it has been used some director, and the kilometers would be marked after the use. Another version is the free parking permission in the expensive parking houses. Or sometimes some actors of the cases has been offered a good five-star hotel for free, which means that the hotel room has been paid by some company, what is asking some permissions, and sometimes the texts, what the journalists have published have come straight from the public affairs section of the company. In those cases, the reporters have been highlighted the benefits of some action.

And of course, in the war, the propaganda is the very usual tool. When we are thinking about propaganda, one mark of it is that the things, what are published are supporting another side, and another side has only bad things. This is one very good point of view of the information.

Let's think one thing. We are the journalists who are operating in the middle of the crisis. And then the government official brings us to the place, where have been happened the war crime. Then that person would give the governmental and official information about that thing, what might be something like killing children. Would we dare to write anything else to our boss, if we are surrounded by the local militia, what is telling the stories about the war crimes?

And what if that information would be given in the press conference, and the information officer would say, that he has taken us to the place, what is not true. But the men with assault rifles in that room would be real. Then we would write something, and the government official wants to check that information, what we are sending. Then we would go to our motherland, and tell that story to our boss or editor, who tells that the sell of the newspaper has risen.

Disinformation is not a new thing. 

Would that person write to the newspaper, that the situation, where the information was given, was somehow different than the reporter claims? Or would the reporter dare to tell the editor that thing? This is a very good point when we are analyzing the disinformation, and another name of the disinformation is propaganda. When we are looking at the information, what is shared in the press conferences, we must remember that the information, what is shared must be accepted by the keepers of the conference.

And especially in the case of the crisis, the press conferences share only the information, what is serving another side. And that's why we should take the purpose of all of the so-called press conferences more or less propagandist. We should know that all shared data of those press conferences are "cleaned". That means that they share only information, which supports their own benefit.

When we are thinking about social media, we are facing the situation, that the shared data is very one-sided. And the thing what makes this data more one-sided than before is that we are choosing people, who have similar opinions with us to our social media network. This makes social media really good tool for propaganda and other ways there is a massive number of non-relevant information, what means information, what has nothing to do with the thing, what we are looking for. And this is the reason, why we must have to use critics when we are looking for information from the Internet.