History and hoaxes

History and hoaxes

As you might know, history is full of hoaxes, and the reason for that is the thing that especially the cases of war, history is written by winners. And when we are thinking about winners, the winning side might be changed several times during history, which makes it very difficult to find out, what happened, and why something happened? History is full of cases, where the cities have been moved, and moving the city is happening very easily.

The ruler of the state would just come to someplace and then said that people must move. Then the city was burned, and the new city would get the name of the old city. Sometimes this operation was made because of the epidemics like plaque, but there might be cases that the king just arrived in some city, and said that "was this the old Canterbury?". In those cases, people should agree with the king, or that person might just cut the heads off.

The thing is that the reason, why some city has been moved might cause that there was something, what might be embarrassing for the king. This kind of thing is fascinating, and if there could be some documents of the reasons, why the king made that kind of decision, that could give the window to diplomacy, what has been made hundreds of years ago. Why some king has ordered to move the entire city to another place?

So this is one point of view of the things. When we are thinking about the things, what is embarrassing for people, who are in control of the state, we must realize that if the orders for punishment are coming from the king, there is something that is embarrassing for the rulers of the state. The reason why the absolute monarch was above the law was that this thing made him independent.

Nobody allowed to prosecute king, and if something puts that man to the difficult position that thing must have very big power and effect to the king, because of the independency meant that king must not even answer to prosecutions. So why the king was not told some reasons, for the war his henchmen? What that person hide? There are many cases in history when some rulers have been hidden the real purpose of the military actions and persecutions in the religious mask.

The list is long and it starts the ancient Greek kings and continues to Huguenot persecutions and actions of communists, nazis and far wing radicalism in the modern days. So the thing is that religion has been a thing, what has been the reason, why people have been ordered to the army, and attack against each other. Also, kings justified their power that they were got the authority to rule countries from God and if somebody disagreed that means the blasphemy.

What if the rulers of the world must live the life of minorities or some other ways intolerated people before they start their campaign?

What if the rulers of the world must live the life of minorities or some other ways intolerated people before they start their campaign?

Here I just saw one "What if" movie in the Facebook, where is asked, "What if people with down syndrome ruled the world?". This thing brought one very interesting thought in my mind, and that is that most leaders of the world are very popular persons, and many of them have not faced things like discrimination in the working or some other life. And here I just started to think, should the leaders of the world face those things themselves, before they would start to lead or become the candidate of the election campaign.

That kind of experience could be a very instructive thing and that would teach those people, how good things like membership of the team or society act in real life? How tolerate people are with things, what are not persons own fault? There are many sad experiences about people, who have claimed to be defenders of the "ordinary people", but when they are in power, they have started to discriminate people, who are somehow different than the majority of the citizens.

When we are seeing cases when somebody resists things like gay-laws or the same-sex people marriage, and start the political campaign against those things, we are facing the truth, that there are still people in 21st century, who cannot tolerate that minorities have same rights with them. The thing what brings feelings to visible must not bigger than that, and then some people are starting to make demonstrations against those things. Here I must ask, who cares about who are you married? Whose business is your marriage?

Then we would go to our next favorite question, what concerns about abortion. Here I must say a couple of things about abortion. The first is that marriage has nothing to do with abortion. Second is that I would not give birth to a single child in my life. Third is that legislation is not the same as medical science. Things like abortion trips to other lands are making abortion prohibiting laws ineffective, and wealthy people can circle them anywhere they want.

Poor women must give born to their children, and that thing is a problem. When we are thinking about history, the orphanage children were good "material" for military forces, because they had no families, who missed them. And the royal guards were chosen were selected from the group of orphans. Their loyalty was guaranteed by introducing the ruler of the nation as their "big brother" or "father", whose orders those people must follow.

But let's go back to abortion and the difficult things about that. We know that women should have that right, and that's it. But there should also be choices for that thing. Why we don't offer free prevention for people? Sometimes there is told, that this kind of things would cause the increasing number of the venereal disease. But the truth is that people would get one-night relationships anyway, and this makes things like condoms, what is protecting against things like HIV necessary. The thing in those very dangerous viruses is that people are infected also when they are drunk.

And most of the one night relationships are forming in the cases, where people are drunk. When we are thinking cases, where another part of the relationship has been working as a prostitute, we must realize that the clients of that person might not tell you about this thing. Also male can work in that profession, and they might have women and male customers, which makes those cases little bit difficult. Those things are not seen outside, and people would not tell that thing while starting a relationship.

If we would think that some people are telling that the new spouse has been working as a prostitute, that means really good poker face, because that means that person confesses to using that kind of services. And would we believe that thing anyway? And who is interested in this kind of past anyway? If a person has a good education, and long studies behind, and works as a lawyer or microbiologist, that kind of claiming might harm the career of the blackmailer worse than their target's career.

And those things must be proven anyway, or there would be prosecutions about the defamation. By the way, those things are not crimes. The deliberating HIV in purpose would be an attempt to murder people but the other things are outside the criminal law. And in those cases, when prostitution has been happening in the countries, where it's crime the prosecutions must be proven as truth by the prosecutors. I know that I wrote provocative, but try to stand.

That means that a person might have the venereal disease even that inmate wears nice clothes. And the thing is that that adult people have always had other relationships than the single one, and the infection can get from one night. Not a single male has not given birth one single child yet, but that thing is always forgotten when we are talking about abortion, and my personal opinion is that the well-done prevention and chemical abortion are the best ways to handle those things.

So if there would be an accident, that case should be done as fast as possible, and that makes things safe and clean. This thing seems very cynic, but the cell-level morula remove would be the best choice in the case, where abortion is the humanitarian solution like in cases, where a woman cannot or don't will to born child.

And the other thing, what is interesting is that those people can tolerate only thing, what is supporting their own opinions about things. When we are facing people like Donald Trump, who are acting a little bit of differential way than other politicians, we must ask why people who cannot tolerate that man, and his way to act are always calling him to help? Why the name of the leader of the state is always found when something that writer cannot accept happens?

Sometimes I have asked is the negative attitude for that man occur, because Trump has seen also the negative side of the American dream when he made the bankruptcy. This is the thing, what we must realize when we see that man. But I know that he acts a little bit different way than other people, who have the same power.

About teaching, leading and influencing the attitudes

About teaching, leading  and influencing the attitudes

In modern time teaching is not one direction operation, were teacher or lecturer just talks, and pupils or students just listen to the wise words, what that person says to them. In the modern version of a teaching and educating, the teacher is observing the pupils or students and try to find out their weaknesses and strengths. And then that would make possible to get involved in the wrong things, what that person makes. What are those "wrong things"?

One of the best ways to turn down the problems is to tune the attitudes about people for defending supporting the motivation of education. Good motivation and positive way to think that education would give something in the future would help to survive in the school. If a person thinks that everything is boring that attitude would turn everything else turn to boring. If the attitude to drugs and alcohol is positive that thing would turn very expensive career in some correlation system. Those things should always think when people start school. Young age is a very good time to fix the attitude problems and grow self-esteem.

And we must realize that we are ever ready. There is always something new to learn, and that thing what this way to think support is the lifetime learning. Self-advantage is always allowed, and those things, what people are learning might be paintings, dance some new sports. As well as some new language or way to make new computer programs. The learning can support own hobbies, work-life or both of them.

The wrong attitude is always the problem, what would create mode problems during the class, and if there are enough problems the entire school would go in the wrong direction. And in the worst case that causes the person chooses the career as the professional criminal. But the thing that the teacher notices the problematic attitude requires certain freedoms, what were unknown in the past.

The thing is that the freedom uncovers, what kind of people are belonging in the pupils or students social network, and what kind of things that person wants to talk. And if the pupil or student would believe in that person handling everything in the school better than a teacher, or even doesn't need the education, would that thing also uncovering in the freedom. Don't understand this thing wrong. The thing is the authorities must be followed, and teachers are the authority in the classroom. They must have power and authority to order things, and if those orders would not be followed the punishment must be given immediately.

But when we are meeting pupils, who think that they must not follow the rules, what the school has been given, we must compare this thing the situation, that somebody would come to the prison after the rough and long series of crimes. Those crimes might be overspeeding or stealing things or some more serious things. And in this case, the same things what those prisoners are thinking about orders can compare to the things, what pupils or students thinks about the orders.

Who told them, that everything that they do or think to do is accepted? Who told puṕil that the beginning of school day is free, and that person can choose does the school day begin in the eight, ten or half-past one afternoon? There are also things, that somebody believes that homework can be left undone, because of some hobbies, which is the wrong attitude, and those ideas need correction.

And then who told that every kind of behavior and cheating is allowed? Those things must find out, and the child must be taught that those things are not tolerated in regular life.  When we are thinking about situations, where pupils are making their own rules, we must understand that it's a very good way to find out about those children attitudes and expectations about school. But the authorities must be handled by critics. The thing is that every person, who is thinking to be auctorial should not think as that kind of person.

Or what would you think, if some alcoholic or dosser comes to use authority to a younger person because being elder is justifying that thing? That thing is called as criticism. We should teach youngsters, that they should understand that every elder person is not a "nice man" or "nice woman" at all. When we are thinking about education, and things what that thing is causing in the society, that thing transforms even the biggest leaders to the normal people, who also might make mistakes.

This is the thing, what Greek philosophers meant, what they were spoken about "stealing the fire from the Gods of Mount Olympus". Education makes people suspicious, and that is a bad thing for the authorities, what are arguments their way to use power as the term, that their way to operate is only the right way.

That kind of things is an interesting way to think, and when we are thinking about dictators, who are ruling their nations with an iron hand, we should ask them "who told that they are only possible choices for leading the nation"? Those things are really interesting aspects when we are thinking about the relations between education and power. The thing that everything comes from above the pupil or other person makes life easy.

But otherways that kind of things passivate people, who would not make a thing without separately giving orders. The thing in the absolute monarchy and dictatorship is that people would believe that they can live without thinking a thing, and without responsibility. And that thing is still visible in the ex-communist nations. The spontaneous way of making things is somehow missing in those countries, because of the bureaucracy.

And that thing influences still in the everyday life of those nations. If human must wait for command whenever something should be done, and if something has been done before that command would that cause that everything must be done again. That thing highlights the position of superiority but at the same time, the henchmen would be lost their will to spontaneous work. This is one way to see the complicated relationship between power and education.

The Roman strategy was to keep the friends far and enemies close.

The Roman strategy was to keep the friends far and enemies close.

The way to think that the Roman empire would want to keep the enemies close and friends far were very good for the military forces of the empire. That set was able to put the Roman enemies between two fronts if that actor attacks against Rome and the second thing in this kind of strategy was that the fights would happen in the enemy territory.

That denied the propaganda against Rome, where the propagandists claimed that all fights were happening at the Roman friend's territory, and claim that the friendship was one side. But the thing was also very practical. 

The Roman gladius units can raise the enemies against Rome if some legion commanders would think, that they were Emperors and that thing kept legions in the work, that those men would have no time to think about things like they were suitable for rule the state. Those things are really interesting.

The people who have control masses would always want more and more power and the things what made those people want the final rule was interesting. For those people the power is like a snowball, they always want to become more and more powerful, and get the higher and higher ranks. And the little war was a good place to end those willings. The end was an arrow to back, and that ended the dreams of that military leader. The Roman way was, that the military leaders were not too popular, and that guaranteed, that somebody would tell to the emperor if the person thinks something, what was not tolerated.

And the thing was that without sharing information taking the control in the empire was impossible. Or would you think, that the new emperor would get always the authorization for the ruling? 

But when the thing is moved to our world, there is always somebody, who needs to be better than somebody else. There is always unnecessary secrecy and the people, who are in charge are always deny the information from their henchmen.

Sharing the information to henchmen is somehow disgusting or shame, and that means that the henchmen would not even know, what they have to do. If we would transfer that thing to the Roman warlord, the ability to share the information would save their life because the henchmen could keep shield to protect their back.

But otherwise, that thing could inform the Emperor, what could cause execution. And the thing is that if the legion would be ordered to march inside the Roman city, that order would cause death.

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

When we are looking at some king of street gangs, we see how those people are driving with expensive cars and wearing expensive clothes. At the same time, the henchmen are wearing cheaper clothes, and other things are worse for the henchmen. And that thing makes easy to notice the rulers of the gangs.

The thing that the street gang bosses are wearing expensive clothes is happening because that person wants to prove to be better than others. The similar effect has been seen in the clothes of medieval kings and Roman emperors.

The golden wagons were rising the ego of those persons, and they believed that they selected by some power, what was above the people, and the same argument was used by medieval kings when they augmented their way to use power against normal people. The ruling was a holy mission of those people, and that justified them to do whatever they wanted to do.

Those people used the most expensive clothes to prove their position to regular people, and maybe they needed to think that they were somehow better or above other Romans. And in modern states, many dictators are driving with expensive cars, and the car, what that person uses is probably the unique piece in that country.  In the North-Korea the leader of the state drives by using expensive Mercedes, and others are using cheaper vehicles. That isolates and also rises the leader of the nation above other people.