Public opinions might be different from real opinions

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

When people are telling their opinions publically, the real opinion of that person might be different than they think in their mind, and that will be explained that we all have will to please the bosses and great audience. That means that we sometimes are talking things, what other people want to hear. Or otherwise, because of respect, we will let people have their wrong opinions or pseudoscientific arguments because we want to please them, and that's why we let them say things, what is wrong or even dangerous.

We The problems with metering are that some people are using different kind of tools than others and in those kinds of cases, the problem is how to make people understand, that something that they cannot see might be true anyway. Many times those people have made a long career in some respected areas. And that would make a little bit difficult to say against them.

Let's take one example of the things, where many people just believe something, but the research has shown things being a little bit different than people expect. That case is bitumen, the real thing is that this material is the most stiffed liquid in the world. That thing has been proven by putting a piece of bitumen in the funnel, and during tens of years, those bites just flew down the funnel.

The thing is meanless in normal life, but cases, when somebody will repair the vacuum tanks and space stations, would that thing be in the vital role. If the place what would be used to repair the hole would be sucked to the vacuum, the results would be devastating.

Respect is bad for research. And good researcher should respect nobody.

When somebody is collecting the statistics and asks people opinion of some questions, there have ever discussed things like the majority of the population might not have opinions at all, what consists some question. But they give answers anyway. And in some cases, people don't even listen to questions what the Gallup poll maker asks.

And in some cases, they would give the name of the politician, who has become in their mind. Or what would you think about the situation, that some bodybuilder with the political police branch will come to ask the opinion about the state leader's policy? In this case, the wise man will say "yes", because in that case, the wrong answer will cause a bad result.

And there are always people who, have 20 years of experience of something, but their roll meter would not meter something, and that makes things wrong. In the science metering, something would be happening by using special equipment, and those lasers and other things will give results, what are the size of a micrometer. In that case, respect would sometimes cause that nobody fixes the answer.

The thoughts about scientific research

The thoughts about scientific research

Only empiric research give results, what can be accepted scientifically

Scientific research means empiric testing, what is made in the controlled space, and when the simultaneously made last, where is used the same equipment and arrangement. When the tests would give the same result every time, is theory turned to the scientific truth. But before that, we must make some theory, what should prove by using some test series.

When we are testing non-living particles like stones or chemicals, we are facing the thing, that the tested particles are passive, and they would not say a thing about the test. But when we are testing things like humans, we are facing the object, who has own will and what can also tell lies for hiding something, what that inmate would not want to tell other people. And this makes human tests, where is tested the psychological things like learning or ability to observe something.

Humans are the most unpredictable objects for research, because we have own will, and we can give the wrong information. The reason for that could be that person fears to uncover something, what causes discrimination. 

This kind of things is really hard to make because the test persons would be hard to recruit if the tests are made for testing some kind of abnormalities or persons, who are different than other people. People are afraid to be different than others, and that means that sometimes coming to the tests is really difficult for people, who are some kind of different than other people, because they are afraid of being marked in the eyes of society.

But let's go back to scientific testing. Before the tests have ever been made, normally scientists would not able to say anything about the thing. So there is not "of course there is" or "of course there is is not" answers for some questions. One of those questions is, that is traveling faster than the speed of the light possible?

Before research is done, there is no way to say "yes" or "no" to some theories.

When we are thinking the gravity, we are facing the physical principle that the particle is dropping in the center of gravity in the speed what is the same what is the escaping velocity from the object. And if the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light, the object would drop in the gravity field faster than the speed of light.

This makes that the object will suck even the light in it. That thing, that even the light cannot resist the gravity is visible in the Black Holes, the supermassive objects on Universe, where even the light cannot escape from that particle. Black Holes are giving the impulse for the researchers and developers, who are creating spacecraft, what can travel faster than the speed of the light.

When we are creating theories and hypothesis, we forget that something that is impossible on Earth might be possible in the space there is no free oxygen on the atmosphere. In those conditions, the materials like gasoline would warm in extreme high temperature, without the risk that the hydrocarbon would start to burn. In the chambers, where is used the specially controlled gas mixtures, are possible the special catalytic processes, what are impossible in the space, where is the oxygen.