Can we predict evolution?

Image above: Glowing corals entice nutrients like small water insects. 

Why are species advancing? The reason for that is that the species must get nutrients. And they must get descendants. The challenge is that if the species is good prey for hunters it dies before it can make descendants. If the hunter is too dominating, it eats its food to end. And that thing can cause extinction. Same way, if some animal is a too easy target. That causes extinction. 

For success, the species must ensure its nutrient source. Without nutrients, the species is gone. So, that's why corals are glowing. Glowing corals are a good example of how a thing that seems meaningless has a big role in evolution. 

When we think about the reason why corals glow, we can answer that the glow of corals is meant to entice food. Because bioluminescence increases the nutrient level of corals higher than corals that are not glowing, that makes glowing corals stronger. And they will take over space from other corals. Sooner or later that thing causes the accumulation of genetic material that makes corals glow. That means corals are starting to glow brighter. 

So we can think that maybe in the future glowing corals are turning more common than other corals. The reason for that is that those corals get more nutrients than their competitors. If shining coral is next to coral that has no shine the nutrient that is mostly small sea creatures will go to shining corals. And that decreases the nutrient level of that dark coral. And maybe someday shining coral gets all food. 

This is one version of how we can predict evolution. But then we must realize that there are many types of evolution. This is one version of how we can predict evolution. 

But then we must realize the thing, that evolution is not always biological. The next list includes a couple of examples of that thing. 

1) Natural evolution. That is the regular advancement of the species. 

2) Cultural evolution. That thing can increase the success of some species. 

3) Technical evolution. When some system is turned old-fashion there is a need for a new and better system. One of the examples of technological evolution is the history of electricity. 

4) Economic evolution. When some model in economics turns useless or too expensive. The new model replaces it. The modern economic model bases the growth that continues forever. But we know that this model is impossible. But economic evolution is an extremely large sector. So maybe I will return that thing later. 

But also the development of other civil and military equipment is a good example of technical evolution. When a new product is entering marketing that product must answer to need. If the new product is superior, that means old products and models must step away from the new product. 

When we are thinking about the problems of electric cars the first challenge was to turn the infrastructure so that electric cars can recharge their batteries The new equipment must have support. If there are no charge points for electric cars, there are no electric cars. 

Light bulbs and electric stoves replaced gas lamps and stoves because electric lights and stoves are safer than gas versions. If somebody leaves the gas tap open, that thing turns the gas light and gas stove into thermobaric bombs. Electric light and stoves can cause a fire but they are not as dangerous as gas lamps and stoves. 

The next big step in technology, environment, and culture is AI. AI can control the use of electricity and use of natural resources more effectively than ever before. And AI can turn life more comfortable than ever before. 

Modern lights are using light diodes that decrease their use of electricity. And in future the artificial intelligence can control stoves. That system can see if is food ripe enough. And the system can control if the person is at home. That means stoves are part of the network. If the chef sees that something is missing, that person can visit the shop. 

When the person will step out the door. The system says that the person is cooking and asks where that chef is going. When the chef says that he or she is going to shop the AI will calculate the time how long that thing takes. Then that system adjusts the temperature to the right level. The artificial intelligence can also ask when the person wants to eat, and then adjust the cooking temperature precisely right.

Also, the AI can ask what food the chef wants to make. And then it uses surveillance cameras for seeing if there is the right raw material in the cupboards. And then the system says that if something is missing. The AI can same way asking if a person wants to order those things from the shop. Or would that person want to go shopping? 

When we are thinking about energy production we must realize one thing. We have developed energy transportation tools. 

But there are no new energy sources since nuclear energy. The large-scale use of solar power is a new thing. Same way geothermic energy is a new thing. The fact is that nuclear power can be safer if the nuclear reactors are put in deep underground caves. If the reactor is hundreds of meters below the surface that protects it against terror strikes. That means that the reactor can place in the same depth as nuclear waste final disposal. 

https://scitechdaily.com/yale-study-suggests-that-evolution-can-be-predicted/

https://scitechdaily.com/a-mystery-solved-why-does-coral-glow/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/a-mystery-solved-why-does-coral-glow/

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The galactic civilizations

Futuristic alien city

The galactic civilizations or Kardashev scale 3 civilizations are the speculations of the models of advancing intelligent lifeforms. And I certainly hope that humans would someday in the future after thousands of years reach this scale. But the fact is that before species would turn to galactic or even interstellar scale civilization it must first conquer its solar system. 

That is the first step for conquer the entire universe. But for taking the first step in the Kardashev scale the species must have the motive to make that kind of step. Making the bases to other planets is not cheap. And that's why there must be some kind of motive for that kind of investment. 

One of the reasons why the civilization would want to establish bases and then cities to other planets could be the lack of raw materials and then overpopulation. The thing is that making the cities for ordinary people who have no training for space operations is a little bit different thing than making the base for maybe 20-50 highly-trained specialists. 

If the species want to solve the problems of overpopulation by dumping its people into space. That requires extreme high-class construction skills and also huge investments in technology.

Even the cities with a population of millions are not solving the problems of planetary-scale overpopulation. But creating large-scale bases for the other planets can cause the chain reaction that makes civilization take the next step in the Kardashev scale and conquer the other solar system. 

There can be two types of population in the civilization of tomorrow. The spaceship crew that ever land to planets. 

Those creatures might awaken during the journey. And the crew that is landing on planets. The last ones might travel in deep hypothermia or frozen in zero degrees kelvin. 

The scale of the universe is enormous. And that means if there is no faster-than-light technology the journeys between solar systems take a very long time. So the advantage of that kind of civilization can be that there are two types of citizens. 

The population that lives in the spacecraft all their life. And the population that lives on planets. Maybe the last ones are traveling between solar systems in deep hypothermia. And during those journeys, the generations of the ship crew are chancing. 

The thing is that there are lots of resources in the solar systems. But resources are not endless. And sooner or later all asteroids are used in artificial worlds and cities that are under giant domes. So the civilization would start to move to another solar system. In that case, there could be other civilizations that might resist those conquerors. 

And that can begin the star wars. The war between civilizations is not a very nice thing. The weapons that those civilizations use might be antimatter clouds and mega-lasers that can terminate entire stars. In some scenarios, the Kardashev II-scale civilization would be the biggest threat to other civilizations. 

That kind of civilization might trust its technology and skills so much that it can try to sweep other civilizations away from it. The thing is that if two civilizations are on the same technical level. That thing might force them to discuss things. And maybe death stars and antimatter cannons are helping to make bridges between civilizations. But the future might show the future of the human race? Is it bright or is it dark? The choice is us. Or our descendants. And we cannot see the future. We can just try to predict it. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

Virgin Galactic space shuttle

Space tourism is opening the road to solar system-scale operations and stable bases at other planets. 

Space tourism is making it possible to create technology that allows non-trained persons to fly at orbiter. Those kinds of systems are needed in the most dangerous moments of space trips. The lifting-off and return are the most dangerous moments in space travel. 

Space tourism can be the key to conquering the entire solar system. Today the space tourist's journeys take quite a short time. The future can be different. And some companies are creating plans for space hotels where people could stay longer time. 

That thing can cause some kind of changes in the proteins of neurons. The article below this part of the text highlights that there are no structural damages in brains. 

The thing is that the astronauts are staying in ISS for about 4-5 months. And the space tourist spends there about 1-2 hours. So the brain damages might be not so large as they could. 

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/931125

Image:https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/virgin-galactic-richard-branson

https://aboutspaceandtech.blogspot.com/

Nothing is stable than changes and advancing in the universe

Nothing is stable than changes and advancing in the universe

Nothing is stable at the universe and that thing consists of the universe itself. Even the universe itself is advancing all the time, and then that thing means that the universe itself is not lasting forever. Someday the last hydrogen atom is turned helium, and in that universe what would be existed in the billions of years in the future, the main element could be helium.

So when we are looking at the advancing of the universe from the beginning, it has started as the quark plasma. But then the quarks are starting to make contact together and form protons and neutrons, and this thing has caused that the universe has turned to the atomic universe.

That thing required decreasing the temperature, that the electrons could take their place in the cores, what are orbiting the protons and neutrons. After the temperature has been decreased enough, the atoms have started to make contact with another atom and formed the molecules. So this universe, where we are living can be called as that molecular universe. But then the temperature of the universe would continue decreasing, and that makes possible to forming super-large molecules.

The decreasing temperature along with increasing helium level causes that the form of material has turned to another. In that universe is also forming stars, but they are bigger, and they are fewer because those stars are burning helium in the fusion reaction. And the universe continues it's advancing and transformation because the stars are burning always the lightest elements. In the helium universe, the planets are looking at the same what we know, but they might form the same homogeneous elements, and that would turn them another type, that we ever can imagine.

After the helium universe, the advantage would turn to the carbon universe. In there the main elements in the space is carbon. There are lots of supernovas in that universe, and there are also only a few stars. Those stars are forming of the carbon, and other materials are forming the molecule balls. In that universe, the planets can turn to giant fullerene balls, and that would make them fascinating and different than we ever thought.

The thing in that universe is that it is very cold but gravity would win the expanding someday. The decreasing of temperature is causing because the size of the universe is getting larger, but there is the same amount of energy or electrons, which means that the density of energy is decreasing. And here we must remember, that gravity always wins, and then happens the big crush. Before the big crush is the moment, what we can call as the "big silence".

At this moment the universe is in its largest point, and then the particles would start to drop in the point where everything has begun. So when the density of the universe is growing, the temperature is rising, and the universe would start to repeating the sequences, what it went over during the expanding process. And this makes the universe so interesting and mysterious thing.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg/1280px-M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg

The right-wing politics and nationalism

The right-wing politics and nationalism

Right-wing politicians are always connected with the nationalism and another kind of things like militarism. But when we are looking at history, also left-wing movements are supporting military and being even more militaristic than right-wing governments. And as we see in the cases like uniting Germany the same politicians, who were like national heroes, turned to be the most unpopular political leaders in the history, and Helmut Kohl flees from stages in the rain of eggs. But when we are looking at the right-wing government's relationship with independence, we must remember that popularity is a volatile thing.

When the leaders of the government are telling that some nation should make union with another land, and sometimes those leaders are telling that their nations should leave those unions. This is the thing in history, and always there is some argument, what supports those decisions. And the opinion of the journalists has always colored the news about those big things. When we are thinking about the crisis and constitutional problems, we must remember one golden rule: that thing is that also constitution is how we want to read that text.

When we would think that some Great Britain flees from the European Union, we must say, that there might be people, who are willing to begin new discussions with the membership of the same union. This kind of things is typical for the politics of today. And one of the thing, what brings this kind of things in the public is that there are so few things in the world, what are giving topics for media.

One of the major things what gives breaks for military solutions in crisis is that the new nations are joining the "nuclear club", and will to get those armaments are decreasing the will to get military solutions in conflicts. The nuclear weapons have influence, that the leaders of the nations would want to discuss things more than ever before. There are many things changed in the world, and one thing is that the so-called "official press" doesn't control information anymore.

And that brings so-called faked news closer to the normal people than ever before. But one question remains on the air. Why we ever discussed how attitudes of reporters have influenced to the text, what is written about something? There has been news also in respected media which is prejudiced in purpose or without purpose. That means that when we want to believe something very hard, that thing might make us blind. We might not understand that something, what we might think as fact might be an only rumor. And do we ever dare to confess, that we are wrong?

What if something that we have believed as true proven as lie or wrong? Would we want to go to the front of people and say, "I've been wrong in 20 years"? In those cases, the question is about authority. Somehow the attitudes of the community are that elder people are always right. That thing is of course because we need to respect those people, but when they are wrong, and the case is scientifically proven, we must accept that thing.

But would we want to confess that thing to our children? That's another difficult question because that thing would turn the image what we want to give our children different. We would not be perfect anymore. In my childhood were people, who teach that adults were perfect, and they didn't make any mistakes. And in younghood, we hoped to get the same position what our parents had. But then the Internet and social media turned things.

We had the opportunity to check facts from the sources, and that made the first time possible that we were wrong in front of our children. In our younghood, the books, where were information were too high, that we couldn't take them, and suddenly we could get all the information straight from the net, and that turned us erring people. Even if we would not that our children see from the internet how children should make, and we can censor those pages by using authority, we cannot censor the homepages what are telling what is going on on Earth, or what is going on in space programs.

In the past, we could say, that we need that telephone and modem, but then we got high-speed mobile Internet, what made those excuses impossible, and that means we must say that we are right because adults are always right. And sometimes those things cause little bit embarrassing situation when our children open the homepages, where is the data, what is against our opinion.

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

In the future, the eavesdropping and motoring tools can installed in the human body by using surgery. That kind of system would transmit every word and think what people would speak or see around to the NSA headquarters. And this kind of things might revolutionize the spying and dark operations.

There is a very interesting thing, that some poltergeist phenomenon would be created by using the TRW (Technical Remote View), which means that the camera prosthesis of the eye would be connected to the cell phone. Or the prosthesis itself can be equipped with the data connection straight to the internet, or by using the GPS system, that prosthesis would be connected straight to the satellites.

Because the eye prosthesis where is the camera is connected to the nervous system, the user would not probably know, that the prosthesis is sending data to the third party. And then if the system is operated by NORAD, it can use laser satellites to create the poltergeist. That means that if the person, who has this system looks at something, the operator of NORAD must only target the killer satellite to that point.

When we are thinking the implanted microphone on the ear, that implant can put in the ear, by using the same method with a surgically implanted hearing aid. And the difference between eavesdropping system and hearing aid would be that the other would send the discussions to the third party.

The thing is that that equipment can installed in the body without the inmate would not even recognize this thing. The cornea can cover the entire camera and the person would feel the touch to the eye similar, what it is normally felt. The eavesdropping system can installed behind the eardrum during some other medical operation, and the inmate would not even recognize that surgically installed eavesdropping equipment.