Discussion and algorithms

Discussion and algorithms

When some discussions on the Internet have interesting topics, that thing will bring clicks to that thing. And when the algorithm is following the number of clicks per time unit, it would raise the rank of this thing. The idea is the same with every case of Internet marketing. The idea is collecting as many clicks as possible, and there is nothing important.

So the text, where it is claimed that there is somebody naked, and the terms "unclean" in those texts is important if the writers would want to get the clicks. The thing is that the time, what those people will spend in those places doesn't matter. And the thing is that if the person would collect very much clicks, there is needed the clicks, and thing, what makes people find out that page.

On the Internet "find" means that users are clicking those homepages. And this is why there is only one thing, what is needed to put in those pages. Interesting keywords, and the code, what would automatically change the page. That code, what automatically clicks to another page can be used in many ways. The code could be used as the ring topology, which means that clicking the "gate page" causes clicks to the homepage entirety.

But the thing, that makes it possible to share the homepage links to multiple users is just to build a large social network in social media. That means that when the person shares some links, as many users as possible can see that thing. The problem is that people must see things, what is shared in social media.

If there are many messages on social media, the messages can move at a very high speed. And people must click those links, what they see. But the thing is that the large network would guarantee the publicity, and clicks to those homepages are sure, when there are many people, what are seeing those messages. A large social network gives value to the person. And the idea is similar to normal business. Good network with the right persons guarantees the interest for the things, what are spoken and written in that social environment.

Why we all have chairmen in meetings?

Why we all have chairmen in meetings?

In the beginning, we must realize, why we have meetings? When we are making new kinds of business strategies, or new product, we need people who innovate things. The thing in the real world is that the best innovators are not the best experts in every sector in projects, which might handle strategies or making the merchandise.

When we are making new things in the company, we must analyze the possibilities and threats of that thing, what we are going to do, and that kind of thing is really difficult to think. We must first think, of course, the benefits of that thing, and then we must take negative brainstorming to find out weaknesses, and then we should look at those things, and find out, how we should solve problems, what we are facing. And then we must collect the all possible data of that kind of project, and think that the project is like a ball, and if that ball will bring us or our company more benefit that problems we can kick the ball to roll.

And then to the leadership. When we or somebody else is taking the role in the company as the team leader, the thing is that everything will begin from self-knowledge. What kind of person I am is the key to effective leadership. People who are sitting around the same table with us, are some kind of personalities. They might be dominating or they can be shy, and the thing is that we are also some kind of personalities.

We are one person on that table. And we are all making mistakes. That's nice that people are willing to speak and share their opinions, and it's nice that somebody listens and marks everything in memory. But the problem is that we should combinate those skills. And in that process, we are facing things, that somebody speaks a little bit silent voice. But the thing is that that sometimes we are facing something embarrassing, and that thing is that we are finding those things, what is irritating us from our personality.

We might be too dominating, speak with too low voice or do something else, what we should not do. And the worst case in this kind of situation is that we are ourselves persons, who are making those mistakes. We cannot find anywhere people, who we can blame about things like digging nose on the table, where is highly trained people. So, nobody is perfect. We must find out our weaknesses and strengths, and that would help us to live with those things. Everything begins from self-accepting, and then we can accept other people.

Here I must put a little thing, what we must realize. Sometimes our boss has the thing, that we cannot accept. And in that case, we have two choices. Learn to accept our boss or change the workplace. Or there is, of course, the third change is that we can call our rich uncle or aunt, and ask would that person change that boss, but every people has not wealthy relative who has a so-high position or good relationships, that the boss would be changed when we want. So we must accept the boss as that person is.

Why leadership is important in meetings? The reason for that is simple, the leader's job in the meeting is to make sure that also shy and quiet people would get allowed to speak. One of the reasons for that is that those people, who are sitting in those meetings are hired individuals, and there is a need to get them to share their knowledge. The thing is that if the quiet and shy person is the lawyer, who is hired to find out is some decision legal or not is very quiet, the company should make that person share that knowledge with another.

Because if some decision is against the law, that could bring very big payments for the company, if it will act against law. And also many other things must be known when some decision has been made. When we are facing people in meetings we must realize, that they are hired because of their knowledge and training.

So the company pays their salaries, and that's why they are expected to share their ideas and thoughts in those meetings. When the company selects people, it wants something from them, and that's why there are leaders, whose mission is to make sure, that every person can share their knowledge in those meetings, even if that feels the waste of time, and meetings feel uncomfortable.

But when they are ordered, they are compulsory. So when the leader comes to the team, the most important thing is to find out what kind of people the henchmen are, and for that, we could make a little test for those people. In this case, we would make something, what those people don't expect or they hate. And also find out their strengths and weaknesses.

Many technical experts have good knowledge of technical things like machines and chemicals, but they don't know anything about the law. And that's why there are lawyers, wh might not even interested in technical solutions, but they know everything about law and how to use it, and in those meetings, we should combine those things.

We can make a little informal meeting, where is some kind of topics but the discussion model is free. In that case, freedom uncovers the things, what kind of people the participants are. The persons who want to dominate discussions are always very well seen, and there are of course silent people and people who have something else to do, and they don't care about those meetings at all.

Of course, we could act as some kind of leader in the cartoon named Donald Duck, and kick those people away. But this is not the model of the real-life working environment. We should remember many things in those meetings, and the thing is that everybody must be allowed to speak.

Sometimes some team member causes problems, or there are discussions, what is not meant for ears of everybody. This means that these kinds of things must not be told to those people. So otherwise, they or outsiders have not to know meetings, what are not handling things, what belongs to them. So if there is some meeting in the calendar or Email, that thing is not allowed to tell everybody.

The meetings are confidential if there is a message in the email, and then when people are going in those meetings, they would notice, who else is in place. That means confidentially. And when we are leading some meetings, our mission is to make sure, that the other people are everybody gets shared their knowledge in that meeting.

The purpose of life and passion

The purpose of life and passion

Sometimes top scientists are comparing with people like compositors. The thing what drives those people forward is a great passion, what they feel when they are doing their job. Only great passion makes people like Beethoven or Einstein, and that thing is the energy, what those extraordinary people need, for making the perfect work. Being on the level of those people, who were best in their areas could mean something very extraordinary, and extraordinary people are making great things.

When we are thinking about the great compositors and musicians or nuclear physicians and other men and women who have been top in their areas, we must realize that those people lived for music or some other work, what they are doing. The thing was that the music, making science, or whatever those people have made, and what brought them to the knowledge of great public was and still is their passion, but sometimes there is forgotten that being number one in some area, what might be very thin needs sacrifices.

If we think about the people like Stephen Hawking, we must realize that their work brought other people in their life, which might otherwise be very lonely. When we are thinking the greatest compositors in history, we must see one thing, those people had nothing else than music. They got their energy for living from music, and when we are looking like biographies of men like Ludwig van Beethoven, those people didn't even know anybody else than other musicians.

So if we are comparing people like Ludwig van Beethoven to the people like Isaac Newton and Albert einstein, we must see one thing. Albert Einstein and newton probably knew only other scientists, and that thing brought their passion to their work. When we are seeing the passion, we must understand one thing, that thing would mean, that everything that a person makes is the thing, what is excellent in the other people mind.

The good feedback gives a good feeling for those people and that thing would help to create a passion for creating new things. And the point of view things is very important. If we would think wisely, we would avoid the situation, where we are facing troubles, but if we would learn to think like an engineer, we could make many things, because we have brains and capacity to solve problems. When we are thinking things, what brings respect for us, we must believe in hard work.

And when we are practicing to solve problems, we might become something big. But if we want to become something, what makes big things, we must learn things, and through the trying and errors we can find the solution, what we can introduce to other people. This kind of things would bring a passion for creativity in the mind of people.

The writing about the way to make science

The writing about the way to make science

I have seen many people during my life, who have very strong opinions about science. And the thing is those people are always somehow defending their opinions with some other method than using scientific facts. One of the worst ways to make science is the boxing fight, where people can see, who is right in any question. Those kind of things are really funny when they are seen on television, but that things are not probably the best way to make people like surgeons.

One other version is to make people choose, who is the best of scientists, or what theory is the best? The thing is that the elections and commands from the bosses or other rulers don't make theories true or false, even they are popular or unpopular. The thing that theory is popular doesn't make it true, as well as if the theory is against the own opinions that don't make it false.

Theories are theories until they are proven true or false by using observation, where the phenomenon is simultaneous could be done in the laboratories by using the same tools for repeating the test. And if the theory is proven wrong even the most popular position of that theory in the world doesn't make it true. And the unpopular theory can be true, even it feels uncomfortable, or the introducer uses running shoes with a suit.

The interesting thing about the ability to face different opinions, we might think about things like aggression what is caused a different kind of opinions, that kind of things is a really interesting way to earn publicity. When we are looking at people who are always giving commands to other people, and who would always need to have the last and greatest opinions of every question, but they are looking always people who would give them advice.

But when somebody is giving a piece of advice, what doesn't please that kind of people, they would start to yell shut up. The question is why those people are asking the advice if they start to yell to the advisor? When some person would come to position as an advisor, that kind of people have the right to expect, that their superiorities are listening to that advice. But if those instructions are not interested in the bosses, they might make their decisions without even asking about those things.

If we are thinking about the way to make the business the thing is that every company has their way to act in the field of business. And the ruling area of the bosses is limited to the companies, what they are leading. The thing is that in business life the profit is the thing, which means something. There is always some big leaders, who are always telling others, what they should do? And those people are always getting big publicity because many people want to believe those things.

We don't want to change our lifestyle for "saving the world" as somebody wants to say. If we are thinking about the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere and its effect on the greenhouse effect, we might face people who would believe that the level of carbon dioxide does not affect, and then they are delivering that kind of information in every channel.

And then we are forgetting that the production of carbon dioxide is not a problem, the problem is that nature has a too-small capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Or otherwise, we might say that we are creating too much carbon dioxide. The thing is that people who are against the warming of our planet, have many times get very much publicity is very interesting and sad detail in the discussions of the environmental changes.

The question is that people who are thinking the same way with other people are giving very much support for their opinions, what is supporting own lifestyle. Sometimes I have thought that are those people always driving by using big cars and have money to do everything, what they want.

If we are thinking theories, what the greenhouse effect would cause, the extreme example of the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is planet Venus, where the surface temperature rises above 600 celsius. That means that carbon dioxide has a very big role in the warming of planet Earth. That means that those things are not theories any more.

Perfect virtual reality and simulation need extreme powerful machines

Perfect virtual reality and simulation need extreme powerful machines

Numbers are an awesome tool for humans, but we always are forgetting a thing, that the word of numbers is virtual. We play with things, what is a pure abstraction. In one day, I found a nice little question from some notes and that question was that what if the person, who invented the decimal system would be lost one finger? Would we have a numeric system, where the number nine would be in the place of number ten? This is a very good thing to think when we are thinking about the virtual world.

Everything in the virtual world is based that the thing has been settled, and that means virtual worlds interesting. Virtual worlds are places where everything is possible and in some theories or points of view, one of the virtual worlds is the imagination of people. The imagination brings the rules for the virtual world, and the thing is that there we can do everything, what we want.

This is the strength of the virtual world, where we can build every kind of houses, what we want, and those houses would rise in seconds, or how fast the computer can calculate the things, what will be happening in that process, what will take many months in real life. And that is a very important thing for people like architects and other inmates, who would need a cheap and powerful way to create and model their thoughts. But as we know, the cheap way doesn't necessarily mean, that the tools for that cheap solution are cheap.

Virtual reality is not only the 3D-images and nicely rolling film, which can take back when we want. It is also the simulation, how particles are moving around some objects and the size of those particles changes between single atoms to sand bites. That means that the flow of the wind and also the changes in thermal conditions would change the form of the house or any other structures. When we are observing the thermal growing and contracting of the structures, we might think that there is nothing matter, if the material is growing a couple of tenth of millimeters.

But if those growings would happen in thousands of places at the same time, that would matter. And if there would be some one-tenth of millimeter size holes in the frames of the windows what are top of the 400-meter tall building, the underpressure would cause that the flow of the air is causing the freezing in the building.

Even if that building has not to effect those holes, the extreme structures like space stations the smallest holes can be fatal. And the same thing happens in deep-sea structures. The thing in those structures is that the pressure inside them is different than outside, and that causes the problems with that structure. When we are thinking about the possibility to create an extremely tall building, we must remember, that the sea would be the perfect place for that thing, because water is supporting that structure.

If we would think about the building, what is kilometers high, that thing would be done in the sea, because in the very heavy structures would connect the floats, what will decrease the weight, what influences to the foundation of those extreme structures, what might someday build in the seas. But there are very much problems with the water flows and winds if we would want to create the skyscrapers of the seas.

The way how to create successful political movement or party

The way how to create successful political movement or party

What kind of political parties are successful in politics? The idea is that no group would ban from the voter's list, and also the party must get cooperatives also in parliament. This kind of things requires, that the name of the party doesn't give a negative image to some group of people immediately when they are seeing the name of the party.

The name of the party is very important. When some party would want to get success, it should find a balance between financial funding and the way to get votes. There is only a small group of really rich people on the Earth.  The regular people would give votes, and that's why there must not support the great financial power too much. But if the party would be profiled as the communist party, there would be hard to find funding.

And that's why the name of the party must be neutral, like the Social Democratic Party, or the Christian Liberal Party. They are not telling much about the party and its agenda, and that would make easy to change politics.  

But in the last case, the name of the party would give a negative image in the eyes of immigrants, who also give votes. The problem with choosing the agenda is, that there should find also cooperatives in the parliament if that party wants to get other parties with it in the cabinet.

If the political statements or name of the party are too radical or too tough, there would be difficulties to find the cooperatives inside the parliament, or the party can, of course, get a simple majority in that place. But that would be quite difficult in western democracies.

The thing is that the majority gives most of the votes in the election. This is what makes the creation of the political agenda very difficult, is that the people should look like an adult and avoid too radical statements. But at the same time, the political movement must wake interest in its agenda and ideology. This kind of things requires colorful people, who are speaking  "as the regular person would understand".