Precisely controlled light makes it possible to create layers that are only three atoms thick.

Making layers that are only three atoms thick can use to make the new extremely small-size microchips. But if those light tweezers can use on a large scale. That means this technology can use to create the new type of quantum materials. To the layers of some other material can put a couple of atom-thick layers. 

That is making them harder. But the ability to move single atoms can make it possible to create new and more complicated nanostructures than ever before. If that system is combined with things like fullerene or nanotubes. That means the system can install the iron or some other atoms to the carbon molecules. 

And in that case, the Van Der Waals forces between those atoms can use as the glue for making the new and more complicated nanostructures. The ability to move single atoms or only a couple of atoms at the same time makes it possible to create new molecules. Which angles are precisely positioned and that would make a revolution in nanotechnology. 

What if we could someday create the fullerene- or graphene-type material that is formed of neutrons?

If we could someday create the laser light that allows moving subatomic particles like neutrons we could make the material. That is harder than any other material. 

That material is called "neutron graphene". The "neutron graphene" is one of the most interesting hypothetical materials. If we could make the ball-shaped neutron structure where neutrons are connected with the polar connection that allows us to make the artificial neutron star on earth. If we would put that neutron structure to rotate in the magnetic field. That thing makes it possible to create a new type of generator. 

The idea of this material is that the neutrons are making the network like carbon atoms. In that structure, neutrons are connected by using their polarity as the glue. The difference between "neutron graphene" and carbon-based graphene is that the last one is forming of the subatomic particles. The neutron fullerene and neutron graphene are similar materials that is forming neutron stars. 

https://scitechdaily.com/controlling-light-more-precisely-than-ever-before-with-a-material-just-three-atoms-thick/

Image:https://scitechdaily.com/images/Controlling-Light-With-a-Material-Three-Atoms-Thick.jpg

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

Are gluons the wave movement that surrounds the superpositioned and entangled quarks?

The model of superpositioned and entangled particles

Gluons are the elementary particles when they are out from protons and neutrons. But the wave-particle duality means that it is also the wave movement. So could the form of gluons the wave movement when they are inside the proton and neutron? 

Wave-particle duality means that all particles are also particles and wave movement. First, that ability was seen in photons and the light was proven to have particular and wave movement forms. But then the wave-particle duality proved to be a universal phenomenon that happens in the quark-size world. 

The thing is that things like quarks and electrons can turn to wave movement and particles don't mean that any other things other than elementary particles can turn to wave movement and back. The reason why the proton cannot travel through the black hole. Is that the black hole will separate its quarks away from the structure. But quark an electron can make that thing because they have no sub-particles inside them. 

Protons and neutrons are the particles that are forming of the quarks. And between quarks are traveling mysterious particles called gluons. Gluons are the things that keep quarks in form. The question is could it be possible that gluon is more wave movement than some kind of particle. Could it be possible that the gluons are traveling inside the protons and neutrons by the form that is like "8"? That could mean that the gluon is the power field that is traveling between the superpositioned and entangled particles. 

If the gluon is the power field or bite of wave movement that acts like the wire that connects particles called quarks together. That thing would explain why protons and neutrons are splitting. When those quarks are rotating inside that quantum wire they are delivering wave movement through the quantum space.  So the thing that makes the proton and neutron disappear is the quantum friction. That thing causes the wave to move away from that thing. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

When the energy stress to the structure ends. The particles release the extra energy as radiation.

That radiation burst pushes particles away from each other. And that is the thing that breaks structures. 

The extremely powerful radiation can destroy even the neutron star. The idea is that the high-energetic radiation burst is hitting the neutrons that thing loads them with energy. And when the energy is released the energy radiation will push those neutrons away from each other. The idea is that the neutron star turns to the extremely high-energetic neutron bomb. 

Neutron radiation is released in two stages. First, the neutrons are delivering electromagnetic wave movement. And if that wave movement is strong enough it pushes the neutrons out from the structure. 

The hitting energy load would not break the neutron structure. The moment when the radiation is breaking the structure. Is when the energy load is ended and the particles are delivering the extra energy away. This is one of the things that we must realize when we are talking about energy and how it affects particles. 

If we are thinking that the energy load that is targeted to the object is positive energy. And the energy that comes out from the object is negative energy we must realize that the energy that travels in one direction is not breaking structures. But when the direction of the energy is turning that is the thing that breaks the structures. 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.

When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.

That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.

In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?

The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.

What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.

But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.

When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.

The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.

In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.

The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.

But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.

So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.

Is time an illusion?

Is time an illusion?

1. What is the form of time?

Sometimes physics and other people are asked the definition of the time, and sometimes they got an answer, that time is a form of energy. The idea is that when the particles are forming, the protons start to rotate, and this rotation is called "spin".

This rotation would lose the energy or forces, which keeps the particle of atoms together, and also the spin would cause that at the last the quarks, what are forming protons and neutrons are released. This thing has been proven, when the particles protons and neutrons are broken. This is the physics explanation for the thing, what is called time.

2. The energy is stable in the Universe

Sometimes people think that if we would target the electromagnetic radiation to atoms, we would make them exist forever. That thing is possible for a small group of atoms.  But the thing is that the energy is not forming, it's transferring from the place to another. There is a stable mass of energy in the Universe, and the energy is only changing its form.

It can be in the form of material, radiation or particles like electrons and quarks. And it can turn to another form. But if we want to make our universe live forever, we must open a wormhole to another dimension, what brings energy from outside. This kind of things might be the problem of the civilizations, what lives in the distant future.

3. What is the physical time?

The end of the time would be the situation, where the energy of the atoms will end. The atoms get energy for keeping the electrons on their trajectories from the outer source, and if that radiation emission would not exist, the atoms would start to break, because the rotation of electrons and the spin of those particles causes that the atom would finally break. And at least the spin of quarks is ending, which means that even the particles of the atoms would not exist.

Or actually, they exist, because there is the law in nature, what denies that material cannot vanish. It can turn to energy, and when we are thinking about the situation, that the final star and black hole is broken, those particles would exist in the form of energy. The level of the energy is so low, that it is almost invisible, but the energy exists. But if we are thinking about the time, we must find some other explanation for the thing, what makes us older.

4. Are telomeres the reason, that we are believing the time

Telomeres are small parts of the chromosomes, and they are getting shorter in each time when the cell is dividing. Those things would cause the aging process of the living organisms, and that might cause the illusion of the time. But there is a thing, what makes time very interesting phenomenon.

There is one idea, what would make the species of the distant future save the universe when the material ends. That thing is open the wormhole to some other dimension for bringing the energy from outside to this dimension, and that might save the universe.

We cannot live without time, and we can meter that thing by using a clock. So there would be the idea, that the time is the virtual force, which means that we can meter that thing, but it does not exist. And that has brought the idea, that the time is only decreasing the energy level in the Universe.

. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME3sjezuckE