What literature tells about society?

What literature tells about society?

Litterature or so-called official writings is a very good tool for deciding the attitudes in society. If some publishings are prohibited or censored, that means that something is embarrassing about those texts or writings. There are two ways to make censorship. Another is the official censorship, which is made by authorities, and the other way is that the publishers just refuse the co-operation with writers, whose texts are not pleasing them or the people, who are behind those firms.

But the opposite or mirror-version of the censorship is the books and writings, what are marketed by strong volume. Strong or high-level marketing is telling that somebody, who has money wants that everybody should read those texts. And if the government shares some texts to its officials or quests, that means that in those texts is the agenda, what the government wants to represent for everybody.

That text might be the book, what is written by the leader of the state, what means that the book is offering the window to the mind of national leader, and how the top man wants to see things. And how that person arguments things like how that person became the candidate for the elections, and other cases that would bring the light to decision for staying in power over a couple of elections.

Those things are important when other governments are planning the strategies for that nation and the policy for other nations. If the writer has a strong influence on the internal politics of that nation the profile of that person is very important.

The literature, what is brought to markets by so-called official publishers is the window to the society. And the reason for that is that the writers who are selected by publishers are so-called leading persons in the cultural society and those people want always to be people, who have attitudes and opinions about many things like the environment and social problems. That kind of persons is really good examples, what the people think about some things.

If the books are telling stories about heroism and other important things like wars, that thing tells about growing national spirit. But when we are thinking about cases, where books are telling some kind of wild west hero or old-timer social influential person, that thing would tell that those publications have been changed for some reasons. When we are analyzing the attitudes of the person they are forming in the younghood.

The way how teachers are explaining things are forming the way, how people see things, and of course, people are always against war. When we are looking at things like movements against the Vietnam war, we must realize that there is a couple of things what we must remember. There is a small difference if people are against war, or if people are against the war or campaigns what are made by the USA, and other wars have no mean. This kind of things might be seen, how people are writing about things, what have been happened in the past.

The thing is that the writers, whose texts are published are representing people, who are being young at a certain time, and that means that their attitudes are forming in the certain time in the past. That's why literature is a good window in the things, what government wants people to see. Politicians must know what people are thinking about things like oversees relationships because this kind of things is becoming more and more important.

The published text is showing somehow the attitudes about people, who are leading the cultural things. And culture is one of the best ways to influence to so-called normal people opinions.  When we are thinking about the text, it can transfer feelings, what the living picture cannot transmit. By using text the feelings can transmit precisely. And when we are thinking the text itself, we must remember that the text itself is independent of the platform, where it is published. That's why we should separate Gutenberg from the text what is published.

About the hyperinflation of the 1930s

The series of happening what caused the great depression in Wall Street was the reason because all banks were started to inherit loans back from many customers at the same time. The type of loans what were inherited were so-called network loans, what is the reason for the series of bankruptcies in the 1930s was the series of news, where one bank was faced with bankruptcy. This bank was guaranteed the loans and this caused panic in the financial area.

The thing that the falling of the stock market began in Wall Street in the 24.10 and it ended 29.10.1929. Even if that falling took about five days is the remarkable thing in world history. The effect of this thing was so powerful, that it caused hyperinflation in Germany, and around the world was depression.

The thing what caused the hyper effect of this financial falling was that the thing happens in New York, and people were not experienced readers of the news. Because people believed that everything that was written in newspapers was true, and the rumors claimed that the USA was in some kind of civil conflict the effect was extremely powerful. In that time people had no media training and they were not known about the rumors and false news. That increased the effect of the fall.

The thing what caused the panic was the news, that bank was faced bankruptcy. People read that the bank had financial problems, and that caused panic, that they should take their money out from those companies. There is a conspiracy theory, that that news was written in purpose for causing the fall of the stock marketing.

And in that case, the invisible hand, what was controlling the financial world would be the news, what investors used the sources when they chose their targets for investments. But that theory about the false news, what was written in purpose has ever proven the truth. So that thing remains only as theory. But the information is in a big role in modern stock marketing.

The information what was behind the panic and depression of the financial world was the news, where was mentioned, that one bank was falling. The thing was enough, and people started to take the money away from banks, and that caused the end of the money. When people went to the streets, they saw other people waiting at the doors of banks, and take their money out, what deeper the panic.

So the thing is that if newspapers or social media would be written information, that some currencies are falling, or some nation would not have money, that thing causes panic, which means that people start to transfer financial investments out from the country. When that thing happens, the result would be very large scale depression. This is the problems with the news what is telling about financial disasters could be used in wrong purposes.

If that information what is delivered is wrong or a little bit too provocative, the chain reaction can cause destruction. And what makes this kind of things problematic is that that news should involve real or checked material, what makes them trustable. But how normal investor can check the financial condition of some corporation if in the morning would come report of the falling value of invests?

What if somebody would just take the telephone from the table, and call to market, that the company has financial problems. And then that person could claim, the leaders of the company would cover those problems. How the company would show that there is money, what it can use to payments? The thing is that those signals are really important when investors are selecting the targets for their investments.

And if it is impossible to get trusted information about the condition of the company, that means that there could be financial problems, if people cannot see the bank accounts and money transfers. Those things are protected with banking secrecy, but in that case, somebody could turn the banking secrecy against the actor, what it is meant to protect. That means that those directors cannot get information, how they could waterproofing show that there is money in the banks, and it is not earned by selling the headquarters of the company.

The "white life" of some secret societies

The "white life" of some secret societies 

When people who are members of the secret societies are claiming, that there is nothing wrong about those societies, people should ask "why that secrecy"? What are those people hiding? When we are talking about satanism, neopaganism, and their connections with pedophiles and drug dealers, we might understand that those things are a good way to make people closing their mouth about the other things, what those people are doing in those secret societies.

One version would be making inner circle stock marketing inside those secret societies. The thing is that pedophile stuff might help those people trust together, and you know, how much money people can make in the wallet if they would get information about the things, what can raise the value of stocks before other investors.

Why people are wanted to drink alcohol in  Disneyland so much, that they want to wait for the membership of "Club 33" even the years? What is so special about that kind of clubs?

Sometimes people misunderstand the meaning of white life. That thing is meaning the purity and honorable facade, what the members of the secret societies are using against the suspects, that everything is not all right. And if the person has the white and bright side, where everything is public, we must remember that this kind of thing sometimes covers the other "black" or non-public side of the person life.

When people are covering their real nature behind the over-honorable public images, we must ask, what those people are hiding? Let's take some example of that kind of secret or non-public society, which are causing polemics all the time. That thing is the "Club 33" in Disneyland.

The reason, what makes that thing so interesting is that in that club is served alcohol, and the question is, why it is so important to drink beer in Disneyland, that person would want the membership of this kind of clubs? Every non-public societies have connected some kind of rumor about the activities, what those people want to hide from the public eye. And secrecy feeds the rumors?

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

Here is one thing, when we must realize that we are adults, and probably some of those underage persons have even don't understand things, what they are saying or writing. But there is one thing, what might make some people suspicious, that there is something else than the teenager behind some social media accounts. And if the writings and talking would seem like some kind of press conference of Vladimir Putin, that would mean that somebody else uses that account.

Here we must remember that pedophiles are using the underage person identity in the net, and also hackers and propagandists are looking for the images of cute teenagers, and those images might be used in the account, what is used to benefit those peoples purposes. Sometimes I have imagined, did Zuckerberg even understand, what kind of rock that man put to roll when he started the Facebook. And today Facebook is the only solution and many other social media channels are driving past that solution, what was "the first".

Social media is a very big thing in the world, and also political campaigns can target by using the same method with normal marketing

There are many beautiful things in the case, and one of them is that Facebook grows a very powerful tool for many things, like mapping the political opinions of the users. And also it's powerful marketing equipment, which raises the value of his corporation. Today social media is big business, and there would be billions of dollars, what the marketing companies invest in those actors.

They are creating more effective algorithms, which can be used to make profiles of the people. The same algorithms can use to make the marketing profile of the user, but the same algorithms can be used to uncover the political opinions of the people, and the election campaigns can target to the certain audience same way with normal marketing campaigns.

In some scenario, the politician would just put the crosses in the squares of the form, and then the artificial intelligence would target the campaigns to the persons, who has similar opinions with this politician. This would increase the popularity of some politician. If a candidate would press the button, where reads that this person is strictly against foreign people, the artificial intelligence just selects people, who are against foreigners.

Those people are selected by using the words, what they are writing on Facebook, and that thing helps to find people, who have the same opinions with that politician. In fact, those algorithms can help that inmate to create speeches, what have the best influence on the audience. That means they can pick things from the information, which is share shared on social media, and find the things that are easy to solve by using political authority.

When we are thinking about the value and problems with Facebook is that if Zuckerberg would want to terminate that service, that man needs very much money, because it is used as the marketing tool, and those companies, what are using it as the communication and marketing tool might ask compensation about their work, what they have done in the world of algorithms.

Mobile devices are problematic because the person can push buttons accidentally

Those algorithms are used to collect the data about the things, what people are doing on Facebook, and those algorithms have problems with mobile devices. People are striking the "like" or "dislike" button accidentally when they are using Facebook by using mobile devices. But if the user listens to some song very often, what this person "dislikes" would that mean that the button is pushed accidentally. Those systems can collect data about the words, what people are using, while they are writing on Facebook, and if the words are positive that means that the thoughts about that thing are positive.

That kind of algorithms can also compile those words and clause structures with other accounts, and that thing would uncover persons political and another kind of opinions, and they uncover also if some texts are written by somebody else. Especially if this "somebody else" is writing on Facebook by using multiple accounts. That thing would rise those accounts in the close look of the moderators.

Psychological profiles can use to wrong purpose

One of the most horrifying problems of that profiling is that those profiles can uncover if the person is some kind of serial killer. This kind of data can misuse in many ways, and one is that data, what is collected from Facebook can use to track other that kind of persons, and if some criminal would know the "trigger", what makes that person make the horrifying things, that data can use to target the violence to certain person.

This means that using that data the person, who has necessary skills can use some psychopath as the "torpedo", who makes murders for that actor, and the thing, what makes those people extreme dangerous, is that they feel that they are making the right things when they are making murders for some mafia boss. The serial killer would not have a social conscience, and that means this person ever regret things what this person have done.

And if the profile of the user is made by using long term data collection, the artificial intelligence might notice, if there would be differences with the user, what began to use that social media account and the user, who uses that account in the present day. If the interests and words are suddenly changed, that might mean, the account is taken by some other user, who uses it without permission. Here I mean that using another person's identity in Facebook or any other social media channel is prohibited.