Could the real-life spacecraft look like sailship?

Could the real-life spacecraft look like sailship?

(Picture I)

There are many uses for airships in the modern world

I have wondered, why Germans didn't make remote-controlled Zeppelin in the Second World war, what would use the TV cameras, what would send data to the operators, and then that system could drop the Fritz-X glide bombs to the targets. The upper winds of the stratosphere would be quite stable and for that operation would not need so much fuel as many people would think.

 When we are thinking about the full-size zeppelin-style airships they could allow to make the thing, what allows the surgical rooms and resting areas for the people, who are operating in the hard environment, and because the airship would fly above the weather, will the travel be stable. Those modern airships can be equipped with jet engines, and they can fly extremely high altitude because they are made by using carbon fiber, and the idea is that the hydrogen tanks would be washed, what means that all oxygen will be removed from those tanks, what might be made by using mylar.

In fact, this system uses similar technology with ECHO satellites, what would blow in the form by using hydrogen, and because the oxygen is removed, there is nothing that can burn. The mylar balls would have a vacuum, and then the hydrogen will conduct in those balls, what will be blown in the form.

Sometimes I have thought that the stratospheric winds on the higher atmosphere could be exploited in the reconnaissance missions, what are made by using unmanned airships. Those airships would use mylar tanks, which are filled with hydrogen, and the outer layer of them might be made by the carbon fiber materials, which allows them to fly extremely high altitude. Those systems might drop quadcopters to the operational area, and they might be very sophisticated. They can also collect the radio signals from the enemy radars and communication systems. That kind of airships could operate in the atmosphere of the gas planets like Jupiter and Saturn in the distant future.  The high-flying airship can also use tubes, which are equipped with the rotor, and that kind of system can create an artificial tornado, which can be a very devastating thing.

The sails could improve the operational time of the drone airships. That kind of solution could allow the thing that the airship would operate in the atmosphere a very long time because the use of the sails would save the fuel, and that will help the automatized reconnaissance airships to operate a long time in the atmosphere. In those systems would be the solar panels, and long enduring combustion systems like fuel cells, which supports the electronic equipment. Those airships would be quite small, and they can be delivered from the torpedo tubes of the submarine.

Could the spacecraft of tomorrow look like some kind of sail ship? 

In cyberpunk and steampunk stories is sometimes introduced spacecraft or airships, what is looking like some kind of sail ships, and sometimes people are asking how realistic they are? The thing is that those spaceships would have nuclear reactors, what needs very large cooling elements, and those cooling elements could pull in, and that means that they might seem the spacecraft look like some kind of sail ship. That means that when the nuclear reactor will run with high power, the cooling elements would be opened like the rags, and that kind of thing might make this kind of systems possible.

And in some of those ships of heaven have been drawn the bow, what looks like some kind of butt keel, what is a well-known thing from the ancient barge. That keel could actually be the electromagnetic version of the butt keel, what is installed in the galley, and the mission of that thing might be to target the electromagnetic radiation to the target, what could be a dangerous asteroid or some other spacecraft.

In real life, this kind of spaceships could be the future, but in fact, there might be plans to create the spacecraft, which could also operate as the ships. And maybe in the distant future, that kind of automatized space probe would sail in the Titan and other icy moons lakes, and collect samples from that strange environment. The size of those space probes might be very much smaller, than the flying ships from some sci-fi book, but the idea is the same.

Picture I https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/technology/visionaries/the-airship-a-truncated-past-a-promising-future/

Thoughts about the painting "The Last Supper" by Leonardo da Vinci (1495-1498)

Did Leonardo da Vinci rename that painting after his death?

Did Leonardo da Vinci paint that masterpiece with claiming that he was painting some ordinary painting for the decoration? And then changed that name in his testament? Is the person, who sits in the middle actually meant to portray Jesus? Or witch one of those characters is Jesus because there are two persons, who seem similar?

Are those same looking persons in the middle of the table actually Leonardo's way to remember, that there could be the twin brother of Jesus? The thing is that Leonardo painted that painting, and that means that we cannot ask about this master, what he might think during the creation process? Because this we can only use our imagination to create ideas, what might move in the mind of that master.

Is there the hidden hint of the twin brother of the Jesus? The mysterious "Lucifer-character"? 

Is there a hidden thing or theory about the twin brother of Jesus? The mythic "Lucifer". There is claiming that this character walked also in the middle of the people, but he chose the way of violence for the resistance against Romans. This means that the "Lucifer" was the man, who caused the death of Jesus. This character has been claimed to be the Antichrist, and the thing is that if that person would be worked like the Antichrist, that would cause terrible problems for Jesus.

This theory has supported the persons, who seem something interesting about the case, where Jesus went to the temple for giving the lesson. There he said that there is no need to pay, and then the Pharisees asked money. So was the price of the temple actually paid, but somebody else has used that space. And could that other person be the twin brother of Jesus?  That Is the key element in the twinkles what have been made about this painting, and the second question is that did Leonardo renamed it after his death by using the testament to deliver that message, and did he made that thing to other paintings?

There are many ways, how we might see this painting, and one thing is that the disciples would not seem to notice Jesus Christ, who sits in the middle of them. They are just talking together, and one of those inmates seems to show Jesus, who sits in the middle of those lines. That person seems to blame Jesus or the female character on another side of him, but the thing is that is it possible that the character in the middle of the team is actually portrayed St. Peter. And one of the characters seems to have sunglasses

Those people were sitting in the line behind the table, and if Jesus wants to wash their feet, that would mean that he must rise from the table. The thing is that those people seem to yell and argue together, and that means that there would not able to hear a thing in that room.  This will bring one strange idea in my mind.

Did Leonardo try to hint, that there could be the wrong man, who was arrested, and Jesus was able to flee? 

I now that this feels some kind of ridiculous. But it is possible that Leonardo thought that Jesus could flee, and that made him fear the Inquisition and death?  If that is the thing, what Leonardo thought, and he has discussed that thing with some other people, that thing could cause death. And sometimes I have thought that is it possible, that Leonardo painted that painting with another name, and after his death, that painting was renamed. So did Leonardo mentioned the name, what he wanted to give the paintings his testament? And during life, that man could claim that he painted ordinary paintings.

So the theory about this painting is that Leonardo thought that there is a possibility, that the Pharisees were arrested the wrong man during the Eastern evening. And there is a thing, which is very well known for the people, who are known for his personal history. Leonardo played ideas, and in fact, this artist might be thought that kind of things, while he made the paintings, what is marvelous and brought many thoughts in the mind of other people.

One of the most interesting things is the woman, who sits in the middle of those disciples. The thing that there is a woman in the middle of the group of the men is a little bit extraordinary, and maybe Leonardo painted that character to confess, that the people behind that table were not Jesus and his team. If we would think about this situation in the point of view of psychology, that woman would cause a schism between those men, and that would cause that the volume would be very high in that room.

Who those people really were?

There are some other twinkles about that female character, and one of them is that character is Mary Magdalene, but the thing is that Leonardo couldn't see that situation. And the thing is that how he created that image. Was there some kind of documents, what told how those people were sitting during the last supper.

They are all without shoes, and that thing would cause strange ideas in my mind. One of those ideas is that behind that table is sitting only the disciples and the point of view is the thing, how real Jesus has been seen that thing. And maybe Leonardo went a little bit too far in some other painting, and he afraid the inquisition, so he painted only the disciples.

The question in this painting is that the thing, what Leonardo da Vinci claimed that was portrayed, and what it really portrayed could be very far away from each another. Maybe Leonardo portrayed some ordinary group of people, and then there was something, what that painter should not see, and that's why he covered the thing as the religious painting.