Why does Jesus dare to do things, as he did?

Why does Jesus dare to do things, as he did?

The thing about Jesus and his relationship with John the Baptist is that when he went to take the baptism, that thing began his work in the Judea, and sometimes there has been introduced a theory that the mark what John the Baptist made launched the programming in the mind of Jesus. That thing means that the man, who we know as Jesus was someway programmed by using the same methods, what is used in "Monarch programming".  That kind of mentoring could give very much courage and believe of holy mission in the mind of Jesus.

But what was the reason, why he did things, as he did? Why did he believe to be the son of God? Who told that thing to him? And what confessed Jesus about this thing? The evidence of that must be very hard because if normal people are talking about that kind of things, they would keep as lunatics. This thing is really interesting topics about the life of the most remarkable man in history. And the question is, who he was? Was he the son of the Roman emperor, or maybe creature of God or aliens, how we should call about that man? Was he an angel, what God created in his own hands? And was the creation means, in this case, some kind of genetic manipulation?

The thing in the life of that man is that he was well prepared for his work, and there was something, what gave him bravery for making the thing, what turned to be the greatest religious movement on Earth. There is a thing that is remarkable in the tale of that man, and one thing, what we must find out is, who told the parents of Jesus, that they must leave the Bethlehem right away.

And who mentioned that the birthplace of Jesus was Bethlehem? When we are thinking that Jesus left right away after birth to Egypt, was there happen one thing, what we might ever think. Were some other people took that just born baby to custody, and did those people leave with the caravan? So was the woman who gave birth to that child the same Mary, who was introduced as the mother of Jesus? If we think that soldiers were hunting babies, who were born in Bethlehem, they must look for man and woman, who has suddenly lost stomach.

Or there is some other explanation of that strange survivability, and that is that Joseph and Mary were Bethlehemians, who was moved to somewhere else, and when the Mary gets pregnant, Joseph didn't come to Bethlehem, because the trip was too heavy. And maybe they were already in Egypt. When we are thinking about the early years of Jesus, we must realize, that those people could introduce every city in the world as "Bethlehem". But in the Bible, the birthplace is mentioned as Bethlehem, and that is the official truth in Christianity.

So were the hallucinations, which were probably caused almost death to that man, when he went to desert caused by the mushrooms, what were used in the rituals of the Egyptian priests. So when we are thinking about the background of Jesus, there is one remarkable thing, what happened in the Chrismas night, or very soon after the night, and that thing was the genocide of Bethlehem.

During that operation Roman legions killed every child in that city, and this thing might cause the rest of the life of Jesus. That means that when people told about that thing to Jesus, that thing might cause very deep feelings in the mind of that man because he was, of course, grateful, to surviving from the genocide, but the thing was that he might be very upset.

And probably he planned to make suicide in the desert. He went into the desert and made fast, and during that period he might take mushrooms for relaxing. There is a possibility that some mystics gave them for him, and that was because of this man wanted that Jesus would ask some higher spirit the advice.

I don't know could this man be jew or was he even exist, but the thing is that during the fast the level of NTP is rising in the body. And maybe the pineal gland would start to find the new connections in the brains. There is a possibility that Jesus remembers something, or he just tuned the pineal gland to the right frequency, that something was contacted him.

Could the god create the stone, what he cannot raise?

Could the god create the stone, what he cannot raise?


In the headline is the question, what  I sometimes have read from some book. The thing brought me one question about what has ever asked in public speeches. That is why omnipotent and powerful God just cannot destroy Satan?  That question has caused a philosophical idea that the human mind and the entire universe could be the computer simulation, and in this case, Satan would be the computer program that has a too strong firewall, what denies it destruction.

This so-called "humoristic" idea has been used sometimes as an example of the case, where the person makes something, what will cause regret. There is another version of this tale, that in the future if the human nervous system would be connected to the Internet, Satan would be artificial intelligence what would infect people by using brain core stimulation. The connection of the human brains with the computers would happen with brain core stimulation, and that means that in those cases the computer virus can cause very terrifying effect, and in this case, the smile of Mona Lisa can be coagulated.

In this point of the text, we must say, that God means character, who has created something, and that's the reason, God knows the weakness of creature, and that's why he can destroy everything that he has created. This is the thing, what has ever been mentioned when we are telling about our relationship with God

And the question is that could God create the character what he cannot control. This question has come in our mind, because of the research what is connected with artificial intelligence. The artificial intelligence is the computer program, which can be destroyed by the users or privileged users. In that case, the existence of artificial intelligence depends on the will of the creators or programmers, who created that thing. But could the god create something, what limits his power, like stone what is too heavy for him? Or otherwise could god create the thing, what is too omnipotent to himself?

This is the great weakness of the theological idea of the limitless God if God just doesn't want to pick the stone doesn't mean that he could not pick it.  Willing and ability are a little bit different things.  But at the same time, this is one of the most interesting questions, what theology has ever established.  The thing is that could God create the stone, what denies the omnipotence of God, but if God cannot do that thing, that means that there is a thing, what even the omnipotent God cannot create, and also that paradox denies the omnipotence of the God.

This is one of the most interesting things in theology, and that thing is telling, that there would be something, what we must think carefully. The paradox of the omnipotence would cause the thing, what we ever imagine. And that thing is that is it possible that God creates the character, what would be more than the God himself. So if there would be the character, what is more, omnipotent than the God, that thing would make the end of one of the greatest strongholds in the theology. 

If we would think that God couldn't create character what is the above himself, there is a possibility that there is a paradox in the holy texts. This thing is really interesting topics while we are thinking about God and creation. We might think one thing, and that is that if we are thinking about artificial intelligence we are the creators of those things, and when we are thinking the artificial intelligence in the point of view of this way to think, we can ask one question, are we creating the character, what we cannot control?

Michelangelo's famous fresco "The Creation of Adam"

Picture I

Michelangelo's  famous fresco "The Creation of Adam"

One of the most mythical characters in the Holy Bible is the thing, what is called as God. What and who this thing was? When we are thinking that God is the abstraction and astral character, we must ask a couple of questions about that character. The thing, what makes that character interesting, that at the beginning of the Holy Bible in the Old Testament God would take part in human life personally. In the New Testament God has transferred the power to his son. And the other thing is that this character, what has the absolute power on the Earth would allow, that the kings and rulers would act as they want, and not a single lightning would strike to them.

 But in other cases, the punishment would be extremely strict, if somebody would break the orders of God by the minimum way. When we are thinking about the case of the wife of Lot, that woman made very small broke, and the punishment was to turn to the salt statue. And in the cases of Sodom and Gomorrah, the hate of God destroyed entire cities, what was not do anything, what was not happen in other cities. By using modern language, God used nanomachines or artificial Sandstrom to destroying those cities, and the crime was sodomy.

That thing is that sometimes the term "loving father" would not s fit to God. And the thing is that somehow, that thing wanted to hide his face and identity. Another thing is that, why God didn't help Jesus on the last day? Why he didn't use mind control or some other force to make Pilates give the little bit softer punishment. But those things are only thoughts, what I have thought about this mythical power.

Have you noticed that Michelangelo's famous fresco "The Creation of Adam" contains the structure, what looks like human brains, and God seems to be in there? Or the creature, what is thought to portrait the God, and this thing is very interesting because, in the time of Michelangelo, the portraying precisely God would cause very big troubles, and the question is, how Michelangelo got his idea for this fresco? When we are looking at the structure, where God is, and when we are comparing it to images, what are portraying human brains, we must understand, that somebody must show the brains to Michelangelo, and this thing is really interesting.

Of course, Michelangelo would know that things like thinking are connected to something, what is inside the human head, but how he knew how thinking is connected to an organ, what is inside the skull. And what that artist mentioned, when he painted the touch of the god, what would transfer the life to the character, what is named as "Adam".

The thing is that in the time of Michelangelo in the 16th century there were no anatomy books, what could be bought from the shops, and maybe many people didn't even know things like an autopsy, or what is found inside the human body. So why Michelangelo painted that structure? The thing what makes that painting interesting is that "Adm" is naked, and those things were not at least more acceptable than in modern time.

Even in modern times, the naked image in the Church is not a very "common" thing, so why Michelangelo dared to make that fresco on the roof of Sistine Chapel in Vatican state? Could it be possible that Michelangelo thought that the god was spoken to people through the brains? And the thing is that the thought might be that only a couple of people were spoken with people by using the words, what god was given to them. This would be the way to think in the time of Michelangelo.

How we would transform those words in modern language? That thing would be that the alien would implant some people, who were the handlers of the aliens, who would use those people as the "human radios". But of course, that thing might feel to get a little bit too far.

The idea of this fresco might be that some character would take a person under the control, and use that body as a tool, but what that character would be? What we are calling as God, is the thing, what we should think very careful? The question is, why the name of that character should not say? And if a person would not be allowed to say that word without the reason, what would be the reason to ask God, or say the name of that thing? This is the thoughts, what this painting has brought in my mind.

Picture I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam

Horus, one of the eldest gods of ancient Egypt

Image:Pinterest

Horus, one of the eldest gods of ancient Egypt

Is the image over the head of Horus  the sun,  some other red star, grapefruit or watermelon? That's an interesting question.

Above this text is the image of Horus, one of the gods of ancient Egypt, and there is a couple of remarkable details of the stories about this god and this image. Above this character, what portrays Horus, is the red ring, where is an overhang on the left side of it, and this red ring or the ball is claimed to portray the red star, like a red dwarf. Somebody sees this red ring as the red giant star, and that is the reason, why some people have believed that Horus came from another planet. Other people see something else in this red area.

Some people see that red area as the grapefruit or watermelon, and those fruits would be extremely important because they are a good source for the vitamin C. Without C-vitamin the people would get scurvy, and if the army would have this disease, they could not fight. Those fruits are good vitamin source, and the juice, what those fruits product is good to drink in the hot desert. That juice would be easy to store, and it would keep a crew of pharaoh wealthy.

Horus-god is one of the eldest Egyptian gods and the tale about the born of this god has many similarities with Jesus. That makes Horus very interesting character, and when we are thinking the virginal born of this god, and the character as the human, what has the head of the Eagle, we must remember that if that character portrays some high-ranking official of ancient Egypt, the real identity of this person would know the only couple of persons.

That means that when some people talked about "Horus", the official would take the notebook from the pocket, and looks at who this "Horus" is in this time. So that thing, that the Egyptian gods were portrayed with heads of animals made possible to hide their identity, and maybe the "god" meant something or somebody, who has extreme superior of power in that society. 

But when we are thinking that Horus was born virginal way, we must remember one of the most important rules in the research. That rule is that we just cannot expect something if we haven't considered all sides of the story, and maybe there are something explanations of this character, which makes this character more natural than some space aliens. And the thing, what we must realize is that is it possible that the Horus is born as the test tube child.

This thing is that if we would want to create pharaoh, who has no connections with regular people, we would create the artificial child, who would plant and born from some animal. The thing is that the immune defense of animals like cows can be destroyed, and that would be guaranteed that the pharaoh doesn't have a relationship with families or anybody who is outside of place. That makes easier to control that person. But this writing is only the thinking about things like, what made pharaoh so special?

Why people have intelligence?

Why people have intelligence?

Almost every day we are facing thing, that somebody claims that some writers are just stupid, and they don't understand things. This was the attitude in the medieval period. And then somebody asked, "why those people burned in the bonfire"? The reason was the thing, which is called the blasphemy. Those people were talked or wrote something, what was against the opinion of the Catholic and Protestant church. In fact, the only thing, what first changed in the Protestant church was the language, what was used in the church.

And of course, priests were allowed to get married, and that thing was used to show that the priest was not Catholic. But otherwise the law was the same, and in the Lutheran and other protestant countries, the place of the pope was given to King, whose criticism would mean the blasphemy because the king ruled because of the will of God. The ruler of England Henry VIII persecuted protestants first, but when he turned to protestant, that man started to persecute Catholics.

The reason for that was turning was that he needed a divorce from his wife. The way how Henry VIII handled the problems in marriage was straight, he executed all his wives except one.  That kind of thing caused little bit embarrassing situation because people started to think, that if somebody needed to die because of writings and speeches that thing had influence for somebody, who had something to hide. The official attitude of the pope and other rulers was that the normal people were like children, and then somebody must die. That thing was meant that the things were not influential.

Another version about this kind of question is "why we have brains"? In the begin of the empiric research, somebody asked why we just cannot just be, and leave the thinking to god? The people, who made the research answered the person, who made that question by saying God has given us brains, so why would we not use them? In fact, at that time everything what people said and what they had done must have the reason, what should be found from the Holy Bible. In modern time there are people, who are really thinking, that they are somehow wise because they don't write or say a thing, and they just want to be.

This is one version of the wise people, that they are doing nothing, and that thing denies them to make mistakes. If the person does nothing or tries the now things, life would be safe, but then we must realize that there must be really something if we ever try new things. Because if the fear of mistakes makes the person just laying without making anything, would that support the things like predestination and descending of the position. In that model, the persons, who have not born in wealthy families are not allowed to go to higher class education, because they are born in some less wealthy families. I just wrote this thing in the last writing, but I like it very much, so I write it again, and that is that if we would be very wise, we would live on the trees and eat a banana.

I haven't created that quote myself, I have read it from some book, and I always been very sad about that, because that means that I cannot get my own quote in the history, what the wise men would use in their texts. That quote about the wisdom of living on trees and eating bananas has been written by Douglas Adams in the "Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy", and it has rotated in my head very often.

Sometimes we are facing the thing, that somebody says that the wise men ever get in the trouble. So, in this case, that kind of person would tell that people are better to be without own ideas because that thing would make other people laugh. This is the thing, what somebody would repeat and repeat endlessly. And that kind of ideas is supporting one-man leadership. In this kind of cases, the thing is that we should think carefully, why somebody wants to support that kind of things?

When we are thinking about the questions, what we should ask in those cases, we might ask what is the position of that person, who wants to support the leaders? Where that person is in the hierarchy?  If we would think about the case. that somebody, who writes about something, is just stupid, we must also think something else. Why that thing is mentioned on the front page of the biggest daily newspaper? If somebody is stupid and the writings of some person have no influence, why this thing must comment?