Devil's Tower

Image I

Devil's Tower 

Devil's Tower (1) what is locating at Wyoming, USA is a well-known national monument, which is known in spectacle Close Encounters of the Third Kind from 1977. The shape of this mountain is a little bit different than others, and there are stripes on the hillside, which makes that thing look like there was something like mud that came in the mountain and that would make this monument the biggest mud volcano in the world. 

But there is a couple of details in this remainings of the melted core, what makes some people think that there have been extremely, of far higher tower-shaped structure in that place, which top have been melted for some reasons, and then the melted material would flow down of the valley and made the unique shape for that thing. The reason what made "Devil's Tower" is found from the annex 2(2).

The monument itself is protected and sometimes people afraid the erosion could damage this mountain. The name of that place is interesting, and we must sometimes ask, what makes it the "Devil's tower"? Where is the devil? When we are looking at that strange-looking mountain, we must ask, have native Americans seen the creation of this form, what is visible in many pictures, and what has made this place well-known. 

And when we are thinking about the mysteries, we must realize, that there should be something connection between some kind of devil, and this pylon. So is this pylon artificial? That thing seems taken from far from the reasonable world. Who and why would you build something like this? And this has one very interesting answer, what might come straight from some kind of science fiction novel. 

There is a couple of non-scientific ideas, what this tower might be, but what is without scientific evidence. But those imaginational theories are fascinating, and that's why I will put them here. 

People have always said that I have a good imagination. So I think that I dare to say, that could it be possible that the Devil's Tower has been the basis for some kind of space elevator. That means that there has been some kind of artificial counterweight over this place and that would keep the cables to the space straight. But this is only theory or writing about this thing. 

That is one modification about that hypothesis, and that is that "Devil's Tower" would be the remainings of the Tower of Babel. The argument for that is claimed that the original Tower of Babel has lost somewhere in history. And the thing that the real place for that Tower is in America could explain why that tower lost in history. And of course, this kind of idea is fascinating. But there is not enough scientific evidence for proving those ideas. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devils_Tower

(2)

http://www.geologyin.com/2018/04/new-insight-into-how-giants-causeway.html

Image I

https://www.nps.gov/common/uploads/grid_builder/deto/crop16_9/893914AB-C506-A2AD-D41690FD11B7B348.jpg?width=950&quality=90&mode=crop

One writing about political commercials

One writing about political commercials

Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?

But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.

Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.

Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.

Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.

But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.

We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.

And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.

The mystery of alien megastructure has almost solved

The mystery of alien megastructure has almost solved

The alien megastructure or one of the claimed alien megastructures has been solved, and the reason for the unusual change of brightness of the star has been uncovered the asteroids, what is orbiting the star in the unusual cluster. So there might not be civilization, what would be the scientific sensation of the millennium.  

One of the things about that kind of things or structures in the universe is that we must get better observations and use the best possible equipment before we say something about those things. That kind of ideas that there could be alien civilizations are only one track in the lines of research. But we must keep our mind open when we are talking about the alien civilizations. 

We cannot remove any kind of solutions before observations. And then we must realize, that we should dare to introduce different opinions about things, what has been introduced as the scientific facts. In philosophy and science, we must realize that people need very good poker face if they want to tell that they have different opinions with the so-called big thinker. But if we want to change things, we must dare to do that. We must say something, what is different than the common opinion. 

Great scientists have always faced some kind of a cheat, and one of the best examples are the "jokes" where Charles Darwin was introduced as a monkey. Would you think that this kind of things is feeling nice? And after a long time, I sometimes think, that what the drawer of that image wanted to show? Was that person believed in being fun? 

But maybe those things allowed that the evolution theory was denied. Maybe there was some kind of voting campaigns, that how many people believed that Darwin's theory of evolution was accepted or deny. And the side, who won that election would get a bottle of beer for that thing. This kind of things is increasing the assertiveness of science. The main purpose of scientists is always fall theories, what younger colleagues have been introduced, and repeating words, what famous people have said. The science is meaning that all evidence about things is collected before the judgment has been given.

In some writings is visible the attitude, that the use of own brains is always prohibited in places like University unless it supports people own opinions. And if somebody dares to introduce other opinions what have not included the texts, what are published before those people, that would cause laughs. 

We are forgetting that we should trust some writings, and if writer shares information about what is faked for purpose or some other reasons not true, the responsibility for that information is the person who has written the original article. Not persons who use the trusted platform as the source for their articles. 

If the original article is published in the respected magazine, the people have the right to believe that the article is properly checked. And if the images are made by using photoshop, that thing would seem a very good joke. But it might cause the extra work for astronomers, who are using those images in their texts as the source. 

So when we are looking at the news about the cosmic megastructures, we must remember that we have only the knowledge, what is delivered in the news, and if we want to produce the new data about the object, we must buy the very large telescopes. So before we cannot get precise information about the object, we should make very big investments, or wait that somebody else is publishing the more precise data about that kind of things. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tabbys-star-kic-8462852-mystery-explained-dust-cloud-2017-10?utm_content=buffer89e1f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&fbclid=IwAR0B2zjEOA3cHKRIOEbrKVfKFFZUXYbjzpZeI5arwSRNwZysj2rDdaVjG6Q&r=US&IR=T

Is Pluto planet or not?

Is Pluto planet or not?

When I was young Pluto was the last planet in our solar system, but then the status of that planet changed to a dwarf planet, what has the moon, and that thing is one of the most interesting things in the world of science. The term, what is used about this kind of objects like Pluto are based on the agreements, what are made in the international astronomers' society.

The thing is that the term, what is used about Pluto might not interest the planet itself, because I don't believe that Pluto could be an intelligent organism, and that's why we cannot injure the feelings of that planet or dwarf planet. The term what is connected to Pluto doesn't make any work, what astronomers have done or any thesis about that area puny. That means that we don't have lost our sleeping or go to the doctor if we accidentally say Pluto as a planet. That mistake is very common for people, who have thought that Pluto was the planet.

But there is one little mistake about that planet or oops, the dwarf planet, and that thing is that it is not every time the farthest planet of our solar system. Sometimes the trajectory of that strange world is coming inside the trajectory of Neptune, and that is the reason, why Pluto is so different than every other particle in our solar system, or actually, every planet what is orbiting the Sun are different, and there is not a typical planet in the entire solar system.

So that's it people sometimes makes mistakes, and that's the thing, what we must realize. When we are writing about things like Pluto, we can use only the name of that particle, but when we are talking about the particles of our solar system, we might say that there is eight planets and Pluto, but then we are facing some kind of problems with the other objects, or should we also mention large dwarf planets like Eris, what is very far away from the Earth. This is one of the interesting questions about our solar system.

Should we just forget the existence of Pluto or write the names of the planets, and then put the text after Pluto, where is mentioned that object as a dwarf planet? And when we are thinking about theories what are concerning the intelligent lifeforms, we might think that somewhere in the universe could be the asteroid, what is filled with neurons, and the surface of that organism lives alga or photosynthetic bacteria, what are feeding the neurons.

This thing would recycle the biomaterial, and that thing would give good topics for the discussions between some researchers. But we should not worry if we are forgetting to say dwarf planet when we are talking about Pluto, and for us who are been young in the time, when Pluto was the planet, that small and strange world will always be the planet, if that thing will comfort somebody.

That particle has been given a name for a silly dog in Disney's cartoon, and that is always in the heart of us, who are reading cartoons in the elder age. And Pluto has been always been a symbol for thing, what comes in last. It has been the name of the god of death, and symbol for things, what is different and a little bit strange. And that strange world is still a very fascinating thing, even if we should call it a dwarf planet.

How much is much?

How much is much?

Sometimes we all see the news about nursery services, which has not enough workers. Sometimes I have thought, that how those nursery companies even dare to take patients because there are only two or three nurses for maybe tens of patients, and that number of staff is enough? So what if something happens during those shifts?

And in the cases that there is so little personnel on work, that it's dangerous for patients, that thing brings my mind the question, should there be some nurses or doctors, who have not come to work? If the thing is like that, why that thing has not mentioned in reports? Or why those people have not called to authorities, that nurses have not come to work?

One thing, what is interesting is, why that thing satisfies patients and their families? Why the small number of personnel is not caused reclamations, and why people who are living in that kind of institutes are not telling a thing to their families?

The things, what satisfies us might be different to someone else, and the things what are dare to us might be meaningless to other people. If a person repeats some words, they are important to that inmate and gives satisfaction. The satisfaction is very well seen in the writings and speeches, what a person makes. When we are thinking about things, what seems meaningless for us, we almost ever think, that for someone else those things are very important.

So what this means? When we will go to the city, we might want to drink a cup of coffee, and then we just go to the cafeteria and take that cup, it doesn't cost very much and that's it. But have you ever thought about an underage person, who wants that cup of coffee? Buying that thing is not so easy thing to them. 

They must find the place, where is no age limit, and then they must have money for buying that cup of coffee. This kind of things is what we must realize when we are making something. Things that are easy to get might be hard for somebody else. So when we are thinking about the way, how people write about things what they have written or spoken? Have you ever thought about cases, where people have written or spoken something that is not tolerated about some other person?

When somebody has mentioned, that some other person has mental problems or that person is somehow incompetent in public writing, and the knowledge is wrong, that could cost very much because of the juridical payments. In those cases, a person must believe, that the thing, what has been written is right. Or actually, the writer must hope that the thing, what has been spread is true. And sometimes this hope causes the phenomenon, that the writer just uses or fixes some term, what supports the last thing, what that person has been spread.

Here I must ask one little question, what is "is it right to leave a customer without service, even that person is incompetent"? This is a very interesting question. Incompetence is not a thing, what justifies to act how people want to act, and that kind of things are not meant for justifying criminal activities and other kinds of things like unnecessary removings from the area.

When we are talking about things like sending faked job applications, I have thought that maybe those people, who are making practical jokes, like sending job applications for other people would like to do those jobs themselves, because they are asking them to others? If somebody thinks that it's a very good improvement to social skills, that person washes some stairways, that person should make those jobs one summer. This kind of thing could be very teaching lesson, how that kind of jobs is improving social skills.

Writing about dictatorship

Writing about dictatorship

Do you know that the laws, what is protecting the dictatorship are created for protecting the state against the outland enemies? When the Roman Empire was under threat the power was put in one hand for protecting the state. After that, some people have thought that the leader of the state must have dictatorial authority in the state.

One of the defense for that thing is simply, what we would do with the head of the state, who has no power? Why we have presidential elections if that person would not have the right to scatter the parliament? 

The problem those things is, that when the policy in parliament is similar to policy and opinions of the headman of the state, there is no problem with those laws, what is supporting the personal power of the head of the state. But when the head of state is in opposition to the majority of people or members of the parliament, would there always find people, who are supporting the constitution, what gives the head of the state authorities and justifies the disbanding or scatter the parliament.

And there are many people, who want to support that kind of actions, end their argument is many times that the constitution has given those powers for the head of the state. So why the head of the state might not use those authorizations, because the constitution justifies those kinds of actions? The answer to the differences of opinions would be simple. The riot police would deny the parliamentarians enter their workplace, and then the power would be in the hands of the head of the state. The reason for that is the head of the state would perceive being over politics.

This kind of thing is a very dangerous way to think. When the laws, what supported the limitless power of the monarchy were establish the monarchs were civilized and enlightened persons, but sooner or later the power was given to a person, who was a despot. 

In this case, we must say that one thing what could be worse to the state than a dictator is a popular dictator. That means that the popularity in the eyes of the majority would hide the merciless persecution and use of power, and that would drive the nation to chaos.

Sometimes the dictator will get old and after that, the closest men of that person would start to fight, who would get the power in their hand, and that might drive the nation to civil war. The problem with strong leadership is, this kind of places will want to get by using the force.

If the person, who has power self has made crimes against own people, that means that maybe nobody cares, what happens to that dictator. This fate has faced the King of England Henry VIII and Joseph Stalin, who just left without help when they faced their final moments. That tells about the attitude of people to those men. When they couldn't give orders anymore, that thing caused that own men attacked them, because they wanted to get the same power, what those leaders have.

The way I talk is the way I talk

The way I talk is the way I talk

The headline for this writing has taken from the song, what is presented by the Finnish rock band "Leningrad Cowboys" a long time ago. The thing is that when we are thinking about the feedback, what we get from writings and speeches, we must follow things, what those feedbackers are giving to us. The things like we had wrong pants or wrong slips are things, what we should not care because the writings and speeches are the important things. Not what kind of clothes we use, when we are writing about texts.

And here we are facing the real thing, what we should consider, and that is when we are facing cheating, we should find, what thing the cheater would use as an argument? Many times that thing uncovers, who has given those pieces of information for the cheater because the argumentation would uncover the source, what that person uses.

If some person would seem very prideful, we must think that maybe that thing is seen because that person would think somehow, that the blog would be closed by some other persons. And in this case, we are facing the things, that the rumors are not involving real information at all. Those rumors are sometimes fictional stories about things, what is not true. 

Sometimes I have seen stories, that I'm a dead or somehow incompetent person, but that thing is not true. I don't know who has told those things, but they are pure creation of the imagination, and I would not normally even comment on those things. But this is a very suitable situation to comment about that thing, what might be behind some bad feedback, what I have got. And here I must say that the persons, who have created those story, are made those claiming in their head.


Many times people say, that there is nothing, what can harm them. And the thing, what the blogger of some other person would write on the Internet is like some kind of wind. That thing would not have any real mean in real life. And then we would say, that it would not look like that if the trollers would like to kill some writer. And if some people are starting to cheat or treat some writer or talker, that means that the thing has got meaning, what is so big, that person wants to lose the weapons carrying license or get other kinds of troubles.

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud 

Dr. Sigmund Freud has been written lots of things about libido and orgasm. In the case of Freud, those things have many more meanings that for some normal person. The terminology what Freud uses is very complicated, even it seems simple at first sight. The texts of that person are full of symbol, and sexuality symbolizes the secret world, what is in the human mind.

In this text, I will write the thing about the psychoanalysis. There are actually two types of versions of psychoanalysis. The original or so-called classic version, which was created by Dr. Sigmund Freud. In that version, the psychoanalyst doesn't give medicals to the patient. And in the "modern" version of psychoanalysis created Dr. Carl Jung, under the supervision of Freud. That version of the medical treatment would be accepted in this therapy.

Normal people would at the same time shame and protect that world, and the thing what that term means is the thing what people should handle in the psychoanalysis. Libido is the thing, what satisfies the person, and what person also wants to keep in mind.  When Freud created his methodology, what is called as the Freudian psychoanalysis, the first thing, what the person, who operate with client or patient must be done is to make the map about things, what patient wants to speak, and what that inmate wants to hide.

So the psychoanalysis is not the medical treatment. It is meant for the tool, what is used to analyze the mind of the patient, and that thing is the most important thing when the medical, and treatment would be planned and executed.

Of course, the psychoanalysis can help a person to handle feelings and willings, and those things are really important when the behavior of the patient wanted to change. The psychoanalysis is handling very personal things, and it can be used with or without medical treatment.

The role of the psychoanalyst is to follow the reactions of the patient when the discussion handles things, which is very sensitive and personal. Those reactions are things like yelling, violent behavior like punching the analyst or treating the analyst or some other members of the medical team.

If the patient is violent, the psychoanalyst would punish the patient and if the reaction is what is willing to get, the patient would be gifted. And that makes psychoanalysis very effective tool for qualified persons for supporting the other methods.

But still, in today the remarkable thing about the psychoanalysis is that sometimes this method is used as therapy, and in other cases that are purely the method, what to use as finding out the problems, what the patient has. The thing what makes this method the long and very hard for the patient is that Dr. Freud was not used medical treatment during this process. That has caused blaming, and Freud explained that thing in this case medicals would cover some dangerous things in the patient's mind.

Modern psychiatry is using different methods and more advancing tools than Sigmund Freud, but even in the most modern research rooms, the main role is the sofa. Of course, modern medical treatment is more advancing, than some cocaine injections. And in the version, what created Dr. Carl Jung the medical treatment is, how we should say, accepted.

In the most modern version, all electronic equipment would be covered, and the psychoanalyst can record things like speech, but also the functions of the parasympathetic nervous system. Those things would cause that in the modern world the classic psychoanalysis would be the most effective tool for finding out things, what person wants to cover. And for the effective medical treatment, the patient must be honest or therapy would fail.

The Philosopher's Stone (Why one stone is different?)

The Philosopher's Stone (Why one stone is different?)

The Philosopher's Stone is a mythical item like some kind of version of the "Holy Grail". And sometimes I have thought that this kind of Item is not actually physical thing like some real stone or something like that. Or maybe The Philosopher's Stone was the stone, what was painted by using a certain way, and that would be marked for membership of some community. So it was the stone, what Philosopher owned.

Or maybe it was the thought about the group of stones. And the mission, what master gave the student was to think, why there is a couple of stones, and why one of those stones was different? Was The Philosopher's Stone actually the item, what every philosopher carried in their pocket, and why did they do that?

The alchemists looked for the spiritual aspects from their experiments, and that means that The Philosopher's Stone is not actually the item. I could also be a way of think. or maybe it's the stone, what is painted, and what shows the membership of the secret community of alchemists. 

But then we must realize one thing, and that is the alchemists talked by using the allegories, and maybe The Philosopher's Stone is the thing, what alchemists used to make people think about things more carefully. And if we are thinking about things like Philosopher, we should ask one thing, when we see the stone in some rack. That question is, why this stone is put on the rack, and if there is something special like painting, we must realize, that the paint could be the white phosphorous.

If that thing is put on the papers, and somebody steals them, that would cause that entire house will burn. When we are thinking about the role of the alchemists, we must realize, that those people must hide their real purpose of the experiments, and that's why they must use the allegories and another kind of things.

The thing is that alchemists were proto-scientists, who made many interesting and remarkable notifications and inventions in the field of early science. But as we know, they were also looking for the spiritual roads to things like living forever and making gold from every part on the Earth.

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

In the future, the eavesdropping and motoring tools can installed in the human body by using surgery. That kind of system would transmit every word and think what people would speak or see around to the NSA headquarters. And this kind of things might revolutionize the spying and dark operations.

There is a very interesting thing, that some poltergeist phenomenon would be created by using the TRW (Technical Remote View), which means that the camera prosthesis of the eye would be connected to the cell phone. Or the prosthesis itself can be equipped with the data connection straight to the internet, or by using the GPS system, that prosthesis would be connected straight to the satellites.

Because the eye prosthesis where is the camera is connected to the nervous system, the user would not probably know, that the prosthesis is sending data to the third party. And then if the system is operated by NORAD, it can use laser satellites to create the poltergeist. That means that if the person, who has this system looks at something, the operator of NORAD must only target the killer satellite to that point.

When we are thinking the implanted microphone on the ear, that implant can put in the ear, by using the same method with a surgically implanted hearing aid. And the difference between eavesdropping system and hearing aid would be that the other would send the discussions to the third party.

The thing is that that equipment can installed in the body without the inmate would not even recognize this thing. The cornea can cover the entire camera and the person would feel the touch to the eye similar, what it is normally felt. The eavesdropping system can installed behind the eardrum during some other medical operation, and the inmate would not even recognize that surgically installed eavesdropping equipment.

The thoughts about Hvitträsk mansion

The thoughts about Hvitträsk mansion

If we would think that Geselius or other architects were neopagans. Neopaganism was the in the late 19th. century version of the heavy metal music and it was the youngster's way to rebel against the values of the elder people. If modern rebel youngsters are listening to rock music, the rebel youngsters were searching the national romantic writings in the late 19th. and early 20th. century.

And when we are thinking about that the three architects, Geselius, Lindgren, and Saarinen were quite difficult personalities, because they were made creative work, and those persons were very gifted architects and artists. Maybe some neopagans took those things more seriously than they should, and could Geselius or some other persons in the threesome try to contact with spirits in that beautiful place. Of course, the ancient Finns have noticed the beauty of this place and pursuit their rituals in this beautiful environment.

The Hvitträsk mansion is claimed to be a copy of the ancient Finnish noblemen house, but there is no proof about that. The thing is true that the house is representing the national romantic style, and it's a mixture of the church, castle, and mansion. Every single detail in that house is dressed to the nines detailed and perfectly finished.

Sibelius found the first rock painting in Finland in 1911

So that kind of person's egos was very big, and the Hvitträsk was too small to them. But when we are searching the tales that there are living ghosts in that area, and the first rock painting of Finland was found by Jean Sibelius in 1911, we must realize that this story might be fiction. If those architects found that rock painting, they might hide that thing because that might cause the ridicule and those men might think that they were kept weird if they were told about that rock painting. Or maybe they thought that they were claimed as fakers if they were told that thing to other people.

The thing that Sibelius would find that painting was like straight from some movie, and it seems like some stories, what the children tell their parents.  Maybe those architects found that thing before Sibelius, but hide that thing. You can look at the picture of that rock painting from the homepage, what is linked below this text, and somebody sees even UFO in that red image, what is maybe painted in the ancient holy place. But who knows what that thing really portrays.

And if those architects were neopagans, that thing might be the reason, that they moved to that place. And when we are thinking about the thing, that their maid died in her bedroom in suspicious conditions, there might be rumors, that this girl saw something, what she should not see. But there is no evidence about the violence or murder. That kind of things made those architects real interesting people. And was there some kind of laboratory in the house, and what those persons made with that thing is a mystery. And maybe I just imagine this thing.

https://retkipaikka.fi/kummituksia-taitelijoita-ja-suomen-ensimmainen-tunnettu-kalliomaalaus-vittrask/

The fictional story of the secretive group

The fictional story of the secretive group

Here I will write a fictional story, how the international secretive group of the businessmen would work. In this text, I will use the theatrical name "Illuminati" of that fictional group. And that means that every connection with the existing or past secretive groups is pure coincidence. So read this text, if you want. I wrote it for reading, and that means "be my quest".

Do you know that the origin of the "Watchmen" is actually the same with the characters, what Walt Disney has been drawn? Once I heard the silly idea that there could be a secret society, which is very secretive, and the members of that imaginational society would meet together by using the "Donald Duck" masks for hiding their real identities.

When we are thinking about the situation, that somebody would be a member of the "Illuminati" or some other international secretive organization, and want to meet other members of the group, that member would want to hide the meetings. So the meetings of the hypothetical secretive group would be made under the cover of the holiday trips, and they might happen in the tourist centers and those persons might use hotel rooms.

In this hypothetical meeting, the things would be negotiated ready, and those persons would spend only one day in that room, and then they would leave or continue their holiday, and maybe they have their family with them. And maybe those persons would send the family, what would not know a thing about the secretive group would go to trip during that time. The family will make people more trustable, especially if they would not know anything about the membership of Illuminati.

The idea was that the members of that secret mafia-type organization would use the nicknames like "Donald Duck" in their meetings, and maybe those things would be really interesting ideas for some TV-series. But as we know, there is a possibility to use this kind of thing as the base for the fictional story of the "Illuminati", the secretive group, what could control the economy of the Earth.

In fact, "Uncle Scrooge" could make that thing very easily. The thing is that this fictional character has been stored very much money in the money storage, where that duck has been transferred all money, what that duck has in the storage house. If that money would be released on the streets, w that would cause the hyperinflation? The thing bases the idea, that every single money must have value, what is used when the money must buy from the markets.

When there is too much money in the markets, that means that there is too much money compared to the national treasury, and that means that the value of the currency is going down. That kind of things would happen if somebody has stored currency in some storage for a long time, and then that money would be released, what would cause the decreasing of the value of the currency.

But I will write sometimes later about this phenomenon, which is called the "hyperinflation". That thing is a very powerful tool in the hands of the wrong people, and making hyperinflation the actor would not need to be the governmental operator. The private corporation can make that thing if it can buy enough currency. And when we are thinking about the "Illuminati" there could be the organizations, what are created the persons who operate across the cultural and political borders. Maybe those actors would be the mysterious "Rothschilds" or they could be some other men, who wear a business suit and meet in some mid-class hotels in Europe or America.

The little tale about the fantasy-planet of the book "Dune", what was invented by Frank Herbert

The little tale about the fantasy-planet of the book "Dune", what was invented by Frank Herbert

A very extraordinary book, the masterpiece of fantasy "Dune"

When we are trying to make the analyzes of the books, we must first think, what was in the mind of the author, when that person wrote the book. And this is very difficult. The writers are very complex people, whose texts are creating visions in our mind. And at first, we might start to think, that there is nothing extraordinary in some book until we see the name of the author, and if we would think the name of the writer, who wrote the book what is under the observation in this text, Frank Herbert, we might see that there is something strange in that name.

And that thing is that the person has the proper name as the family name, what might mean, that the writer uses the faked name or pseudonym. Then we must ask why some writer would want to hide the identity? What is so special in those texts, that the person must use hidden identities. If the book contains the pornographic material, that pseudonym could be explained by the need to protect friends or avoiding some kind of jokes about the things, what is mentioned in those books, but the book "Dune" is nothing else than the science fiction book.

Why Frank Herbert used a pseudonym?

When we are thinking about the book "Dune", what was written by Frank Herbert, we might first think, that this book is only pure imagination. The giant sandworms and the "spice" which gives power to hyper motors would be only the imagination, but then we can think those things in another way. In the universe could be the extreme dry planets where lives organisms, what could benefit the crystal water, what means water, what is stored in crystals.

That kind of life form could be very much different than, what we know. In this scenario, the sandworm could separate the water from crystals by using heat or something else method, and maybe it could create enough heat for that separation process in its mitochondria. But there is another thing, what makes Dune so fascinating thing, and that is the "spice", which would give extreme high energy for the engines.

In theory, which is scientists way to say, that they are using their imagination could be possible that inside the uranium mineral would form the ball-shaped crystal. Inside that crystal would form the condition where the heat of the star would form the nano-size black hole. In that case, this kind of crystal would give the system extremely high energy.

The singularity, what forms inside the worm

If the idea of the spice is that inside the symmetrical crystal would be the black hole, which is smaller than an atom. In this reading, the giant sandworm could be the singularity, what would look like the worm.

In fact, in this case, the extremely high energy, what that mineral gives would allow them to grow very large. In this case, those sandworms would be the life form, what uses nuclear power, and in fact, there could be possible that the cylinder-shaped worm could create the singularity inside it. We don't know this kind of lifeform, but there is a possibility, that somewhere in distance could be the lifeforms, what uses nuclear energy. But this kind of things are actually the most marginal cases, what we can ever imagine.

And if that fuel would put in the reactor, the system would give an extreme high punch. The idea of this fictional material is that inside the uranium mineral is forming the absolute ball-shaped crystal and inside it, the sun of that extremely hot and dry planet could form the small black holes along with the static electricity, what the massive sandstorms caused.

Writing about truth and lies

Writing about truth and lies

If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine.  But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.

That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.

In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.

This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.

A couple of hazards what intelligence can cause for the human race

A couple of hazards what intelligence can cause for the human race

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/

One of the greatest threats, what mankind can imagine is the intelligent artificial species, what can act against us like we would be the enemies of that species. Those artificial organisms can be robots, which is connected to the brains, or some kind of genetic research like a monkey, what would be the test animal, where is injected the genomes, what would make it more intelligent than normal monkeys are.

The thing is that those intelligent organisms would not probably tell people, that they are more intelligent than others. And that means that the intelligent species can hide that ability from the research team. The thing in the artificial organisms is that the genetic material would be connected to its genomes and transfer to the next generation.

The thing what would deny the advance the brains of the adult monkeys would be that the skull of those animals is too small, that it would allow the increase the size of the brains, and the second thing is that the form of the skull is different with people, and the frontal lobe would not space to advance. That means that the adult monkey, what would get the injection of the genomes, that would not have influence for advancing the intelligence level.

But the baby monkeys would have a skull, what would be more flexible and that allows the increasing the size of the brains. The size of the brains would not mean everything and the importance of the number of connections of the neurons have also a great role in advancing the level of intelligence. And the thing is that this kind of things is actually in a very big role in the advancing of intelligence. The monkeys are very dangerous animals, because they are normally very intelligent, and they learn to use weapons and release themselves from jail.

If we would create the intelligent species on the Earth, we might face the situation, that this creature would become rebellious.  In the point of view of morality, we would create the slave for us. And the information is in the main role of slavery. If the slaves would get information, that the things could be better, or they realize that their master is not invulnerable, the result would be terrifying, in the point of view the master.


An interesting scenario of the treat, what the defective programming of artificial intelligence might make in the distant future.


The intelligent life forms would have the ability to defend themselves against an attacker, and if we would send the intelligent probe to the other solar system, that system might attack against other civilization, if it denies something important things from that probe. In this scenario, the programmers would not program the probe to face another intelligent species, because there is no evidence about those alien civilizations. The probe would be a couple of hundred light years away from the Earth, and it would continue its mission, what began thousands of years ago.

And then it would face alien, what denies the landing. The race, what has created that thing have already forgotten that probe, and then the programmers have made artificial intelligence, what has the mission to destroy the things, what would be treated for that machine. And that case would cause decision, that the probe will open fire against the alien.

The idea of this imaginational scenario would be that we would create the spacecraft, what will have the same intelligence level as a human. After that, we would send that spacecraft to another solar system, and there would cause damage. The probe would ask permission to get some important mineral for the repairments, and it would not understand the answer, or it would translate it as the denying. That means that the probe believes that the other species would attack against it, and starts the war between the stars.