The antimatter motor would use only electrons and positrons for creating better thrust than photon rocket.

The antimatter motor would use only electrons and positrons for creating better thrust than photon rocket.

The one form of the antimatter motor, what can be possible is simple to use positrons and electrons, what will collide outside the rocket. The idea is that when the antimatter motor would operate it would use one particle accelerator, what will shoot positrons or anti-electrons in the middle of the great shield, and around that structure are the electron cannons, what shoots electrons in that shower of the antielectrons.

That propellant would be easy to make, and the electrons are everywhere. That system would use high voltage electric cannons, which will shoot electrons to the shower of positrons. The impact of those two particle types would happen outside the spacecraft, which will be pushed forward. The idea of this kind of rockets is that they might make greater punch than photon rocket. And it would bases technology, what is already existed. The accelerator would send to space in pieces, what just put together.

One of the things in this system would be that electrons would pull positrons to them, and then the system would create very hot and powerful annihilation. The antimatter rocket, what uses this kind of technology would be possible to create by using the technology, where the linear particle accelerator is used to create the positrons, and that system would be connected to the nuclear reactor.

In real-world, this kind of systems is not technically very hard to make. But the prize of those systems is very high. And that makes them hard to create in a financial point of view because the construction and building processes need very many launches, and we would need also a clear target for that mission. The probe must be equipped also with highly sophisticated artificial intelligence. And the communication with the probe would be extremely difficult.

So the target for that kind of systems must be very extraordinary, that it would be done. The use of that kind of systems would be safer, than using the antiprotons or antihydrogen. The accelerator would create positrons by the speed when they are used in the annihilation reaction. And when the power is switched off the production of positrons would be stopped. So that material would not be needed to store in a magnetic bottle, where it would not touch the wall of the tank, which will cause a huge explosion.

That makes this project expensive, and this version is modified photon rockets, where the photon is replaced with electrons and the speed of those particles could increase near the speed of light. But the problem is that only light can reach the speed of light, and that's why researchers are talking about photon rocket one of the most capable versions of the rocket, what will someday send a human being to the interstellar journey.

The thing what makes photon rocket very complicated thing is that the thrust of that rocket would be so poor. The accelerating rocket to the speed of light or near the speed of light would take even hundreds of years, and that's why the rocket would need something, what will give more punch to that system.

One of the biggest problems with the rocket is it needs a very much fuel and in the space also decreasing the speed must be done by using the rocket, what will thrust is turning forward. And that thing means that the decreasing the speed of spacecraft would need the same mass of fuel, what is used in accelerating process. The fuel pack for photon rocket is quite small, and that rocket would shoot the photons backward.

That thing makes it act like a giant lamp, but the thing is that the thrust of that system should be greater. One thing what some physics have introduced for solution for that kind of problem is the use of electrons and positrons in the same way as the hypothetical fusion motors use the fuel. The thing is working that the pellet of helium 3 would shoot through the cannon and the lasers would target to that pellet. 

But the speed, what that system could create, will be something like a couple of percent of the speed of light. But if we would use antielectrons and electrons the thrust of the system would increase, and the fusion would happen outside the spacecraft, behind the great shield, what would give the surface, what the particles will impact and push the craft forward.

And what was the "Big Bang"?

And what was the "Big Bang"?

"Big Bang" is the creation of the material, time and Universe. Time existed before "Big Bang", but there was nothing where it can influence. When time faced material, the Universum started to form. And in the space, before "Big Bang" time was connected with the material. But because the form of the material was different time got influence on the material when it released in the "Big Bang". In the "Big Bang" the material and antimaterial electrons released at the same time, but somehow the form of material, what we are calling as "material" won the antimatter in the great annihilation, what happened in the begin of Universe.

When the "Big Bang" happened the first form of the material was released to the Universe. That first form of the material was actually the electrons and positrons, what was pulling together to the impact trajectories, and then happened the annihilation reaction, what is called as the "Great Inflation". Because there were a little bit more electrons than positrons, the form of material is, how we know it. In fact, we can think the "Big Bang" as the series of the phenomena were released very high energy levels. Maybe the "Dark Energy" is from that period, when giant annihilation has shaken the entire universe. 

So what caused this very high power explosion? One of the explanations for the "Big Bang" is that was some kind of erupting black hole. After the explosion formed a large number of electrons and positrons, and that caused the new explosions. When the material "won" antimatter, the universe was really hot, and electrons started to collide with another electron. If there would be the same number of positrons and electrons the annihilation continues forever until another type of particles would get a majority.

In this extremely hot universe, the protons and neutrons started to form in the collision of electrons. Another explanation for the "Big Bang" is that two clouds of electrons and positions collided, and this annihilation started the universe. The positron and electron are pulling each other in a colliding course because they have different polarity. But where those particles or black holes came?

Maybe they were remains of the elder universe, what has faced its end in the big crash, and then the black hole was in the totally empty space. And that caused the eruption because sometimes the photon would escape from the black hole, and if there is no replacement the black hole starts to vaporize faster and faster. Normally lose of the photon would mean anything, because the black hole would replace that in seconds. 

But in this case, there would not be any photon, electron or other material in the universe, and the black hole starts to vaporize forming the new universe. Or if the universe would lose its life in the great emptiness, the neutrons and protons start to break, and in the last in the universe would have only electrons existed. And suddenly some of those electrons start to rotate in the opposite direction than another, which means that it would transform to the anti-electron, and the electrons and positrons are starting to close together, and finally happens the great annihilation.