Standard model updates and the fifth force

The elementary particles of the Standard model

Should we update the standard model? Definitely yes. But the thing in that operation is that. Almost every single thing that is calculated and made in physics uses the standard model as the matrix. And in that case, there is the possibility that the calculations are wrong. If the standard model is wrong that means that all things bases on that model are wrong.

The Muon G-2 experiment and the experiments made after that experiment have shown that there is the possibility of the existence of the "Fifth force" or "fifth fundamental interaction". So if we are thinking of the standard model and the four fundamental interactions we must say that there is the possibility that the "fifth fundamental force" is even more dominating but at the same time weaker than gravitation. 

The reason why that thing is possible is that when the fundamental forces are turning weaker when their scale or effective distance is increasing. Gravitation is the only interaction that interacts in long distances.

So logically we can think that the fifth force interacts even longer distances than gravitation. That means the fifth force can help to solve the question of the existence of the multiverse. There is the possibility that the fifth force has similar wave-particle duality like all other fundamental forces except gravitation. 

If gravitation is the weakest known force, the reason for it may be simple. Gravitation would not be limited to the quantum field of the atom. And if we use allegories. The density of gravitation is lower than that of other basic interactions. The reason for this is that gravitation affects longer distances than three other fundamental interactions. 

The strength of the interactions rises when their range decreases. The reason for that could be that energy is trapped in some kind of quantum field. And that means the energy in those quantum fields cannot erupt. 

And it's not limited by the quantum field of the atom. Gravitons are the hypothetical transportation particles of gravitation. The existence of the graviton is predicted because all other fundamental interactions have the transportation particle. But because there is no observation about the graviton. There are discussions is gravitation one the independent interactions or not. 

And that means the hypothetical fifth force is interacting between even longer distances than gravitation. But the same way the fifth force is weaker than gravitation. So even if gravitation is the weakest of the known interactions it's the weakest of four interactions. 

The strongest of the interaction is the strong nuclear force. That force is the thing that keeps quarks in the protons and neutrons. The strong nuclear force affects only between quarks. The transporter particle of that force is the gluon which jumps between quarks. The answer for the strength of the strong nuclear force is maybe coming from the quantum field. 

When the gluon hits the quark it would touch the quantum field that is forming the core of the proton or neutron. The quantum field would also get energy outside the atom. And when the particles are hitting the quantum field. That thing acts like a lens and aims the energy back in its entirety called proton or neutron. 

Or energy can store in that quantum field. And when the mirror particle hits that quantum field like in proton-antiproton annihilation that thing will cause the quantum version of the electric arc. That thing is one of the most powerful reactions in nature. 

()https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677

()https://physicsworld.com/a/neutron-experiment-tightens-the-net-around-possible-fifth-force/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

Images()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

The biggest challenge of the quantum network is to make the superpositioned and entangled particle pair that stands long enough.

The next-generation quantum network bases the qubits that are superpositioned and entangled between devices. The ability to create a network of superpositioned and entangled qubits would be an amazing project. 

The idea is that the data travels between devices by using quantum teleportation. So the superpositioned and entangled particles are forming quantum sticks between the devices. The problem is that the electron and proton have only one pole. 

Image 2 shows the spin of the electron and this is the problem. Creating superposition in the clockwise and anti-clockwise spinning particles is difficult. If the spin could be beautiful rotation creating the long-term quantum entanglement is much easier to make. 

The superposition and entanglement need long-term stabilization if that thing wanted to use in mobile devices. Or making the quantum computer connected to one entirety. 

Otherwise, the entanglement connection between the devices must renew simultaneously. If the quantum network wanted to use in mobile devices there is the possibility to download movies to mobile devices in one piece and also the other data transmission would also use as short-term bursts. 

But talking by using quantum mobile devices would be difficult because that thing requires a long-term connection. And that thing means the quantum systems are the systems of tomorrow. 

The thing that makes the straight superposition the most effective thing to make the quantum network real. Quantum teleportation makes two mobile devices acting like they are the same system. 

But if we are thinking that the quantum network would be the same way flexible as the GSM network there is much work to do. The thing how to adjust the distance of the ends of the qubit is one of the biggest challenges for making the quantum mobile network. But the first challenge is how to create the quantum superposition safely through the air without causing injuries or damages. Maybe the quantum network is in everyday use sooner than we expect. 

(Image 2)"A single point in space can spin continuously without becoming tangled. Notice that after a 360-degree rotation, the spiral flips between clockwise and counterclockwise orientations. It returns to its original configuration after spinning a full 720°" (Wikipedia, Spin (physics))

The electron has only the south pole and the proton has the north pole. Everything that I write about the spin of the electron is similar if the particle is a proton. The spin of those particles is 1/2. So you might replace the word electron by using the word "proton". The spin of an electron is always limited. And when the power transmission to the electron ends the electron rotates back. 

During returning to the original direction or returning to base level electron will release the extra energy as the radiation. This radiation is the thing that will detect by sensors that are driving data to the quantum system. But the problem is that when the electron (or proton) spins back it can break the superposition and entanglement. 

So what if we would use neutrons in this demanding process, where we want to make the stable entanglement between two devices. The neutron is the only particle that has south and north poles. That gives neutron the ability to rotate full lap. The spin of the neutron is marked as 1/2. But the two polarity quantum structure makes it possible that the neutron can rotate full lap. There is one interesting thing about the neutron. The neutron acts like a neutron star and if that particle is put to rotate. 

So if the neutron is aimed in the right direction, and put to rotate that radiation can act as the data transporter. In some visions, neutrons can act as the rotor of the quantum generators. The spinning neutron can position inside the ring of the protons and electrons. And that quantum generator would same way transform the kinetic energy to electricity like the bigger ones. maybe those kinds of things are making electricity for the next-generation quantum systems. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrons

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)

Image 2():https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

The other dimensions and what they are?

The image above: The Cosmic Microwave Background as seen from the Planck satellite. Credit: ESA https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2013/03/Planck_CMB

There is the possibility that the higher dimensions are connected to the material. So the higher dimensions are energy levels of the material and space. When the energy level of the material rises too high it just drops out from the universe. We should say that the particle is jumping to an energy level that is so high that we cannot reach that particle. 

When we are thinking of the dimension as the room. We can think that particle is like the ball in the room. We can strike the ball. And it starts to jump. And if we are hitting the ball too hard it would jump through the wall. 

The ball acts like particle acts in the quantum world. When the energy is pumped to the particles like an electron its energy level rises. 

So that stressed particle will jump to a higher energy level. And soon the energy level is rising so high that the particle cannot stay in the dimension. 

In the case the particle's energy level rises too high will jump out from the dimension. Or if the particle is the ball, it jumps through the roof of the room. So it would not drop it would fly away from the third dimension. At this point, I must say that we usually think of the black hole the wrong way. 

The energy level of the black hole is so powerful that it is actually above the other particles. So if we are thinking dimension as the room the black hole or the area inside the event horizon is at the higher floor than regular material. So material would not fall into a black hole. The material would rise to the black hole. 

If the dimensions are like the superposition of the material. That explains why we cannot see those other dimensions.

That means the dimension is like the state in the qubit. In this version of the higher dimension theories, the material itself is the dimension. The idea is that the material is like a qubit. It has states that cannot connect with together. But the fact is that even if the material has dimensional states there could be also space-based dimensions. The space where is the so creased wave movement that we cannot observe it. 

The other dimensions are things that we cannot see or feel. We cannot imagine other dimensions because we cannot imagine anything that we haven't seen. And that is the thing that makes the other dimensions interesting. 

The big question in the discussions of the fourth and fifth dimensions is this: Are the fourth and fifth dimensions in space? Or are they connected with the material? In that case, the hypothesis goes like this. The space is in the interaction between material and wave movement. 

If the other dimensions are in the space, that thing will make them interesting research targets. There is no evidence of the interaction between the fourth and fifth dimensions with our third dimension. But sometimes some people have thought that the mysterious "fifth force" could be the effect of the energy that comes from higher dimensions. The idea is that photons are particles that are staying between the third and fourth dimensions. 

The dimensions are like floors. We cannot go through the floor or roof for reaching the higher dimensions. The term "higher dimension" means a higher energetic dimension. 

There is the possibility that the higher dimensions can interact with the material in our universe. That interaction happens through photons and hypothetical tachyon-particles. When the energy level of the tachyon decreases it will impact with photon, which throws it back to the fourth dimension. 

When the speed of a photon decreases. It gets energy from the third dimension and that thing accelerates it. When the speed of a photon rises too high, that thing will cause that the photon "calls" a hypothetical tachyon to it. And then the tachyon will push photons back to the space between the third and fourth dimensions. 

This thing is sometimes called tachyon symmetry. That term means that when the speed of energy level of some particle increases enough it will impact with tachyon. The hypothetical tachyon particle is the particle that is too energetic being in the third dimension. 

And the idea of the tachyon-photon symmetry is that the entire material is similar to light. The wave-particle duality proves that thing. But why we cannot see tachyon. The answer could be that tachyon is too energetic that we can observe it. 

Or is the higher dimension only the space where the wave movement has the wavelength that we cannot observe that wave movement? Is the higher dimension is the extremely short wave movement which wavelength is smaller than quarks? That means the fourth dimension could be the pack of extremely creased wave-particle entirety. 

()https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/three-totally-mind-bending-implications-of-a-multidimensional-universe?utm_source=dscfb&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dscfb

()https://www.multidimensionalman.com/Multidimensional-Man/Model_of_the_Multidimensional_Universe.html

()https://www.sciencealert.com/a-physicist-has-calculated-that-life-really-could-exist-in-a-2d-universe

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

About particles, what is elder than our solar system

About particles, what is elder than our solar system

In the beginning, we must understand that the Sun is not the eldest star in our galaxy, and our galaxy is not probably the eldest of the galaxies in-universe. So when we are thinking about the possibility that the particle that is elder than the Sun has been found on Antarctica, we must realize that the small particles are coming from another solar system all the time. 

Here I mean the grain of sand-sized particles must be most common visitors, and some of them are coming from very long distances. The reality is that the small particles are aways more common than large particles, and that thing means that most visitors in our solar system must be farl smaller that the famous Oamuamua. 

The visitors like Oamuamua and other asteroids are not the most common particles in the Universe, and if the visitor from another solar system would come to our solar system it must have enough energy to win the effect of the solar wind, or otherwise, the particle would be pushed away from our solar system. But because Oamuamua came to our solar system there must be smaller particles, what we cannot see, and what also comes from the long distances. 

So could this type of gran of sand-sized particle drop in the Antarcean, or does it burn in the atmosphere? 

There is no straight answer to that kind of question. We must think the situation that the grain of sand would be covered by the ice layer, which means that this kind of bite of sand can be dropped to the ground, and if that dropping point is Antarctica, that kind of sand bite would contain very important information like minerals from the other solar systems. 

If the stone is elder than the Sun or our solar system, we can try to determine the atomic and isotope structure of the minerals, and also search the possibility to find the remains of cells or other living organisms. And that data can help us to find out, why life has been grown on our planet?

Even if the fossils of bacteria do not exist, the meteorite would tell us about the solar system, which might be destroyed by supernova a long time ago. But also those bacteria or some other organisms might have formed on Earth, and they would be a slip in the void of the rock after it has been dropped on Antarctica.

This kind of thing is a very fascinating opportunity to see what kind of minerals and gasses would be in the other solar systems. But first, we must find the particle, what we can prove come from another solar system, and one of the best proof is that the meteorite, what researchers are observing would contain a certain level of some isotopes. 

If we would have some fossils of the living cells, we could use C-14 or some other radioactive method for making those determinations. But if the bite does not contain organic material the only way to determine the age is to find out the isotope structure of the bite. That structure tells something about the origin of the meteorite. Problem is that those things, that the researchers can find out are directional, and the thing is that we don't know all asteroids in our solar system. 

The moons of planet Mars, Phobos, and Deimos are unique, so-called carbon asteroids. They are opening the eyes of the astronomers, that there could be single asteroids in our solar system, which might be different than others. And there could be more about this kind of carbon-asteroids, which are far smaller than those two asteroids. The relativity of elements can be unique in some asteroids, and when we are thinking about the protons and electrons, those nucleoids or sub-atomic particles are formed during the Big Bang. 

And that thing tells also something, about the conditions, where the particle has been formed. If the materials are containing metals like iron and nickel, that tells that it could be from a similar planet, what Earth is. If that kind of planet has been destructed in the supernova explosion, this means that the planet could have some kind of lifeforms. 

https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/solar-system-formation

Can any particle travel between universes?

Can any particle travel between universes?

If the multiverse theory would be true, and there are other universes, we might ask a one really interesting question, and that is: could object travel between universes. So when we are thinking about the edge of the universe, we might use the term "solid", if any object than a photon can cross that line. 

The thing is that if some object wants to travel across the border of the universe, that thing would need so much energy, that we cannot ever imagine that thing. The object must win the gravity of the entire universe, which means that it would pull the particles back with the power of all galaxies and dark matter particles, and that means that the gravity level, what it must win is so huge, that we ever cannot imagine that thing. 

The form of the universe is a very interesting thing to think, and when we are thinking about multiverse theory, that theory has brought many things in the mind of the theorists. One of the most interesting questions is can the light or some object across the line, what is called "the edge of the universe"? 

In this case, we might ask, is the layer of the universe solid or is it something else? And then we might start to define, what the world "solid" means at this time. If we are thinking that the edge of the universe is the point, where our universes domination ends, and after that point, the gravity of our universe would not pull objects back, we might think the possibility, that could some object travel to another universe, if the supernova blows in that border? 

In this case, the word "solid" means that nothing can go across that line, which is the shockwave of the Big Bang. And why we are interested in the edge of the universe? The thing is that the first formed stars would find at that layer. And this thing makes the location of the Big Bang very interesting. If we find the location of that object, we might define the distance of our solar system to that location. 

So if we would find the galaxies or black holes that are farther from that location, that means that that object is forming before our solar system. And how simple this kind of thing seems in the paper. But we know that there is a big difference between practical solutions and theories. In this example, I started to write that the speed of galaxies is stable, and all galaxies are traveling at the same speed. 

But we have forgotten that there is a possibility that there are galaxies, which are formed of dark mater or gas and dust. Those giant disks would have gravity but there would be no stars at all. And that means those objects would pull the other galaxies faster than others, which means that the galaxies would not travel with the same speed, and this means that in the practical world only the very big distances means that some galaxy is older than some other galaxy. 

So can the object travel between universes?

If wormholes or "Einstein-Rosen bridges" (1) are real, the meteorite or asteroid could travel between universes. Can the energy of the supermassive black holes, what are oscillating with the same frequency be so powerful that the Einstein-Rosen bridge or wormhole would be forming between those objects, what are in different universes? And that means that there is a possibility that the object, what is formed of antimatter can travel to our universe or even in our solar system. There is a hypothesis that some supernova explosions are caused by antimaterial, what impacts with stars or planets. 

But can object make that journey without wormholes? This thing is a really interesting question. The journey between universes would take so long time, that the neutrons of the atoms would start to break, which means that the material stops its existence. And that means that if some particle would slip to another universe, that would be meanless to the things in another universe.  

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image:

https://miro.medium.com/max/2700/1*QS59aHuIEgJoIogixOJ32w.jpeg

Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

The answer to the question of Bethlehem's star could be an eruption of the surface of Van Maanen's star or Sirius B. 

Could Van Maanen's (1) star (Van Maanen 2) or Sirius B (2)the Bethlehem's star? Van Maanen's star is too cold for being that star, but could that thing be the Sirius B. The age of Sirius B is about 228 million years, but there is the possibility that some kind of eruption on the surface of Sirius B has caused the effect, what we are known as Bethlehem's star. 

The star itself can be old, but sometimes the white dwarfs and neutron stars are impacting with bigger particles or a large mass of gas or dust will be dropped to the surface of the star, and that causes a very big explosion. So this kind of eruption that happens at close star would cause an effect that the new star has been born to skies. 

The most common explanation for that thing is the supernova or nova (3) eruption or explosion, which exploded somewhere in our Galaxy. And that thing is one of the most interesting theories in the world. Some scientists have believed, that the Bethlehem's star is the Van Maanen's star, what is at the distance of the 14,5 light-years from Earth, and that thing would explain the mystery of the Bethlehem's star. 

Van Maanen's star has ever been the supernova, but the nova-eruption, what has been happened so close would be very bright, and that thing would be seen in the darkest night. The key question in this theory is that the age of that white dwarf is too old being Bethlehem's star. But sometimes even the lonely white dwarfs are erupting, when the bigger particles are impacting them, and could the Bethlehem's star be the eruption on the surface of Van Maanen's star?

But the problem is that Van Maanen's star or Van Maanen 2 is too hot being the Bethlehem's star. And that means there could be another white dwarf near Earth, but nobody has been found. Sometimes also Sirius B is claimed to be that nova. 

The distance to that star is 8,611 light-years, which means that also smaller changes to the brightness of that star are easy to recognize. And the surface temperature of Sirius B is very hot, but the reason for that is the material from Sirius A is dropping to Sirius B, and that determines the age of that star difficult by using the surface temperature. But this is only theory. And the answer for the mythical Bethlehem's star could be the eruption on the surface of Sirius B. 

Could the Bethlehem's star be some kind of propaganda tale?

One explanation for the Bethlehem's star would be that it is only the propaganda tale. In that theory, some leaders of the Jewish community or Romans created this tale for making the chosen one brave. The story would be told that God was protecting that child, who will be the king of Jews. 

The purpose of those tales, what are told to noble children's purpose was to prove, that the God or higher spirits were protecting that person, that the royal mission was to complete. And if Jesus was the descendant of the King of Israel, that meant that the royal mission was to get Romans out from that place. 

When we are thinking about the hypothetical descendant of Jesus, we must remember, that the rule of the kings was, that they must protect their families for making the heir for themselves. That means that the holy bloodline would have existed. But this thing is only theory, and the book Da Vinci-code has been made it well-known. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Maanen_2

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11080216

Image:

https://cdn.eso.org/images/thumb700x/eso1605a.jpg

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

In the world of science is forgotten one of the most interesting things, what we face always in real life. That thing is artificial intelligence, which can be used for handling multiple points in the calculations and observations. The thing is that artificial intelligence can handle billions of variables, and that thing causes conflicts with classical formulas in many areas.

Many of the classic formulas of classic mechanics like Kepler's point have been calculated by using two or three points, and modern computer technology can notice billions of points, and it can also mean that the smallest effective forces can be noticed. This thing means that we must confess, that even the farthest objects affect the particles, which are moving in some trajectories. We cannot meter that effect while the stress to the particle takes about two weeks or even months.

But when the effect continues even thousands of years they can cause the effect, what has mean. And when we are thinking about things like spaceflights, we must remember, that there are many other forces than just gravity, what effects to the trajectory. One thing is the solar wind, which will warm the spacecraft. That thing causes that the small particles are flying away from the craft, and the recoil force would turn it away from the course. That thing affects if the craft is flying tens of years.

Every particle affects other particles in the Universe

Also, the RTG generators, what is used in the space probes would cause that the radioactive particles will push the craft to the trajectory, which is not predicted. That thing can cause minimum errors in the trajectory, what can be measured. In the universe, every particle is in interaction with other particles and that thing causes errors in the calculations. Those errors have no mean in normal life.

But they can be measured. And when we are thinking about the minimum errors in the trajectory of particles like comets, that kind of thing can cause the false alarms of the new planets. The thing is that if the frozen nitrogen is in some part of the asteroid, and there would be the pocket of helium, the radiation can cause the jettison, which would turn the movement of the particle.

The thing is that the old-time scientists were not wrong. That means that the advanced measurement methods have caused the calculations to have turned sharper. The modern supercomputers can also use float decimal numbers, which contains even millions of numbers. That causes the systems to have more accuracy than any scientists in the world.

No human can handle numbers where are thousands of decimals. Or they cannot handle the gravity force of thousands of background stars, what is affecting the particles in every solar system. And that thing is causing the revolution in the world of science.  Computers can connect also the extreme weak variables to the calculations, and that makes them the ultimate tool for research and scientific work.

Graviton: the mysterious dark photon

Graviton: the mysterious dark photon

The name of this text should be, gravity and space. Because here I think gravity and its relationship with space. The reason, why the hypothetical particle, the graviton is fascinating is that gravity is an only force, what has the power to effect light, and the suspected mass of graviton is zero, what allows it to travel with the speed of light. So is the graviton so-called dark photon? And are pure gravitons the dark energy? Those are good questions.

Sometimes some philosophers have introduced the model, where the universe is like a rubber layer. Every particle is making small pit on it, and there is an unproven theoretical model, that particles are bringing that layer closer to something, what we can call as "other layer". Then the force that we can call as "gravity" would forward to space, what we are calling as the space-time continuum or simply the universe.

But what would be behind those imaginational rubber layers? Maybe there is the fourth dimension, space, where the gravity has some kind of unknown form. You must realize that this kind of thought is made by philosophers and theoretical researchers. And that's why they are not proven as right or wrong. So they are just theories.

Gravity is the only force in nature, which doesn't need active maintenance. That means that gravity is a so-called passive force, what pulls particles in the central point of the mass, and that's why gravity always wins, and the particles would be pulled in the central of gravity. And that is a thing, what makes gravity so interesting. So some people are making plans that the gravity would offer us the very effective and pure energy source if we someday will find the way, how we could benefit that thing.

Or actually, we could benefit gravity in the hydropower plants, but that thing doesn't mean that we would have the possibility to benefit gravity itself as the energy source. The thing is that there have been ideas to benefit gravity energy by drilling the hole through the moon, and then put the weight dropping in that hole, and the opposite movement can rotate the generator. In this little bit clumsy solution the mass is connected to the wire and then the system would create energy.

But that thing would not probably mean pure energy. The pure energy or creating gravity energy probably doesn't mean that kind of thing. So why the scientists are so interested in gravity. Because gravity cannot fit any other things in nature, the scientists or at least theoretical scientists are creating an idea that gravity is something bigger and more fascinating than we have even thought. They believe that gravity is a gate to the fifth base force in the universe. That fifth force would be the gate to pure energy.

So what means pure energy? In normal natural forces, the energy is transported from one place to another by the transferring particle. And in some very wild theories, the fifth force would not need the transferring particle for traveling from one place to another. But this kind of pure energy is only theory, and we are seeing only the shadow of the fifth force.

Could the energy travel from one place to another without a transporter particle? That is a very interesting question because that means that the fifth force would travel only in the form of wave movements, and it does mean that the force would be very interesting. That means that the top force would not act as a light in the universe. Other base forces are acting like light, which has particular and waveform.

But the missing particle that could be called "gravitons" could tell that gravity is not a similar force than others. That means that gravitation would have the only the waveform or the particles somehow resonate with other particles, or they are forwarding some other force.

So is the model that the particles are like lay around on the layer, what we can call as the time-space continuum, and those particles would take the layer closer to another layer, where some force is transmitted to every single particle in the universe. That thing would seem like the phenomenon, known as "gravity". But what that force could be, that is a really interesting question. Would we sometime benefit that strange thing? That is what we can probably solve in the future, but maybe we ever find the answer.

Rutherford's mussel and creation of antimaterial

Rutherford's mussel and creation of antimaterial

Rutherford's mussel means the spiral track where would shoot ions by using the magnetic accelerator. Or in this case, the name of the device would be particle accelerator, and the mussel or spiral structure would be equipped with extremely powerful magnets, what would keep the ions away from the walls. When those ions would travel in this track the idea is that it would transform the spin of the particle to the opposite, and that would allow creating antimaterial.

If this device would work, it would revolutionize many things in physics and technology, both in civil and military sectors. When we are thinking about the ability to create a very large number of positrons or anti-electrons, we could use those little particles for many purposes. They could be suitable fuel for the very powerful nuclear rockets, which opens the road to the entire solar system, and maybe to the nearest stars.

But the anti-electrons can be used as the most horrifying weapon in the world. If those particles are shoot to the atmosphere that would cause a very powerful explosion. And that makes possible to create almost microscopic bombs, which can have a powerful explosive capacity.  If the genomes of the virus would be removed, and the surface of that bite will be covered with extremely small magnets, what will pull the positrons away from the walls, of the chamber, that system would allow making small-size, but at the same time extremely powerful weapon.

The thing is that the anti-electron must not contact with electrons, or they would transform into energy. And the core of the virus would keep the regular material away from the antimaterial nucleus because if those particles are touching together that will cause a huge explosion. So the miniaturization would make Teller's bomb or antimaterial bomb extreme deadly. But if the antimaterial-ions would shoot against the incoming asteroid or planet, the antimaterial can destroy that incoming object. The gram of antimatter would destroy the earth-size planet, and maybe that technology where ion-cannon will shoot the incoming object can save the world.

The flash when anti-electron impacts electron is extremely powerful and that thing could be used as the very high power lasers. That kind of laser-systems would be the conventional lasers, where the light would create by using electron-positron collisions for creating the light for the laser beam. That would increase the power of lasers in the brand new level. Those solutions might interest military and civil persons, who are creating new lasers for many purposes.

Sometimes people asking about names of the systems and planned to use in physics, and we must remember that the names of those systems are not coming from their real inventors. So this means that the creator of this theoretical device can be everybody in the field of theoretical physics. But the devices can be named after dead men because those men cannot tell secrets to other people, and many nuclear secrets are not meant for ears of a great audience.