The networks, virus scanners, and hacking

The networks, virus scanners, and hacking

If we are thinking about the role of the virus scanners in a computer network, the system might detect things, what people might not want to tell. When we are thinking about the role of networks in computing, we have always forgotten that almost every computer in the western ICT-infrastructure is connected to the network.

Every network is an intranet, and in cases, like North-Korea the entire country is the giant intranet, where is shared very well filtered information. The methodology is similar to the companies, what are using IP-address based system, where is shared only information, what is allowed by the leaders of the company. But the scale of those macro-sized intranets is much larger than in some company's network.

And also official authorization makes those systems more powerful tools for surveillance more effective than any private network can be. In that infrastructure, people must force to use the software, what is terminating their privacy, and let government agents check their computers whenever they want. Also, those people should force to get surveillance operators to use their web-cameras by remote control to find out, who is with them. If somebody denies those things, that person might send to prison camps for "retraining".

That means that we must be careful, what we are doing with our computers. The virus scanners can protect the network in the many layers, and of course, server-based systems might protect the system even single computers would not have virus scanners.

But this thing requires one thing, every bit what comes to the network and comes from the network must travel through that server. And the thing is that also the communication between computers, which are connected to the network must be routed that also their data would travel through the server. This arrangement is called the star topology.

One of the things, what virus scanners are doing is that they are protecting the network from outer attackers, and the other mission, what virus scanners have is to protect other users from the attacks, what comes from some network. The thing is that if some hacker would use some network as the attack platform, that means the system can cause damages because trust to that operator is gone, but also authorities are making research and investigations.

That means that the offices might be sealed by officials, and the use of the internet is limited from the personnel who are working in that company. Sometimes is introduced a scenario, where saboteurs would connect their devices to the network, what is operated by their competitor for making troubles for the reputation of that company, what they use as an attack platform.

Those attacks might be tracked very soon, and the police would arrive at the headquarters of some company. Even if those attacks would fail, the platform company would get very big losses, because police must search those offices and interview personnel. When we are thinking the antivirus software in this kind of situation, the mission of it might be identified all computers, which are connected to the network.

Also, the system might have a mission to detect computers, which have different settings than other users computers. But when we are returning to think about our favorite tool, the artificial intelligence, that system can detect computers, what seems like hacking tools. The thing is that the creators of artificial intelligence can input the parameters, what can detect the computers, what are used for hacking tools.

The profile of those machines would get from the computers, what the officials are confiscated. Then the settings and programs of those machines would be programmed to artificial intelligence, and it can detect similar settings and programs from the network. But if we could get more data about the actions of hackers, we could use that data to make a model of the hacker, and that model can be used to detect other hackers from the network.

So in this model, the actions of detected hackers would observe, and that data is used to make model and profile, what can compare with other users. In the best case, the data can be collected from entire studies time, if the hacker is a student. And then the officials would arrest that person after graduation, which makes possible to create a full-scale complete profile of that kind of people.

I know this seems utopistic, but during that surveillance time the hacker could be used to share hoax information to the back organization, and also the files, what that person deliver might be equipped with tracking cookie. Tracking code allows detecting people, who are paying for some other reasons to share that information, what is got by using the illegal methods.

Where comes the mask of the pharaoh?

Where comes the mask of the pharaoh?

The ancient Egyptian gods and their relationship of the founders of Egypt are very little known persons. And there is one thought about the mask what pharaoh used. That thought is that some of the first pharaohs who were maybe Narmer abject the power in ancient Egypt by killing his successor. Maybe the position of the pharaoh was first the fixed-period. Then Narmer killed his successor and then started to rule the mask on his face. This is a really interesting thing to think in modern-day, where the rulers are using power out of the public eye.

As I have written before ancient Egypt has many secrets, and one of them was who were founders of this ancient kingdom. The first person who has been mentioned in Egyptian chronicles were "Scorpion", the king who lived about 3100 BC. But there were rulers before him. Lower Egypt had a ruler, whose name was Hedju Hor, and his mark was the Bird, who stood on the mark, what seems like a box or rather to say drum. Do you notice that I still have very much attitudes, because I just say that those people, who ruled Egypt were men?

There could also be queens, who used power, but this is the speculation, and maybe those queens were working as the shield for some people, who ruled the people from the back of Pharoah or king. When we are thinking about the first pharaoh of Egypt, Narmer who united Upper and Lower Egypt, we must realize that this man could be the mercenary, who ruled for some other people. When we are looking at the famous palette of Narmer, we must notice that he has portrayed as standing on the kneeing person and keeping the spear on his hand, while humiliating that person, who should serve the new ruler.

When we are thinking the societies of Upper and Lower Egypt, Lower Egypt was the living in the agricultural society, and Upper Egyptians were Nomads, and when Narmer conquerer Lower Egypt, that caused the class to the Egyptian society, what was very deep. When we are thinking about the Narmer's position as the ruler of Upper Egypt and as the conqueror of Thebe, we must realize that there could be two ways how he made that.

Maybe there was a fight before that but there is a possibility, that there was a union between the Nomads and Farmers, who worked on the field. And to that union might belong the contract, that half of the officials were named from the Upper and half of the officials were chosen from the Lower Egyptians.

But then the Narmer was selected only the persons from Upper Egypt to the positions, which was important for the public affairs. And maybe the image what is graved in Narmer palette was made for propaganda, where Narmer defended child by punishing person, who has made something to that child. Maybe the case that the Narmer attacked or took the rule in Thebe was excused that the somebody has done something for the child of upper Egyptians, and then Narmer came to punish that person, who was hurt that child.  In some theories the thing, that some person has problems to get work are coming from that period.

So how Narmer conquerer Thebe? Was he ordered his men to fight, or was he just ordered all officials for the nation, from the own group. There is theory, that there was first the system, where the position of the pharaoh was ambulatory, and the ruler was chosen for a certain time. But then Narmer killed his successor and started to use power mask on his face. Could this the tale behind the mask of the pharaoh, as I have written in the first paragraph of this text?

If we think that the Narmers men kept their power simply by controlling the instructions about how some work must be done, would that thing cause that the persons who were from Upper Egypt were ruling class, and the antigene what would transmit from that era causes that the leaders of the working sites would get antipathy against people, who has genomes from the Lower Egypt. That kind of thoughts is quoted as pseudoscience. But they have been very interesting topics about academic discussions.

When we are thinking about the first periods of ancient Egypt, there are many secrets, because the hieroglyphic system has not advanced yet. This means that this era when prehistory has turned to history has given the ideas for the most incredible and creative theories and stories about the era, what is living only in stories. Many things, what happens that era were stored long after those first pharaohs.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pharaohs