A short tale about pseudoscience

A short tale about pseudoscience

What if there is no right answer?

One very good example of the question, where is not answer is the tale about scientists and boys. In this tale, the boy shows the brown and white horse on the plant, and then that boy asked the scientist "what is the name of that thing?". The scientist answered that "I don't know" and then the boy said, "it's a brown and white horse".  Here we must understand that the question was about the name of that thing. And how a scientist should know that name? The right form of the question would be "what is that thing?". And then the scientist would answer "horse", and then the real answer would be "brown and white horse".

Or if the scientist would answer that way, the boy could say "brown and white horse, what name is XXX", and then the answer would be longer and longer. The thing is that this tale is one of the best examples of things, where we cannot even give the right answer. This is one of the versions, where the form of the answer would also change all the time, and we cannot ask the hose, what its name is.  And who knows, how other horses are calling that horse, and could we even say its name? The name what the owners of that horse use of it, or the name what other horses call that horse?

There are two types of pseudoscience, harmless and harmful.

A harmless version of pseudosciences are things like horoscopes or some other things. Most of us don't believe them, and that thing makes them look quite harmless. Of course, some horoscope could be coded messages to intelligence or some other things, but there is quite a small possibility, that this kind of thing concerns the normal people.

Also, things like the mass of the photon or some case near the black holes, where the black holes extreme gravity field would cause the situation, that the speed of light could be crossed have no mean to people. We must say that for proving that thing, we must fly to the black hole, and meter our speed beyond the singularity. That is the thing, that gives answers to us, and before that everything, what we say about that thing is pure theory.

But the harmful pseudoscience is things like playing with medicals and homeopathy. This kind of thing can cause even death. And also things like carelessness while testing medicals and other kinds of things are serious things.

We should not justify everything, what we see in the world of quantum physics as pseudoscience. But the thing is that some pseudoscience makers are good speakers, and they can make even the very dangerous things looking good. They use good-looking arguments for supporting their way to see things, and sometimes they are an appeal to religious opinions. When the motivated followers are standing in the next of those people, there are only a few persons, who can resist those quite charismatic people, and that will boost their way to say things.

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/dd/RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg/220px-RWS_Tarot_20_Judgement.jpg

The bad situation of Donald Trump and the problems with tactics, which are used in the counter-guerilla operations.

The bad situation of Donald Trump and the problems with tactics, which are used in the counter-guerilla operations.

So Turkey hits Syria and the problem is that it is part of NATO, which means it is one of the allies of the USA. And another problem is that there are Kurds, who are also the allies of the USA what makes this thing little nit more complicated than normal people might think.

The thing in that area is that there are two parties on the Kurd side, another is YDF, which is a so-called official organization, and the other is PKK, which is classified as a terrorist organization in Turkey. So what makes this case so problematic. The thing is that the relationship between armed groups and governments in that area is also very complicated.

When we are saying that Turkey is allied with the USA that doesn't mean that the generals of the USA army control straight the military forces of Turkey. And the thing that makes this situation "interesting" is that the USA denied selling the F-36 fighters to Turkey, which choose the S-300 missile system from Russia for air defense.

The reason for that is Russia could calibrate it's air defense missiles to shoot down those fighter-bombers. And of course, Turkey doesn't like that kind of advantage in the relationship between it and its other allies. The position of Donald Trump is not very nice anyway, because of his period as the President of the United States of America is the internal political crises, and his way to act is far away from the way how people have adjusted to seeing in the international politics.

So this is the reason, why commenting about this kind of situation is so complicated. When we are thinking about the situation in Syria there is no military answer. And the violence increases violence. When people are facing bombardment that thing causes hate and increases the support of the PKK and other radical groups, as we have seen in other places on Earth.

I know this might mean a really cold way to think, but a good example of this kind of advantage is the situation in Israel. The Israeli military force crushed the PLO in 1982 and after that, the policy in that country has been that because Israel is the stronger side, it must not negotiate with the opposite side.

And in that area, the conflict has continued as terrorism and guerilla warfare. The tactic of IDF is to use aircraft and helicopters with smart weapons against guerilla targets. Those tactics cause hate, and of course, those strikes are effective and they are keeping Israeli forces safe.

Some people believe that airstrikes are used because of the psychological aspect, what is two side thing. Airstrikes are coming like lightning from the skies, which makes fear in the mind of the enemy. But also that thing makes sure that the distance with own troops and enemy is long enough.

And the own troops are not facing "negative psychological effect", which means that the own troops are not spending time in the homes of the opposite side. That thing is supporting the terrorist agenda, which wants to show their enemy as a monster. And airstrikes guarantee that there is no trace of the terrorists, who are not in place at that moment.

We always forget those normal soldiers, who are operating in the field are they special forces or tank men are sometimes forced to make tough decisions. And those field operators are also under the psychological influence of the regular representers of the opposite side. That's why helicopters and airplanes are a better way to scout and fast strike operations.

They can track mobile telephones, and then shoot their missiles against those targets, but in those cases, the person who uses the mobile telephone might be different than a person, who has bought that device. That means that airstrikes are effective against targeted mobile telephones.

But they are causing that tracking the terrorists or the user of that telephone is difficult because there is no DNA or other samples in those targets. There are also no people for interrogations, what is, of course, a good thing for terrorists.  And there is a possibility that terrorists are waiting for the last second and then leave the house, what might confuse the intelligence of Israel, that they are dead.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11012691

The writing about the Battle of Little Big Horn

The writing about the Battle of Little Big Horn

Picture I

One of the interesting details in the case of the Battle of Little Big Horn is that the graves of men of Custer are not in lines. Those graves are in a disorder, and that thig is a very interesting detail. The graves of the men of 7th cavalry are separated from the national cemetery of Little Big Horn, and the grave of Custer is marked as black. Death of George Armstrong Custer caused two gunshots, one was pointed above his heart, and the second one hit his temple.

That might be suicide, or maybe the first shot was caused shock, that Custer accidentally launched his gun to his head. Or there is a possibility that some Indian made that thing, and the motive might be that this particular person could be Indian scout, who was working as an informer in the society of Indians. Maybe he or she afraid that the real identity of that individual was uncovered, if that person opened mouth and spoke English. That would cause that this man shot Custer.

Because that man could uncover this spy under extortion, but there is a possibility, that Custer knew that man. Or maybe Custer was in shock because of the disaster and gave his life for avoiding the extortion. And in that time were stories about the Indians, who extorted people and took their hair and head skin. Scalping was a habit, what was started by Europeans, and then it transferred to Indians.

The question is, why those graves are not in order? Even if those men were buried in the place, where they were found, why their bodies were not moved in lines? Of course, shiny and warm summer caused the smell, but why the places of the graves or drave stones were not placed later? Seems that somebody wanted to forget the Battle of Little Big Horn. This writing is about the things, what caused that George Armstrong Custer took his men to trap and death.

There are many writings about the battle of Little Big Horn itself, but the reasons, why Custer went to battle, has not very much stories. The major thing was that Indians wait for 7th Cavalry on that day, but who informed them about this thing? Did Indians read New York Tribune? Or was Custer himself informed opposite side accidentally or in purpose, that he could cause battle, where that man could show his skills for his political career.

This is one question about the disaster of Little Big Horn and the death of Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer (1839-1876) on July 15, 1876. In that battle, the 5 of the12 companies of the U.S 7th Cavalry regiment were annihilated. 258 cavalrymen were dead in battle and 55 were wounded. Five of them were dead later. There were many things in this Battle, what has been brought the many questions in the mind of researchers.

The new methods of research have given archeologists a chance to reconstruct the things, what have been happened in the field. And because every gun makes a unique mark in bullet and shells, that allows following the movements of individual men on the field. But those things don't uncover the reason, why this battle was done. There are many things, what are left without explanation.

One of them is, why Custer left in the Indian area with so few men? He was in chief of about 400-700 men. The strength of 7th Calvalry depends on the sources, and the strength of Indians was about 5000, but most of them were women, children and old people. Indian warriors had also new magazine rifles, what were similar, what Cavalry used. Strenght of armed men was about 1400 men, and the reason why the strength of the Indian army was reported as 5000 was probably that the loss was so embarrassing. Losses of Indians were 58 and 10 civilians.

Even they would not have those rifles, the superiority in manpower was very big, and Custer should predict, that Indians probably didn't choose the frontal assault tactics, even they had no rifles. And rifle is quite difficult to use from horseback. The thing, what makes this battle very interesting were the names of those Indian chiefs, Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, and Gall, and sometimes has claimed that those names were so-called cover-up names.

But as you see, the thing what makes this battle interesting was that Sitting Bull and Gall flee to Canada, and after that, they returned to the USA. One remarkable thing in the Battle of Little Big Horn was that the family of Crazy Horse died in that battle, and this thing is quite interesting.

So did they were standing in the next of that man? Before that battle, Custer met two officers on board of the river ship, and explained the tactics, what he planned to use. And there were reporters also on board, and there is a question, did some of those men be Indians?

Or did some reporters told the plans to Indians by accident? There is a thought that maybe Custer himself gave that information for causing battle and making himself as a national hero. If the man who gave information about the plans was Custer himself, and he planned to flee from the battlefield, and left his men behind him. That kind of thing might make him the national hero. And then everything went wrong, and he died in that place.

When we are looking at those things, we must realize that some white men might be told those planes to Indians for causing the loss for military, and giving a reason for massive military actions in that area, where has founded the iron ore. Or was the reason probably personal revenge for Custer? Who knows what reason, but the fact is that Custer was the perfect buck. That man had two military ranks, the general what was the rank of volunteers, and his military rank in an army was a Lieutenant Colonel.

The thing is that maybe somebody cheats Custer in the photograph and use the volunteer rank. So, was this person the same, who caused the loss of Little Big Horn? And when that man died, he was a perfect hero. The officers of 7th cavalry might have problems with command relationships, and major Marcus Reno had also heavy drinking problems. So was Custer take regiment in command without permission?  Or was it the backup plan? If Indians would not kill that man, the court-martial would do that. And who sold those rifles to Indians? The thing is that those fighters must also know some tactics because they have so small losses.

One of the biggest questions is, why the question is why the reconnaissance information about the strength of the Indians was so underestimated. And why Custer attempted to surprise them with so little troops? That is the thing in the battle. The first patrol, who met Indians were 30 men strong, and that very outnumbered and alarmed the entire camp. So that thing was remarkable detail in this strange story.

https://www.history.com/news/little-bighorn-battle-facts-causes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Little_Bighorn

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Little_Bighorn_cemetery_overview.jpg

Lasers, ions, and DNA

Lasers, ions, and DNA

A new type of lasers can cut extremely small particles, and they can be used in the new type of molecule chemistry. The fact is that the DNA is just the molecule, and it can be cut in pieces like any other molecule in the world. Nanomachines can connect the small bite of iron to that molecule, and it allows the system to pull it on the layer by using a magnetic field.

Nanotechnology can produce lasers, which would create an extremely thin ray, and those laser rays can cut the DNA to a certain point. If we would use PCR-technology, we could create copies of those DNA bites, and use them like artificial viruses, which makes them an ultimate tool for medical and other purposes.

If we would think the thing, what would bring the new things for cancer treatment, and in the future, we could simply connect the sequence, what orders cell to die at the end of the DNA of the cells, what has damages of that sequence. In some theories, those cells could be located in the human body by bombing cells with laser rays.

If that "kill sequence" just missing the cell would be lighter than other cells, and the laser moves it in by another way. Sometimes researchers have thought that the nano-submarine, where is one killed cancer cell on the manipulator would travel to the cancer tumor, and activate the cell death by that way. But if that sequence is missing from the DNA of those cells the thing is more complicated. One version is that the nanomachines can just take telomer sequences off from those cells, and then they would be getting old very fast.

The thing in this version of chemotherapy would be that the chemical structure of the cancer cells is a little bit different than the normal cells, and the nanomachine would use the molecular cutter, what will fit only to that cell core. And if we would someday create that kind of molecule, what will cut only the cores of the cancer cells, we could connect that molecule in the cytostatic, what makes possible to create the cytostatics, what would destroy only cancer cells. 

By using modern nanotechnology would be possible to create artificial ricin molecule, what would have a molecular bond, what can be cut by using resonance. That means that when the ricin is released in the tumor, the sound would destroy that molecule after it has been made the job. Ricin would be effective in the cytostatic treatment but the problem is that if the molecules are released in the body, that thing causes death.

In some theories, we could inject those artificial viruses to the handicapped fetuses, and the nanomachines can replace the damaged part of DNA with the new sequence. Then the nanomachines can put new sequences to that part of the genomes, and the thing is that nanomachines would just create synthetic DNA by using the sugars and base, what are the part of the normal DNA molecule.

Storing the DNA in the digital form is not very difficult, because chemical symbols of the DNA molecule are only one letter long, and the thing is that if we would have time, we could store those letters to the text-file. The problem is that in the human DNA is very many base pairs, and that's why this project must leave to computers.

Nanotechnology allows military forces to create a new type of weapons, which can have more horrifying effects than we ever expected. One version of nanomachine-based weapons is the molecular-size scissors, which would just cut the telomer-sequences of the chromosomes, and that weapon would cause progeria or extreme fast elding of the targeted people and other organisms.

The second and even more horrifying thing is the virus, which will just kill the cells. That thing would be the artificial DNA sequence, what will consist only the genome, what activates programmed cell death. That virus could just kill animals and people by putting their bodies the DNA sequences, where is only the code, what activates the cell death. And these things are not spoken too much in the discussions, what are handling the nanotechnology and DNA manipulation.

Max Valier and his rocket innovations

Max Valier in his laboratory
(Congress library)

Max Valier and his rocket innovations

Max Valier (1895-1930) was born in Bolzano, Italy in 1895, and he was the man, who worked for "Opel" company creating the rocket cars, and also that man invented the first space rockets and shuttles. His inventions consisted the space shuttles, what benefit the liquid-fuel rocket engines. And the thing is that Max Valier was mentioned more productive and innovative than Wernher von Braun ever was.

The thing is that Max Valier died in his laboratory accidentally are causing the rumors about the murder because of the death caused by the rocket engines burning chamber explosion threw the metal bite across the air and that metal bite cut the aorta of Valier, who died immediately. At first sight, this thing might seem a normal accident, which is caused by the high-pressure system, which could not stand the pressure of the rocket motor.

But when we are looking at closer about the image, what is very often published in rocket books, we are looking at the very important detail, and that is that when Valier looks at the thing, what is claimed to be the rocket engine, that man doesn't have earmuffs, what are necessary for those situations. Even the small size rocker engine has very loud noise, what would be in the same level as the jet engine. 

And that means that if the person is in the noise area of the rocket engine, that thing causes pain. So what would be the thing, what is on the table in front of Valier? There have been tales that Velier would create very high power rocket engine, what would be the hybrid system, where inside the reaction chamber of the rocket would create the electric arc by using wolfram electrodes.

The electric system would base the simple dynamo, what is installed to the pumping system of the rocket. That would increase the temperature and the speed of exhaust gas for the rocket. That would increase speed or payload of rockets.

But there is another thing, what Valier might do.  The strange thing what Valier might try to make was the death ray, what bases the sound. In this version, the sound would break or destroy the mitochondria or nucleus of the cell, and that thing would turn the enemy army to ash. In that thing, the high power sound would have the same effect with the Japanese death ray, what bases the electromagnetic radiation.