Showing posts with label constitutional state. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitutional state. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2019

93 years old KZ-camp guard would get to court

93 years old KZ-camp guard would get to court

This would be one of the last prosecutions against the prison guards of the Nazi-Germany. Those prosecutions are very important because their mission is to show that murders ever get old. And if the murderer would catch after a long time, those cases would send to the court. 

The operators who made those crimes were always young in the sides of Stalin and Hitler, because the execution was the thing, what made those people shame about their actions. Also, it was an effective method to tie the person in the system and make sure about the loyalty of that young security police officer.

If the person said "no" that meant death, was the thing, what those people learned to say. But was it true? Whoever knows. And for the first time, the person claimed for self, to be forced in that case. But sometimes those things were only the psychological tricks that were offered to those people. The idea was that the first execution was difficult, and the person would be escorted across the line and then the rest was easier.

Murders ever get old, and this is the principle in the constitutional states. Even if the suspect is old and weak, that would not justify those actions. And even if somebody else makes that kind of crime, that doesn't mean that they are acceptable. So the message of those prosecutions is that if you make crimes, you will be punished even if the orders came from superior officers.

The law's mission is to make strict and clear orders for society. And that means everybody must follow the law. That means that the prosecutions can be raised even if the person is in the hospice, because the law says, that the old age is not released the person from the criminal prosecution process. And this is the reason, why also old cases are prosecuted.

When we are thinking about the mission of the Court of Law, that means the mission of the court system is to punish people, who break the law. The punishments are made for a warning for people, who are planning some criminal actions. The mission of those prosecutions is to make fear in the heart of people, who have made serious crimes. That means those legal actions against the war criminals are important.

War criminals are living in the middle of us. The Yogoslavia war in the 1990s and things like the Gulf War have opened the eyes of the people, that there are monsters also in a so-called good side. Also in Libya, where Muammar Gaddafi was kicked off from power has many people, who were acted in the side of the Gaddafi and his secret police, and tortured the prisoners.

Sometimes I have thought that could it be possible that some of those persons would be acting in the side of the allied force? When we are thinking about those people who would be very normal looking, could make the worst things, what mankind can imagine. And those people are perfect operators in the dark operations because they can shoot during the arresting.

The idea is that those operators would be acting against Islamists under medical supervision. In this model, the bone marrow of the person would be changed, and if the person can be kept under the control by using the immune medicals. Even if the USA itself would not use that kind of staff, the operators like Saudi-Arabia are using those methods.



Sunday, October 13, 2019

Constitutional state and populism

Constitutional state and populism



Populists say that independent justice system would not serve democracy, because judges are living far away from reality. Normally the argument for that is that judges make solutions, which is not in the line with common opinion. In many arguments, the judge is the government official, whose mission is to serve the state as well as the police organization. And sometimes I have heard opinions that when the prosecution has been raised against foreign people, those people just should kick off from the country because the legal proceedings are just a waste of money. 

That kind of argumentation is sometimes very effective for the "regular people", who have not have to see things, what they don't want to see. And this kind of thing the argument about the laws, what are criminalizing things like homosexuality and another kind of that, whom person self cannot effect. 

But do you know, why we have a court system? Its mission is to deny the police and government officials make crimes. If we would not have neutral trials, where also persecuted people have a chance to defend themselves, the officials would try to put their illegal acts to other people's fault. 

The thing in the populism is that it is a very good tool in the hands of the politicians. We must remember that the destruction of the Warsaw Pact caused the new kind of information technology, which allowed people to communicate with together without state control. 

And new popular politicians revolutionize democracy. But that advantage continues, and the problem in the ex-eastern block nations is that there has ever been a democracy. People are grown for respecting or rather saying obey the government, and they have ever been in the world, where the politician is the same kind of person as they are. 

They are not adjusted to the public decision-making process, and because of the rights like gathering are new, the politicians use that kind of thing for making their position stronger. When we are thinking about people's relationship with governments, we are seeing one very interesting thing, and that is that police is more confessing in the eyes of the people than some judge, who gives the convictions in the closed rooms. 

In the past, some people had an attitude, that when police arrested people, that person was convicted at the same moment. The model was taken from Mickey Mouse cartoon, where police take criminals to prison right away when they are put to the handcuffs. This is the problem with publicity. When the police would arrest people, the interest in the case ends. People thought that the person was convicted right away, and they were ever returned. 

This happened in countries like Finland, where the press was free, at least if we would compare the situation to the Eastern block. And in Eastern block the political arresting caused that people believe, that police ever made mistakes. In fact, in some criminal cases, the officials raised two prosecutions, another was about normal crime, and the second one was a political crime like agitation. And the person left to jail anyway, what made sure that police must ever confess that it makes mistakes. 

Image:


Six clicks separate people from each other.

“A long-observed social phenomenon suggests that people across the globe are separated by surprisingly few connections. Credit: Stock” (Scit...