Two interesting pictures and the Battle of New Orleans

Image I

Two interesting pictures and the Battle of New Orleans

Yesterday was Halloween and the spirits were walking in the middle of people. So this kind of thing might cause the effect, that everything seems weird, and if people are believing supernatural, they might see things, what they are not seen before, and one thing is that coincidences get new involving. The painting in this text is the painting, which was painted by Jean-Hyacinthe de Lacrotte, and the photograph what is taken in Southern Finland in the dark time shows that street lights have taken the same form, what the stars have taken in the painting, what Jean-Hyacinthe de Lacrotte has been painted, and that kind of thing is really interesting coincidence. 

The name of the painter is interesting, and the second name of that man means Hyacinth, the flower, what people are taking to the graves at Christmas. So are those forms only coincidence, or are they made in purpose? That kind of thing is interesting things to think while being out in the dark. But I believe that those lights are in that certain form only because of an accident. But coincidences are interesting, and they make life easier and more interesting to live. 

And if those lights have put on that form in purpose, that means that there must be some reason for that. So what is the legend of the Battle of New Orleans? History tells that the general Andrew "Old Hickory" Jackson was the commander of the US troops in that battle in 1815. But was he the real commander? The thing is that in those days the truth was very hard to find out, and there is a possibility, that somebody has miswritten history in purpose. But that kind of thing is meanless in modern times. 

There are also stories that Andrew Jackson got the British plans from some very high-ranking officers, who wanted to lose those men, who came to New Orleans in 1815 with the Major-General Pakenham. That battle was the begin of the U.S militarism, and the big British losses have put people to think that the reason for those losses was some kind of paper, which was in the hands of Jackson. The wildest theory is that Jackson was a time traveler, who used history books in his work but don't take those things so seriously.  

The myth is that somebody saw that Jackson had strange papers with him, and there was the entire battle in that paper, but there is no proof for that thing. But this kind of thing is fascinating. And the thing that we might see on the Wikipedia page, what is linked below this text is that Packenham could continue his attack if he were not dead. Pakenham died in that battle, and that caused the British must change their plans. But somehow he has withdrawn after 350 dead and 1521 wounded and 552 missing or captured soldiers. Casualties of Jackson were 55 dead, 185 wounded and 93 missing soldiers (1). 

Here I must say, that we must trust someway the historical writings, which means that the mystery remains. The thing is that the official history-writing must sometimes be enough, and that means that Andrew Jackson is the winner of the battle, but otherwise, we must say, that without that battle there would be very different USA, than what we see in the modern days. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_New_Orleans

Image I

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Battle_of_New_Orleans,_Jean_Hyacinthe_de_Laclotte.jpg

A point in the map can uncover many things, what we want to hide

A point in the map can uncover many things, what we want to hide

The point, where the people are having mean, and only one cell-phone, what is forgotten to close can uncover military action. The thing is that social media location tools can uncover the location of the special forces trooper or some nuclear researcher. The thing is that if the person claims to be in some other country or some other area, where the location information is coming, that tells that the person is telling manipulated information.

Lies are telling that person has something to hide, and if the location information comes from somewhere in the middle of nowhere, that tells that something is going on in that location. The thing is that nuclear scientists are not normally spending their time in the desert, and that means that the recon satellites can point their cameras in that location.

In those cases, the satellites might use VLF radars to locate the underground structures like tunnels.  And if that area is disturbing the radars by using the plasma-shield or building structures, what denies the radars to get sharp images, that thing causes suspicious that there is something, that the government wants to hide in those areas.

Another version is that the well-known nuclear scientists are in the same location. Those kinds of people are not making meetings without reason. The thing, that sometimes uncovers the nuclear program of some countries is the willingness to get that kind of training. Sometimes the exchange programs of universities are uncovering the need to train nuclear physics, and other staff, what is needed for that kind of program.

The other case, when the location information uncovers lies are situations, that some friend of the nuclear scientist is seeing that they are in the same city. This means that the friend might ask a meeting, and in some cases, the location information tells that the person is on the opposite side of the road or street. And if the person, who arrives is different, that means that the scientist is somewhere else.

When we are looking at the things, what is causing the suspicious that in some countries everything is not like they wish people to believe is that people are places, where they should not be. If we are thinking the social media as a tool to uncover secrets, we might see that almost every person in the western world has some kind of social media account.

And if someone else is using the account simultaneously, that tells that something to hide. In some cases, the thing, what uncovers that someone else is using social media account is that some friend knows that person. The things relationships inside families might not be known by those operators, and that means that there could be very bad mistakes about that kind of messaging.

Things that surveillance operators are looking for in those messages are problems with attitudes. Another kind of disagreements with a person outfit, another identity, and attitudes, which means as an example the hardcore heavy metal music fan would often mention that the mother wants that person to select some profession, what doesn't fit that individual.

Or the person would just turn to another side. That means that this rock fan would turn to listen to classical music, which might be a sign of growing to adulthood. But those kinds of changes would not usually happen in one second, and leather pants and jacket don't turn to slips and suit in second. If this kind of thing happens, that could mean that the user of the account has been changed.

The hidden message of the image "Jaqueline" or "Woman with yellow hat" by Pablo Picasso (1961)

Image I

The hidden message of the image "Jaqueline"  or "Woman with yellow hat" by Pablo Picasso (1961)

At first sight, painting might look like a little bit boring, but when we are looking at it longer, the hidden meanings of that image would open to the observer. But that process takes time and after the long observation, the observer would find hidden details from the painting.

The image what is under the observation is "Woman with the yellow hat" or "Jaqueline" from the year 1961, what is painted by Pablo Picasso. The painter claimes that this image portraits his las model, who went married to Picasso, but there would be other dimensions.

The painting of Pablo Picasso, what connected in this text is one of the most typical representers of modern art. And as you might see, at first nothing is interesting about this character, but then we must notice, that the character is a little bit more than some blot. 

The character seems to be a woman and man at the same time. That portrait would also look like staring the looker intensively but at the same time, the position seems boring, head lies on the hand, and the facial expression is at the same time understanding but pity.

The eyes, what are looking at the observer would seem like empty, and that means the person hears but not listen. Also, the character what has the two genders symbolizes character, what never can say wrong things. That person always walking in the middle of the road, and let other people say things first.

And after that, this kind of people would say the opinion, what is supporting the opinion of majorities. So this might be the symbol of this painting. The idea of the art analysis is to find the hidden inspiration, symbols, and codes from the image, what might seem very normal in the first sight.

(Image I)
https://www.wikiart.org/en/pablo-picasso/woman-with-yellow-hat-jacqueline

What is so special with this creature?

What is so special with this creature?

Picture I

When we are looking at this sculpture or creature, what is made on the wall of the bell tower of the church of Vähäkyrö, Finland (Picture I), we must notice, that there is something interesting about that man-shaped creature. Another leg of that inmate seems to be bigger than other, and that thing brings in my mind the medieval image of the monopod from Nuremberg chronicles, who has only one extremely large leg (Picture II). When we are thinking about medieval art, there is one thing, what we must remember.


That thing is that the monopod would be actually the caricature, what gave the anthropologists instructions, what they must be looking for in some special situations. But why the bigger leg is so interesting? Was it the mark of belonging of some royal families, or is there something deeper meaning? When we are thinking about the anthropological characteristics, that kind of things was a very good note, when the criminals were searching from the forests.

Picture II

There is one very interesting detail of those very mysterious figures. The people, who have faced abductions are claimed to see some kind of handicapped people, who have grotesque figures, and who were communicating with the abductors. There is possible that this thing has been caused by extreme stress or something, what we don't know.  But we know that there is something special of that kind of images because it was made on the wall of church's bell tower.

Nobody makes those things for fun, and there is a detail, that this creature may ask for money or something else. The clothes of that character are clean, and that would not seem like a poor man, which makes this thing very interesting. So this image is not made for causing pity, and this man seems like really hard.

And there must be some reason, why that character has been made in this particular place. Was it really made for remembering, that somebody need help, or for some kind of warning, that there would be some kind of problem if somebody will hurt that person? And there is not any kind of cup, where that character would collect the money. So who or what that character was? That is a really good question for thinking on a bright summer day in the year 2019.

(Picture II) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nuremberg_chronicles_-_Strange_People_-_Umbrella_Foot_(XIIr).jpg