One interesting detail in the name of Abraham Lincoln

One interesting detail in the name of Abraham Lincoln

Have you noticed that the name of the president of the United States Abraham Lincoln is the same as the ancestor of the Hebrew villain Abraham, the creature of the Old Testament? When we are thinking about the similarities of Abraham Lincoln and the Old Testament's Abraham, those persons are both the creators of something great.

Abraham Lincoln was the creator of the modern United States of America and the father of the modern presidency, which means that this man was one of the best leaders of the United States. So if I have said that he was more about the "man of the south" than Wilson, that thing is not seen in the policy, what this man selected.

As you see, there is a little possibility, that this president has been changed, because of the noses of the people, who are introduced as president Lincoln has been changed. But the thing is not proven, and if we are thinking about the letters and photographs that are taken during people living, we must realize that those photographs are faked in the 19th century as well as the modern time.

The thing is that there was a theory, that Abraham Lincoln was grown as the candidate for the presidential election. But when we are thinking about the assassination of Lincoln, there is a possibility that the man, who shot by John Wilkes Booth was the body double, whose mission was to play Lincoln in that evening, because Lincoln was in the dentist, and that allowed Lincoln step away from the position as the President of the United States of America.

The civil war was a really bad thing in the history of America, and that thing might cause that Lincoln was afraid of the new conflict. And when we are observing things like freedom of slaves, that thing solved one very interesting problem in the USA. That means that the possibility to agitate slaves for rebellion against the USA was whipped away. This was one of the reasons, why the USA went to civil war. The slaves could be a good target for agitators if they want to raise a rebellion.

And that's why they have formed a threat to national security. This thing was problematic in the 19th century because slavery was prohibited in Great Britain and France, and if those nations would agitate slaves as the rebellion, that could be the catastrophe. And that was one reason, why Lincoln was supporting Union in that war. But there were many other reasons, why civil war began. Even if the person's personal opinions would be something else, we must estimate them by using sources, what is possible to get. And publically Lincoln was against slavery, what should be enough for critics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ro0SlVPlWE&t=49s

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.

And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.

Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too. 

The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.

The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.

When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.

The distance between Egypt and Israel is about 613 kilometers, but Hebrews took 40 years for that trip

The distance between Egypt and Israel is about 613 kilometers, but Hebrews took 40 years for that trip

In this text, I will use the words "Holy Land" and "promised land" about the place, where Hebrew people went after they were gone from Egypt. Here I must say that Moses and other people who were born or worked in Egypt had no change to get in that new country. The risk that those people would be traitorous and believe, that the things were better in Egypt was so big, that they must die before those people went to that area.

Sometimes people ask why Hebrews walked 40 years or 43 meters per day for finding the holy or promised land after they escaped from Egypt. The reason, for that journey, is that Hebrews were moved around the Arabian peninsula after they went to the desert because they wanted to lose the men of Pharaoh, and that is the reason, why the persons, who were born in Egypt were not able to move in the promised land. That land was reserved only their children.

The reason, why those people who were lived and worked in Egypt must die before the settlement will take the place in the holy land, was that there were people, who were worked as the leaders for the other Hebrews. And some men of Pharaoh might be promised them something for traitorous actions, but there was another reason, why those leaders of the group must vanish before people could take their place in the promised land. The thing is that what happened in Egypt must leave in there.

The people must stand on one side when the plantations and irrigation for them would be done because if somebody would think, that they live in Egypt would be better than in the new place, the entire escape and the plan for establishing own land and state would be broken. And in this case, people must stand behind the dream as one man. When we are thinking about those people, who were standing behind that dream, we must understand that they were facing many traitorous actions before those decisions.

Pharaoh has been promised many things to those people but the thing is that only the leaders of the Hebrews got the good things in the society of Egypt. Ordinary people of Hebrew community would face the things, that they were the second or third class citizens. And the thing is that those people wanted freedom. They wanted to make their own decisions, and they wanted also respect from other people. When they walked in the desert, they faced many troubles and those troubles grow them.

And during the journey, those people didn't walk in a single group. They played the regular nomadic people, and then they had the knowledge, how to build the fortresses and other kinds of things. When the time was full those people grow together and then they attacked the promised land. Maybe the other team was attacked in the front and two others from the side and back against those defenders. So the people, who lived in Holy land had no change against Hebrews. That operation was giving those people respect in the eyes of other people. Is this true or false, the decision is yours, but this is how I would make those things.