History and hoaxes

History and hoaxes

As you might know, history is full of hoaxes, and the reason for that is the thing that especially the cases of war, history is written by winners. And when we are thinking about winners, the winning side might be changed several times during history, which makes it very difficult to find out, what happened, and why something happened? History is full of cases, where the cities have been moved, and moving the city is happening very easily.

The ruler of the state would just come to someplace and then said that people must move. Then the city was burned, and the new city would get the name of the old city. Sometimes this operation was made because of the epidemics like plaque, but there might be cases that the king just arrived in some city, and said that "was this the old Canterbury?". In those cases, people should agree with the king, or that person might just cut the heads off.

The thing is that the reason, why some city has been moved might cause that there was something, what might be embarrassing for the king. This kind of thing is fascinating, and if there could be some documents of the reasons, why the king made that kind of decision, that could give the window to diplomacy, what has been made hundreds of years ago. Why some king has ordered to move the entire city to another place?

So this is one point of view of the things. When we are thinking about the things, what is embarrassing for people, who are in control of the state, we must realize that if the orders for punishment are coming from the king, there is something that is embarrassing for the rulers of the state. The reason why the absolute monarch was above the law was that this thing made him independent.

Nobody allowed to prosecute king, and if something puts that man to the difficult position that thing must have very big power and effect to the king, because of the independency meant that king must not even answer to prosecutions. So why the king was not told some reasons, for the war his henchmen? What that person hide? There are many cases in history when some rulers have been hidden the real purpose of the military actions and persecutions in the religious mask.

The list is long and it starts the ancient Greek kings and continues to Huguenot persecutions and actions of communists, nazis and far wing radicalism in the modern days. So the thing is that religion has been a thing, what has been the reason, why people have been ordered to the army, and attack against each other. Also, kings justified their power that they were got the authority to rule countries from God and if somebody disagreed that means the blasphemy.

The castle above the clouds

The castle above the clouds

Did Gestapo take the name for Euthanasia program 14f13 (1) from the year of death of Jacques de Molay (1265-1314)(2)? There are many stories and legends about castles, and the people, who lived in them. Do you know that the grandmaster of Normandy Templars Jacques de Molay went to a bonfire in the year 1314, and the horrifying detail in history is that Nazi governments "Euthanasia" or killing operation Action14f13 has got the same numbers, what are the years of the death of Jacques de Molay? Is this thing coincidence or made in purpose remains a mystery. 

This page is an interesting image of the castle above the clouds, and I think that it would be interesting to think about people, who might live in that castle all their live. In this case, we would handle the thing, what is called as "grown in the bottle". That means that if the person is closed in that castle for all their life, they would think that the entire world is this castle. And in this perspective, the other people are like aliens to them. 

And that is the reason, why castles were built. Their mission was to isolate the noblemen from ordinary people. And this isolation meant that those people were able to serve their superiorities, bu that isolation also made easy to control the military officials by using fear. If the person, who was in charge of the castle would not do what the higher rank official want, that thing caused that the rebellious person would be arrested. 

But the thing that we are calling as isolation made also easy to control those people, who ruled the force. They needed money and food for a living, and this is the reason, why those castles are so effective tools for isolation and control. When we are thinking about the people, who lived in those castles, they might think that ordinary people were some kind of barbarians.

The thing is that those people knew, that they were acting wrong, but that thing turns to hate and fear. The thing is that the taxes, what the king was collected through those castles, and that hide the role of the king. And sometimes the people, who lived in the castles were prosecuted and convicted about stealing money from the king. But the reality was that this kind of case was meant for offering the sacrificed gift for people. 

And one of those cases is claimed to be the case of Elizabeth Báthory. The thing, in this case, was that this woman was not rougher than any other noble person in that kingdom. And also people claim that the prince of Hungary had debt from that family, which means that people sometimes compare that case with the case of Templars. 

They were arrested because they were officially revolt against the King of France. But the real reason could be that many noblemen in Europe were lent money from that organization. But who gave that money to Templars? Were those soldier-monks representatives of the Hansa, and that money belonged to that powerful organization of tradesmen. 

Templars could be suitable middlemen between Hansa and the customers of that bank, and that means that there could be people, who will not want to pay back those lendings. And maybe Templars didn't tell the origin of that money to the king, who thought that he must not pay that money back. So the prosecutions were the usury, and of course blasphemy. That thing caused, that three Templars sent to a bonfire in 1314. 

Sometimes have been claimed that Nazis took the name for their Euthanasia or killing program 14f13 from this case. But that thing can be pure coincidence. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_14f13

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_de_Molay

Image:

https://www.thelocal.de/20160803/germanys-10-most-iconic-castles-and-palaces

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

When we are looking at some king of street gangs, we see how those people are driving with expensive cars and wearing expensive clothes. At the same time, the henchmen are wearing cheaper clothes, and other things are worse for the henchmen. And that thing makes easy to notice the rulers of the gangs.

The thing that the street gang bosses are wearing expensive clothes is happening because that person wants to prove to be better than others. The similar effect has been seen in the clothes of medieval kings and Roman emperors.

The golden wagons were rising the ego of those persons, and they believed that they selected by some power, what was above the people, and the same argument was used by medieval kings when they augmented their way to use power against normal people. The ruling was a holy mission of those people, and that justified them to do whatever they wanted to do.

Those people used the most expensive clothes to prove their position to regular people, and maybe they needed to think that they were somehow better or above other Romans. And in modern states, many dictators are driving with expensive cars, and the car, what that person uses is probably the unique piece in that country.  In the North-Korea the leader of the state drives by using expensive Mercedes, and others are using cheaper vehicles. That isolates and also rises the leader of the nation above other people.

The phantom time

The phantom time


Why some periods have been erased from history?

What if some time periods have been erased in purpose to hide the past of the royal families? At the beginning of Christianity, there were many rulers, who persecuted Christians, and when the Emperor to Rome, Constantine the Great made Christianity the only tolerated religion in the Roman empire, that put the rulers in danger, because they were persecuted Christians.

And of course, those people wanted to hide their real identities, and that's why they wanted to erase the archives, where were the evidence about their role in the brutal actions against the new religion. And in those eras, many archives were destroyed, for hiding the identities of the persons, who were commanding the authorities before Constantine the Great.

But then we must realize that there have been also other reasons for erasing things, and one of the most interesting theory is, that the medieval period was not ever existed. In fact, the Medieval period was not existed in the form, how we know that period. The time was hard, of course, but there was not quite a lot of violence, as we might believe. And during that period were the crusades.

The point was that the Crusaders would not always be so brave and willing to give sacrifices as they wanted to tell, and that's why some writings from those cases are suspicious. The Crusaders were also captured by the Saracens and there was one very big problem with those men. They have seen Muslims, and that means that those men might hear something, what was dangerous to the pope, and that meant that sometimes they just vanished.

During those situations like Crusades, the people hear things, what the people like kings and the pope didn't want them to know. During those periods the information, what could harm the position of the Pope caused the death, and that's why some knights just flee and vanish, that they could escape from the prosecution and execution.

Why do some people claim that the Medieval period ever exists?

When we are thinking about the Medieval period, it is like the wall between the time of the Roman Empire and the modern world. In fact, those leaders, who lived in the Medieval period had of course reasons to fake the history, and one of those reasons was that they wanted to hide the gold from the Catholic Church and kings. But they wanted also play bigger heroes, what they ever been for getting the gold and glory.

The thing is that some great battles were an actually pure product of imagination, which means that they ever have happened in the form as we know them is very little known detail. The famous battles like the Battle of Alesia were smaller cases, what the writers of the history wanted people to believe. The reason why the noblemen rewrite the history was that they wanted to hide the strength of their army from the superiority, and that's why the losses were reported as excessive.

If the high-class nobleman was able to form the army without that the king would know that thing, that will give this man able to steal the crown in the rebellion. But at first, those men must collect the army. And the best way to do that was to go to a foreign land and then recruit the troops from there. That would make possible to form the army, where the king would know, and then start the rebel in the against the monarch.