Fascinating way to think

Fascinating way to think

Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".

They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.

And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.

Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.

We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.

Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.

The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.

Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.

The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.

Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.

Problems with intelligent people

Problems with intelligent people

We all want to be intelligent. That thing is very well seen in society because people are respecting intelligent people. But at the same time we are forgetting that the intelligence is something, what is inside our head or in our nervous system. Intelligence is not things like clothes or money. And why the human race has intelligence? The intelligence is meant for solving problems, and that is a thing, what we might not always remember. So what is the difference between wisdom and intelligence?

The wisdom is the intelligence of elder people, what is connected to the discretion. Young people are not many times think the consequences of the action, and that's why they would get in the trouble. So intelligence is not a mansion or automobile, and it would not always be seen from the outer substance. So what is the intelligence? Is it a large number of friends?

Maybe a person, who has a high level of social intelligence can get very many friends, but when we are thinking more carefully, and see some gangs, we must become a little bit suspicious, that is it true, that some person, who has strong opinions and big authority also intelligent? But when we are in the military service, we are always meeting persons like drill instructors, and then we might think that those people have the highest level of intelligence because they are our superiorities, and also those persons are always right. 

If somebody has another opinion, would that cause reaction, what nobody wants. But then we might also think that those persons who give commands might have high IQ, and they might act their roles. This thing makes intelligence officers dangerous. They might seem a little bit "different", and they don't show that they are suspecting something, what should not be done.

And also those superiorities have the instructions, what people must do in the day, and that means that in this case, the list would make them more effective than others. This is the problem with research of intelligence. If we would compare pocket calculators with modern mobile telephones and laptop computers, those calculators might be very effective and fast, if we would do only one thing like calculations. But that pocket calculator cannot do anything else.

The problem with highly intelligent people is that they are also exposed to the influence of other people. Sometimes social pressure would make a person say something, what is against own opinion, or what would you do in the case, where you are surrounded by some Harley-Davidson gang, and they would ask you, what is your opinion about those gangs? 

This is social pressure and the other thing what we always forget in the things, what are conceding the intelligent or highly trained people is that nobody doesn't know and can everything on the Earth. If we would think the highly trained engineer, that person might be the best in the world as creating things like a nuclear reactor, but that person might not be the conference translator.

The second person would learn other things in education, and this is the thing, what we must always remember when we are thinking about education. But the thing is that there are limits, what people can do. That means that we have only a limited number of neurons, and this means that if we would be top men and women in some areas, we must miss some other areas in life. And one thing what the top men and women are sometimes missing is the cooking.

There are tales that the most brilliant geniuses like J.Robert Oppenheimer and Enrico Fermi could not even cook potatoes, but those men created the first nuclear reactor on the world and took the human race to the atomic age. So the number of skills what people can learn is limited, and this is the thing, what we must always remember. There is one thing, what we always forget when we are thinking about intelligence, and that is what we always think, that person who is interested in high-energy physics is same way interested about investments and follows the marketing statistics.

The problem is that we always identify wealthy people as intelligent people at the same time. Here we are facing the thing, what is called "social pressure". If the person, who own many factories, comes to ask is that person intelligent, we would want to please that person. The factory owner is intelligent, because that person owns a factory, and otherwise if our answers would not please that person, we might kick off from the job. So this is the thing, why we will call great directors as intelligent persons.

The big leaders have a greater influence on the system than normal people, and this is why we are thinking that they are always very intelligent. And the induction thought could be that we are always forgetting that an intelligent person can also be bad. When we are looking at the great leaders, we are forgetting, that those persons might inherit their money and all business partners from the parents.

And in that case, we are facing the thing, that we always believe that people who are spending their time in dinners and lunches in some five-star restaurants in nice suits are automatically more intelligent than some two people who are sitting in a pizzeria. We are living in society, which is full of numbers, and every person in the world want to be intelligent. And one thing what is used as the meter of this kind of things is the success in the working life.

The big salary, nice office, and slips are things, which is making us intelligent. That thing is a dangerous way to think because the world is full of people who are not even metered their level of intelligence. The second thing is that the people, who are working in the high command of the military or the research laboratories might be very intelligent, even they are not wearing slips and suits.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.


When we are looking at social relationships with people and social media, what connects many people around the world, we are facing the thing, that our social networks are constructed by people, who are similar what we are. If we are living in our own house, most of our social connections are living in their own houses, because we are meeting and familiarize with other people in the meetings, what is touching something that we have, and if we own house, we might meet people is the garden masses. And there we are meeting other house owners.

One side information in this example is the thing might make us believe that most of the people are living in their own houses, and this thing is feed by Hollywood, where every so-called normal person is living in their own house. And when we are meeting other people, we are asking them to grill parties, where we are making things like skewers or sausages.

Those people are living also in their own houses, and we are talking about things like lawnmowers and another kind of common things. This is a very good example of the homogeneous social relationships in the persons own network. If we think more carefully, we must think, that people would not live in the house, they are living in a flat, if we are living in a flat.

Lack of social diversity kills real discussions

Social diversity is the same thing as biodiversity. We don't have to call people, who have different opinions than we have to visit our home. That is sad because different opinions can enrich discussions. We have right to close every person, who have different opinions away from our social network because we have the right to hear only people, who have the same way to think and similar opinions what we have.

And why we would ask some person, who thinks a different way to our house or home? We have the right to filter those things away from our parties and private life, and then we can hear only things, what is pleasing us, and supports our point of view things.

I have the right to choose my company and news myself, and I can leave things, which are uncomfortable for us without notice

Social diversity guarantees that we would get information from multiple sources, and then we might see, that everything, what we are reading or what we are looking has many kinds of truths. Actually, there are many versions of the truth, and most of the people want to tell things, by using the way, what seems to show that person in the best point of view.

Let's take one example of that thing. When we are facing things that some policeman or reporter asks about guns from some street or MC-gang, whose headquarters is full of weapons, those people might say, that everybody carries guns. This might be true,  in their case, because every people, wh they know might carry guns. And of course, they are told stories, that somebody has shot them or their friends, but there is always forgotten the very interesting part of those cases. That is who began to shoot in that area? Who opened fire against other gangs?

Did people tell truth, the whole truth and nothing more than the truth?

And what happened before that? In those stories, they own part of those cases is always forgotten, and everything happens to some friends, and when the person sits in jail, they will tell, how some person, without reasons, just pull the pocket knife out the pocket, and then this person shot 15 round magazine to that inmate in panic of course. If somebody asks, why there was no knife, that person tells that somebody took it from the crime scene, and police hate that innocent person, who is, of course, faced racial prejudice from the policemen, who were white or black, depending on the color of the skin of the suspect, and policeman has always prejudice against normal people, who like s big cars and who are different than they are.

And of course that the reason for the meeting was the drug deals because the car is full of crack ampules, but those things are always someone else, who lend the car. And every time that kind things are always forgotten to tell in the court. How that man, who looks like some kind of rap-artist can even think violent things, and the sub-machine gun in the car is only for the self-defense, because people hate Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado, what that kind of people are driving. And this 41 years old person lives with mother, so what happens if that inmate would go to jail? Who takes care of the old woman?

The lack of social diversity in the social relationship makes people happy, because everybody, who people know have similar backgrounds, but it kills the ability to hear things, what we don't want to hear. We always want to be right, and that's why we are surrounding us with people, who have similar opinions about the things, what we have. And then we will cheer together when we are getting, what we want.

Social media and the Internet gives billions of choices to share and get information, but we always choose the simplest. We are looking for homepages, which pleases us and talk with people, who have the same opinions as us. And the thing is that we are facing the situation, that we are reading and looking at information, which supports our own opinions.