Robert Bartini and his dreams: ground-effect and invisibility.

Invisible aircraft and nuclear-powered bombers that used ground-effect (Ekranoplan)were Bartini's most radical ideas. There is no information if the original idea of Bartini that remained as a theoretical concept planned to be nuclear-powered. The Business Insider tells that the concept above this text planned refueled by submarines. 

But there is a possibility that Russia planned to create a nuclear-powered ekranoplan in that country. Things like the nuclear-powered Tu-95 Bear-class bomber called Tu-95 LAL tell that in the Soviet Union were many radical concepts in aviation. And one of them could be a super- or even a hypersonic nuclear-powered strategic bomber. 

Robert Bartini (1895-1974) was an amphibious- and ground-effect aircraft development pioneer. He was a Hungarian who worked in the Soviet Union. He was the father of some of the most radical aircraft concepts in history.  

"Caspian-Sea monster" ekranoplans are based on Bartini's research. Bartini's last ekranoplan VVA-14 was completed two years before he died in 1972. The massive Caspian Sea monster made its maiden flight in 1987. The smaller jet-powered ekranoplan, A-90 "Orlyonok" was introduced in 1972. And maybe Bartini saw that aircraft flying. 

That man's most interesting ideas were nuclear-powered bombers or nuclear-powered ekranoplan and invisible aircraft. The idea of the last one was that the oscillation of the aircraft's body will pull the incoming electromagnetic radiation to it. 

The idea is that the aircraft's body will sink in when electromagnetic wave movement strikes it. And that thing makes it work like foam rubber. The same method that makes foam rubber invisible to sonars can use to make layers invisible to all other electromagnetic radiation. 

But the problem is: how to find the right energy level for material which quantum field can tie incoming energy waves in every electromagnetic spectrum's frequency. 

Aircraft in images; 

1) A-90 Orlyonok

2) Caspian sea monster 

3)Beriev-Bartini VVA-14, wings removed. 

If the aircraft's body sinks in as much as radiation brings energy to it. That thing makes it impossible to see the aircraft, but Bartini was too ahead of his time that this kind of system can work. 

But then there is the possibility that a standing wave field can use to catch electromagnetic waves. That thing makes it possible that electrons and photons are impacting that field. And then that thing can aim the radiation in the wanted direction. 

There is the possibility that Bartini's idea can work but the oscillation must not come from the aircraft's body. In some fixed models the aircraft or layer wanted to turn invisible by using a standing wave. In that model, above the layer is forming a standing wave. 

The standing wave can form by using 100% reflection. If the standing wave's energy level is a little bit lower than the incoming radiation. And then it could conduct energy to the right point. That thing makes a situation where radiation sinks to that standing wave movement. 

Holograms and invisibility. 

The scattering effect makes a hologram. And holograms are quantum fields. So holograms can create virtual structures that can aim the wave movement to wanted direction. The hologram can make incoming electromagnetic radiation slide over it. When we think of holograms as creatures of electromagnetic radiation we can understand that all electromagnetic wave movement can create holograms. 

That means UV and infrared radiation can also make a hologram. But usually, we don't think. That also radio waves and even gravitational waves can create holograms. Electromagnetic waves can make holograms if they can scatter. 

And if those wave movements have a certain energy level they make electromagnetic waves with the same frequency to travel over them. That makes incoming radiation with the same frequency unable to reach the object. That is below that hologram. These kinds of things are interesting concepts. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-secret-bomber-that-would-refuel-by-submarine?r=US&IR=T

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-90_Orlyonok

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartini_Beriev_VVA-14

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bartini

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95LAL

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

We should stop talking about nationalism and left-wing movements at the different kind of movements. There is no difference between right- or left-wing radicalism, and the result is always devastating. The thing what might give little brakes for Stalin and Tito was that they were members of the ethnical minority of their homeland.

They couldn't get support from the majority same way as Adolph Hitler could. And the thing why the nationalism was not so highly respected in the Soviet Union was that there were so many nationalities. Of course, Russians wanted people of the world think that they are the heir of the Soviet Union, and that's why there is so great nationalistic wave.

There is very long living opinion, that Russians created the Soviet Union and the entire state was created around Russia, who has rights for the heritage of the Soviet Union. And this thing makes possible to say, that Russia is the Soviet Union, what have lost some land areas.

When we are thinking about the far-wing radicalism, the normal version of their speeches is that they are not far-wing members and the things like fascism have been lost after the Second World War. The argument is similar, with the argument that Mafia does not exist anymore.

That thing is an argument, that the fascist and nazis were lost after WWII. There are some versions, that the Fascists and Nazis were some kinds of the right-wing movement, but the reality is that those movements were market themselves as the labor movement, and the nazism has got the name from their agenda of national socialism.

The difference between those movements is that national socialism is highlighting the greatness of the nation, and that thing also is supporting by the militaristic strength. When we are thinking about the power and the Marxism, the idea about the peace between labors is very good marketing speech. 

But the real socialism is looking like a little bit different than ideal socialism. There are many similarities with nazis and communists, and the reason why there were not so great nationalistic movement in the Soviet Union was that there were many nationalities in that country. Maybe Stalin had problems to create a real "team spirit" in his country because he couldn't just ask support from Russians.

He was Georgian himself, and that put him to a difficult position because he couldn't just agitate the people against minorities. That means that Stalin was one member of the very small minority in the Soviet Union. Hitler was a much better position. He could yell against Gypsies and Jews because he was a member of the majority of people. And that gave him the very good weapon against minorities. The argument of that kind of leaders in that the majority is the thing, who is ruling, and other people must follow the majority.

Who has made this sculpted image, what looks like the head of the bird?

Who has made this sculpted image, what looks like the head of the bird?

Above this text, you see the image, what portraits one rock, and as you see there is strange from in this object. In fact, I have taken this picture, and the interesting thing is, who has made this bird head image on the stone because there is needed very good tools like laser or resonance cutter, what can be used to make sharp and thin lines on the granite rock.

Of course, that can be created by natural erosion, but the image seems very unusual for creation of natural reasons. Maybe it is made by using some home-made laser, or the laser, what is bought from Russia, when the Soviet Union has been decomposed, and there were many things for sale, which were otherwise out of the hands of regular people. But the lasers could actually be made by some local inventor in the home laboratory. And maybe that kind of person has been tested that thing to that rock.

There seems like be the head of the bird sculptured on this rock, and that is really amazing. There is actually needed the laser or some other special instrument for making that image, or the image must be made by some high-speed instrument, what would used to make that kind of line.

The thing, what makes this thing very interesting is that in the normal building sites is not laser-cutters, what can do that kind of things. There is a possibility that somebody has access to that kind of equipment, and that laser would be used for the sharp cuttings, and maybe some worker has lent that thing from the building site.

Did somebody test self-made laser?

There is one possibility, why this image has been made, and that is if somebody has been tested the homemade laser? There is another explanation and that is connected to the decomposition of the Soviet Union, and maybe somebody has bought the laser weapon from that country, and test that thing to this stone.

Otherwise, lasers are really powerful tools, and in the wrong hands, they can be really dangerous. The same lasers, what is used as the cutting tools can be used as the weapons, and also persons like burglaries really would be enjoyed by this kind of Christmas gift. Lasers can cut concrete walls effectively, and they can be used to cutting the doors to the walls, but in the normal building sites there is used the diamond cutter, what is installed in the angle grinder. The lasers are really unusual tools in normal building sites.

This image itself is very interesting, because the reason, why it has been made is really interesting. If in some building sites the holes have been using lasers, or somebody has tested the resonance cutters to that stone, the thing would be really interesting. Those tools are really expensive, and that's why that image has been taken.