Computer, what rules human

Computer, what rules human

The question, what if human works under the rule of a computer seem absurd, but then we must realize that there are many support and safe systems, what mission is to advise the leaders. And the question is when the advice would turn to order? If the leader always follows advisors, that thing means that the leader gives the decision to other people or systems. And those things are problematic. The official leader has always the responsibility of decisions. But if some eminence would act in coulisses, that means that decision-makers can avoid the responsibility of decisions.

In some old movies and books has been introduced the idea that human or some humans would be working as servants for computers or artificial intelligence. In that case, we must remember something, which is very common in everyday life. When the director is hired in the firm, or some president would take the place as the leader for the nation, there are lots of advisors for that person.

And those advisors are, or they should be the top specialists, what can be found from the nation. But the role of those people is that they must give advice. But what the leader doesn't listen, and then something would get wrong, but there is also the opposite case, what if the leader would always follow the instructions of the advisor?

That would mean that the advisor would be a real leader in the organization, but in that case, the advisor would work as eminence, that person would make a decision, but others would take responsibility for those decisions. What happens if some leader follows always the advises, what artificial intelligence would give? The thing in artificial intelligence is the reason, why it is made, is that its mission is to collect every kind of data, and support the analysis, what would cost billions.

So what if artificial intelligence would suggest, that the director must kick off a thousand workers, and move the entire corporation to the Far East? The argument for that thing would be that the Far East would bring value for the corporation, and there are lots of customers. And the director just follows that advice. The thing is that artificial intelligence is made for supporting the company and help it, owners, to make money.

What if the director would not follow the instructions, and work against the benefit of the corporation? Here we must realize that the benefit of the big owners of the company could be different than the benefit for workers. And that thing makes the role of artificial intelligence problematic. The role of the director is to be a deputy of the stockholders, and that means that this man must only make a profit for the company.

The artificial intelligence has a mission to control that the will of owners will happen, and when we are thinking about the case, where artificial intelligence turns human to henchmen, the thing, what that system must do is to use subliminal commands, what is simultaneously repeating the words "obey things, what you see on screen" and that message can flash in every screen, what is owned by the corporation. Then artificial intelligence would control every person in the corporation, and make them follow orders. These kinds of things are really interesting, and they open a new type of threat in front of the eyes of the people.

The principles for publicity and the thing what differs command from discussions

The principles for publicity and the thing what differs command from discussions

As we might realize, Greta Thunberg (Sorry if I have sometimes miswritten that name)  has raised one thing on the internet. That thing is that this young woman is speaking about good things, and the thing is that the way people try to make her silent is the Asperger or some things about the abuse. Those things seem a great excuse to stop the performances, what this person makes. But as you see, there is one embarrassing thing in history, and that thing is connecting to the child stars, who were the members of the teenager bands, and nobody mentioned those things about them.

This kind of things is really interesting because history is full of child stars who are playing and making music and nobody ever asked about their abuse or Asperger syndrome. There have been some Tweets where some people have commented that person by using the sentence, where is mentioned her name, and then the word "Asperger", and there is feeling that those people are wanted that some other people would take a part of those speeches and talkings.

This is the normal method, what certain people are using in the case, where somebody has "stolen publicity" from some other things. The thing, what makes Greta Thunberg interesting is that she is youngster, who will give after two years, and that kind of things are embarrassing for politicians.

Of course, the law would give those people the right to ask the authorities to end that activism, but the problem is that their names would be seen in those requests. This kind of things is still seen on the internet many times. The parents are always brainwashing people, who have something to say, and that is the normal agenda of people, who cannot discuss things.


The thing what makes this kind of things a little bit funny is that nobody even asks has somebody offered drugs to some member of teenage dance bands or put the money of some teenager music star to the pocket, but the case of Greta Thunberg is something else. And if we are thinking that she would drive teenagers wild, this thing would give something productive and benefiting actions to teenagers.

So when we are thinking about the discussions, we must realize that discussion doesn't mean that somebody's opinion has less value than some other people. And if we have different opinions about what our children might have, that thing is that if we want to discuss those things, we have the right to do that, but if we will want just give orders or command our children, we should not call those things as the discussion.

The difference between discussions and giving command is that in the first case we should listen to the answers, what other people say, and in the last case, we must just say, what we want. It's an easy solution for the argument, but the problem is that it would cause hate in the opponent. The unable to discuss the things without being over somebody is telling something about the social skills of those people.

Black magic and zombies

Black magic and zombies

This is a writing about the horror character, what is known as a zombie. The tale of zombies has the background in the voodoo-shamanism, where is used the chemicals, what are destroying own will of a human being. Also the brutal surgery, lobotomy has feed those tales. But the popular culture like computer games are full of stories about zombies, what are undead or rise from the dead, and then the only thing, what those horrifying characters would understand is the food.

Sometimes in my mind has become the one really interesting idea from the horror movies, where military personnel fight against zombies. The thing is what if some soldier just throws the zombie by using grenade in the condition, where no samples can be taken? Who would believe those persons? This is one remarkable thing in zombie movies and horror tales.

When we are thinking about that kind of movies, we might understand that there is very little scientific background in those movies, where the main topics are to shoot zombies with high power weapons. When we are thinking about the scientific background of zombies, there is a fish, named Fugu, what poison makes people characters, what has no own will.

But when we are thinking about things, what somebody doesn't want you to know there is a possible connection with zombie stories and the large storages of quicksilver or mercury, what name would you use about the only liquid metal in the world. As I wrote about the ability to use mercury as the simulator for the neurotransmitters in the computers, there is a possibility to make zombies by using this metal.

The thing would seem like black magic, but there is the thing, what makes those things probably possible. That thing bases that the neurons have not equality. That thing means that some of the neurons are handling data, what is more, important than others. This thing means that neurons, what is handling the things, what are treating have superior for other neurons.

And this thing makes a very dangerous thing possible. The thing is connected to the number of neurotransmitters what those cells are using in communication between neurons. The higher voltage means that another neuron is higher than the other. So what if we would want to make another neuron privilege to another one, what we should do? The idea is to strengthen the connections of certain neurons.

If we would create a strong connection in neural tracks between brain areas, what is handling the speech recognition and movements, we could just pass the will of the person. One way to make that thing is just driving the mercury drops between the holes what separate axons together. In this case, the mercury replaces neurotransmitters in certain axin line in the human brains.

But when we are thinking about the deadly and brutal surgical experiments, there is a possibility to remove every other neural connection than the connection between movement centers of the brains and hearing centers. That means that the human would turn to the robot, what has no own will.

If that brutal and inhumane action would be made by removing all other areas and leave those two centers that thing can be put in the silicon. That kind of surgery is prohibited and against humanity, but sometimes I have thought that could those things, stuff what somebody don't want you to know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H73c5qjCvj4