The principles for publicity and the thing what differs command from discussions
As we might realize, Greta Thunberg (Sorry if I have sometimes miswritten that name) has raised one thing on the internet. That thing is that this young woman is speaking about good things, and the thing is that the way people try to make her silent is the Asperger or some things about the abuse. Those things seem a great excuse to stop the performances, what this person makes. But as you see, there is one embarrassing thing in history, and that thing is connecting to the child stars, who were the members of the teenager bands, and nobody mentioned those things about them.
This kind of things is really interesting because history is full of child stars who are playing and making music and nobody ever asked about their abuse or Asperger syndrome. There have been some Tweets where some people have commented that person by using the sentence, where is mentioned her name, and then the word "Asperger", and there is feeling that those people are wanted that some other people would take a part of those speeches and talkings.
This is the normal method, what certain people are using in the case, where somebody has "stolen publicity" from some other things. The thing, what makes Greta Thunberg interesting is that she is youngster, who will give after two years, and that kind of things are embarrassing for politicians.
Of course, the law would give those people the right to ask the authorities to end that activism, but the problem is that their names would be seen in those requests. This kind of things is still seen on the internet many times. The parents are always brainwashing people, who have something to say, and that is the normal agenda of people, who cannot discuss things.
The thing what makes this kind of things a little bit funny is that nobody even asks has somebody offered drugs to some member of teenage dance bands or put the money of some teenager music star to the pocket, but the case of Greta Thunberg is something else. And if we are thinking that she would drive teenagers wild, this thing would give something productive and benefiting actions to teenagers.
So when we are thinking about the discussions, we must realize that discussion doesn't mean that somebody's opinion has less value than some other people. And if we have different opinions about what our children might have, that thing is that if we want to discuss those things, we have the right to do that, but if we will want just give orders or command our children, we should not call those things as the discussion.
The difference between discussions and giving command is that in the first case we should listen to the answers, what other people say, and in the last case, we must just say, what we want. It's an easy solution for the argument, but the problem is that it would cause hate in the opponent. The unable to discuss the things without being over somebody is telling something about the social skills of those people.
As we might realize, Greta Thunberg (Sorry if I have sometimes miswritten that name) has raised one thing on the internet. That thing is that this young woman is speaking about good things, and the thing is that the way people try to make her silent is the Asperger or some things about the abuse. Those things seem a great excuse to stop the performances, what this person makes. But as you see, there is one embarrassing thing in history, and that thing is connecting to the child stars, who were the members of the teenager bands, and nobody mentioned those things about them.
This kind of things is really interesting because history is full of child stars who are playing and making music and nobody ever asked about their abuse or Asperger syndrome. There have been some Tweets where some people have commented that person by using the sentence, where is mentioned her name, and then the word "Asperger", and there is feeling that those people are wanted that some other people would take a part of those speeches and talkings.
This is the normal method, what certain people are using in the case, where somebody has "stolen publicity" from some other things. The thing, what makes Greta Thunberg interesting is that she is youngster, who will give after two years, and that kind of things are embarrassing for politicians.
Of course, the law would give those people the right to ask the authorities to end that activism, but the problem is that their names would be seen in those requests. This kind of things is still seen on the internet many times. The parents are always brainwashing people, who have something to say, and that is the normal agenda of people, who cannot discuss things.
The thing what makes this kind of things a little bit funny is that nobody even asks has somebody offered drugs to some member of teenage dance bands or put the money of some teenager music star to the pocket, but the case of Greta Thunberg is something else. And if we are thinking that she would drive teenagers wild, this thing would give something productive and benefiting actions to teenagers.
So when we are thinking about the discussions, we must realize that discussion doesn't mean that somebody's opinion has less value than some other people. And if we have different opinions about what our children might have, that thing is that if we want to discuss those things, we have the right to do that, but if we will want just give orders or command our children, we should not call those things as the discussion.
The difference between discussions and giving command is that in the first case we should listen to the answers, what other people say, and in the last case, we must just say, what we want. It's an easy solution for the argument, but the problem is that it would cause hate in the opponent. The unable to discuss the things without being over somebody is telling something about the social skills of those people.
Comments
Post a Comment