Is this image of Andromeda galaxy or Epsilon Eridani?

Is this image of Andromeda galaxy or Epsilon Eridani?

There is claiming that the galaxy, what is above this text is too yellow being the Andromada Galaxy. So is it the image of the Epsilon Eridani, what it mistakenly named as the Andromeda galaxy? There is a possibility, that there is happened some kind of mistake, when people have given names for the objects, what are seen in the images. That thing would not a very big mistake, and maybe this image is Andromeda Galaxy.

One interesting detail of this image of the galaxy is that we don't know is this image portraying the Andromeda galaxy or is it the star, what is surrounding by the dust and ice. That means that the image of the young star might look like a galaxy. Those things are really interesting, and there is a possibility, that even the people, who are working for the government make mistakes.

Epsilon Eridani is a young star, what is surrounding by dust and ice, which means that the measurement of the brightness of that star is difficult. This means that Epsilon Eridani might be a little bit brighter than we have thought.

And the thing is that there is a possibility, that the young star would travel inside the cosmic molecule nebula, which means that the star can be younger than it's planets. This is one thing, that has been forgotten to mention when we are talking about the stars and their brightness. Epsilon Eridani was another object, where were send the "Ozma message",  but astronomers have thought that the star is too young for advanced civilizations.

When we are thinking about the images, what has been taken from the universe, we are facing one very interesting detail, and that is what we have is that we have given names for the objects by giving the value, how well they are visible in Europe. And that means that things like Magellan's cloud are not very well known outside the society of the Astronomers.

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

What was before the Big Bang is connected to the thing, how the universe ends

In the beginning, I must say, that the Universe is not stable, because it always changing and expanding. But what kind of thing would be the end of the universe will be, when all stars are stopped their shine, and the only existing things are black holes and single particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons.

When the energy of the stars in the universe ends the spin of neutrons and other particles would end because they don't get the outcome energy. That energy has kept those particles spinning, and the thing is that does the existence of neutrons and protons depend on their spin. If the spin of the particle is very fast, the time will slow in that particle regardless of their size.

That means that if the spin of the neutrons and protons would be ended, the time in that particle would start to run extremely fast. And if we think that way, the particle would start to get older extremely fast, and then it would just break. The thing in this thought is at least every particle are destroying because gluons cannot keep quarks together anymore.

In this kind of theories, the key question is how small bites particles of material can be cut? When we are the thing about the super springs what is forming the electrons and quarks, we might ask, is there some other particles after that particle. And then we might ask, is time energy?

The answer why we have started to believe things like the multiverse is the big bang. Material or energy cannot come from emptiness, and that means that if we would explain the big bang, we must realize that just before the big bang started the cosmic inflation, what would be explained by the eruption of the giant black hole.

What was the big bang itself? The giant energy eruption, what turned the most of the material to the form, what is called as dark material. That material is unknown for us, and sometimes I have thought that is it possible that the dark material is the photons, what movement has been ended.

But the thing is that the lightspeed in the universe is stable except near black holes, or in the medium. But could the photon stop? Or could it somehow lose its energy, what is like stopping that particle? If we think the situation, where photon travels in the space, where is no energy sources, and no stars or anything else, that case could cause a very interesting situation.

When we are thinking about the photon as a particle, we must realize that it cannot travel forever, and someday the universe has been grown so big, that there is no ability to see any galaxy, and the distance between particles is very huge. The distance between electrons might be lightyears, the lonely photons would get the movement energy from nowhere, and when we are thinking that kind of cases, we must think that there are two things what can happen to the photon.

The photon can travel longer and longer until it faces some wall. Or does it someday end its journey in the emptiness? When we are thinking about the end of the universe. The time when there is no stars existed and the neutron stars would be the only sender of the light if they face some planet.

In that universe, the dominant stars are black holes, because of the radioactive material and then the rest of the material has been destroyed, and when the last stars are forming and destroyed starts the new inflation. That inflation would cause first that the radioactive particles have been ended from the universe and then neutrons start to scatter.

The reason why neutrons exist in our universe is that the radiation would keep the quarks together. The spin of the particles in the atom would cause the breaking of neutrons is so unusual.

But when the electromagnetic energy pumping to atoms ends, the spin or rotation of the particles would be ended. The thing why the outcoming radiation is so important for existing of neutrons is the spin and the thing what makes it so interesting is that if the spin of the particle would be high enough, the time inside that particle would get slower.

So the question is that is the level of energy connected with time? When we are thinking about the slowing time when the speed is increasing like Albert Einstein has been said, this means one very interesting thing. Does the time correlate with energy? Probably the thing is that and in this idea is one thing what we ever thought or talked and that is, "if the spin is ended the time would go faster and the particles would be elder faster". This is one way to think about the universe and multiverse.