Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

Ernst Rutherford and fusion and the writing about moscovium (element 115)

When we are talking about fission reaction, we must remember that depends on the point of view, who created the first nuclear reaction. If we talk about self-sustaining nuclear fission the man who created that reactor in the Cigaco University was Enrico Fermi and the man who first split atom was Erns Rutherford. And Fermi benefits the work, what Rutherford made when he manufactured the first nuclear reactor. The thing what has sometimes introduced is to split some non-radioactive element like lead by bombing those atoms by using very high-speed electrons or ions.

This kind of technologies has seemed useless, and only material what could replace uranium in nuclear reactions could be thorium, and the idea is that the thorium atoms would bomb the high-speed ions during that reaction, and that technology is under study in many countries. Rutherford created an idea of a fusion reaction. When we are thinking about that era technology, the self-sustaining reaction was impossible, and the success means in this case that a couple of atoms could be connected.

In ITER homepage is mentioned that Rutherford along with his assistant Oliphant connected tritium Atom to Helium, but two atoms are not made fusion power. But there is a possibility that the fusion can be created by using particle accelerator. In that theory, the particle accelerator would shoot the ions in the chamber with very high power, and then that would make those particles melting together.

If the ions have different polarity, they should go together because of the magnetic pulling effect, what should make the use of fusion fuel more effective. But there are any problems with this kind of fusion reactors. The idea is to shoot ions by using "Y"-shaped structure of particle accelerators, where two tracks of accelerators what will accelerate the particles what have different polarity to the single point of the structure.

There have been introduced the theory that compiling two elements lead (element 58) and bismuth (element 33) by using fusion could create moscovium (element 115), what is claimed to produce in some places like AREA-51. There is another reaction in the Wikipedia page, which tells about this element. In this hypothetical reaction, the ions of the lead and bismuth will shoot together by using linear accelerators, and the moscovium would give extremely high power in the lightweight nuclear reactors.

We know that the moscovium is existed, but is there some effective and economical ways to produce so much about that element that it can be used in some kind of nuclear reactors. The half-time of moscovium is extremely fast, and that means that the element must be stored in the place, where are absolute zero points or zero Kelvin temperature what might slow the half of that material.

Or another version is to store that material in the particle accelerator, where it would accelerate to the speed, what will be near the speed of light, and that thing would slow the time in that material. But there is no evidence that this kind of systems has been tested in some places, except Bob Lazar statements, that he was working with the element 115 in AREA-51. But that man has not believed until the existence of element 115 has been confirmed.

The classical error in a common way to translate theories

The classical error in a common way to translate theories

The common error in theories and formulas is that they are meant for common use. They are not meant for every purpose. Theories can compare to the tools, which are used in machinery. Screwdrivers are not suitable for every part of the machines, and the adjustable wrenches are not all times fit the holes. If we would want to make fast and perfect work, we might want to use the electric tools where is the torque wrench. The problem of those machines is that they are not suitable for every condition, because they need electricity. Before we can use those systems, we must create the generator, which gives electricity for those high-tech tools, which makes assembly very effective. 

And every kind of machines is not suitable for every kind of conditions. The machine tools, what are meant for underwater work are not meant for working at the normal conditions, and the opposite way to think is that electric tools are not suitable for underwater working, where is needed the hydraulic tools because of the risk of electric shock. In the theories and formulas is the same effect. We cannot handle every phenomenon and area by using the same theories. And when we are thinking about the famous E=Mc² we are many times forgotten that this theory is meant for calculating the energy levels, what are created by nuclear reactions. 

When we are thinking the personality of Einstein, we must realize that there was somebody who teaches that man and gives the room for the creation of the genius of the millennium. But when we are looking the truth straight to eyes, there were many men before Einstein, and he was the top of the line. But there were men after him, who developed the ideas what Einstein introduced. And one of them was Stephen Hawking. The man who was captured in the wheelchair because of ALS syndrome. 

This syndrome might be a very great personal tragedy for that man, who was well known about the images, where he sat in that chair with his computer, what used the interface, what was able to control with eye movements. That man worked hard for developing the ideas, what Einstein introduced, and that thing was continuing of the series of the men, what were lived a long time before Einstein. There is named thing, what is known for him, and that is the Hawking radiation. Einstein was the top in natural sciences, and there were top men before him like Isaac Newton, who used the calculation machine first for checking the results for the derivate and integrates. 

He created those formulas along with Gottfried Leibnitz, who made the first mechanic computer, which allowed to calculate series. But when we are thinking about paradoxes and tragedies, we must say that the ALS was the reason why Hawking had so much time for working with the formulas of Einstein. That limited the social life and isolated that intelligent man from other people and those formulas gave him the way to live. 

And here we must say if we would like to seem heartless and cold persons, that case what was very difficult for the life of Stephen Hawking was probably good for science. In sometimes people might think that the reason, why Einstein won the election of the 20th century most remarkable scientists or physicians was that he was dead. 

Here I must say that people like Feynman or Dyson cannot win those games is that they are Americans. Here we almost forgot the one great man in the history of physics, Dr. Ernst Rutherford (1)was a New Zealander, who died just before the Second World War, and the work of that person is only the nuclear physics, what means that man was, of course, influential person, and his work benefited in the Manhattan program, but somehow this great man is quite unknown for great audience even if that man created fusion reaction in the first time, when he showed fusion of deuterium to helium in 1934(2). He made a theory about the splitting of the atom and gave the road to creating the first atom reactor in the University of Chicago. 

So by benefiting the work of Rutherford, Enrico Fermi created the first nuclear reactor by benefiting the work what Rutherford has made, so would the title of the most remarkable scientists belong to Rutherford and Fermi, or maybe to Thompson, who invented Electron, and whose work Rutherford benefited. And the thing is that in some publications the reason, that some persons use the American way to write English would be introduced the reason for decrease the scores or value of the work. 

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Rutherford

(2) https://www.euro-fusion.org/fusion/history-of-fusion/