Why plagiarized poems would cause death in the court of Elizabeth I?

Why plagiarized poems would cause death in the court of Elizabeth I?

If we are thinking that Sir Walter Raleigh might be plagiarized his poems, why that man was executed because of them? I don't know the reason, why Raleigh was executed, but if the reason for that were copied poems, the reason could be a disappointment, what Elizabeth felt when he saw the man, who introduced other people work as his own. Those cases are embarrassing, and that's why I don't very often write letters to women.

But sometimes there is has been cases, that the poets hired to make poems for wealthy persons, and the poems might be a very good way to get the trust of women. There was some drama, which was written in the Soviet Union, where Raleigh forced a prisoner to write those poems, and after that, he executed this man. So there is no evidence about this thing, but if that kind of thing was uncovered, that thing might cause the embarrassing situation in the court of Elizabeth, who might want to meet the man, who wrote those letters.

When we are thinking the case, that somebody would send anonymously poem to the Queen, and then start to tell more about self, that thing might seem a very nice way to slip in the popularity of the monarch family, and that kind of things were quite interesting. Because if Raleigh plagiarized those poems, that could mean the takeover. And that's why those people were sharp about those things. This is the thing in poems.

There might be one as a well believable explanation than the first one. If we think of the way to deliver information, there were tales, what were not true. Those stories were meant to uncover if somebody is delivering information, and then somebody told a story, that Elizabeth liked lovely poems. After that those poems were seen in the bulletin boards.

Then the origin of those poems was asked, and Walter Raleigh identified himself as the writer. Then the queen just asked him to her bedroom in the evening. And when poor Walter Raleigh came two pikes closed his road. Raleigh had one road to left. That was only to the execution layer, even if he promised to bring the gold of Indians from South America to the Queen of England.

An idea of those things is that the tales what are delivered in the palace are involving some special information. And there would be answers or things that are fitting in the certain keyhole. Those things are uncovering people, who are telling things, what is not meant to tell outsiders. If there is a tale that majesty cannot speak French might be told to some people, and those things mean nothing.

But there is a possibility, that there is the French translator at the gate asking for a job. That thing might mean, that somebody has told something, what is not meant for public delivering. Or of course, there is a possibility, that this kind of job was offered in public bulletin boards. Who knows the truth.

Are history books contain false information?

Are history books contain false information?

History is always introducing some people point of view of the things, what is happening in a long time ago. Official history is always written by people, who are ruling the nation. And that's the reason, why it's always subjective. Or what would you do, if you were living in the court of the absolute monarch, who had authority to cut your head off right away? would you write something, what makes that person feel uncomfortable?

In the beginning, there are lots of open questions in history, and when the archaeologists have got new equipment for their use, the well-known things are changing to be more mysterious than we expected. When we are thinking about the famous writings, what are claimed to made by the famous and respected people, we must realize that those writings can be fakes, what are made during those people live. And faked documents are not a new thing in history. So there are many things in the official history writing, what are needed a little bit more careful research than we ever expected.

One of those things is connected with the uniforms, which are claimed to be stolen from the dead soldiers after the battle of Little Big Horn. What happened to those uniforms, did  Indians sell them for somebody? But this is the thing, what remains in history. There is one nasty tale about that decision. There is told the story that Raleigh plagued some other poets poems and introduced them to Queen Elizabeth I, and one of those poems were written by queen herself. In some other versions, Raleigh mocks the poem, what was written by Elizabeth herself. And that caused the death. But who knows the truth, that individual is free to tell that to us.

Also, history is full of people, who were acting non-rational way, when they were in crisis. When Sir Walter Raleigh (c.1552  (maybe 1554)-1618) went to Amazons looking for gold he was imprisoned by Queen Elizabeth I. That man didn't find gold what he promised to the queen, and then he was executed. The thing is that Raleigh could just flee away, but why he returned? This is the question, what is without an answer.

Raleigh could set up his death in the South American jungle, and nobody missed that man, who was convicted to death. The thing that this kind of details are very important, because the sacrifices, what that man faced should warm her majesty's heart. That kind of things are making questions, what was the real reason, why those people returned, or what happened to uniforms, what were stolen in the battle zones.

When we are thinking about the influence of those happenings in the point of view in modern life, we are facing the thing, that this kind of things had great influence in the bloodlines and tradition of old families, and maybe the changes of people in the high ranking positions in Renaissance period caused that different people are ruling the countries now, what would rule the world without those executions. But this is only philosophical thoughts. The truth is that history is written by somebody, and there are many questions, what have left behind.

One of them was that were the king or queen always supervised self the executions, what has been ordered by the leader of the country. This is a really good question. And of course, the thing is that the executioner might be corrupted. The cases like Sir Walter Raleigh are an interesting part of the research, and who knows what Europe looks like without that kind of things. The thing is that we all descend from the same monkey, who lived in Africa a long time ago. And the thing, why we are hating somebody would get an answer from those cases.

Maybe the tales of ruthless and barbaric enemies affect modern life. And of course, the stories, what are written for fairy tales might get influence from real historical cases. And if those tales are told to children, they will transform their way to think. The first thing, what child hears are making the base of the point of view. And this is the thing, what we should understand when we are telling fairy tales for children, or when we are talking something that our children might hear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Raleigh

What literature tells about society?

What literature tells about society?

Litterature or so-called official writings is a very good tool for deciding the attitudes in society. If some publishings are prohibited or censored, that means that something is embarrassing about those texts or writings. There are two ways to make censorship. Another is the official censorship, which is made by authorities, and the other way is that the publishers just refuse the co-operation with writers, whose texts are not pleasing them or the people, who are behind those firms.

But the opposite or mirror-version of the censorship is the books and writings, what are marketed by strong volume. Strong or high-level marketing is telling that somebody, who has money wants that everybody should read those texts. And if the government shares some texts to its officials or quests, that means that in those texts is the agenda, what the government wants to represent for everybody.

That text might be the book, what is written by the leader of the state, what means that the book is offering the window to the mind of national leader, and how the top man wants to see things. And how that person arguments things like how that person became the candidate for the elections, and other cases that would bring the light to decision for staying in power over a couple of elections.

Those things are important when other governments are planning the strategies for that nation and the policy for other nations. If the writer has a strong influence on the internal politics of that nation the profile of that person is very important.

The literature, what is brought to markets by so-called official publishers is the window to the society. And the reason for that is that the writers who are selected by publishers are so-called leading persons in the cultural society and those people want always to be people, who have attitudes and opinions about many things like the environment and social problems. That kind of persons is really good examples, what the people think about some things.

If the books are telling stories about heroism and other important things like wars, that thing tells about growing national spirit. But when we are thinking about cases, where books are telling some kind of wild west hero or old-timer social influential person, that thing would tell that those publications have been changed for some reasons. When we are analyzing the attitudes of the person they are forming in the younghood.

The way how teachers are explaining things are forming the way, how people see things, and of course, people are always against war. When we are looking at things like movements against the Vietnam war, we must realize that there is a couple of things what we must remember. There is a small difference if people are against war, or if people are against the war or campaigns what are made by the USA, and other wars have no mean. This kind of things might be seen, how people are writing about things, what have been happened in the past.

The thing is that the writers, whose texts are published are representing people, who are being young at a certain time, and that means that their attitudes are forming in the certain time in the past. That's why literature is a good window in the things, what government wants people to see. Politicians must know what people are thinking about things like oversees relationships because this kind of things is becoming more and more important.

The published text is showing somehow the attitudes about people, who are leading the cultural things. And culture is one of the best ways to influence to so-called normal people opinions.  When we are thinking about the text, it can transfer feelings, what the living picture cannot transmit. By using text the feelings can transmit precisely. And when we are thinking the text itself, we must remember that the text itself is independent of the platform, where it is published. That's why we should separate Gutenberg from the text what is published.

How Claudio Ptolemy cheat all the world?

How Claudio Ptolemy cheat all the world?

When we are thinking about the Earth-centric worldview and the man behind that theory, we must understand that the name of Ptolemy protected that man during the lifetime. Ptolemy was also the name of the pharaohs, who ruled Egypt during the Greek time, and I think that Ptolemy simply introduced himself as the member of the Royal family of Egypt, and made people believe or accept the things, what he introduced as his name. He plagiarized other person's work, and that thing was proven in the 19th century when scientists compared the direction of some stars, what were not seen in Alexandria.

Alexandria was the city, where Ptolemy lived, and the direction of those stars shows, that those observations were made at Rhodos. The thing is that the Earth-centric earth image ruled in the Catholic Church until the new instruments like telescopes made possible to prove those things, that everything was orbiting the Earth hoax. But when we are thinking the things, where is claimed that Earth is flat, we must realize, that Ptolemy believed that Earth was the ball, what were orbiting other stars, sun, and planets.

This thing is a very interesting detail because we know that even Ptolemy was not behind the flat earth theory. And this within is really interesting detail, when we are thinking about the court against Galileo Galilei. The question is who created the flat- or pancake earth theory? If we think the position of Ptolemy in the world before Copernicus put the sun to the place, where it belongs, we must realize that this man had very big authority in the Catholic church.

And nobody was allowed to deny or challenge that man. The thing is that our way to see the world is advanced by using the base of Copernicus observations, and then people normally ask, how Copernicus dare to make those publications. They were published in the year when Copernicus has died, and that thing protected him against the hate of inquisition.

But when we are thinking about the Ptolemy and his work, we must understand that this writing was very "interesting" because if people denied the writings about Ptolemy, those inmates would burn in the bonfire. The thing, what one of the most well known faked research has caused people is one of the most horrifying examples, what the persons, who have enough power can make to other people if they cannot understand that thing, what they want to believe is a hoax.

When we are talking about theories and attitudes of the people, we must understand that maturity means the ability to understand that people can make mistakes. If a person who has absolute power would have an attitude, that every person who is against the opinion of this powerful inmate must be destroyed has some opinion, that means that this opinion would not be denied very easily.

The thing about the theories of Ptolemy caused the death of many people, and still, the thing, what makes people think about silly theories and hoaxes is that the Catholic Church burned people in a bonfire, if they deny the theory of Ptolemy. The reason for that kind of judgments is a mystery. Even today, people don't understand how the thing, that some particles are orbiting some other particles than Earth influenced to the power or the position of the Catholic Church.

Ptolemy introduced his ideas, or ideas, what were written by somebody else before the Catholic Church has even born. So why that mathematician and alchemist who was born 100 AD got the position what he got is a mystery. Did somebody believe that this man was a member of First Christian societies is a mystery?

But there is a very strange explanation for the writings, what Ptolemy has been done. The explanation is that the theory of the Earth-centric universe meant for some kind of code. And in this text, Ptolemy wrote that Earth meant the Catholic Church. And that thing meant that the center of human life should be the Catholic Church or something inside the Catholic Church.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy

How much is much?

How much is much?

Sometimes we all see the news about nursery services, which has not enough workers. Sometimes I have thought, that how those nursery companies even dare to take patients because there are only two or three nurses for maybe tens of patients, and that number of staff is enough? So what if something happens during those shifts?

And in the cases that there is so little personnel on work, that it's dangerous for patients, that thing brings my mind the question, should there be some nurses or doctors, who have not come to work? If the thing is like that, why that thing has not mentioned in reports? Or why those people have not called to authorities, that nurses have not come to work?

One thing, what is interesting is, why that thing satisfies patients and their families? Why the small number of personnel is not caused reclamations, and why people who are living in that kind of institutes are not telling a thing to their families?

The things, what satisfies us might be different to someone else, and the things what are dare to us might be meaningless to other people. If a person repeats some words, they are important to that inmate and gives satisfaction. The satisfaction is very well seen in the writings and speeches, what a person makes. When we are thinking about things, what seems meaningless for us, we almost ever think, that for someone else those things are very important.

So what this means? When we will go to the city, we might want to drink a cup of coffee, and then we just go to the cafeteria and take that cup, it doesn't cost very much and that's it. But have you ever thought about an underage person, who wants that cup of coffee? Buying that thing is not so easy thing to them. 

They must find the place, where is no age limit, and then they must have money for buying that cup of coffee. This kind of things is what we must realize when we are making something. Things that are easy to get might be hard for somebody else. So when we are thinking about the way, how people write about things what they have written or spoken? Have you ever thought about cases, where people have written or spoken something that is not tolerated about some other person?

When somebody has mentioned, that some other person has mental problems or that person is somehow incompetent in public writing, and the knowledge is wrong, that could cost very much because of the juridical payments. In those cases, a person must believe, that the thing, what has been written is right. Or actually, the writer must hope that the thing, what has been spread is true. And sometimes this hope causes the phenomenon, that the writer just uses or fixes some term, what supports the last thing, what that person has been spread.

Here I must ask one little question, what is "is it right to leave a customer without service, even that person is incompetent"? This is a very interesting question. Incompetence is not a thing, what justifies to act how people want to act, and that kind of things are not meant for justifying criminal activities and other kinds of things like unnecessary removings from the area.

When we are talking about things like sending faked job applications, I have thought that maybe those people, who are making practical jokes, like sending job applications for other people would like to do those jobs themselves, because they are asking them to others? If somebody thinks that it's a very good improvement to social skills, that person washes some stairways, that person should make those jobs one summer. This kind of thing could be very teaching lesson, how that kind of jobs is improving social skills.

The paradox of poor people is that in the wealthiest states lives poorest people

The paradox of poor people is that in the wealthiest states lives poorest people

1. The natural resource-based economics would not need a highly educated labor force

When people are talking about the wealthy states and people, they are facing a paradox, that in the richest countries lives poorest people. This is a very interesting point of view when we are looking at the segmentation of material and capital in the world. The difference between the poorest and richest people in some nations is very huge, and this advantage is seen also in western countries.

This is the thing, what is somehow interesting because when we are looking at the gross national product, nations are very wealthy. But that money would not benefit individuals, and of course, there is a possibility to get social benefits, but those benefits are coming only if the person is filling the papers, and knows how to seek them. And this is a really interesting thing.

If the person is living in the country, which is really well-known about its natural resources is a higher probability to born poor than the wealthy person, and this is one of the greatest paradoxes on Earth. The thing is that in those nations, who have the greatest natural resources, have the poorest education in the world is something really prominent. The reason for that is that drilling the oil is no need to educated people and because the wealth of those nations is coming from natural resources, there is no need for higher education.

When entire production is made with people, who don't have education, the worker is easy to replace. That thing is a suitable model in some oil fields, but if the nation would not have great natural resources, it must find another source for its incomes. The high-tech industry needs trained people, and that is the reason, why the western world has the superior against those nations, what the main production consists only things like oil and minerals.

If the product of the high-tech industry is immaterial things like computer programs and other things like marketing pages, that means that there is a need for the people, who are working in multiple areas. That means that if we would want to market those programs and other things to a foreign country, we have two possibilities. Of course, we can teach other people to talk our own language or make the homepages by using those people own language. If somebody wants to buy things like screwdrivers from the Internet, that person needs to read, what kind of tools is wanted.

2. Everybody makes mistakes

In this case, there are differences in tools, and if the ordered tools are metered in inches, they are not suitable for tools, what are made for metric systems. If the buyer would not know the difference of inches and centimeters, that would cause very bad problems in the working place. The thing is that if the person makes work, where the most important thing is to be sharp and make complicated codes or write texts, where are complicated things like customs orders or legal things, there must be realized, that in this kind of things is possible to make mistakes.

And people must live with that thing. Nobody is perfect and in some cases, even the best are making mistakes. Of course, is embarrassing, if the person would have to pay more about the merchandise because the customer forgets to mention something, or put some number in the form, and that might cause extra prices.

Some of those extra prices are caused because in the shipment forms are forgotten to mention, that the information about the order is taken from some certain homepages, and if the stuff is ordered by using that information the customer would get it at a lower price.  Those things cause sometimes reclamation because somebody had to pay more, but the maker of the text must live with that thing.

How to handle feelings on the Internet?

How to handle feelings on the Internet?

Internet and own home are a very good place to handle things like feelings, and in that combination is sometimes very devastating. When we are tired, or somehow in very sensitive feelings, we might make mistakes, what we will shame in the next morning.

And this is the thing, why we should not write when we are tired, but as you know, when the inspiration strikes, you cannot resist emotion. Inspiration is the most important thing if the person is working in the creative area. And here we must say, that creative persons are sometimes somehow different than other people.

This is the thing, what we must understand when we are making texts or something else on the net. On the Internet is many people, who like to say, that hackers or somebody else would see everything, what we are writing in here. And why should we care about that thing? Why we must hide things, what we feel or what we like? Like in many other stories, there is a background in this column.

I just read some feedback, what I got in some blog, what have written, but as you know I have not updated that blog recently, and there was some hacker or something like that, who told that this person has been reading that text. And I was impressed because that blog or text is free to read on the Internet.

So that thing that somebody has read those texts doesn't mean that this person is somehow good hacker. So what must I afraid? That somebody would notice about writings about some Russian modern art? So if somebody says that the person is hacker, we must remember, that we must act in the same way, when somebody is telling to be a burglar.

What we should notice when we are looking at the writings?

There are many times told, that if people should not tell or share a thing on the Internet, and the reason is that their privacy has been a danger. But is this the truth and only truth? When we are looking as so-called qualified books and writings in the newspapers, we are facing the thing, that there are many times published information, what is somehow irrelevant or harmful.

One of the saddest examples about this thing is that the medical diagnosis of the scientists are published, and the only thing that means something is that diagnosis. The thing is that medical staff, who are handling that kind of information has professional secrecy about the diagnosis of people.

When we are thinking about things like psychic disorders, we must see that it's same, what kind of movies about that kind of things are made in Hollywood. There are no people, who are telling that movies like "Hannibal" are harmful to the social life of mental patients.

There is no patient association, which would even say a thing against those movies, but when somebody would make a little joke of the Parkinson patients, that causes very big media protests, that this kind of jokes is tasteless. But no media has been protested against movies, where serial killers are hunting people. Of course, those people are the most brutal and notorious people in the world, but only a couple of psychiatric patients are really that kind of people

The world of social media and algorithms

The world of social media and algorithms

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/

We are living in a world with social media, do we want that or not

When I'm writing about Facebook in this text, I mean about social media. The problems with Facebook and data security is that when artificial intelligence is profiling the user for marketing it can also be used to create another kind of profiles. Data solutions that are used today are created for slower networks and in the begin of Facebook and other social media, the bandwidth of the networks have been less than 500 kilobytes, what made almost impossible to share images. The thing is that nobody even thought that someday almost every person has got the device, which allows sending the photographs and even movies to the Internet and what goes on the pocket.

That means this kind of things have not predicted when Facebook and another kind of social media solutions have been made. And another thing is that the algorithms, what are used for sorting data in the social media have been created for slower computers.

Modern supercomputers can sort billions of bytes more per second than some supercomputer in early 21 century. And the thing, what is new is that the data is transferring in the network. We are making more things on the Internet than before. When we are creating all our papers and memos on the net, we are in danger of hacking. But otherwise, we cannot lose those documents, while we are dropping our USB sticks. And we can continue to make those documents in every place, where we want.

The ability to filter data makes NSA so effective

The thing, what makes NSA so effective is that it has the capacity to filter information. That thing means that the computer can choose the data, what would send to operators by using multiple algorithms. One of the algorithms is the simultaneous calls to the telephone, which is owned by the known criminal. That means that the system can collect telephone calls and E-mails, which are interested in law enforcement. One of them is the E-mails between well known criminal and police chief.

Or the lawyer, whose spouses cleaning company would get millions of euros by cleaning offices, what are owned by Mafia. In the modern time, those officials must not listen to every tape and the computer would also use the "speech to text" solution for creating documents of those records. And the thing is that this kind of solutions is working as some kind of karaoke, which means that the judge can follow the tape like in some kind of karaoke happening.

In a couple of years ago, there were massive campaigns against social media. The attitude was that "companies have their own official channels, and the normal workers should concentrate on their work". But there is one thing, what made that campaign ineffective, and that is that it was made by the media, what has own cow in the ditch. The print media has problems with modern electronic media, and there was always one very big problem, and that is "what if the journalist writes racist or provocative writings?".

The second thing was that why people should be silent if they are harassed at the workplace? When we are thinking about social media, we can see things, what might feel very interesting. Almost every person, who is written in the social media are faced things, what is called "troll". Usually, that thing is like "fucking gay" type phrases, what are telling something about the way, how the harassed will think about things. Sometimes we are facing cases, that somebody has been used trolls for closing the social media.

There are millions of people, who have something to hide with their own backgrounds. And one of them is the unemployed person, who lives in Europe, but spends the winters in Hawaii. Those people would not want their friends to know about this kind of things. But there is another kind of cases, what might be very embarrassing, if they are uncovered. One of them is the priest or head of some charity campaign, who has been the head of the harassing in the school period.

Sometimes there have been suicides in that kind of cases and after that, the person has been changed the name and lived in the foreign land that everybody would forget that kind of things. But social media is a powerful tool for politicians, who are marketing their own ideas on how to improve society. But social media needs an active attitude, and that means that if a person would not have own thoughts, that kind of things is also uncovering in social media.

The social media account might be kept by somebody else

There are services, what are selling the social media writings, which means that the account is handled by professionals. And sometimes is claimed that some ice-hockey players have been burned about this kind of things. In those cases, the player has been written texts for social media, while that man has been on ice. I don't know if this true or false, but if this happens to the politician, that thing would be a little bit more embarrassing than in the case of the ice-hockey player.

In the social media have been uncovered things like that the person, who seems very emphatic and have been marketed very nice guy is something else. And there is also uncovered that some very nice looking kind person is total racists, who believe to be over everybody else. This is the problem with psychopaths and narcissist. They are looking like nice guys, but those persons have no social conscience. Those people are normally nicely dressed and polite, but they think always their own benefit.

One good mark to uncover that kind of person is that the psychopath wants to maximize own benefit. This means that this inmate always chooses the stronger side, and those persons are changing their opinion always to the side of the majority. Or actually, psychopaths are choosing the side, what gives that person the best benefit. And if some person offers the ice-hockey tickets for the psychopath, that person can be the side of the minorities, if that allows getting in the circles of the rich people, whose pictures they can show in the Facebook, what is suddenly filled with the selfies, what the psychopath portrays with the well known ice-hockey players . So this is the sermon for this morning.

One little thing about Stendhal-syndrome

One little thing about Stendhal-syndrome

Stendhal-syndrome or fascination in the front of art

When we are waiting for something we would be like adjusting to the mental condition, that the something, what we would be dreamed is coming in the front of us. And when we at least see something, we would face the situation, that there would be raised only the thought and worlds, what we are thinking as the most wonderful things, what we can ever create.

When that painting in front of the person, who has the Stendhal-syndrome, that adjusting would erupting as the trance, when the person is looking at the painting. Then that person starts to find out the hidden meanings from that painting, what is so impressive. In that situation, that person could repeat things like nobody ever created those wonderful paintings without reason.

Fascination in front of the painting. 

And in front of the wonderful paintings, we can let the "Pegasos fly" as we sometimes might think. When we are thinking about that situation, that we are facing some extraordinary thing, like wonderful paintings, we might release all our skills to make text. When we are facing the "grey man", who would want to write something, what would make an impression, that thing would cause because of those paintings.

They just release the will to write something extraordinary, and in the real world the people, who are "grey" are the most interesting persons. The reason is that those people would not need to make an impression because of their clothes or merchandise. Those clothes you can buy anywhere. They want to make an impression of something, what other people would not able to buy, and that thing is the writing or making something unique.

Writing is the way to introduce own ideas

Writing is the way to show something to other people. It's the way to introduce their own ideas and show people, how that writer sees things. And maybe those things would not ever interest other people, but there are always people, who are interested in the things, like what kind of creatures the werewolves might be. The thing is that sometimes the writers are only a little bit shy, and that means they are quite silent people, and the writing is their way to introduce the things, what they want to tell other people.

There are always people, who say that bad critique and feedback can terminate the will of writing. But at this point, I must say the thing that who cares about feedback what is given in the kilometers away. Nobody ever knows about that feedback, what is given to another person in the bar, and this thing is a really good thing. That would save us to listen to the feedback about the things, that our writings would not please some person, who would not tolerate that somebody will write something, without asking that inmates permission.

Fear is an effective tool for isolating people.

In psychology is a couple of marks, what is telling that the person afraid something. One of those marks is that person wants that somebody would be with that inmate all the time. Fear is a terrible thing and there are many things, which makes it an effective way to control the inmate. In the movies like "The village" the psychological fear is the element, what would make people stay in the line of the isolated society.

The fear is caused by telling the stories, that in the forests would be some aliens or beasts, what would harm inmate if that person would leave the area. The reason for the fear is the thing, that those persons would not ever see the world, what is outside the village and the barrier that surrounds that village. The thing is that because the children of that community have been born in that area, and they ever been outside, they think that there is no world outside their living areas.  This is the policy of the North-Korean government.

If people would not know about freedoms, they would not miss those things, which will make them do something more important than watching the internet. And that thing is serving the country. Why people should write or read because they would know about things, what are boring? Why people should borrow their head about things like democracy or net gaming? The more important place, where those people can be would be in some military exercise, and the internet is of course only the waste of the time. If people would go outside North Korea, they would face the bad western world, what is full of hooligans and criminals.

And this is the thing, what would make possible to make the mirror version of the fear. When we are thinking about hypothetical persons, who would be born in mental hospitals, they would probably think that our world is something terrible. In our world is the rules, how we must behave, and in the mental hospital the mind is free, or this is how we sometimes think when we are thinking about the rules of the society. But in those institutes, the body is trapped or imprisoned, and the people are under the control of the well-trained personnel.

But if we are thinking carefully, that world would sometimes fascinate people. In the real world, that means the society and environment, where so-called normal people are living is one thing, which is really interesting. The people who are different are facing hate and sometimes they are even killed because of the persecution, what would be targeted to the minorities. But there are sometimes happened the things, that somebody has been treated the person, and then that bully would face the case, that the victimized person would be tougher than the attacker.

After that, this bully would start to tell other people, that the person who was targeted to the victim would be not normal. In history one of the best examples are the inquisition courts, where people like Galileo Galilei and Catherine of Siena faced the prosecutions of the people, who were actually jealous of their work. The first one proved that the Earth was not the center of the universe and the last one learned to write and read without teachers and actually that woman learned those skills by hearing the masses.

That thing made jealous people start to prosecute that woman in the inquisition court. Catherine released, and she became the secretary of the pope. One of the most interesting things is that even today somebody would be sent to the mental hospitals because they have different opinions than other people, and the reason is that the people have the right to live without that inmate. In the cases of Galileo Galilei and Catherine the Siena, the reason for the prosecutions was that the law denies the renditions, what have a conflict with the text of the Holy Bible.

And the thing was that the doctrine of the Catholic church was that the Earth was in the middle of the Universe, and the women should be quiet in the church, those people have made crime against the Church because they have seen that the moons of the planet Jupiter are orbiting that planet, and another was spoken in loud voice, while reading the Holy Bible. Both of those persons were released, because the Inquisition didn't find any mistakes the observations, what Galileo made, and there was not a theological conflict between the text of Holy Bible and the things, what Catherine the Siena have been spoken.

The thing is that in those cases the text of the law was in conflict with reality. And one of the most important things is that the Galileo got the anathema, which means that the writings, what this man made were not allowed to read. People were happy when they hear that thing and in the opinion of the pope, they must not think about things like planet movements. The place of the normal people was somewhere else than in libraries or schools. The idea of the pope was that when the people would not read too much, they would be happier because they didn't know that there could be something, what the pope didn't know.

One thing what people would use in the cases when they want to deny publishing on the Internet is that person would face persecution because of the writings. The argument is that the publishing would not probably please the people, who would hire the employees. And that's why those people would recommend the "zero-tolerance" for the net publishings, what would cause that they will be tired of people, who would tell their ideas and thoughts on the Internet. And if you would not please those people, they would kick you off from the working place, what could be some kind of cleaning job.

But if somebody would be wicked for the employee, and that thing would not be published, there could be the problems that would never come in the public. Many of those things are handled behind closed doors, and the thing is that the boss would ever confess a thing. The problem in the court is that the lawyers would read only two lines in the diaries, and leave the rest of the text without notice. This means that the common vision of the diary would be different, what the two lines that are read in the courtroom have been told. If the diaries would be public, those things would tell people, how intelligent or idiot the writer would be.