The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

We should stop talking about nationalism and left-wing movements at the different kind of movements. There is no difference between right- or left-wing radicalism, and the result is always devastating. The thing what might give little brakes for Stalin and Tito was that they were members of the ethnical minority of their homeland.

They couldn't get support from the majority same way as Adolph Hitler could. And the thing why the nationalism was not so highly respected in the Soviet Union was that there were so many nationalities. Of course, Russians wanted people of the world think that they are the heir of the Soviet Union, and that's why there is so great nationalistic wave.

There is very long living opinion, that Russians created the Soviet Union and the entire state was created around Russia, who has rights for the heritage of the Soviet Union. And this thing makes possible to say, that Russia is the Soviet Union, what have lost some land areas.

When we are thinking about the far-wing radicalism, the normal version of their speeches is that they are not far-wing members and the things like fascism have been lost after the Second World War. The argument is similar, with the argument that Mafia does not exist anymore.

That thing is an argument, that the fascist and nazis were lost after WWII. There are some versions, that the Fascists and Nazis were some kinds of the right-wing movement, but the reality is that those movements were market themselves as the labor movement, and the nazism has got the name from their agenda of national socialism.

The difference between those movements is that national socialism is highlighting the greatness of the nation, and that thing also is supporting by the militaristic strength. When we are thinking about the power and the Marxism, the idea about the peace between labors is very good marketing speech. 

But the real socialism is looking like a little bit different than ideal socialism. There are many similarities with nazis and communists, and the reason why there were not so great nationalistic movement in the Soviet Union was that there were many nationalities in that country. Maybe Stalin had problems to create a real "team spirit" in his country because he couldn't just ask support from Russians.

He was Georgian himself, and that put him to a difficult position because he couldn't just agitate the people against minorities. That means that Stalin was one member of the very small minority in the Soviet Union. Hitler was a much better position. He could yell against Gypsies and Jews because he was a member of the majority of people. And that gave him the very good weapon against minorities. The argument of that kind of leaders in that the majority is the thing, who is ruling, and other people must follow the majority.

It is easy to walk in the middle of the road

It is easy to walk in the middle of the road

Walking in the middle of the road is a very nice thing. The people must not say a single word of politics and other things. And that guarantees that those people are popular. One of the best notes of the radical movement is that it claims to be out or above the politics, and the thing, what that movement drives is something more subliming than the normal life. That thing is a really interesting way to think because the leaders of those movements seem to be nice guys before they enter the power, and then they took control of the state.

The opposition and criticism are always suppressed, and that thing is always argument by things like people should stand on the same side for protecting the policy, what is lead by wise men. And sometimes I am wondering, who told those people, that they are the best leaders for their nation? When we are thinking about the dictatorship, the manifest of those people is that they are so popular, that people want that they should stay in power.

When we are trying to make the psychoanalysis of the dictator, we are facing the thing, that those people really seem popular, and that is normally enough. After their death, the crimes of those men and women were convicted. But the people who were guilty could not be punished, because dead people don't feel any punishments.

But when we are thinking about the most horrified dictators and despots in history, we are always facing the claiming that dictators are always given orders to people for making persecutions. The thing is that they were guilty of mass-murders, but something has been forgotten. The people who follow the orders were also guilty. That means that Stalin and Hitler were not guilty alone, the persons who support them were also responsible for their actions.

Criminal organizations are also acting as official states. And the rulers of the criminal organizations are like kings, what is ruling their secret kingdom.

We should stop thinking cases like Stalin and Hitler as some kind of super persons. And start to think them as the ordinary people, who had huge resources to make their willing true. But what if we would think, that some normal criminal like Al Capone would give that kind of orders? Should the henchmen follow those orders? And should people tell everything to Capone?

Here I normally face the thing, that people are claiming that the dictators have police force and special operation brigades for accomplishing their rules. But how the bullet, what comes from the gun of executor differs from the bullets what comes from the weapons of Gangsters? When we are thinking about the role of the mafia-boss in the underworld, those people are actual kings, what is ruling their secret empires.

Those kingdoms of the criminal organization would fight about their living spaces as well as the regular states. And that makes those organizations interesting to research. The criminal boss has own area, what that person protects and defends, and this makes the actions of those people look like actions of some official state, and also Mafia would go to war against other mafia families.

Support and popularity made those things possible, what happened in the era of dictators. And we could transfer this philosophical thought to the criminal organizations. Is Al Capone guilty? That is the question in the court of law. That man is guilty, but the thing is that also his henchmen are guilty too.

They made their actions because Capone ordered but the thing is that those men had to know, that the orders, what Capone gave were not legal. And that means that those henchmen were guilty as well as Capone. And if we are starting to think the position of "Big Al", that means that Capone was not guilty alone. The henchmen who raised him to the power of Chicago underworld made the actions what that man made possible.

Was this image caused that Adolf Hitler believed his "holy duty"?

Was this image caused that Adolf Hitler believed his "holy duty"?

(Image I)

I know that I have written quite much about vampires recently, and the reason for that was this image. Above this text is an image of Vlad III Impaler, who was also known as "Dracula". This image is not so often connected to texts, where this strange ruler is mentioned or handled. 

There is a possibility, that this image is faked,  and the reason, why I think that there are similarities with the shape of Adolf Hitler and the man, who is portrayed in the image above this text. If we would see the images about that image and image of Hitler separately, we might see that they seem like similar. Here I would not put the image of Hitler in this text, because that image is so common, that you might look it by yourself. 

If the image is fake, the thing, what was behind this thing might be "Ahnenerbe", and the method, what is used in this work was to use the original canvas of the less-known artist of the 15th. century. And then the original painting was removed, and it was replaced by the artist who was working for "Ahnenerbe". 

But if the image is original, that might cause the thing, what made Hitler begin to believe the holy mission of that man. And that thing might cause the series of happens in the life of Adolf Hitler, what drove him to the leader of Germany and to the Second World War. 

The strange image of Vlad III impaler who is also known as Dracula has strange similarities with Adolf Hitler. Sometimes I have thought that maybe this kind of image has caused the thought in the mind of Adolf Hitler, that he has the "holy duty on earth". 

Maybe somebody claimed in the childhood of Hitler, that he was a member of the family of Vlad Dracul, and that was giving the holy mission for the man, who would become one of the most notorious leaders in history. Here I'm calling that person, who might create the "great idea" as "The Joker".

Maybe the Joker sends the letter with that image to Hitler and claimed that the man was a member of the Dracula family. There is a possibility that the Joker sent the letter to Hitler, where the story about the membership of that family of Dracula told to Hitler. And maybe that thing caused something, what was unexpected. The thing is that the shape of the faces is descending in the generations.

There is no evidence about this joke, but sometimes I have thought that is is possible that some traumatic experiences during childhood caused the thing, that Hitler started to hate Jews. And I have thought that the fanatic hate against Jews cased because somebody harassed Hitler in the childhood, and that person claims being Jew.

Sometimes, I have thought that was this thing really meant for a joke or were there some other purpose of that kind of actions. If that thing was the joke, would the joker caused the Second World War. There is no proves about this thing, but there is one thing, what is real in the life of Adolf Hitler, and that thing is the hate against Jews. Nothing normal thing would not cause the fanatic hate and in many times the traumatic experience would cause the will to hurt some group of the people.

Picture I https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_III_the_Impaler

Did the wristwatch cause the destruction of the battleship Bismarck?

Did the wristwatch cause the destruction of the battleship Bismarck?

Why battlecruiser Hood was not enough?

In this text, I'm trying to think about the reasons, why Admiral Günther Lütjens made the fatal error after sinking the battlecruiser Hood. The main reason for the destruction of the battleship Bismarck was that Lütjens continued his run at the North Atlantic, and that caused the situation, what is visible in the history books. The thing is that Lütjens run before taking the command of the battleship Bismarck was a disappointment.

During that command, that man was commander in chief of the battlecruisers Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, and during that sail, what took over the month, that man did get any victories, and he almost lost those battlecruisers. After that sail, Adolph Hitler was really angry, but he told to understand that Lütjens was the new commander of the battleships and battlecruisers, and gave the wristwatch for a gift to that admiral.

Did Lütjens afraid the execution, what would disturb his concentration at the fatal moment?

And maybe Lütjens was afraid that he will cause the second disappointment to Hitler, who would shoot him for that thing. Maybe he was not sleeping well, what caused the problems with concentration, or he thought other things and that would cause the fatal mistake during the first and last journey of Bismarck. The disappointments, what was made to Hitler caused that the officer was shot, and the family will send to a concentration camp. Sometimes there was claiming that Lütjens was afraid that there was some radioactive material like radium in that watch, and if that thing would be true, cancer would kill that man.

There were bad stories about the gifts, which were given by Adolph Hitler. Those gifts were meant for telling that the man was a friend of the despotic leader of Nazi-Germany. And those people were easy targets for people, who hated Hitler. The thing was that there were also many Nazis in the Third Reich, who wanted to take the place of Hitler, and here I don't mean that those people would be more kindly to the Jews or political resistance than Adolph Hitler himself was.

Sometimes is claimed that the despotism and mental problems of Hitler were shortened the war as well as the allied actions. If we would think the best thing, what the allied forces would give the thing would be the leader, who has lost the touch with reality.