The Bird Is Gone

The Bird Is Gone

Could there be an encrypted message where is letters T.B.I.G (The Big) (Terminating Big) and could that mean some kind of demolition device?

What does this message mean? When we are thinking about this message it has been found on the tree, what is in one of the farthest and most isolated islands in the world. Sometimes I have thought is some carrier pigeon left to home for sending a message, and then something happened to that bird. At first, we might think, that somebody was mistakenly released some carrier pigeon, but there is another explanation. 

Is that the very well encrypted message? But is the message some kind of encrypted thing, where are the hidden word "The BIG", if we would take only the first letters of the words. So is there some special bag or something else? Those letters are T.B.I.G, what might mean that there has been happened something big. or T.B.I.G might mean (T) BIG, what might mean "Terminating Big". And is that "terminating big" some kind of demolition equipment. 

Or was there some dead bird laying on the rock. And then someday the persons, who have left that message suddenly have seen that "The Bird is Gone", so there is one little bit more interesting explanation for that message, and could that some ship, what name was "The Bird" was gone. Or did somebody accidentally released some kind of bird as an example carrier pigeon?

Is this "Bird Is Gone" message the key to the mystery of treasury, what is claimed to hide on that island? And how the maker of that message hoped, that somebody will find it?

Above this text is a message, that somebody has sent to a tree on the Cocos island, and that message could be the key to the treasury mystery, what has been told about that island. In that island is claimed to be the treasury, but nobody has been officially found it. When we want to solve some problems, we must think about what is the simplest possible reasons for that thing. When we are looking at things, what we might think as clear, we might find another meaning for the things, what seems regular. So when we are looking like the stories of the lost treasure, we must ask, why somebody wants to hide that thing? If some pirate would hire treasury to the beach a long way from home, how that person would think to return and get the treasury? 

Does that pirate rent a ship, and then go to get that thing from the sunny island? But if the treasury is gold and diamonds, why that pirate would not melt gold, and claim to find jewelry, and sell them to some store? So what that treasury could be? Are they some kind of documents, what is proving about some kind of cooperation with some investors and pirates, and this kind of thing might cause that the pirate could buy himself free from the prison if that person would someday catch because somebody has become suspicious of the origin of the money of the old sea captain. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocos_Island

Image:

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/08/strange-clouds-and-writing-about-cocos.html

Sea monk the mysterious sea monster

Sea monk the mysterious sea monster

Is this creature the scuba diver from the 17th. century.

When we are looking at the image of the sea monk, we must realize, that the person, who has seen this kind of sea monster would see the ancient scuba diver. Maybe this man was the scuba diver, who used primitive equipment. And I don't know how much normal people knew about scuba diving during the 17th. century? At that time there were scuba diving suits, and if we are thinking carefully, in the middle of the man-shaped creatures can be the diving bell or the deep submerge capsule. Or that might be the auxiliary oxygen.

Sea monk or sea bishop is one of the most mysterious sea monsters in the world. The origin of that tale might be in the 30 years war, where protestants used this kind of tales as the propaganda against Catholics, but there is one detail in this tale, and the detail is that this story might have a different kind of backgrounds. One of the backgrounds might be that everybody knew that monks told many things to inquisitors, and they send the people to executors.

Maybe some person told something only in the boat, and then that thing brought problems to somebody. And if the judgment is augmented in some special way, that thing uncovered that there were monks or bishop in the same boat with the storyteller. So this means that the sea monk-stories are told for the warning, that the bad guys are not doing anything when they are alone, and that means that they are looking like innocent, but when they get assistance the things are turning, and they will make reports about things like smuggling for getting the benefit. And during 30 years of war, monks were so-called bad guys.

This is one background of the tale about the "Solar Warden".

The strange element of the sea monk stories is that the image, what is drawn of sea monk is that the sea monk seems to have some kind of protective suit. That means that the sea monk would be human, who has just come from the seas by using the boat. So that means that the creature would be just the monk, who was traveling by boat, and then the people would tell more and more details about this thing because everybody wanted to tell better version and because of the 30 years war, the Catholics were enemies, everybody wanted to confess, that they believed that monks were bad guys.

Does the "sea monk" have a gliding suit? That could mean, that this creature would be a saboteur, who jump from the balloon.

As you know that these kinds of tales are living and forming. The story of sea monk is the origin of the tales of the myth of "Solar Warden" the mythic station, which has the origin of the myth of Atlantis. The story is told about the giant space stations, which are created for genetic experiments. In some versions of those stories the "Solar Warden" would be the underwater base or series of underwater bases, where there are genetically selected people, whose mission is to support the scientific and other work for superpowers.

There is a possibility that the sea monk has been jumped from the balloon that was pulled by the sailship. And that means that the person would be some kind of spy. The thing in the middle of those drawn creatures would be the equipment box for their missions.

In the most interesting version, this creature was the astronaut from somewhere. I don't know how serious that claim is, and don't be so serious about this kind of thing. NASA has used this kind of thing to getting innovation for modern space systems. And they have created the one-man recovery vehicles.

In this case, the landing craft of the astronaut might be very small, and this is why the people have laughed at that theory. But in fact, this kind of capsule could bring astronauts from the orbiter. This means that the craft would get energy from an outer source, and it can lay down by using propellers or ion motors. In this case, the "sea monk" would use the glide suit, and the craft would get its energy by using maser ray, which is targeted to that thing.

Image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_monk#/media/File:Japetus_Steenstrup_sea_monks-1-.png

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is so-called "real philosopher" person, who has lived in ancient Greece, and write nice texts about the people, who have sitting in the cave all their lives. When we are thinking the difference of the book writer philosopher, we must realize, that the knowledge and way to get information is a little bit different in the modern life than in the time of Plato.

And that makes philosopher of the modern time a little bit different than some ancient Greek master, whose writings and stories would repeat again and again through the millenniums. Maybe some modern philosophers would be found the millenniums later when their texts would be found from some database of the Internet. Maybe that thing happens, when the data of the Internet would transfer to quantum computers.

When we are thinking about persons like Plato and Aristotle, we must realize that would it be possible that those persons were so-called "ordinary storytellers" in their lifetime. If we would think writings, what are consist of things like Atlantean story, we might think that Plato wrote the SciFi novel of the city, which was very powerful and advancing. But what sunk in the waves.

We don't know did Plato knew some words, what are in common use in modern language. And one of those words is "memory". Is it possible that Plato just didn't know that word, because he didn't have school-type education? Maybe he replaced the word "memory" by using the word "water". And "city, what lost below the waves" would just mean "forgotten city". This thing would tell one thing, what we have ever thought before, and that thing is that was the home language of that philosopher some other than Greek? But this is only the hypothesis about the strange words.

Maybe the idea of that story was given to Plato the destruction of the lost culture of Crete. The ruins of that civilization are in the coastline of the Crete, what might mean that the Minoan culture would just come to that island when the eruption of Santorini or some other volcano just whip that culture away.

The thing is that the eruption of Santorini Island would destroy even the large city, and then Plato used that happening as the source when he created a story of Atlantis. And in some stories, some other storyteller has created topics that the spirits of ancient Atlanteans would still live in the caves of the sunken city.

But Plato didn't mention, where the Atlantis was sunken and was that thing where the city was lost water, volcanic ash or lava? I don't know what kind of education was in the time of Plato, but sometimes I have wondered, was he knew the things like volcanic ash or lava? Today many people see those things on the television or the internet, and we all know what those things are. But did Plato knew those words?

Or was he even see the erupting volcano in his life? If he traveled around the Mediterranean as he claimed, there is a possibility, that he has ever seen a single eruption or probably he didn't know the words like volcanic action. There is also the possibility to think that Plato just didn't know the words like lava. Or maybe somebody else has been written some of the texts, what is believed to made by Plato.

There is a possibility that there was more than one man who used the name "Plato", which is very easy to write and remember. Of course, Plato could change the word "lava" to the "water", because the person, who he told about the tale of the Atlantis because the opponent would nor know what "lava" means.

And when we are thinking about that Plato heard that famous story from some Egyptian priest would be the product of imagination. Plato didn't mention where and when he heard that story. There is a possibility, that he heard it at a very young age. The other version would be that he spent the night in the temple, and eavesdrop the discussion between two or more priests.

That thing could cause problems for him, and that's why he wrote that thing a long time after that happening. Or maybe Egyptian priest was away from the home at some Greek city and told that story to Plato, maybe after drinking too much wine. Or there is the change that Plato heard that story from some Egyptian sailor, who has claimed to hear that thing from the Egyptian priest.

Another horror effect for the legends

Another horror effect for the legends

Do you like horror stories? This writing continues for the last one, and the thing is that, if the orgone would have existed there is a possibility, that the soul or the mind of the person would slip in the electric wires or to metallic structure, but there is no evidence about that kind of thing.

But as we see, the pseudoscience is a very good way to observe things, which are greater than we ever imagine. If there would be the possibility to separate the electric vortex what we are calling as the soul from the body, and that thing makes possible to make things, what are interesting, frightening and hard to investigate. Of course, there is a possibility, that somebody would stop the heart of some person, and that thing would cause divorcing from the faculty of medicine.

So this kind of tests are strictly prohibited, and sometimes I thought that would it be possible that Wilhelm Reich has made this kind of things, while he researched the orgone. The thing what made Reich believe that the soul could be the electric vortex was the finding that there was an electric phenomenon in the human nervous system.

And then the researchers found that the electric phenomenon in the nervous system would be changed when people thought something. But when we are thinking the thing, that what if the electric vortex of our nervous system would be stored after the death, we cannot be sure would we still transfer the mind, thoughts, our way of thinking and memories to the next body.

This is the thing, what has given influence on films like "Sixth sense", which are very frightening and gives the strange ideas in the heads of some philosophers or the story writers. Sometimes I have thought, what is the difference between philosopher and storyteller?

A short story of Mary Shelley and the "Frankenstein monster"

A short story of Mary Shelley and the "Frankenstein monster"

1. When we are thinking about the monster, we must deny everything, what we have been told

In this writing, I try to make analyzes of the creator of one of the most tragic, and at the same time most interesting character of the history of horror stories. When we are thinking about the career as the writer, that is not the most popular and accepted choice even today. In the time of Mary Shelley, women were owned by their husbands, and that thing is remarkable when we are trying to think, what kind of person she was.

The writer just channels or conducts the things, what that person sees, or what that person hears and feels to the paper, what is one part of the process, what creates the text. Imagination is one of the most important tools of the writer, and that means that this person needs good imagination or ability to create fantasies, and then that person must dare to transform those fantasies to paper or texts and allow other people to see and read them.

2. Mary Shelley born as Godwin (1797-1851)

Mary Shelley is the writer, who wrote a book named "Frankenstein, the modern Prometheus". That book is still one of the biggest classics on the history of horror stories, and there are still many mysteries around this book and the tale of the monster. When we are thinking the condition of Mary Shelley, and her brain tumor, we must imagine, how that woman even could write?

How she could keep pencils on hands, and make something, what was able to write by others. There is one very remarkable thing in the story, about the forming this famous book, and it is conducted in the rainy day at the beach of  Lake Geneva, where Mary and her husband spend time with Lord Byron and his psychiatrist. We know that Mary Shelley was not one of the simplest and easiest persons in the world.

She treated her parent to commit suicide if they were not allowed that woman to marry  Percy Shelley at the age of 16. They married in 1816 when the first wife of Shelley committed suicide by deluged in the river at London, and then 20 days later Percy Shelley married Mary. Mary's stepsister committed suicide at that time, and those things might have a great influence on Mary.  Also, Percy Shelley deluged when the boat of him and his friend fell in the year 1822.

3. Was the place something else?

When Mary Shelley created the Frankenstein they were spending a rainy day inside the house. And then they were started to write stories about monsters or horror stories. This thing is really interesting because that is a very unusual way to spend time, so where were those people really were? And did Mary really knew Lord Byron?

Did they be somewhere in Great Britain, and take a part of some essay-club, where the idea was to create some kind of horror story? And if that thing is true, was writing about Lake Geneva and other things, what happened in there just the product of imagination. That means that Mary Shelley could be somebody else, what she claimed to be.

4. Did Mary Shelley see the brain tumor?

When we are thinking about the monster, we must realize that the color of the brain tumor might be yellow. That means that Mary Shelley could write about the tumor, what was in her head. But how could she know about this tumor? Here is one interesting question, and that is when Mary Shelley was told, that there was nothing to do with the tumor?

 When we are talking and thinking about this woman, she was a very remarkable gift for the literature. And was her extraordinary productivity cause of the brain tumor? Or was there something else, what caused that productivity? And where Mary created the figure of Dr. Victor Frankenstein? Was she knows somebody, who used that name? And did some doctor show her the tumor?

5. The death was always with Mary Shelley

There were many things, what was remarkable on the life of Mary Shelley, and one of them is that her husband died in suspicious circumstances, when Mary was 18 in an accident. When we are thinking about those things, there were not many happy moments in her life, because only one of her children saw an adult age.

If we are thinking that Mary Shelley was not a perfect mother, because she was writing about more of her studies projects than the child, what she would get. That woman wrote the Frankenstein after the birth of her first child, and this thing is remarkable because that means that the monster could be forming because of the birth of that child. And that's why this woman was sent to psychiatrists.

But there is one remarkable thing, what we must realize when we are thinking about the role of Mary Shelley in the creation process, what made "Frankenstein" real, we must realize that the writer always conducts the thoughts and ideas to paper or computer screen, and this is the thing, what normal people don't always understand. The writer is not itself the inventor of the text.

6. Why fantasies have so negative echo?

There is a need to have inspiration when somebody wants to make the text. If we are thinking that the writer just conducts fantasies to paper, that is true. Without imagination is no text. Or the writing of the fiction is impossible without the ability to think abstract things. Abstraction is the thing, what is called as fantasies, and I sometimes think, why the word fantasy is so negative role in the normal language?

When we are thinking about fantasies, they are things, what makes novels and other types of art forming in real life. Without fantasies and dreams are no advantages, because inventions and other kinds of things are based on things like imagination. Innovation is the ability to make fantasies or imagination true, and we can say those things as "productive intelligence", which means the ability to form the imagination to the real product, and that is sometimes a very long process.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Shelley