Mermaids and unicorns

Mermaids and unicorns

The origin of the mermaid stories is in the sirens of the mythologies of ancient Greece. The myths told that the siren song made the seamen willingness, and then they tempted the seamen to the trap. The origin of that mythology might be in the pirates, which used harbor girls and prostitutes for getting information about the cargo of the ships. And maybe some pirates used the flipper for overtaking the ship.

They might use the tails of the shark, what can use like pants or plank, what is fastened to legs, and that would allow them to get more speed. This kind of swimming equipment has been tested or used also by modern special forces.

Mermaids and unicorns are I hope fictive animals, but the tales about those characters have been the origin of modern biology and genetic engineering. When the philosophers researched those tales they created the ideas that the sea monk was the male version of the mermaids, and that was the beginning of the long-term research, which has been futile.

But the explanation for mermaid legends could be that some people might be used the tail of the shark as the flipper, or those people might use the plank, what is fastened to the feet, and the same kind of equipment would be used by modern swimmers, who want to get the highest speed as possible, as I have written before. So the origin of those tales might be in pirates, who used some drugs like opium to sleep the sailors, and then they would get information about the expensive cargo.

In some versions of the stories of mermaids and unicorns, the mermaids transformed to normal women, when they rose from the sea. And of course, they would ride with unicorns. That means that the mermaids were fishes and unicorns were narwhals in the seas in those versions of those fictive characters.

But there is another thing, what those tales have been caused, and that thing is that those tales about began of the genetic research. The thing in the mermaids and unicorns was that nobody saw them. And then somebody thought that those characters were creatures, what will change the from when they come to drylands, and today we know that some primitive animals can change their form when their metabolism transforms into anaerobic.

So the fictional characters have caused the creation of the so-called serious science. And the thing is that even modern science needs innovation for making models, where we should look for new creatures and species. But the thing is that the myths of the mermaids, sea monks and other kind of things are still fascinating the mind of people.

Image:

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeatures/live/624_351/images/live/p0/35/zw/p035zw0h.jpg

The Jersey Devil

The Jersey Devil

Is this devil the fictional tale, hybrid animal or the recon drone of aliens?

This tale is very fascinating. And the origin of the tale would be the key to solve that mystery. Is the "Jersey Devil" only the tale? Or is it some hybridization of animals like Horse and Narwhal, what some person has tried to create, for creating the "Unicorn". Or in some theories that thing might be the recond drone of humanoids. 

Is the original tale from the Jersey Island at British channel or New Jersey from the opposite side of Atlantic? When I 'm thinking about this particular story, I have sometimes thought, that is it possible that the name for that story and monster are caused because the storytellers were the settlers from the Jersey Island, and moved for some reason to America. But this might be a too simple explanation for that thing, what has earned a story in the Readers Digest.

One of the most extraordinary monster tales is the tale of "Jersey devil", the creature, what looked like some kind of combination with the horse, bat, and some kind of beast. The thing that makes this tale very interesting and different is that the origin of that story might be at Jersey Island, which is part of the Channel Islands near the coast of France. The thing, why I think that the origin of that monster is in Europe, is that it is called the monster of Jersey.  

The thing that this tale is connected to New Jersey is really interesting because there is lots of distance between Jersey island and New Jersey what are the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean. And dropping the word "New" is remarkable. So maybe this tale has been told first at Jersey, but then it transformed to handle the case, what is happened in New Jersey and what is, I hope fiction. 

Did the tale transform, because of the tellers' afraid something?

The mystery of that tale is that it has been changed, and the thing is that was it changed because of the tellers of that story afraid authorities and the death penalty for witchcraft. Or is there something else, what those people afraid? 

So the thing is that there might be the very dark background of this tale, and that is it possible that the "Jersey Devil" was some kind of hybridization? Is the person, who created that hypothetical creature tried to create the Unicorn? The thing is that there is the strange claiming that the Unicorn was the hybridization of the Narwhal and Horse. But as I wrote this kind of theory are the only hypothesis, but is it possible that somebody has got success in that attempt. 

The thing that makes this particular tale very interesting is that it has got the place in Readers Digest. And there is something, what somebody wanted to hide. And of course, one explanation of the Jersey Devil is that it is the recon drone of humanoids. The secret remains, and the mystery is still fascinating to many people in the world. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Devil

A couple of films about this topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C33HiCDlwGg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRx0P3AS_1Y

Image 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Devil#/media/File:Jersey_Devil_Philadelphia_Post_1909.jpg

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is the story of Atlantis only the ancient SciFi tale? And could it be possible that Plato's home language other than Greek?

Is so-called "real philosopher" person, who has lived in ancient Greece, and write nice texts about the people, who have sitting in the cave all their lives. When we are thinking the difference of the book writer philosopher, we must realize, that the knowledge and way to get information is a little bit different in the modern life than in the time of Plato.

And that makes philosopher of the modern time a little bit different than some ancient Greek master, whose writings and stories would repeat again and again through the millenniums. Maybe some modern philosophers would be found the millenniums later when their texts would be found from some database of the Internet. Maybe that thing happens, when the data of the Internet would transfer to quantum computers.

When we are thinking about persons like Plato and Aristotle, we must realize that would it be possible that those persons were so-called "ordinary storytellers" in their lifetime. If we would think writings, what are consist of things like Atlantean story, we might think that Plato wrote the SciFi novel of the city, which was very powerful and advancing. But what sunk in the waves.

We don't know did Plato knew some words, what are in common use in modern language. And one of those words is "memory". Is it possible that Plato just didn't know that word, because he didn't have school-type education? Maybe he replaced the word "memory" by using the word "water". And "city, what lost below the waves" would just mean "forgotten city". This thing would tell one thing, what we have ever thought before, and that thing is that was the home language of that philosopher some other than Greek? But this is only the hypothesis about the strange words.

Maybe the idea of that story was given to Plato the destruction of the lost culture of Crete. The ruins of that civilization are in the coastline of the Crete, what might mean that the Minoan culture would just come to that island when the eruption of Santorini or some other volcano just whip that culture away.

The thing is that the eruption of Santorini Island would destroy even the large city, and then Plato used that happening as the source when he created a story of Atlantis. And in some stories, some other storyteller has created topics that the spirits of ancient Atlanteans would still live in the caves of the sunken city.

But Plato didn't mention, where the Atlantis was sunken and was that thing where the city was lost water, volcanic ash or lava? I don't know what kind of education was in the time of Plato, but sometimes I have wondered, was he knew the things like volcanic ash or lava? Today many people see those things on the television or the internet, and we all know what those things are. But did Plato knew those words?

Or was he even see the erupting volcano in his life? If he traveled around the Mediterranean as he claimed, there is a possibility, that he has ever seen a single eruption or probably he didn't know the words like volcanic action. There is also the possibility to think that Plato just didn't know the words like lava. Or maybe somebody else has been written some of the texts, what is believed to made by Plato.

There is a possibility that there was more than one man who used the name "Plato", which is very easy to write and remember. Of course, Plato could change the word "lava" to the "water", because the person, who he told about the tale of the Atlantis because the opponent would nor know what "lava" means.

And when we are thinking about that Plato heard that famous story from some Egyptian priest would be the product of imagination. Plato didn't mention where and when he heard that story. There is a possibility, that he heard it at a very young age. The other version would be that he spent the night in the temple, and eavesdrop the discussion between two or more priests.

That thing could cause problems for him, and that's why he wrote that thing a long time after that happening. Or maybe Egyptian priest was away from the home at some Greek city and told that story to Plato, maybe after drinking too much wine. Or there is the change that Plato heard that story from some Egyptian sailor, who has claimed to hear that thing from the Egyptian priest.

The moon shuttle concept of the future could also operate as the moon car

The moon shuttle  concept of the future could also operate as the moon car

Very interesting solution for Moon car would be the moon shuttle, what have wheels, which allows the vehicle to operate as the car on the surface of the moon and fly directly back to Earth. There is one very interesting detail in Moon vehicles, and that is that the solutions are always so complicated.

Why those vehicle concepts, what are meant for traveling on the surface of the moon are not equipped with rocket motors, that they could fly and drive with the wheels at the same time? The thing that the Moon lander could land and operate as the moving base, what can fly to Earth without the crew need to change the vehicle?

The construction is simple, the Moon car, or how those vehicles are called would be equipped with the rocket motors, what are below that vehicle, and the normal motor what would thrust backward? Or actually when we are thinking the things too complicated, and we always forget that there is no air, and there is no friction in the vacuum. 

That means that the device could flight in every angle and that means that the shape must not be aerodynamic. So the rockets, what nozzle would face down would also drive the craft to earth. And that would probably cause the artificial gravity in the vehicle. That vehicle would also have wheels, that it can also drive on the surface on the Moon like a car.

The benefit of those systems is that they could load the moondust to the cargo bay, and fly to Earth with this cargo. Those simple solutions are very interesting because if we someday in the future would use Moon as the commercial purposes, the thing what we would look for is the Helium 3 and other minerals. And that material can load to those shuttles ad those vehicles would fly them to Earth.

This is one of the interesting ideas of the systems, which can be used as the transporters. And they can transfer tools to Moon for making the railgun, what will shoot the manganese and other materials to Earth in capsules. But that kind of visions of the magnetic railgun, what makes traveling easy and cheap are somewhere far in the future.

The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

When Albert Einstein created the Theory of Relativity, he invented that the speed of the time would be connected to the mass or speed. And if the speed and gravity would slow time, the induction thought would be that the energy would slow the time, and that will cause the slowing of the clock.

This means that the energy could also cause the slowing time, which has proven because of the difference between atoms clocks in the GPS satellites and ground station would run at different time. That thing proved that Einstein was right. And at the next in this text, there comes a couple of fictional writings about that thing.

Or the first one is the thing that tells about the fictional theory about civilization, what would be timeless. And the second one would tell about the fictional character, what would have a mouth in the hands.  I found those topics from some old papers, what I have been written, and I decided to share them for you.

1. I sometimes have thought that there is a possibility, that the super civilization would have the ability to turn themselves timeless by landing on the event horizon of the black hole. In that case, the fictional or hypothetical civilization would orbit the black hole in the level of the event horizon, that their space station would travel by the speed of the light. 

And the speed would slow or even stop the time, what would make that hypothetical civilization timeless, which means that they can live forever. Or at least their civilization would not be connected to the time. In this case, civilization would benefit the black hole as some kind of time machine.

2. The character, or alien what would have a mouth in hand would not seem to be dangerous. There would not be mouth with teeth in the hand. The mouth could be like some kind of disk, what the bugs have. 

Or the sweat from the hands would contain the enzymes, what would liquidize the nutrient. And the duct would take that nutrient in the body of that character. This thing would not be intelligent, but there are theories that some aliens would have that kind of ability.

But in fact, in officially we would not have a single alien in custody, and that's why the thing, what is called as the cosmos biology would be more writing of the science fiction novels than using the observations of the humanoids. Before we would meet the first alien or the extraterrestrial living habitant, we can write and think almost everything about those characts.

Because the extraterrestrial habitat might look like totally different than we are. And before we see the first one that thing,  everything that we are writing and talking about those things is purely hypothetical fiction.

Writing about truth and lies

Writing about truth and lies

If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine.  But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.

That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.

In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.

This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.