Handling a large database by artificial intelligence is the key element when program calculates probabilities with great accuracy

Handling a large database by artificial intelligence is the key element when program calculates probabilities with great accuracy

What gives accuracy for a computer program?

The number of variables is affecting the accuracy of prediction, and a large number of variables are giving great accuracy. But handling those variables without high-power computers and effective algorithms is an impossible mission. And making highly accurate predictions the computer needs billions of variables.

 In the last writing, I wrote about the computer program, which will calculate the probabilities or chances, what is calculating by percent, and that kind of program would introduce as a too simplified mode. The problem with a prediction of the political decision is more complicated than taking the two possibilities and calculating the probability of those cases. Things, what is influencing the political decision are more complicated than we ever imagined.

The things that affect are more complicated and one thing, what we must notice is, who those decisions have been introduced, how close the elections are and what kind of attitudes the media have? These kinds of things have a really big influence on political decisions. But the thing is that this kind of computer program needs tens of thousands of cases, what it will store in the database.

The key element in artificial intelligence is that is the database, or multiple databases, which can be linked together. And the network-based databases can have billions of records or variables, and those databases can be used by many types of software. In this case, the program would use the recorded and shorted variables to create the models. And the thing is that an increasing number of variables are increasing the accuracy of the computer program.

A large number of variables gives great accuracy for the program, but handling those variables needs the algorithms. For human handling, even billions of variables is an impossible mission. 

Sometimes we are forgetting that the same algorithms, what are collecting data of the users of social media are making the collecting data from the history more effective than some manual method is. The thing is that artificial intelligence can review even large databases in a couple of minutes. And if we are thinking the databases like archives of the parliaments, we must realize that those databases are very small, if we want to compare their size with the entire internet.

That's why artificial intelligence makes some things, which has been impossible in history possible. This means that computers can handle data very fast, and the artificial intelligence can isolate every single word from the document, and sort them to the database. The thing is that the automatically sorted and created databases may have billions of variables. So this thing makes artificial intelligence a very effective tool for many roles to create the software, which makes predictions.

So how artificial intelligence will make the database automatically? 

The key is that the titles and other things are just words. And the creator of the database can use the lists or databases of the titles, what are used in the parliament and other government. That means that those words like the spokesman of parliament, member of the supreme court, engineer and leader of the party can simply collect to file, and then copy to the database. And connections are making databases more effective.

That means that there could be algorithms that are following the newspaper articles about the opinions of the people. Those articles that are telling about the results of the Gallup polls have errors, but the key element in the order, how the journalist would handle things. The thing that supports the attitude of the journalist or media house is normally above the other text. And also headlines are telling the official attitude about the things, and the reason for that is that most commonly those things are read.

The research has been made by following the movements of eyes by using the cameras, and the thing is that it's the same are people reading a newspaper or looking at web sites. The psychological functions in human brains are similar in both cases. 

That's why the things that please the media house are in the position, what is most commonly read. It is also researched, what locations in the newspaper pages are most commonly read, and the most important things are put in those positions. Of course, the interest can be increased by using colorful images, where are lots of bright colors, and if those images are in the upper left corner on the page, that would make the text more interesting.

The reason is that we are starting to read from the upper left corner, and that thing is learned in the school because western languages are read from the left to right. And if we would make similar pages to Arabs, we must put images to the right side. The idea of the color image is to make the person stop browsing and increase the interest of the pages. As I have written earlier in this part of the text, it is the same, are we making a newspaper or web pages. The same psychological elements are suitable for both things.

Image:

http://www.wallcoo.net/cartoon/tsamedien_thomas_saur/images/%5Bwallcoo.com%5D_thomas_saur_illustration_hks.jpg

How many errors we would find depends on the used accuracy. And then we must ask: what is needed accuracy?

 

Technical advantage and accuracy in the point of view of the research. 

When we are looking at things like a technical advantage, we have forgotten that some solutions, what seems non-practical in history, would turn very practical if they are controlled by artificial intelligence, and one example of those things is STEALTH aircraft. By using modern computer technology and interaction between the sensors and computer allows that the aircraft can turn the most affordable part of the body towards the radar, and then that thing would maximize the effect of the STEALTH-form. This is one of the things, what we must think about when we are creating new things.

The way of seeing things is the most important part of the research. And if we are looking by using a very big zoom or the accuracy, we might see mistakes and errors in every single particle and object in the world. Even if we are seeing the layer, what is looking like a solid and tight thing, we must realize that if we would use extremely high accuracy, we might see holes in every single object and layer in the world.

Now everybody says, that there are no holes in the metal layer, but when we are using very high accuracy, we might see that there are holes between the atoms, what is forming the layer. The atomic level of the structure is always finding the holes, which is so small that even photons cannot go through them. The thing is that if the atoms of the metal would be straight in the line, and the photons would be enough, we might see that light goes through the object. In the natural world, even photons are not flying straight routes. Gravity would affect their moving direction.

And if we are thinking carefully the thing, what is called as interaction, the smallest particle has affected to photons, but we cannot measure that effect. But when there are enough particles, that thing would change the effect to measurable. When the escape velocity of the surface of particles would increase very high, that means even the photons would drop in that particle, what is called "black hole".

How many errors we would find depends on the used accuracy. And then we must ask: what is needed accuracy?

In the quantum world, the photons are always chancing their course when they are moving near other objects, and every layer is full of holes, but do we need that accuracy in real life? There is a possibility that gluons are connecting with the photon in some distant future, and form the material. And should we prepare for that by buying the sunglasses, because someday our house can be formed by photons, and that would harm our eyes? That is a really interesting point of the view in that kind of thing.

But when we are thinking theory and practical world, are we always think that every layer is full of holes? Or are we think that photons would not travel straight routes? No in normal life and world of normal size objects, we must not think those things. But otherways we might think that the subatomic particles are also "normal size objects", and then we will start to think about the description or definition of the normal-size objects, we must ask: "are all objects, what are invisible to us some kind of abnormal"?

So is the human eye and ability to see things the thing, what defines is the object normal size or not? We might say that something exists, but we cannot observe it. Or we can observe something by using very advanced tools like electron microscopes. But then we must realize that somebody can send us faked information just sending the framed information to the screen. And that thing means that the faked information can be the purpose or accidental.

The accidental way might be that some operators would start to watch the movie by using the same screen, which is meant to use in some scientific experiments. But did those operators know that there are some other things, where those screens were reserved? If a person doesn't know that there is some other use for the system, that means that the fault is not those persons, if they are not told that the computers are reserved for some other purposes.