Diversity in working life part III (When a different kind of person has superior to us)

Diversity in working life part III (When a different kind of person has superior to us)

One example of the cases, where the majority is not right is when the boss of the company has a different opinion than henchmen because the boss is superior or otherways saying, in a different and this case higher position than others. This is the thing in the position of the boss or leaders and directors. They are giving rules, and other people must follow those orders. If that thing doesn't please, the henchman can start to ask for a new job.

When we are talking about the diversity of working life, we always forget one golden thing in that thing. What if that different person is our superior? What would we do in this case? So even if we would sometimes in our younghood selected workplace, where we can be with similar people, what we are, we might face the situation that the company has been sold and the new owner would come from the Saudi-Arabia.

In that case, we can, of course, change our working place, and say the reason for that is we want to be with similar people, what we are. In that case, we might have a  big problem with the attitudes, if the policy in the company has been that the benefit of the majority has always been first. In that case, the problem is that we cannot kick owners out of the company, and if they would put some controller for us, we cannot kick that person out of the office.

The thing is that in some cases the new owners would use the observer, who would meet new workers and explore ways, what might cause adjusting for the behaves and tradition in some companies. The thing is that in those cases the henchmen must just follow the rules, what the new bosses would give, or they can find a new job.

But when we are facing minorities or different kinds of people in working life, we must ask, why those people give challenges? If somebody talks a little bit slower than others, there might be the reason, that person is the translator, whose home language is a little bit different than other people's language.

And that case would cause things, that we must speak a little bit slower or listen a little bit longer when that person will find the correct words. But those cases would not be problems. This is one version of diversity. So if we think that we can just follow the will of the majority, we must realize, that business life is not democracy.

Owners of companies are giving rules, how people should act in the workplace. And in modern life, we must realize that ownership of the company can change all the time. If the owners would be foreigners or the foreign company has brought our workplace, we can do only one thing. Follow the rules and start to flex, or we can start to make new job applications. The bosses would give orders and others must follow those rules. This is the way in modern working life.

Can we always flex and please others? (Writing about ultimate capitalism)

Can we always flex and please others? (Writing about ultimate capitalism)

Today is time to talk and think about the thing, what is knows as the ultimate capitalism. We are seeing in history thousands of innovative directors, whose name has been raised the symbol of advantage like Henry Ford. That man created the assembly line, and that allowed to create the cars by using the method, where the worker should make only one work and movement. This man manufactured the first serial produced automobile, T-model Ford from the year 1908, which made him the ultimate genius.

And this same thing has raised that man as the symbol of ultimate capitalism. If the worker made things slowly in his factory, or otherways worked against the benefit of the company, that caused failing. The simple work made possible to replace the worker immediately, if somebody rebels against the rules of the company, what made the position of the owners very strong.

But the economic depression in the early 1930s and mass unemployment caused the position of the owners of the companies, what used the assembly line would be turned very strong. The thing that people needed money caused that many students were left their studies or needed part-time jobs, and the working in assembly lines was not needed a long education, and that allowed that there were lots of workers who wanted to come to work. And part-time jobs like cleaning were suitable jobs for students.

When we are looking at the working life, we must realize that employers have the right to tell people, what kind of workers they want to work in their companies. And if the employee doesn't please the boss, the leader of the team has right to kick that worker, who would not adapt in the ream away from the company. That thing is not the right of the leader of the team, that's the duty if someone would not want to follow the orders and instructions, what the company has been given. If the person is always against the boss, that means that the new employee must realize, that adapting to the way of work is always the way to keep the job and get higher positions in the companies.

When we are thinking about persons like language translators, they can be replaced by algorithms, what would not say a word against the leaders, and would make teams homogeneous. And if the corporation would train their workers self, the salaries would be kept low, and the thing is that that would make easier to create the worker team, where the member of the team is really easy to replace by another one. This is the idea of the conveyor belt, what Henry Ford invented, and that thing made that man the billionaire. But the when we are thinking about the conveyor belt in the ICT-business, we can understand that there has been made tests, where the programmer does only one thing in the program, and because the programming happens in the cloud environment, that means that those programmers can work at home.

Then the team leader would search the code, what is made and if the programmer cannot do the job, the passwords would be taken. This is one version of capitalism. Sometimes some people ask questions about why the big directors of the corporation have guts to kick people off their working place? The thing is that the big bosses have the educational requirements, and during that process, those people would be turned or correlate to think that they are deputies for the owners of the company.

The only thing, why the company exists is to bring the profit for their owners, and that's why those leaders and directors must think, that their mission is to make things roll. And here you might think, what happens during the correlation or education. Those directors would see the workers brotherhood, while they are making their summer job. And that would make the legends like Henry Ford and Lee Iacocca born.

The thing is that enterprise managers must think like hardcore capitalists are caused that something happens in their life. But when we are thinking about working life, we must realize that nobody is perfect. We cannot always please other people even we would want to think about that. This is the fact in life and every case, we must remember that there is no perfect job. We cannot every time flex, and that thing creates legends.

Machine learning as the support of the sales management

Machine learning as the support of the sales management

1. The company would record the phone calls

Machine learning would benefit companies and other actors in many ways. One thing is that the company, what makes sales work would record the phone calls and then collects the database using those phone calls.

Then artificial intelligence would compare the result of the sales speech to the result, what is wanted. The wanted result is, of course, the thing, that the people buy the merchandise. The artificial intelligence keeps a database about the salesmen, who has a perfect voice and would please each group the customers, and that makes possible to choose a certain member of the team to each customer.  And that thing would help the company to use the speech more effective than without artificial intelligence.

The algorithm is searching the length of the speech, and if it complicated it searches the use of the voice of the person, who answers the phone. And that tells the algorithm, is the person really interested in the product. But normally people would not even understand the abilities of artificial intelligence.

2. Algorithms are comparing the telephone calls and results of the calls, and that helps to make a better result

That machine would create the profile of the users, what would buy certain products. And those algorithms can also make profiles of the combinations, what is making certain people buy things. Those groups can be "single living web developers" type sorting of the customers. And those algorithms would also notice if some group of customers would not buy things.

When learning machine makes analyzes it would use many kinds of variables. One thing, what it can analyze is the noise, what be heard in backward. That will tell the artificial intelligence, what is going on in that space. And then it will compare the variables, and if some variables are heard backward when the telephone call is cut. The artificial intelligence notices that the things like the jingle of the dishes are causing the cut of the phone call and that data makes easier to train the salesmen to get better results in their work.