Could a computer someday debate itself to the doctor?
The artificial brains
Could a computer someday debate itself to the doctor? This is one of the best questions, what has ever made in the field of artificial intelligence. For making this kind of thing possible, there is needed the system called the "neurocomputer". That thing is the artificial brains, which will learn things spontaneously. The learning process and structure of those machines are similar to human brains and in those systems, the nanomachines would make connections between the artificial neurons. And they can also remove those connections when they are not needed, which makes them act like human brains.
When we are thinking about quantum physics that thing would offer also solutions for everyday life, and the solution would be the quantum computer. And that thing is really interesting because that machine will calculate things faster than any computer in the world. It will break every possible code, which is made by using a conventional computer. But that machine will not think. Thinking machines are the thing, that is called as neurocomputers.
Neurocomputer will be some kind of 3D-model of the quantum computer, which means that the system would be made by using microprocessors, which is created by silicone. That system will use artificial neurons to create thoughts, and those artificial neurons would look like normal neurons, but there is a microprocessor in the place of the nucleus. Every single silicone-neuron would be covered by using the metal net, which makes it possible to emulate the core of neurons.
This hypothetical system is created for replacing the destroyed neurons, but the system can also be used to form artificial brains. In this structure, the synapsis will be replaced by using the nanorobots, which allows them to move, and that thing makes possible to make artificial connections between neurons. And that kind of system could be a technical copy of the human brains. This kind of technology can be revolutionizing if it would someday work. But this kind of system is a purely theoretical level, and before we will do them, we must carefully think, is this kind of thing, what we want.
One myth of Albert Einstein
There is one myth of Albert Einstein, and that is that this man had only excellent numbers in his high-school diploma (1). There was only one number three, which makes that thing very remarkable. In that matura the number six was the best, what was possible to get, and that thing makes some people think that this remarkable master-mind of the science was "only human". There are many myths about this man, and one clear thing is that many or sharper saying all universities and laboratories want that kind of student. He was a clever, sharp and fully devoted scientist, who made remarkable theories, which are many times proven to be true.
So there is one thing, what we must remember when we are thinking about this kind of person. The thing is that when this man lived, there were not text editors and computers, which means that everything, what those men made must be written to paper, and have you ever handled very big and long numerical series in the night and very late. When a person is tired, there would be mistakes, and even today persons who are giving their thesis to the inspectors are making mistakes with things like the speed of light, and sometimes there is km/s, but the real value would be the m/s.
Those mistakes confess that a person makes the master's thesis self. When we are thinking about the persons, who have lived in the early 20th. century, the tools of those people were very limited, when we compare them with modern scientists, who use supercomputers for checking the formulas, what they have created. Ability to use decimals, where are thousands of numbers make calculations sharper than ever before. And that thing opens the new roads to science.
If we are thinking about the modern brain scanners, we can find out things, could some fish feel pain, or how the dogs are seeing things? That kind of thing is revolutionizing science. But there is still one thing, what we must realize, and that thing is that the science, observations, and research are different things than some kind of imposing things. When we are thinking about the bitumen test, which shows that the bitumen is liquid or very stiff liquid, that experiment would not be very impressive.
The test was the funnel, there was a piece of bitumen. After twenty years that bitumen has been flown through the funnel, and researchers have proven that this thing was liquid. So why these kinds of experiments are really important? If we would fix the holes of the space station and high-pressure tanks, we cannot use bitumen for that kind of action. This kind of science would not seem very fantastic or it doesn't offer superlatives, but it's very important in everyday life.
(1)
Image:
