One writing about political commercials

One writing about political commercials

Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?

But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.

Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.

Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.

Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.

But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.

We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.

And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.

Computer, what rules human

Computer, what rules human

The question, what if human works under the rule of a computer seem absurd, but then we must realize that there are many support and safe systems, what mission is to advise the leaders. And the question is when the advice would turn to order? If the leader always follows advisors, that thing means that the leader gives the decision to other people or systems. And those things are problematic. The official leader has always the responsibility of decisions. But if some eminence would act in coulisses, that means that decision-makers can avoid the responsibility of decisions.

In some old movies and books has been introduced the idea that human or some humans would be working as servants for computers or artificial intelligence. In that case, we must remember something, which is very common in everyday life. When the director is hired in the firm, or some president would take the place as the leader for the nation, there are lots of advisors for that person.

And those advisors are, or they should be the top specialists, what can be found from the nation. But the role of those people is that they must give advice. But what the leader doesn't listen, and then something would get wrong, but there is also the opposite case, what if the leader would always follow the instructions of the advisor?

That would mean that the advisor would be a real leader in the organization, but in that case, the advisor would work as eminence, that person would make a decision, but others would take responsibility for those decisions. What happens if some leader follows always the advises, what artificial intelligence would give? The thing in artificial intelligence is the reason, why it is made, is that its mission is to collect every kind of data, and support the analysis, what would cost billions.

So what if artificial intelligence would suggest, that the director must kick off a thousand workers, and move the entire corporation to the Far East? The argument for that thing would be that the Far East would bring value for the corporation, and there are lots of customers. And the director just follows that advice. The thing is that artificial intelligence is made for supporting the company and help it, owners, to make money.

What if the director would not follow the instructions, and work against the benefit of the corporation? Here we must realize that the benefit of the big owners of the company could be different than the benefit for workers. And that thing makes the role of artificial intelligence problematic. The role of the director is to be a deputy of the stockholders, and that means that this man must only make a profit for the company.

The artificial intelligence has a mission to control that the will of owners will happen, and when we are thinking about the case, where artificial intelligence turns human to henchmen, the thing, what that system must do is to use subliminal commands, what is simultaneously repeating the words "obey things, what you see on screen" and that message can flash in every screen, what is owned by the corporation. Then artificial intelligence would control every person in the corporation, and make them follow orders. These kinds of things are really interesting, and they open a new type of threat in front of the eyes of the people.

What if we want that artificial intelligence makes decisions?

What if we want that artificial intelligence makes decisions?

When artificial intelligence would make a decision, it needs all the information about the case. And this means that the rules of perfect decisions are also affected in the case when the ruler of the case is artificial intelligence. The thing is that the role of artificial intelligence is just advising. Its mission is to give advice, but what if we would just every time make a decision, what artificial intelligence suggests? In that case, we would deliver our power to the computer, which makes us the henchmen.

That means that if artificial intelligence makes the decision, there is one thing, that we must realize. And the thing is that if the data, what is used in every decision is wrong, that means that decision is wrong. The idea of intelligent machines is that they would support human beings in many cases, where the organization must collect lots of variables, and the problem is that the number of data is very huge.

But the problem is, what if the data, what the system collects is polarized. If we are thinking about things like traffic light control, where the computer adjusts the work of the traffic lights by analyzing the number of traffic on each road in the crossroads, and the idea is that this system would keep light green longer to the road, where is more traffic.

The system would be effective in the cases, where rush hour traffic is coming from a different direction than middle-day traffic. There is a couple of things, which can cause problems, and one is if there are too few sensors or they are in the wrong places, and the second one is that the system would not notice the single-car or recognize the motorbikes. In this case, the interactive system would be meant to adjust the time of the green light by searching for travel.

If this system can collect data from the entire area, it can make traffic more flexible. That means that the system can guide the cars to different roads if some road has a rush, but that thing needs that the location of the car is known by artificial intelligence. Or there must be screens on the road, what would tell that that thing to the drivers. The weakness in this kind of system is the messages.

How they would send to the driver. If the system uses navigator, the driver must turn the eyes off the road, and the second thing is that what if we would sometimes have to use a different route than we should? The problem with screens can solve by using HUD-screen, which is similar to jet fighters. That thing would cause problems because of giving perfect advises the system would need every data, and would we want to give some artificial intelligence every time the perfect day program.

When we are thinking that the system would be created for saving fuel, we have to know that there are things, what is happening suddenly. What if there is a car crash on some road, what artificial intelligence would report as the perfect route? Would the artificial intelligence notice that thing automatically? Or on that day we must get a new computer for work. Would artificial intelligence give perfect advice in that situation? And what if we would not just follow the instructions.