The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

If you have read my texts before, you might read one of the texts, what probably look like this, but don't worry, these texts are meant for the reading. When people are creating new things, they should also see those things with critics, and tell people, how it can be used for wrong purposes. The things like tractors have transformed to combat vehicles, and the history is full of those cases, where the thing, what is made for good, has turned to the ultimate weapon. And do you know why military forces turn to use petroleum and oil in the vehicles?

The reason was easy, it made easier to control the most lethal force of the state. The warship couldn't take fuel from everywhere, they must take their oil from exactly the right harbor. And the oil was more effective fuel that some wood or coal. But when we are thinking the tanks and other vehicles the mechanized warfare was more effective than use horses, and the gasoline was an easy way to deny the rebellions.

The reason why military forces took aircraft in the use was simple. The pilot didn't need ground combat training at all, and the vehicle was a very effective, and cheap way to make an impression for generals, who wanted results. And that's why fighters became popular weapons. The reason why those persons would not be unpopular was that they were all officers. and that showed the men, that also officers took part in the war b giving personal investment in the action.

And the aircraft became more and more powerful. When we are thinking about the advantage of the military devices, the missiles were the next step. They could be sent to the target, and then the crew was free to fight like the regular soldiers. There was no defense against ballistic missiles until the first anti-ballistic missiles were created. And those systems based the nuclear warhead, what could damage the own electronics as well as destroy enemy missiles.

Robots are the most dangerous tools, what mankind has ever created. If they are used for bad purposes, they would not excuse the orders. So if the operator will order them to torture, they would not say a thing against that order. 

Modern versions are basing the combination of microwave and kinetic energy and they should destroy the incoming warheads. Also, the target can be covered by using plasma-layer, which should deny the radar-echoes from the area, or the systems, what are making the more powerful echoes, and the idea is to make the warheads to detonate too early, or jam the detonation system by using the EMP-pulse.

The advantage of military systems is causing the thing, where drones and killer robots are coming to the battlefield. Those systems are facing the resistance, but same way nuclear weapons and bombers, as well chemical weapons have faced resistance when they were taken in use.

The drones are remote-controlled systems, and the operators would not need military training at all, and the military police can take the operator in the custody if something bad is happening. If the operator would start to make things, what that person should not do, the commander can just remove that operator from the command console.

This is why the superpowers are creating more and more effective robots, and another argument is that the commander of the robot army doesn't need to care losses. But the things against those systems is that they could be the ultimate tool in the hands of dictators. The robot doesn't ever excuse its orders, and this is the danger of those systems.

I always have said that robots don't torture, but if the commander orders them to do those things, they don't excuse. And robots are allowing to go to war, what nobody even knows. They can make even mass murders, and then they can be destroyed. That makes those devices the most dangerous thing, what mankind has ever created.

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor

Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft

Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space.

There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatter would also produce in the spacecraft itself, but there is need the enormous systems to create the thing.

The producing the antimatter would happen the same way, what it is made in the CERN or other particle accelerators. And there might be used the anti-electrons or positrons in this kind of system. Positrons would produce in the particle accelerator, and then they would conduct to the particle, what is made by normal material, and they can create a huge punch for the spacecraft.

Antimatter would store in the superconducting magnetic balls. 

But if we would not want to make spacecraft, what has the ability to create the antimatter itself, we can play with some balls. If those balls are extremely low temperature, they would be superconducting, and that antimatter storage would not need an external power source.

This system has given an idea for "Teller's bomb". The satellite, what will store the ball, which involves the antimatter in the thermos bottle, and then it will shoot that ball to the target. When the ball will impact, the core will turn to pancake, and then the antimatter would contact the material.

The antimatter would be stored in the magnetic balls at the place, where it will produce, and then those balls will transfer to the spacecraft, and after that, it will just break. And that would make the antimatter contact with the material, and sometimes there have been plans to use the abrasive blast to that thing.

The sand or snow or another kind of dust would target the magnetic ball, what is made by using iron, and at the first laser or some other electromagnetic radiation would break the core of that ball, and then the dust will blow to the antimatter. The thing is that the magnetic iron ball would keep the anti-matter ions away from the core of that ball.

Things about natural friendly products

Things about natural friendly products

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/


Biodegradable products can save money.


Natural-friendly products are a very interesting thing because if as an example, the toy is made by using natural material, what is called as the biodegradable plastic it can just send to normal dum, or if we want to be ecologic, we would put that thing to compost, and there it transforms to the soil. That means that handling that kind of products is easier and cheaper, than use synthetic plastic.

If we would think things like natural materials, we might think the new usage for things like cellulose. If we would create things like toys and even furniture by cellulose, that might be a very good article for the industry. In those cases, the normal paper just casting in the form of toys, and the usage of the product is similar to plastics, but the form if 3D structure, and the 3D printers can also use to a product that thing.

Natural friendly products are the products of the future

When the paper would be pressed in very high pressure, it can be a very tight and tough element. If we would use the cellulose mass for source, molding of the product will allow making those products with the same method with plastic products. And the high-pressure push will make the product very tight.

The cellulose can be clean and nice material if it will look exactly like plastic if the surface layers will polish, and they will cover by using the waterproof varnish. The idea of this product is that it can be burned after use, and it would also decompose in nature.

Use of biomaterials as fuel and things like cosmetics

The biodiesel and other biological fuels like ethanol would offer a very good choice for fossil fuel, and when we are thinking about the use of methane in the power plants and vehicles, that thing might be a very interesting thing, because those gasses are forming in the composts and other places because of natural decomposition. Of course, that means that the methane would be taken even from the sewer system of the city, and it can use in the same purposes with the normal natural gas, and the same thing is with organic petroleum.

The bacteria, what makes natural oil can bring up from the earth and after that it can put in the anaerobic dish, where it forms the fuel. And this kind of research is very interesting and at the same time problematic. Because if this kind of system would start to produce the fuel, that means that the traditional oil industry will become like some kind of dinosaur. It will decrease the political influence of the oil exporting countries. And of course, alcohol would be the effective fuel in the motors, what are already existing.

But when we are thinking about other products like cosmetics, we might realize, that those cosmetics like perfumes can produce straight by using the ether oils, what can be extracted straight from the flowers. This kind of products are naturally friendly, and they fit also for allergic persons, who cannot use another kind of products. When we are talking about things like rapes and sexual harassment, modern cosmetics can also protect against that thing. If the perfume is mixed the progesterone, that means that the sexual willing of men will be ended. And this kind of things is very interesting articles for the makers of the next generation products.