What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

Are human-reptilian hybrids true?

Are human-reptilian hybrids true?

1. There are two kinds of hybrids in the stories

1.1  The thing what makes possible to create those aliens are isolated areas, and the method, how to control them is fear. 

When we are thinking about military forces, that would create military operators, whose mission is to operate illegal assassination and mercenary operations. For keeping secrecy the commanders must make sure that those operators would not speak about this thing.

One very good method to control people is making that inmate fear something. And if a person has lived all the life in the closed and isolated military bases, there is only one truth and the truth is what the leaders would tell to be the truth.

1.2 The chief of the operator can claim to some operators, that they are hybrids because it will decrease the value of testimony. And those things make easier to deny the information, what those people are told. 

The commanders would claim, that if the person is telling their secrets to another those people would kill that operator. And this would make easier to control them.

In fact, military intelligence can claim that some operators are hybrids because that will able to make their stories less believable. And if the normal person would come and tell to be hybrid, it would cause sent to the mental hospital and those stories would not ever be believed.

2. Hybrids what are made by humanoids, who could be the scientists, who work in isolated military bases

Those hypothetical hybrids could be produced to operate on the Earth, and the reason, why possible humanoids would create those hybrid creatures is that they want real information, how people live on earth and also find interesting individuals for closer examination. The reason why humanoids would create hybrid organisms could be that those creatures would not have connections with the human race.

And maybe humanoids think that the racism and other kinds of things would keep those hybrids away from the humans, what denies them to tell the items of the humanoids and their technology to the human researchers. Maybe the hybrids mission is to assistant humanoids on Earth, and that's why they want to keep out from the humans.

3. Hybrids what are created by humans

Hybrid species would be excellent military operators. They would not have the same kind of relationship with social life and families. That means that those hybrids would act as the military commander orders and in those cases, things like a military command could use the humanoid-shaped remote-control robots.

Those creatures mission is to play humanoid to those hybrids, what could operate by special forces. Those hybrids would be loyal to their commanders, and they could order them to do everything, what they want because they would afraid to be uncovered.

Did somebody forget to tell something important?

Did somebody forget to tell something important?

Sometimes, when we are facing things when somebody is suggesting very bog changes or advantages for something, we might think that there would be something, what that person would not want to tell to others. In one example the person is suggesting that in some community would buy the new Apple computer, which is a very expensive tool, but that thing is a very effective thing for drawing and handling other graphics. The thing is that there was something, what that person forgot to tell, and that was that the location of that computer was at this inmates personal room, because there was a free table for that thing.  Another example was the person who lived in one institution.

That person suggested that every person in the community would change the telephone contracts to cheaper, there was a small number of data and the other persons could use WiFi for data calls, and there was one thing, what forgot to tell. That person was ordered the responsible person for the "house phone", where was unlimited use of the data and phone calls, what that person would share with others.

In those cases the question would be, what did somebody forget to tell something? In this kind of situations is a very big risk, that somebody would just increase their own benefit. First, those people seem to be very candid, but then we might think, what kind of real benefit some advantage or change would bring. And when we would give the power to some person, that means, that this inmate can really make something to others, like cutting their net, would that means that person might want to use that power to others. In those cases, the quarrel might cause that the passwords of the net would change very soon. And in those cases, the power would corrupt the system.

And when we are thinking about the last case, there seems to be no problem, if somebody would have a different kind of connection, what that person shares with others, and in this case, we must realize, that the permissions are not always similar to what a person actually thinks to do with the new toy. But we should think that case really careful because that kind of benefit would give that inmate the thing, what is called as added value. If some person would have the power to limit the usage of data, that thing would be the big benefit for that thing. This thing is a very good tool to make sure, that person who has this power always finds friends.