Did somebody forget to tell something important?
Sometimes, when we are facing things when somebody is suggesting very bog changes or advantages for something, we might think that there would be something, what that person would not want to tell to others. In one example the person is suggesting that in some community would buy the new Apple computer, which is a very expensive tool, but that thing is a very effective thing for drawing and handling other graphics. The thing is that there was something, what that person forgot to tell, and that was that the location of that computer was at this inmates personal room, because there was a free table for that thing. Another example was the person who lived in one institution.
That person suggested that every person in the community would change the telephone contracts to cheaper, there was a small number of data and the other persons could use WiFi for data calls, and there was one thing, what forgot to tell. That person was ordered the responsible person for the "house phone", where was unlimited use of the data and phone calls, what that person would share with others.
In those cases the question would be, what did somebody forget to tell something? In this kind of situations is a very big risk, that somebody would just increase their own benefit. First, those people seem to be very candid, but then we might think, what kind of real benefit some advantage or change would bring. And when we would give the power to some person, that means, that this inmate can really make something to others, like cutting their net, would that means that person might want to use that power to others. In those cases, the quarrel might cause that the passwords of the net would change very soon. And in those cases, the power would corrupt the system.
And when we are thinking about the last case, there seems to be no problem, if somebody would have a different kind of connection, what that person shares with others, and in this case, we must realize, that the permissions are not always similar to what a person actually thinks to do with the new toy. But we should think that case really careful because that kind of benefit would give that inmate the thing, what is called as added value. If some person would have the power to limit the usage of data, that thing would be the big benefit for that thing. This thing is a very good tool to make sure, that person who has this power always finds friends.
Sometimes, when we are facing things when somebody is suggesting very bog changes or advantages for something, we might think that there would be something, what that person would not want to tell to others. In one example the person is suggesting that in some community would buy the new Apple computer, which is a very expensive tool, but that thing is a very effective thing for drawing and handling other graphics. The thing is that there was something, what that person forgot to tell, and that was that the location of that computer was at this inmates personal room, because there was a free table for that thing. Another example was the person who lived in one institution.
That person suggested that every person in the community would change the telephone contracts to cheaper, there was a small number of data and the other persons could use WiFi for data calls, and there was one thing, what forgot to tell. That person was ordered the responsible person for the "house phone", where was unlimited use of the data and phone calls, what that person would share with others.
In those cases the question would be, what did somebody forget to tell something? In this kind of situations is a very big risk, that somebody would just increase their own benefit. First, those people seem to be very candid, but then we might think, what kind of real benefit some advantage or change would bring. And when we would give the power to some person, that means, that this inmate can really make something to others, like cutting their net, would that means that person might want to use that power to others. In those cases, the quarrel might cause that the passwords of the net would change very soon. And in those cases, the power would corrupt the system.
And when we are thinking about the last case, there seems to be no problem, if somebody would have a different kind of connection, what that person shares with others, and in this case, we must realize, that the permissions are not always similar to what a person actually thinks to do with the new toy. But we should think that case really careful because that kind of benefit would give that inmate the thing, what is called as added value. If some person would have the power to limit the usage of data, that thing would be the big benefit for that thing. This thing is a very good tool to make sure, that person who has this power always finds friends.
Comments
Post a Comment