Philosopher's stone: alchemy in the modern point of view
How to influence the structure of the atoms and make those changes stable?
This is philosophic writing about the thing, what is called as "alchemy". Alchemy is an attempt to make gold from the ignoble element, and the thing what justifies the alchemy as the pseudoscience is that the alchemists had only influenced the electron cores of the material. They could not influence the nucleus of the atoms, and that's why those people were left in history.
But let's think about those very interesting characters of history, and also think about their methodology, and try to translate their terminology in the modern language, what might be very difficult, but it might help to understand the things, what alchemists meant when they were made their experiments. The major phrase, what is told about the alchemists, is that they were looking for the "stone of wise" or Philosopher's stone, what would transform other metal like iron or lead to gold.
The "stone of wise" could be the thing, what opens the test, what alchemists made to make the things, what they wanted. But also sometimes I have thought, what kind of element this thing could be. And the answer would be that this hypothetical particle is so electropositive, that it will transfer electrons to other metals, and they could set in the electron layers same way with the gold. But this thing would not work, because in the nucleus of atoms must be the same number of protons with the electrons what orbits the nucleus in electron cores.
https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/59262/difference-between-electropositivity-and-electronegativity
In theory, electromagnetic radiation would allow adjusting the number of electrons, what is orbiting the nucleus of the atom
That means that the increase those electrons is impossible, or it would make the super-ion, what would terminate something, what comes in its route. There have been discussed that using the most modern technology the positive capacity of the nucleus of atoms can increase, by targeting the atoms some kind of electromagnetic radiation. The thing is that the electrons have the same electric capacity as protons are because the electron is moving.
The orbiting speed creates a very powerful electric capacity compared to the mass of those particles. In fact, there have been thoughts, that if the spin of protons would be increased somehow, there could be a possibility, that even the single proton's mass would be increased 79 times more than a normal proton, and that allows to increase the 79 electrons in the orbiting cores of the electrons. And in theory, that thing allows turning hydrogen to gold. So in the simplest way to say, the all thing is to transform the rotation speed of the particles in the nucleus of atoms and remove or increase the number of the electrons that are orbiting the nucleus. But the practical solution is a little bit more complicated to make than write about theoretical solutions.
When we are thinking about the use of the electromagnetic radiation for shooting out the electron layers, we might think that if the most out electron layer will remove the gold transforms to the Lutetium, what is one of the most expensive metals in the world. And when we are thinking about the electronegative or electropositive particles, that term determines the direction, where the electrons would travel. The problem is to make the electron cores adherent or deny the atoms, where the electron layers have removed get new electrons for replacing the lost particles.
An alchemist in his laboratory (artuk.org) |
How to influence the structure of the atoms and make those changes stable?
This is philosophic writing about the thing, what is called as "alchemy". Alchemy is an attempt to make gold from the ignoble element, and the thing what justifies the alchemy as the pseudoscience is that the alchemists had only influenced the electron cores of the material. They could not influence the nucleus of the atoms, and that's why those people were left in history.
But let's think about those very interesting characters of history, and also think about their methodology, and try to translate their terminology in the modern language, what might be very difficult, but it might help to understand the things, what alchemists meant when they were made their experiments. The major phrase, what is told about the alchemists, is that they were looking for the "stone of wise" or Philosopher's stone, what would transform other metal like iron or lead to gold.
The "stone of wise" could be the thing, what opens the test, what alchemists made to make the things, what they wanted. But also sometimes I have thought, what kind of element this thing could be. And the answer would be that this hypothetical particle is so electropositive, that it will transfer electrons to other metals, and they could set in the electron layers same way with the gold. But this thing would not work, because in the nucleus of atoms must be the same number of protons with the electrons what orbits the nucleus in electron cores.
https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/59262/difference-between-electropositivity-and-electronegativity
In theory, electromagnetic radiation would allow adjusting the number of electrons, what is orbiting the nucleus of the atom
That means that the increase those electrons is impossible, or it would make the super-ion, what would terminate something, what comes in its route. There have been discussed that using the most modern technology the positive capacity of the nucleus of atoms can increase, by targeting the atoms some kind of electromagnetic radiation. The thing is that the electrons have the same electric capacity as protons are because the electron is moving.
The orbiting speed creates a very powerful electric capacity compared to the mass of those particles. In fact, there have been thoughts, that if the spin of protons would be increased somehow, there could be a possibility, that even the single proton's mass would be increased 79 times more than a normal proton, and that allows to increase the 79 electrons in the orbiting cores of the electrons. And in theory, that thing allows turning hydrogen to gold. So in the simplest way to say, the all thing is to transform the rotation speed of the particles in the nucleus of atoms and remove or increase the number of the electrons that are orbiting the nucleus. But the practical solution is a little bit more complicated to make than write about theoretical solutions.
When we are thinking about the use of the electromagnetic radiation for shooting out the electron layers, we might think that if the most out electron layer will remove the gold transforms to the Lutetium, what is one of the most expensive metals in the world. And when we are thinking about the electronegative or electropositive particles, that term determines the direction, where the electrons would travel. The problem is to make the electron cores adherent or deny the atoms, where the electron layers have removed get new electrons for replacing the lost particles.
Comments
Post a Comment