The man behind quantum physics Max Planck

Max Planck (1858-1947)

German scientist and the father of quantum mechanics Max Planck (1858-1947). In Finnish Wikipedia is claiming that he was baptized as  "Marx".  (2)But he used the name "Max" all his life. But history knows that man as Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck. 

It is suspicious that the name "Marx" was the trick. Which mission was to deny the Nazis to make contact with that man. And the thing is that this man lived an unhappy life because all his children died before him. So the life of that man was not very happy. 

His first son and the only child saw adulthood executed by Gestapo in 1945. Because he was involved in the  July 20 conspiracy against Adolph Hitler. Another interesting detail in this man's life was that his home was destroyed by an allied air raid in 1944. 

The notes of that remarkable man were also destroyed in that incident.  Max Planck died at the age of 89 in the year 1947. And there is no physical merchandise that proved to belong to that man. So there is hard to get DNA analysis of the cells of Max Planck and by using that data could be possible to track the descendants of that family. In Germany, there is a "Max Planck institute that carries the name of that man who invented quantum theory. 

(1)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck

(2)https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck

Planck and the theorem of the black ball

The idea of a black hole has the origin of the black ball theorem. What if the object absorbs all energy and wave movement that impacts it? The energy level of the black ball rises until the energy will break out from the ball. The idea is that when the energy level of objects is increasing. The oscillation in particles that are forming the ball is increasing. The power of the quantum fields around them is rising higher and higher. 

Until the expanding quantum field of those particles pushes particles. And they will fly out of the structure. If that thing will not happen the weight of the particles is rising and then sooner or later the particle will turn into a black hole. When the weight of the particles is rising high enough it drops out from the universe forming the black hole. 

The Planck's mirror ball

If there is a ball whose inner layer will have 100% reflection and researchers conduct light. That thing increases the energy level in the ball. If the ball cannot conduct energy somewhere. That thing causes destruction. 

If the layer would not absorb energy or photons the level of the energy rises in the ball. The rising energy will push the layers of the ball outside. And then that thing causes the explosion. The fact is that the level of energy cannot rise forever. Or the structure of the ball will be destroyed or there is forming the black hole inside the ball. 

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

The holographic reality

The holographic reality

Anyone who isn't shocked by quantum physics has not understood it.
-Niels Bohr-

And when we are looking at this quote, we must ask, does Niels Bohr himself understood quantum physics? Or is there anybody else, who understands this kind of thing? Or when Bohr created the idea of the Quantum theories, did he understand how fundamental his ideas were?

When we are talking about quantum physics, we are talking also about the very fundamental area of science, what is full of colorful people, who were and who are looking for thig, what is the final truth or definition about truth. Sometimes we are thinking that many things, what we see or what we are making is true, and we are forgetting that there are always exceptions about that kind of thing. And one thing, what we cannot ever understand is the reality.

What is the description of reality? For us, the reality is the thing, what we can taste, feel or see. And that's it. But then we must remember that we always see reality from a different point of view. That means that there is no absolute reality, and we can take one example of this thing. The thing is that when a person, who would not see colors looks at the traffic lights and says that they are red doesn't mean that this person sees colors. That person sees that the highest light is on, and that makes this person say, that the traffic light is red.

The possibility that we are meeting a person, who cannot see colors is very small, but in the world, it must be that kind of person. So should we think about this thing, when we are asking the color of the traffic light? I think that this thing doesn't affect the real life of most of the people. The probability that the absolute color-blind people come in front of us is very small. But when we are going to think the thing, that reality could be an illusion or some kind of hologram, we must remember that there are many people, who are writing many articles about this thing.

The Danish physician Niels Bohr explained that the universe is the hologram, what has sucked from some greater entirety. The thing that Niels Bohr precisely said was "subatomic particles only come into existence in the presence of an observer, then it is meaningless to speak of a particle's properties and characteristics as existing before they are observed"(1).

The thing, that Bohr pointed out was that the subatomic particles are forming the atomic particles, what are forming molecules, what are forming things, what we are calling as the reality. The thing was that this thing has been connected to the de Broglie's theory, that every single particle in the universe has the wave and particle mode, or the wave-particle duality (2).

So this thing has been created an idea, that the universe has been crushed through the wormhole to space, what we are calling as the universe. The thing is that when Bohr said that particles come into existence in the presence of an observer, he meant that the observer makes things real. Or he meant that the observer sees things, they have existed. If we are not seeing things they have not existed. And our consequence makes things real. And what this thing means? We know that quarks and Higg's boson are real, but at the same time, we cannot feel, see or taste them. So what makes this thing holographic?

In this case, we need the middleman to tell us that the thing is real. The thing is that we see the articles, which are written about those things, but we cannot see them ourselves. Or we see quarks when they are part of the bigger entirety. We see concrete walls, but we cannot see quarks inside it. So can the particle or object be real, before we see it? That is a really good question. The existence of an object is depending, that we realize that thing has existed. And is the wave movement or waveform of the material existed?

If you will touch powerful laser ray, that thing exists, because it burns our hand regardless of the form of light. And that means that the wave movement also exists. But what if we are looking at the radio waves, we are facing things that the machine or radio would need to transmit the radio waves to us. And are radio waves real? We know that they are real because in some books is written that the phenomenon that is called the radio waves is transmitting data, which can be analog or digital through the air. So in this kind of case, we need a tool to find out the reality.

(1)
https://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/398/print/

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Physical holograms and material transfer.

Physical holograms and material transfer.

Wave-particle duality(1)

When Louis Raymond de Broglie (1892-1987) (2)created an idea that the wave-particle duality doesn't belong only to the photon. This thing created an idea in the head of some inventors and researchers that this thing, what is called the wave-particle duality(2) can be used to transfer objects from one place to another by using electromagnetic radiation.

Because every single particle in the universe has two forms of wave movement and particle. Before that scientists have thought that only photons have this kind of form, and this makes that kind of thing very interesting. That means that every other material has the wave and particle form. The idea is one of the key elements in quantum physics and quantum theories. That means that every single particle and object in the universe can transform to wave movement and back to particle form. 

That thing has been given an idea to transfer the material from one place to another. That means that in theory, the material transfer system, what is introduced in the Star Trak movies would be possible. When we are thinking about this kind of system, we can transform things to wave movement, but when we are moving them back to particle form, that thing is problematic. So if we would want to send the object to one place to another by using electromagnetic radiation, we can transfer that thing to wave movement, but we cannot collect it back. Or can we?

So if we are thinking the "Star Wars" style material transfer by using electromagnetic radiation is the real utopian. But when we are thinking about the hologram, we might think that maybe there is a possibility to move the person to another place by using the laser ray. In this version, the transferring would stand between the weak laser ray, and the lens, what is collecting the laser ray, and then the more powerful laser ray would increase the energy of that ray.

The physical hologram, what benefits the wave-particle duality. 

There have been created hologram-style objects by using ultrasound (3). In that kind of thing, the objects would be created by pushing the molecular particles like steam to a certain form and those fog-creatures might be classified as the "physical holograms", but could the systems create those things by using the electromagnetic radiation is a mystery. The system would be operated by very sharply targeted soundwaves, which are created by using highly accurate LRAD-system, which are controlled by computer. 

Them the object would be sucked to another place by using laser rays. This means that the research on physical holograms is really interesting. But would the lasers form the physical creature, what is similar to the original creature? This is a problematic thing. 

Sometimes it is claimed that holograms cause ultra- or infrasound, and the reason for that is that lasers, what is creating a hologram would pump energy to the atoms on the places of the hologram. And that thing makes the gas in that area expanding. The expanding gas causes sounds, and those things might be dangerous because there is a possibility that those holograms cause resonance. But if the laser, what is used in that kind of thing is very powerful, that would cause the warming of the air and the materials can start to burn. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

(2)

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-de-Broglie

(3)

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/13/hologram-like-device-animates-objects-using-ultrasound-waves

Is there a slight object that exists in the Universe?

Is there a slight object that exists in the Universe?

When we are thinking about the size of the quantum world, we are talking about the smallest possible particles in the universe. Those particles are quarks and something that is forming the quarks, and that means that there is the thing, what is known as the super spring, what is the border form between the wave movement and real material. We don't know are super springs material or wave movement, and if they are wave movement, what is the thing that moves? This kind of thing is fascinating things because they are important in the world of quantum mess.

So is there a slight particle in the universe?

Neutrons and protons are formed by three quarks, and the question is do those quarks form small size bubs in the protons and neutrons? Also, we might ask, do the super springs cause the small canyons on the surface of electrons? These kinds of things seem to have no mean because those forms are extremely small, and the fast spin or the rotation movement of the particles will turn over the effect of those possible bumps, which are only hypothetical things.

The thing is that this kind of thing might have a bigger mean than we even want to know. The thing is that a fast-rotating particle can cause the electromagnetic turbulence in the electromagnetic fields of the atoms and space, which is between electrons and the nucleus of the atom. And this kind of electromagnetic whirl is probably one of the most interesting things in the universe.

Large whirls are forming the universe.

The thing is that the electromagnetic whirls might be the origin of the giant whirls, which are forming galaxies. This thing might seem very far from real life, but there is one thing, that makes this kind of theory and ideas interesting.

The thing is that the universe itself is an absolute stable formation, and if there would be forming whirls in that gas mass, those whirls are making a similar thing, which is the base of chaos theory. When the butterfly would flap their wings near the equator over the sea, that means the solar energy would cause the rising of the power of the whirl, and that means that this effect is causing the formation of the tropic hurricanes.

Of course, the whirl would get energy from the rotation movement of Earth. And if there is no landmass, the friction would not face resistance, and this makes the forming of hurricane possible. The thing is that standing swirl is the most dangerous effect in the atmosphere. The energy would make it a very powerful and dangerous vortex.

In the atmospheres of gas planets, that kind of tropic winds can continue theoretically forever. The low temperature and the form of the gas are causing that the friction is extremely low. But there is one of the most fascinating theories in the world, and that is that if the atmospheres of the gas planet would get ledge, that thing can cause the whirl, which can grow the size of the entire galaxy.

That whirl would get its energy from the billions of stars, and of course, the material is very thin, which makes that thing very large, but mostly harmless phenomenon, what can cause the forming of stars.

What kind of computers would we need or want?

What kind of computers would we need or want?

When we are creating computers, which can even think, we must remember that there are two ways to make those things. Another way is simply connecting the human brains, and then just start to connect our brains collectively. The thing is by using that kind of data handling or processing systems, there is a possibility that those things give wrong answers because they are similar to us, and that means those computers would have own will. The thing what scientists want is the computer what is solving problems without excuses.

That means that the computers what are giving the right answers to the questions should computer just process the data, what it can collect, but it must not have own will. That means that we would need many new things in computers. The thing is that the system needs very powerful programs, but also the hardware must be different.

The thing is that the new type of theoretical computers are both different than existing computers, and they are also far away from each other. Another computer type would be the high power calculation machine or so-called quantum computer. but another system would be even more complicated thing than a quantum computer. That system is called the "neuro computer". The neurocomputer is even more complicated tool than some quantum computer, what needs the qubit, what has values 0,1 and 2.

The neurocomputer would be 3D processing structure, where the high-power microprocessors are stimulating the neurons, and the as neurotransmitters are acting by some kind of mercury drops. But the thing is that making that kind of systems is very complicating. And maybe someday in the distant future, we can make the combination of the neuro- and quantum computers. Those neuro-quantum computers would need even more radical technology than some simple quantum computer. The size of both computer types or their prototypes will be like some city.

Those theoretical computer systems need of course qubits, but those qubits must have billions of values for making that computer make true. In this version, the very high-voltage ion would travel through the line of pylons, and every time this ion would lose its capacity, and the level of capacity is giving the value for that ion. The idea could be easy to create by using the steel ball and line of nails, and when the ball is touching the nail, it would lose the capacity. And the remaining electricity can meter by using voltage meters, which tells the value of the ball, what is the qubit in this case.

But making a practical version of the computer is a little bit more difficult than just loading the steel balls and meter their voltage by using a voltage meter. The thing is that there are many attempts to create qubits, and some versions are far away from conventional.

One version is to benefit the quantum teleportation for that purpose, and the thing is just to increase the mass of the atom by using electromagnetic radiation, and then the time-slowing effect would help to stabilize the locations of electrons, what allows to deliver values 0,1 and 2 by touching the gate or sensor. So, in this case, the position of the atoms makes them as qubits, and as I have written before touching a gate with one electron gives value 0, two electrons give value 1  and nucleus would give value 2.

But here we must remember that those systems must need extremely high voltage electricity, and that's why those computers would be very large. The functioning quantum and neuro computer need nuclear powerplant for working. The table-sized solutions for those kinds of computers are far away from those theoretical prototypes, which are created when we would create the first qubits.

Theories about virtual photons and how they are connected to Poincaré conjecture or calculate the form of any geometrical form in the universe.

Theories about virtual photons and how they are connected to Poincaré conjecture or calculate the form of any geometrical form in the universe.

Prolog:  How to model 3D image on the 2D layer without hologram system?

Mathematician Grigory Perelman created one answer to that calculation, what is known as Poincaré conjecture. And he won the price what has been offered to a person, who created that kind of solution, or how those things are written.

That thing was one of the so-called Millenium problems, which means that the Clay mathematical institute has paid the price for a person, who has solved one of those problems by the acceptable way.

Modeling 3D model in paper is impossible. So there is needed the mathematical formula for creating that thing. 

The idea of the Poincaré conjecture is to calculate every geometrical form in the universe. The reason why those forms must be calculated is that the 3D forms are impossible to make in the 2D layer.

The answer would be that creating the coordinate system. what has billions of axels in the 3D universe is possible to demonstrate every geometrical form in the entire universe. The idea os to use imaginal numbers, which has billions of imaginal parts. And the idea is the same as calculating the points in the regular coordinate system. In a regular system, a point has two values  (4,2) which means that the X-axel the point of the point is 4, and the point in Y-axel is 2.

But we could also connect Z-axel to that coordinate system, and that means that we could determine the point, what is above the paper. The mark (4,2,3) means that the third number is 3 units above the paper, which means that drawing that thing is impossible. Then we can increase the number of those axels, which is rising above the paper or to the 3D universe as many as we want.

And in those cases, the marking (4,2,3,6) means that the last point is in the axel, what is in a certain angle to the axel, which raises straight above the paper. And there is no limit for the number of those axels. This is one version of the system, which can calculate 3D images, which is impossible to draw without holographic systems.

Richard Feynman and his virtual photon

When photon makes many curves, it would travel a longer journey than photon what makes fewer curves. This is a very interesting way to think about Feynman theory, and the thing is that when photon would make many curves it would travel a longer distance than photon what goes straight trajectory.

That means that two photons are traveling in the space with the same speed but a different journey, and that means that other photon would come to the detector before another photon even if they are launched from the same place, same time, but they have different frequencies and in this case, the photon what arrives in sensor before other would not break the cosmic speed limit, because another photon would travel longer journey. But if we think this idea more careful, there is an idea, what this thing has brought in the head of some other quantum physics.

The thing is that if we would a little bit transform that theory that would allow, that electron could travel some journey in a shorter time than a photon if photon makes enough curves on the journey, and that means that if the electron would travel straight and very high speed, that particle could travel between two points in shorter time than photon, but in that case the photon would travel longer journey, and the speed of the photon would be faster than the speed of electron.

This is the thing in quantum theories. The thing is that the quantum theories born when Albert Einstein didn't get a match with the theoretical calculations of his first or so-called special relativity theory and the practical observations. So he created the "Common theory of relativity", and he created the first theory, what is connected to quantum theory.

The quantum theory, what was created by Niels Bohr and Richard Feynman using the base of that thing the Einstein's  "Common theory of relativity" what allows the changes of the speed of the light. The quantum theories are meant for fixing or solving the minimal errors of the calculations of classical physics. 

And the idea is that the quantum theories are explaining the minimum errors, what is visible in calculations, what are made by using the very big accuracy and long decimal numbers. That means that when we are thinking about the theory of the fourth dimension, that theory is conducted from the minimal errors in the calculations, of mathematical formulas, what was handled geometrical forms in the 3D universe.

That kind of calculations are made by using the imaginal numbers, or the numbers, what have two values. The imaginal number usually means two numbers one is determining the place of the X-axel in a coordinate system, and another is determining the number's place in Y-axel.  But there could be other imaginal parts in those numbers. and if there is a 3D coordinate system in use, there could have a three-part imaginal number. That thing allows calculating the forms, what are impossible to draw on paper. And that thing allows demonstrating any geometrical form in the universe.