Problems with cyberdefense

Problems with cyberdefense

Cyberdefense is a complicated thing, and one of the greatest problems in that area is would the other side of the operation use it's best tools for handling enemy operation. So when some state is under the cyberattack, should it use physical force like bombing the targets, where the cyberattacks come, and in this kind of cases, the attacking computers can be remote-operated, what means that the attackers themselves are not wounded even if the smart weapon hits the target.

But when we are thinking possibility, that some operators would put the malicious tool in the Linux operating system, and that operating system would be used in the tactical systems like missiles and trolling servers. Would the operator uncover that it has access to every system, what is using that operating system, or rather saying what is the scale of the cyber- and other attacks, when that ability should be used?

If some operators can shut down every tactical system of the enemy by destroying the kernel of the operating system, it would cause very big troubles for the enemy offensive. And the other problem or threat is that the numbers in the systems like cannon and smart bomb targeting algorithms would be changed, and the systems would be lost their accuracy.

The one part of the cyberattacks can be cyber sabotage and cyber assassinations. The cyber sabotage can be that the centrifuges of the nuclear enriching process are adjusted wrong, and in the worst scenarios that thing would cause spontaneous fission, and nuclear explosion in the laboratory.

And in some cases, the algorithm that detects the people by their key cards or biometric access data would be turned to the assassination tool. That means when the targeted person would step in the elevator, the break will turn off, and that means the end for that person. This kind of thing might be devastating and horrifying scenarios in the cyber threat.

That kind of thing must be noticed, when the system is planned. And the thing is that that the most vulnerable systems are protected systems, which have the only couple of users. The thing that increases the level of a vulnerability is that the systems are supposed being safe. And there is no public data about the codes, what are making those programs.

If somebody could pass the firewall and have the source codes of the system, that can allow creating a virus, that cannot detect by using a normal firewall or antivirus software. The thing that those systems are located in the secret laboratories, and they are not updated makes them vulnerable, and the personnel that is operating those systems might be highly trained, but they might not experts in the cybersecurity. And if there is no firewall in the laboratory, the infected mobile telephone can slip the malicious software inside those systems.

But when we are looking at the cases, like when Israeli aircraft lost from radar during an air raid to Syria the reason for that is probably not necessary be the cyber attack. The military forces around the world have been tested plasma-shields or so-called echo-radiation, which means that the radar impulses just turn away from the front of attacking aircraft. Plasma ionized gas is more effective for that purpose because it affects every frequency of radio transmitting.

And the target can be found by using laser scanners and other optical sensors. But things like computer viruses are also a very good way to increase the effect of things like radars. The program code can simply install or involve the radar transmitting, and that means that it would give more effect to that system if it can infect targeted things, but if the infection is not successful the radar can use to locate targets.

Picture:
https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/5ba0c0575c5e52537d8b4ead-750-569.jpg

Flying cars and national security.

Flying cars and national security. 

The flying car can change our way to travel fundamentally, and that equipment can equip with natural friendly fuel cells, what are using hydrogen and oxygen as the fuel. They can make traffic more comfortable, and the problem is that the technology would need a special driver's license or pilot's license that it would be safe. Or it would need autopilot, what can communicate with central computers and the problem with those systems is that they need very much tests, that they could be suitable and safe solutions, what ordinary people can buy and handle safely. 

But also the military is interesting about this kind of low-noise and low-cost all-terrain vehicles. If this kind of technology is connected to the normal jet plane, that would make possible to operate that vehicle in extremely low altitude and from the runways, what are full of craters. If this technology, what is introduced in the film below, is used in jet fighters, those systems would not need aircraft carrier, and they can be dropped above of water simply driving them over the deck, and they can be used by any ship or field, what can be found. Those systems might not have fixed installation. 

The very big model or so-called "flying truck" can take the jetplane on the back, and then the aircraft can accelerate by that vehicle to the speed, that it can raise airborne. The so-called "catamaran structure could be effective. That system would raise the jetfighter to the high altitude, and then it would rip from the middle to two parts, and the aircraft can get enough speed, while it drops, and then the pilot can fly it as normal aircraft. But if the all-terrain vehicles would equip this kind of technology, they can avoid minefields. 

Flying cars can be used as the base of the developing fundamental weapon systems. They can be used as the base of creating the next generation cargo systems for nuclear weapons. 

The problems with technology what is used with flying cars are visible in the film, what is below this text. The same technology, what allows this futuristic version of the Renault to fly in the low altitudes can benefit in the new generation cruise missiles, and bombs what can be dropped on the areas, and then those bombs can drive or fly in the bunkers, where protected targets are stored. So the question is it wise to build that kind of devices in China. 

The flying vehicle can be dropped over the harbor, and then they can slip in the storage bunkers where the nuclear submarines are waiting to go overseas. And in fact, in those systems can equip also nuclear warheads. 

That makes possible to create the vehicle, what can attack to heavily protected targets. The new kind of cargo-vehicles can drive the nuclear warhead to the entrance of heavily armored command bunker, and then explode themselves near the armored door, what can destroy those targets in seconds, or at least damage them very badly. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6K-yQaWgTw

The man-made earthquakes

The man-made earthquakes


The system would be quite easy to make

One version of the man-made earthquakes is simply. Only thing, what is needed is explode explosives under the surface of the Earth, and that was the idea of the 10 000 kilograms "Grand slam" bomb. This was created during the Second World War to use against heavy armored German submarine bunkers.

Those bombs would push in the ground before the explosion, and then the seismic waves would destroy targets, what are under the ground. The idea of bunker-buster nuclear explosives is similar, just use the nuclear version of the "Grand Slam" bomb would cause the destruction of the commanding bunkers, what is deep inside the ground, and those ground penetrating bombs are installed in the nuclear missiles and strategic bombers. The thing is that nuclear bombs would cause radioactive pollution, which uncovers the system.

Modern nuclear bombs are really sharp, and the modern nuclear bunker-busters are equipped with a parachute, where are four winches. Those winches will set the bomb in the right location, straight over the target, and then the rocket would launch, and the bomb, what is installed in the tank, which allows it to penetrate deep in the ground before the explosion. The structure of the tank is classified, but there is structure, what keeps the hydrogen bomb in one piece during the impact. This is the weapon, which used to threat Iran during the nuclear laboratory crisis. And that weapon could destroy the under earth laboratories.

The electromagnetic option

The man-made earthquake would not need actually nuclear explosives for being successful. If in the ground would form the magma-pocket, the ground would drop down. Also if something would cause the boiling of the groundwater, that thing can cause the earthquake. This kind of earthquakes is really nasty and dangerous because they cannot be proven as the result of the weapon use.

In fact, that kind of device would be even too easy to make. The thing, what would make that kind of earthquakes would be actually quite small-size satellite, what would have antennas, which can make it look like a giant spider. The thing is that this kind of satellites would not need nuclear reactors for operative use. If the satellites would need to create the magma-pocket under the ground there would need two satellites, what will point two opposite polar radio transmitting to the certain target. If under the ground would flash the electric arc, that could cause the earthquake.

The thing is that the radars can send the radio waves to that device pair, what would collect them and target that electromagnetic radiation to the certain target what can also be the computer center. Or the otherwise those satellites can use similar technology, what is used in the microwave bombs, and the high-voltage electricity can be made by pressing normal batteries by using explosives to pump energy to the battery.  In fact, there is one threat, and that is if the radio transmitting would target a nuclear reactor, will that thing cause the accelerating the fission. This weapon was investigated during the cold war, and its mission would be detonated enemy nuclear missiles in the silos.