Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people.

And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners.

By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create the bacteria, what would create tetrodotoxin, the nervous poison, what can kill somebody. There is one more feared influence of this poison, and that is the so-called zombie-effect. If the tetrodotoxin would be given in a certain dose, the person would turn to a robot, who would follow every order, what the master gives to that victim.

That poison is normally in the liver of ball fish, and it is used in some voodoo rituals. Normally the effect of this poison would disappear when the poison is left from the blood.  But there is a possibility that somebody would create genetically engineered bacteria, which could cause a long term effect on the victim.

The bacteria would be the combination of the bacteria, and the genomes, which are taken from the ball fish liver, and what controls the production of the tetrodotoxin. Also, those bacteria can have the genomes, which can keep the tetrodotoxin at a certain level in the blood system. That thing can base that the production of this poison begins when the level is low and stops when the level of this poison is too high.

That thing can base a similar thing, which controls the level of immunological antibody, what the B-immune cells are producing. So this kind of bacteria can be produced by using advanced bio- and nanotechnology, which allows combinate the DNA bites together in certain points of DNA.  That kind of genetical engineered bacteria would be the next-generation biological weapon. The thing, what the actor needs are the laboratory, and things that can be used in that operation.

The most difficult thing is to create the genetic regulator, which will adjust the level of the poison. It would make people robots, what are following the orders and never say no. Commanding those victims can happen by telling them what to do, and if that thing would be made to some bank director, that person would transfer all money from the bank to the criminals.

The principles for publicity and the thing what differs command from discussions

The principles for publicity and the thing what differs command from discussions

As we might realize, Greta Thunberg (Sorry if I have sometimes miswritten that name)  has raised one thing on the internet. That thing is that this young woman is speaking about good things, and the thing is that the way people try to make her silent is the Asperger or some things about the abuse. Those things seem a great excuse to stop the performances, what this person makes. But as you see, there is one embarrassing thing in history, and that thing is connecting to the child stars, who were the members of the teenager bands, and nobody mentioned those things about them.

This kind of things is really interesting because history is full of child stars who are playing and making music and nobody ever asked about their abuse or Asperger syndrome. There have been some Tweets where some people have commented that person by using the sentence, where is mentioned her name, and then the word "Asperger", and there is feeling that those people are wanted that some other people would take a part of those speeches and talkings.

This is the normal method, what certain people are using in the case, where somebody has "stolen publicity" from some other things. The thing, what makes Greta Thunberg interesting is that she is youngster, who will give after two years, and that kind of things are embarrassing for politicians.

Of course, the law would give those people the right to ask the authorities to end that activism, but the problem is that their names would be seen in those requests. This kind of things is still seen on the internet many times. The parents are always brainwashing people, who have something to say, and that is the normal agenda of people, who cannot discuss things.


The thing what makes this kind of things a little bit funny is that nobody even asks has somebody offered drugs to some member of teenage dance bands or put the money of some teenager music star to the pocket, but the case of Greta Thunberg is something else. And if we are thinking that she would drive teenagers wild, this thing would give something productive and benefiting actions to teenagers.

So when we are thinking about the discussions, we must realize that discussion doesn't mean that somebody's opinion has less value than some other people. And if we have different opinions about what our children might have, that thing is that if we want to discuss those things, we have the right to do that, but if we will want just give orders or command our children, we should not call those things as the discussion.

The difference between discussions and giving command is that in the first case we should listen to the answers, what other people say, and in the last case, we must just say, what we want. It's an easy solution for the argument, but the problem is that it would cause hate in the opponent. The unable to discuss the things without being over somebody is telling something about the social skills of those people.

Modern digital business environment

Modern digital business environment

Networks and revolution of technology are not a new thing, but the thing is that those things are now happening in the many times during the generation. ICT and digitalization are becoming a more and more important part in the business and governmental actions, and today we can be connected to the people more effectively than we ever thought before.

The lightweight, mobile systems allow people to be connected on the Internet all the times, and that makes new kind of threats and opportunities for business and another kind of things. The key role in digital business is similar to normal or traditional business is in the networks.

And the value of networks is that those things are giving information for the people very fast. And when we are thinking about the case, that we would want to give an offer to some company, the most important thing is to let those people read our offer. The things, that the people who are buying services and select subcontractors would have contact with the offer maker because large and well-known companies get offers all the time. So why the person, who selects the subcontractors or contractors would read our offer?

This is the most difficult thing. When we are thinking the digital business and management of that kind of things, we must remember, that if we want to create trust with those actors we must give something, what might interest those actors. So the biggest difference between traditional and digital business is the speed, how the data would travel between companies. And when we are sending emails, we must remember, that those people, who are getting those emails would get probably hundreds of emails every day.

The thing is that we must realize that information security has a strong role in that kind of marketing and other business. We must secure our working environment and our network against hostile operators. In the network of business and private life, the rumors and false information is delivering very fast. And that's the thing, why we must be careful while working in the high-speed and hectic network. And the thing is that we must choose data, what we want to share. Fact is that we should tell people something about ourselves and our role in working.

But we must not uncover things, what might risk the security of the company or other people. The thing that somebody doesn't have a social media account is suspicious. That means that we must uncover something, and remember that relationships in private life would be a good gate to the inner circle of ourselves or somebody else.

If some person would get access to the wrong mailbox, that thing would cause the catastrophe in the relationship between the offerer and receiver. Or what would you think, if the first offer, what you get from some actor is some kind of joke? In the modern world, the thing is that we would not use one kind of software anymore for communication.

Social media applications might be used together, and even the person would not tell if they have a social media relationship with some person, who would send the offer of services. This is the thing, why we must be careful in this kind of things. If we would screw up in our private life, those things can be used against us. The thing is that people are not always telling their actual position of themselves. And that kind of things is dangerous because if we use strong criticism of some things, we might face that the target of our criticism is sitting at the front of us.

And the people, who are analyzing attitudes and data, what somebody shares might have multiple backgrounds, what means those teams are connecting their training. Those things are extremely important when services are offered to children.

The thing what makes a person suspicious is that that person accepts only similar people, what that person is to mate in social media. That tells that there is something wrong if the person would accept only the owners of the motorbike to the social network. Those people who make analyzes have psychological and another kind of training.  Their mission is to find out dangerous people from the network.

Humans must handle with care in working life.

Humans must handle with care in working life.

The most important resource in the data system are humans, and humans are also the most vulnerable part of the systems, and we must realize, that we must handle people with care because of disappointments might cause that inmate would make the revenge to the company. But otherwise, the system is made for serving humans, and this thing causes that we must notice the benefits and weaknesses of every user group.

When we are making frames, where people must operate we must remember that every user in every data system are not people, who have a Ph.D. in the data systems, and those people can still be highly trained professionals. So when we are meeting those people, who might be excellent lawyers, architects or artists, we must respect their skills and way to act. And at the same time, we must minimize the damages, what would happen in the case, that some user makes an error.

This is the thing what the people, who are acting in the research and developing of the data systems should understand. The people who are operating in data-oriented business must realize, what kind of data is stored in the system, that they can control the delivery of information. And why people are the weakest link in security?

People have feelings, and they might be nervous. In the cases when a person is failed or treated badly, that thing might cause the situation, where data is delivering in the wrong hands. In the worst case the USB-stick or the mobile telephone, where is important data would just be given to some person in the hands of an unknown person. The disappointments are growing people, but nobody likes them.

And if the thing in the private life or workplace would be tight, that can cause the will to revenge. This is one example of cases when everything will go wrong. There are many ways, how to make damages in the computer systems, and one of them is that somebody will give too many authorities and accesses to wrong people.

One of the things, what would have too bad consequences is the case, where another person would not dare to say, that there are maybe over 20 years the last time when the person wrote some SQL databases. In those cases, something might be forgotten, and the database would have quite many errors.

And those cases are problematic. If people come to the workplace, there are skills, what person tells to have. But if the worker doesn't use those skills they are forgotten. That thing is a nice thing to understand before we are given or taken some missions. Also if we would treat other people despicably, that would cause that the wrong names would be leaked to criminals, what might cause problems.

Many people who are working in the ICT sector have social media accounts, but other people would not know their position. If somebody would answer by hurting another person, that inmate would probably deliver those Emails to the entire Internet, and then some gangsters will kidnap the family members of that chief or whatever that person says being.

Who can we trust?

Who can we trust?

Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.

When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.

The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.

When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?

So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.

But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?

When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.

Problems with intelligent people

Problems with intelligent people

We all want to be intelligent. That thing is very well seen in society because people are respecting intelligent people. But at the same time we are forgetting that the intelligence is something, what is inside our head or in our nervous system. Intelligence is not things like clothes or money. And why the human race has intelligence? The intelligence is meant for solving problems, and that is a thing, what we might not always remember. So what is the difference between wisdom and intelligence?

The wisdom is the intelligence of elder people, what is connected to the discretion. Young people are not many times think the consequences of the action, and that's why they would get in the trouble. So intelligence is not a mansion or automobile, and it would not always be seen from the outer substance. So what is the intelligence? Is it a large number of friends?

Maybe a person, who has a high level of social intelligence can get very many friends, but when we are thinking more carefully, and see some gangs, we must become a little bit suspicious, that is it true, that some person, who has strong opinions and big authority also intelligent? But when we are in the military service, we are always meeting persons like drill instructors, and then we might think that those people have the highest level of intelligence because they are our superiorities, and also those persons are always right. 

If somebody has another opinion, would that cause reaction, what nobody wants. But then we might also think that those persons who give commands might have high IQ, and they might act their roles. This thing makes intelligence officers dangerous. They might seem a little bit "different", and they don't show that they are suspecting something, what should not be done.

And also those superiorities have the instructions, what people must do in the day, and that means that in this case, the list would make them more effective than others. This is the problem with research of intelligence. If we would compare pocket calculators with modern mobile telephones and laptop computers, those calculators might be very effective and fast, if we would do only one thing like calculations. But that pocket calculator cannot do anything else.

The problem with highly intelligent people is that they are also exposed to the influence of other people. Sometimes social pressure would make a person say something, what is against own opinion, or what would you do in the case, where you are surrounded by some Harley-Davidson gang, and they would ask you, what is your opinion about those gangs? 

This is social pressure and the other thing what we always forget in the things, what are conceding the intelligent or highly trained people is that nobody doesn't know and can everything on the Earth. If we would think the highly trained engineer, that person might be the best in the world as creating things like a nuclear reactor, but that person might not be the conference translator.

The second person would learn other things in education, and this is the thing, what we must always remember when we are thinking about education. But the thing is that there are limits, what people can do. That means that we have only a limited number of neurons, and this means that if we would be top men and women in some areas, we must miss some other areas in life. And one thing what the top men and women are sometimes missing is the cooking.

There are tales that the most brilliant geniuses like J.Robert Oppenheimer and Enrico Fermi could not even cook potatoes, but those men created the first nuclear reactor on the world and took the human race to the atomic age. So the number of skills what people can learn is limited, and this is the thing, what we must always remember. There is one thing, what we always forget when we are thinking about intelligence, and that is what we always think, that person who is interested in high-energy physics is same way interested about investments and follows the marketing statistics.

The problem is that we always identify wealthy people as intelligent people at the same time. Here we are facing the thing, what is called "social pressure". If the person, who own many factories, comes to ask is that person intelligent, we would want to please that person. The factory owner is intelligent, because that person owns a factory, and otherwise if our answers would not please that person, we might kick off from the job. So this is the thing, why we will call great directors as intelligent persons.

The big leaders have a greater influence on the system than normal people, and this is why we are thinking that they are always very intelligent. And the induction thought could be that we are always forgetting that an intelligent person can also be bad. When we are looking at the great leaders, we are forgetting, that those persons might inherit their money and all business partners from the parents.

And in that case, we are facing the thing, that we always believe that people who are spending their time in dinners and lunches in some five-star restaurants in nice suits are automatically more intelligent than some two people who are sitting in a pizzeria. We are living in society, which is full of numbers, and every person in the world want to be intelligent. And one thing what is used as the meter of this kind of things is the success in the working life.

The big salary, nice office, and slips are things, which is making us intelligent. That thing is a dangerous way to think because the world is full of people who are not even metered their level of intelligence. The second thing is that the people, who are working in the high command of the military or the research laboratories might be very intelligent, even they are not wearing slips and suits.

How artificial intelligence can help to research the ultimate objects at the universe.

How artificial intelligence can help to research the ultimate objects at the universe.

The thing is that artificial intelligence is an ultimate tool for many things, and one is to search the extreme objects of the universe. When we are thinking about this system, where algorithms are looking for things from the giant black holes and distant planets. The algorithm can follow every change, what happens in the extreme targets, and even the man would not notice something, the algorithm can search and report the smallest changes of the symmetry of the object, and also the minimum changes in brightness and the form of an object can be reported.

This makes artificial intelligence so powerful tool in the cases, where it must find something, what is very small and that thing would let researchers make other things, then keep some statistics about changes of the brightness or the direction of the eruption or jettisons. The system can register those changes, which might be only the one-tenth part of degrees. And that thing would give very interesting data about how black holes are acting together, and what kind of influence they have to each other.

But artificial intelligence can do many other things and the thing to separate even the smallest details would make it the ultimate tool for the people, who are promoting the rock concerts and another kind of happenings. The artificial intelligence can, of course, locate the dangerous persons from the audience. 

That happens by storing every detail of the person behavior, who have acted dangerously, and the idea is that artificial intelligence can compare the gesture of the people to the gesture, what is found from the database. And the idea is that the things can be stuck to before somebody goes too far. But artificial intelligence can also mark persons, who seem nervous and bring those situations to the screen of the observers.

But artificial intelligence can also search the faces of the people, and see are they really glad. And that thing tells if people are enjoying the show. That system can also search for people, who seem unhappy because those people might have serious reasons for that kind of behavior. Also, the system can search for things like different clothes from the audience. If some person would be dressed to suit and slips in a rock concert, that thing can be very interesting. 

Artificial intelligence can also locate vests of a motorcycle gang, and it can locate people, who are talking with that kind of people. But the thing is that the system can work many ways sophisticated than some analog system. That means that the system might keep a couple of seconds pause, even if the personnel is just watching real-time camera images without the need to record those things.

That means that if somebody punches other persons, or in the worst case the bomb is exploding, the system can notice the details, that something happens. Then it can save the record of the case to a special file, and send it straight to police. It can also locate the exploded bag or the person, who has put the hand to fist.

And it would locate every slap, and thing what people are doing. It can also locate persons, who might have drugs in blood, and also cases where somebody is throwing drinks to other people. The system is that artificial intelligence notices if something flies in the air, and then the system would target cameras to that point.

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Do you notice the similarity between images of pop-star Ed Sheeran and the political star Boris Johnson, who is now the prime minister of Great Britain? Boris Johnson is now the prime minister in Great Britain, and he says that Britain would leave the EU with or without agreement. And Johnson has been said, that Great Britain would not pay the severance pay. But who cares about those things anyway, would the EU declare war to Great Britain, if that money would not be paid. What is the real choice in that situation?

The thing is that the Brexit is the storm in some glass of water, what locates in some cabinets, and if that thing has something to do with regular people is, that they will lose 12 000 workplaces. That thing does mean anything when people are hearing when Britain is great again. But do you know, what makes Boris Johnson a very effective politician?

The answer is simple Boris Johnson is different than others. The image with unkempt hair would be similar to Ed Sheeran, and because Johnson seems different the reporters would come to his and ask things. And the media writings where that man claimed to be some kind of "motormouth" makes him more interesting. Of course, tough speeches are also giving trust in the eyes of electors, and the terms what that man uses are very easy to understand.

But who cares about those things. Boris Johnson is a very popular person in Britain because that kind of people is normally very successful politicians. Boris Johnson is like the political version of Ed Sheeran, the man who would talk things, what regular people wants to hear. And that makes those persons very easy to understand. They will drive their political agenda very effectively, and that makes them easy to hear.

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

When people are telling their opinions publically, the real opinion of that person might be different than they think in their mind, and that will be explained that we all have will to please the bosses and great audience. That means that we sometimes are talking things, what other people want to hear. Or otherwise, because of respect, we will let people have their wrong opinions or pseudoscientific arguments because we want to please them, and that's why we let them say things, what is wrong or even dangerous.

We The problems with metering are that some people are using different kind of tools than others and in those kinds of cases, the problem is how to make people understand, that something that they cannot see might be true anyway. Many times those people have made a long career in some respected areas. And that would make a little bit difficult to say against them.

Let's take one example of the things, where many people just believe something, but the research has shown things being a little bit different than people expect. That case is bitumen, the real thing is that this material is the most stiffed liquid in the world. That thing has been proven by putting a piece of bitumen in the funnel, and during tens of years, those bites just flew down the funnel.

The thing is meanless in normal life, but cases, when somebody will repair the vacuum tanks and space stations, would that thing be in the vital role. If the place what would be used to repair the hole would be sucked to the vacuum, the results would be devastating.

Respect is bad for research. And good researcher should respect nobody.

When somebody is collecting the statistics and asks people opinion of some questions, there have ever discussed things like the majority of the population might not have opinions at all, what consists some question. But they give answers anyway. And in some cases, people don't even listen to questions what the Gallup poll maker asks.

And in some cases, they would give the name of the politician, who has become in their mind. Or what would you think about the situation, that some bodybuilder with the political police branch will come to ask the opinion about the state leader's policy? In this case, the wise man will say "yes", because in that case, the wrong answer will cause a bad result.

And there are always people who, have 20 years of experience of something, but their roll meter would not meter something, and that makes things wrong. In the science metering, something would be happening by using special equipment, and those lasers and other things will give results, what are the size of a micrometer. In that case, respect would sometimes cause that nobody fixes the answer.

Who were those people, who are buried in the old grave?

Who were those people, who are buried in the old grave?

This is only the thought about an old grave. Why it seems like that, and who those people were because they had no need to put the cross on that memorial. So this story only the product of the imagination, and the question is was this family wait in this area for one generation, and then those children flew away? And why they made that thing?

The reason, why I publish these two images is that there is something special in this gravestone. There is no cross on the mark, and the thing is made by using metal. Those vegetables what are ahead of this metal plate, which shows the mark of this grave seem to put in this place in purpose for hiding this grave marker. There is the flower, what branches in the many parts in the place, where the cross should be, and this would mean that there is some kind of family, what is branching behind this mark.

The thing is that maybe there was some family, what was stay in this place, and when the parents died, the children separated around the world. But why this thing is marked in this grave? That thing remains a mystery, but the lord's roads are unknown, and maybe there was something, what that family wanted to mark in this memorial.

Maybe they felt that they had some mission or something like that, and they moved into this area for the one generation. That mission might be something, what is conducted from their private life. And sometimes I think that was the same kind of crime reason for that. But this is only one translation of the reason, why there is so strange memorial in this grave.

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/

Why people should be poor?

"Keep them poor" is one very good motto for people, who want society, where people cannot advance by their own work. But why somebody wants to make the class-society, where the only couple of people would have real rights and the rest of people would be very poor?

 In that kind of societies, the thing is that this set would separate the high-class people from the ordinary people, and if so-called regular people would be poor, they would not have time to get education and rise in the hierarchy. If the people would be working all day in the heavy physical working, they would not know about better things, because they spend all day in the workplace, and then get home as tired, that they would not able to get an education.

Every people makes mistakes

In this model, the ruling class is hiding behind the mask of perfection, and that kind of things are seen in the way, how some people are sharing articles about persons like computer specialists. The computer workers or specialists like micro support people and programmers are people, who are working in the area, where is not many layers between the leaders and workers, and there might be not henchmen, who can be blamed if the work is not done well.


And that would make possible that the henchmen would see, that the boss is not a perfect man or woman. Those people would uncover only the regular members of Homo Sapiens species, who can make mistakes, and that removes the image of perfection. The reason why some people are fighting against things like artificial intelligence and social media is, the same in both cases.

All writings are not propaganda

The artificial intelligence would eliminate the method where some person can get the benefit because the handler of the information would not have time to read some things in the files. One of the things might be how many speeding tickets would some person get, and the second thing is that how many of the other drivers would get speeding ticket in the same size crossing of the speed limit in the same police district.

That would tell if somebody is a little bit "more equal" than others. Also, artificial intelligence would control equipment and that would give people more free time for hanging in the social media, and the social media can uncover that there is something wrong with the workplaces or attitudes of the bosses or other people, who would be hiding behind the image of perfection. But the major problem in social media is not that there are people, who are hanging in there all day.

Social media is a very effective tool for disinformation and propaganda. That thing is an effective tool for making contact with youngsters and giving them hardcore propaganda, but there is another point of view of that thing. There is also justified protests on the Internet, and that kind of things are really problematic for the police and military forces. If the protesters would just march across the city, would the situation handle by riot police and denying to publish the images of the protests.

Things always have two sides, and sometimes there is no right side

Of course, some provocation can break a couple of windows, what justifies the use of force to scatter the demonstration, what is defined as the riots, and breaking the property would give legislation and justification for using the violence against rioters. The social media would give another image of the demonstrators, and maybe we are wanted to see those things in some other point of view.

That means that there might be two very undemocratic parts against together, and this is the thing, what we have seen in Arab nations. There were dictators, who were replaced by new dictators after the Arab spring, who are continuing the same politics against their own people, and that thing means that the same way continues, but the faces in the official wall paintings are changed.

Things like social media would uncover things, like some very famous people would not have opinions at all. The thing, what makes social media very interesting thing, and that makes it problematic for the people, is that it is a very good environment to share information. Those solutions and environment are really easy to use, and they can be a very good tool for telling things, but there is a one really bad thing, In social media would be uncovering things that some very nice and cool person cannot talk about anything else than some clothes.

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

Havis Amanda statue Helsinki
(Wikipedia)

Usual can be extraordinary

Thinking is the thing, what we should practice very hard, and in fact, we should confess that we don't know everything. What we think as the regular and common thing might be very extraordinary. And while we are practicing thinking we must try to find another side of the things. There is always something good in everything in the world, and there are many ways to see things. Let me explain a little bit about this thing. Normal people think that fishes are swimming in the water, but why don't we try to think something extraordinary, and try to think that fish is in some certain place and it would move water around it. That would mean that the fish is a stable object, what is laying in the water, what flows around it.

This situation is true in some places, like fast flowing rivers, where the fishes are at a certain place, and water goes around it. This case would be seen very often in nature, but there is one thing, what we don't actually think, and that is that only the little part of the water on the Earth is in the rapids. That means this is a very unusual situation if we would compare it with the conditions, where most of the water is on the Earth. The probability of this phenomenon can be calculated as an example by division the area of the rivers by area, what is covered by water.

We could take some other quantities of this calculation, and one is the number of water molecules, what is found in the flowing water systems and division them with the number of all water molecules on Earth. And then we can start to ask, should we take clouds in the number of water molecules. And is rain flowing or stable water, which is a very important question, if we would want to write a little bit longer text. But as you see, there are many people, who don't want to do that, so let the thing be. There are many things, which are fascinating and impress people, but what is away from everyday life.

The position of the observation can obfuscate people

Let's take another example. If we would go to walk in the evening of May Day, we would think that every people, who would walk in the city are some kind of students. That is visible especially in the Helsinki, and near the statue of Havis Amanda. Every year tradition is that the students would put the graduation cap on the head of that statue. In that situation, we are surrounded by the students, and we might think that every person in the Helsinki Metropolis area is a student, who studies in the university or some other higher education institutes.

But the Havis Amanda statue is only one position in the city. We might go somewhere else, and then we might understand that something obfuscates us. This thing is called the obfuscation of the probability. If we would go to some city, and wind up in the University campus, we might meet many doctors and professors but are those people actually the typical samples of the normal people, who are living in the city? This thing would interest the politicians, who would make decisions about taxes and other things, and the most important thing in the work of politicians is to please the biggest group of people because that this guarantees the votes.

And the pleasing of the majority would cause a collapse in next elections if the promises that were given during the campaign have been broken. The high position allows making many decisions, but that position would also make possible to make many mistakes. This is the problem in the position of the directors. If the person would make decisions, what causes problems there could be nobody, who will give advice, and that would cause collapse. And in those cases, the mistake is made by that certain director, who would kick off or if that person owns the company would that kind of the wrong decision cause the bankruptcy. So if the person would have too much power, there is a risk to make wrong decisions, what will cause the destruction of the company. This is the writing for the morning.