The holographic reality

The holographic reality

Anyone who isn't shocked by quantum physics has not understood it.
-Niels Bohr-

And when we are looking at this quote, we must ask, does Niels Bohr himself understood quantum physics? Or is there anybody else, who understands this kind of thing? Or when Bohr created the idea of the Quantum theories, did he understand how fundamental his ideas were?

When we are talking about quantum physics, we are talking also about the very fundamental area of science, what is full of colorful people, who were and who are looking for thig, what is the final truth or definition about truth. Sometimes we are thinking that many things, what we see or what we are making is true, and we are forgetting that there are always exceptions about that kind of thing. And one thing, what we cannot ever understand is the reality.

What is the description of reality? For us, the reality is the thing, what we can taste, feel or see. And that's it. But then we must remember that we always see reality from a different point of view. That means that there is no absolute reality, and we can take one example of this thing. The thing is that when a person, who would not see colors looks at the traffic lights and says that they are red doesn't mean that this person sees colors. That person sees that the highest light is on, and that makes this person say, that the traffic light is red.

The possibility that we are meeting a person, who cannot see colors is very small, but in the world, it must be that kind of person. So should we think about this thing, when we are asking the color of the traffic light? I think that this thing doesn't affect the real life of most of the people. The probability that the absolute color-blind people come in front of us is very small. But when we are going to think the thing, that reality could be an illusion or some kind of hologram, we must remember that there are many people, who are writing many articles about this thing.

The Danish physician Niels Bohr explained that the universe is the hologram, what has sucked from some greater entirety. The thing that Niels Bohr precisely said was "subatomic particles only come into existence in the presence of an observer, then it is meaningless to speak of a particle's properties and characteristics as existing before they are observed"(1).

The thing, that Bohr pointed out was that the subatomic particles are forming the atomic particles, what are forming molecules, what are forming things, what we are calling as the reality. The thing was that this thing has been connected to the de Broglie's theory, that every single particle in the universe has the wave and particle mode, or the wave-particle duality (2).

So this thing has been created an idea, that the universe has been crushed through the wormhole to space, what we are calling as the universe. The thing is that when Bohr said that particles come into existence in the presence of an observer, he meant that the observer makes things real. Or he meant that the observer sees things, they have existed. If we are not seeing things they have not existed. And our consequence makes things real. And what this thing means? We know that quarks and Higg's boson are real, but at the same time, we cannot feel, see or taste them. So what makes this thing holographic?

In this case, we need the middleman to tell us that the thing is real. The thing is that we see the articles, which are written about those things, but we cannot see them ourselves. Or we see quarks when they are part of the bigger entirety. We see concrete walls, but we cannot see quarks inside it. So can the particle or object be real, before we see it? That is a really good question. The existence of an object is depending, that we realize that thing has existed. And is the wave movement or waveform of the material existed?

If you will touch powerful laser ray, that thing exists, because it burns our hand regardless of the form of light. And that means that the wave movement also exists. But what if we are looking at the radio waves, we are facing things that the machine or radio would need to transmit the radio waves to us. And are radio waves real? We know that they are real because in some books is written that the phenomenon that is called the radio waves is transmitting data, which can be analog or digital through the air. So in this kind of case, we need a tool to find out the reality.

(1)
https://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/398/print/

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

The natural constants and reality

The natural constants and reality

The speed of light is one of the natural constants, and it's a very interesting thing because in real life the speed of light is not stable. Gravity and medium are causing the changes to that thing, and this thing might have meaning in the extremely large scale of distances.

When we are talking about the mean of the changes in the speed of light, those changes would not have meant even in the scale of the galaxy. But when we are metering some really far distances, what are in scale thousands of trillions of light years, those changes in the speed of light have influence in the metering and results of calculations.

But when we are thinking about the speed of light as the natural constant, that thing is a really important thing in everyday life. The laser-based rangefinders are very simple to use in the big distances, and the technology, what is used in those systems bases the knowledge of the speed of light. Or actually, most of those systems use the trigonometrical method.

There are two lasers, which are pointing the target, and when the points are connecting in the center of the cross, the system calculates the height of the triangle by using normal trigonometrical functions. By using small size computers the system can calculate the distance, even the base of the triangle is the only couple of centimeters. The thing what makes this thing ultimate tool is the computer, which can handle very long decimal numbers.

The computer must know the distance of the prisms, what are aiming the light, and the angle of those prisms. Then it can calculate the distance. Normally nobody doesn't need this kind of information in normal life. But there is a special case, and people who might be interesting in this kind of information.

That special case is the military security organization, what mission is to protect the security of the systems. Or what would you think about the cases that the distance of the prisms of the rangefinders would set wrong in those computers, what are calculating those calculations?

If the hackers can change that number in the computer programs, what are used in that system, the results can be something, what we don't want to see. This is the problem with natural constants and theory. They are meant for common cases, and that's why they are not considering the special cases.