Antimatter might have a bigger role in the material than we have thought.

Artistic rendering of quarks in deuterium. Credit: Ran Shneor (Image: I) 

The antimatter is the thing that is the most high-energetic in the world. When an antimatter particle impacts its mirror particle the result is an extremely high energetic annihilation. In an annihilation reaction, those particles turn to energy. Or if we are very accurate when the antimatter hits material it pulls the strings that are forming particles open. And the extremely high energetic radiation would start to travel through the space. 

So why the annihilation releases so much energy? Some people are saying that the energy impulse is releasing when the superstrings are open. Is like the slam of the whip but the size of the actors is smaller. The thing is that when the wave movement that formed the particles is moving ahead with extremely high speed. The head of the string can move faster than the ball-shaped photon. 

The reason for that is. The head of the wave movement is fitting between quantum fields easier than a ball-shaped photon.

The wave movement form of the light is the flat photon. So the speed of a flat photon is higher than the ball-shaped photon until it hits the quantum field and turns to particle form. 

But the thing is that annihilation is possible only between mirror-particles. So the anti-electron or positron would not annihilate with the proton. And one of the most interesting things in the world is that inside the proton are antimatter particles. Those particles are inside the quantum field of the proton. And there is an asymmetry in the antimatter quarks. The thing is that the antimatter quarks are between normal quarks.

But the anti-down quark between the up-quarks should not cause an annihilation reaction. When the proton is destroying or split one of the reasons for that is that the quantum fields around them are turning too big. The gluons cannot keep those mirror particles separated. So the antiquarks will touch each other and then the internal annihilation destroys the proton. The thing that makes quantum annihilation interesting.  

Adjustment of the quark annihilation is more accurate than annihilation between higher particles. That thing means that quark-antiquark annihilation can use the energy supply for nanomachines. Or that reaction can destroy cancer cells from the body. 

https://www.britannica.com/science/annihilation

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

(Image I) https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Are the gravitons primordial black holes inside protons, neutrons and electrons?

Above: "Three colored balls (symbolizing quarks) connected pairwise by springs (symbolizing gluons), all inside a gray circle (symbolizing a proton). The colors of the balls are red, green, and blue, to parallel each quark's color charge. The red and blue balls are labeled "u" (for "up" quark) and the green one is labeled "d" (for "down" quark)". Wikipedia/Quarks)

If we want to guess the certain place of the hypothetical graviton in the material there are two possible places. The place where the researchers can find hypothetical graviton is the center point of the proton and neutron. Or another possible place is in the middle of the quarks. In that version, the quarks are like the ball of yarn, like electrons. And they are formed when superstrings are forming the ball around the extremely small primordial black hole. The quantum gravity of that primordial black hole would pull the protons and neutrons together. 

Can the graviton be found just in the middle of the proton and neutron? The idea is that when gluons are jumping in the proton and neutron. By using the trajectory that looks like a triangle. That thing can from the primordial black hole in the proton and neutron. That means the graviton could be the thing that formed from the wave movement. 

So does graviton even have the physical form? Is it the primordial black hole? The extremely small-size primordial black hole is more like a power field than some kind of particle. That power field is turned to the package like a particle or ball of yarn. 

So is the annihilation the impact of two primordial black holes that are locating in protons or neutrons? In that idea, the electrons are the balls of the superstrings. That is forming a ball around the primordial black hole. In that case, the superstring is denying the eruption of the black hole.

And that extremely small black hole will get its energy from the spin of electrons. In that case, the size of the black hole is so small, that it cannot curve the wave movement inside it. Or the superstrings are forming the ball near that miniature singularity. That is smaller than any particle in the world. The same thing that is written about electrons can transform into quarks. 

If the graviton is the primordial black hole inside the proton or neutron that could explain, why it's so hard to detect. The primordial black hole requires energy pumping all the time. And in this scenario. The primordial black hole that is smaller than quarks or gluons is getting its energy from the movement of the gluons. If that movement is stopping the primordial black hole vaporizes immediately. 

Can we find graviton in the place where nobody predicts to find that kind of particle? The idea is that in the protons and neutrons is the group of quarks. And between those quarks are traveling particles called gluons. The gluons are something like electrons, but their size and effective range are different. The gluon is the transmitter particle of the strong nuclear force. 

So in the cores of protons and neutrons is the "quantum flashes of lightning" between quarks that are forming a similar effect with lightning. But in the smaller distances. When the gluon is traveling it sends energy waves both ways. The energy that the gluon gets is similar to kinetic energy with the balls that people are throwing. 

But the scale of this thing is extremely small. Gluons are jumping inside protons and neutrons. And then the Law of Energy Indecision means that the gluon must take energy load from somewhere or they will stop and material is disappearing. So is the energy source of the gluons some kind of primordial black hole? And is that black hole the graviton hypothetical transportation particle of the gravitation. 

The movement energy of gluons travels outer ways or to the core of protons and neutrons. And also the part of the energy that is stored in muons while they are jumping between the quarks is traveling in the middle point of the proton or neutron. So there is the possibility that there is graviton in the middle of protons and neutrons. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Image: ()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Universe from the Big Bang theory to the theory of Great Annihilation

Universe from the Big Bang theory  to the theory of Great Annihilation

At the beginning was something, what is called the Big Bang

Just after the Big Bang was only subatomic particles existed. There were many explosions during the Big Bang when particles and antiparticles touched together. And just before the hot Big Bang happened thing, what is called a cold Big Bang. During that process, a large number of particles released to the universe, and could those particles forming the thing, what is called "dark matter"?

The thing is that when those particles released to the universe there was nothing. And when the particles came to absolute emptiness, there was nothing and even radiation has not in that space those particles were not rotated. When the hot big bang started those particles just flew too fast, and the radiation couldn't reach them.

This means that those particles couldn't start the rotation movement, which is called spin. That thing makes them unable to react with other particles, except by gravity, and that causes ideas, that could the particles of dark matter create black holes or things like planets or even solar systems, what we cannot see?

So the thing is was the Big Nang some kind of wormhole and the material traveled across that tunnel. That thing could explain the form of dark matter. When the particles traveled through that tunnel, the electrons and quarks, what touched the "wall" of that wormhole or tunnel started to rotate, and the particles that traveled in the middle of the tunnel would not rotate.

That means that they couldn't get magnet field, and those particles, what traveled in the middle of wormhole turned to the "Dark matter". And then the rest of subatomic particles turned to electrons and positrons and quarks and anti-quarks. The subatomic particles reacted together, and then the material started to form in the quark fusion.

Is dark matter the electron that spin or rotation is stopped? Or is the dark matter the particles, what traveled too fast that the radiation from hot Big Bang couldn't reach them.

At the beginning of the time at the Big Bang formed two or three types of material. "Normal material" "Antimateria" and "Dark Matter". When we are thinking about the forming of the "Dark matter" in the Big Bang, we might think that the "dark matter" has been released first, and when those particles released, they couldn't react with other material or radiation. And that caused the effect, that the material, what could be the stopped electrons would not start their rotation. And that causes this material cannot react with other material, because of the lack of the magnetic field.

So again we are starting to think about the thing, which is called "dark matter". The question is what is why dark matter doesn't react? Is it something, like an electron, what spin or rotation has been stopped?

That thing would explain why it doesn't react with other materials. In the quantum world, the rotation of electron makes it acting like a small generator. The rotation movement would make the magnet field for electron, and when the spin of the electron stops, that particle loses a magnetic field, and that makes the electron unable to react with other material. But because the electron has the mass, that thing causes that dark matter has the mass, which reacts with other particles by gravity.

The direction of the rotation of the electron means very much

When Niels Bohr and other scientists created an idea of quantum theories, they would not even realize, how important those things are changing, when we are creating very small and fast computers. When we are creating an idea that new and more accurate models, what are creating new things for science, we must create more and more effective computers and in this kind of process, quantum theories like quantum mechanics turn very important.

The rotating of the electron is called "spin". Who cares, what is the direction of the rotation of electron. That direction is really important because it determines is the particle electron or positron. And if the electron turns to positron it releases a very high level of energy, when it touches it's mirror particle, what is the electron.

The thing that can destroy the entire universe.

So this thing has created one of the most horrific scenarios in the world. That scenario is that what if some force like impacting of black holes can make the dark matter rotating different directions? That makes possible that the electrons and positrons would start to hit together. And if this phenomenon will expand the entire universe would be destroyed in the giant annihilation.

Why we have more matter than antimatter in our universe?

Why we have more matter than antimatter in our universe?

The question about the nonsymmetric formation of the material and antimaterial during the big bang is very interesting. And it is also one of the biggest questions in physics and cosmology, and there was one good explanation, and that was the material came in the young universe from some other place.

This theory has brought one version of the so-called multiverse or bubble theory in the front of cosmologists. That theory goes that there have been universes before our universe, and when the past universe has met its fate in a big crash, and then then the next universe would begin in the big bang, there would be left material from the past universe, what takes a part in annihilation, and that means that there would be more material because of that happening.

Because there came the material outside the universe, that caused that there was an asymmetry between material and antimaterial. But when we are thinking about the differences between antimaterial and material, only the spin or the direction, where the nucleoids and other particles are rotating. And when the material faces antimaterial, the result would be a huge explosion.

This is why antimaterial is so terrifying and at the same time fascinating thing, what can be used as the fuel, but the high level of energy would make very difficult to store that thing. And only one gram of antimatter would destroy Earth if it would contact with the material. The scientists have created ideas that antimaterial could store in the small magnetic bottle, where the magnetic fields would keep antimatter away from the wall of the bottle.

When we are thinking about the possibility, that entire galaxies can be formed by antimaterial. That means that somewhere in a distant universe could be intelligent lifeforms, what are just like us, but they are formed by antimaterial. This means that those creatures can communicate with us, but they would not have the ability to touch us.

But is it so? When we are thinking about the case that the entire radio transmitter would be made by antimaterial, that means that those transmitters would send anti-electrons or positrons, and that means that we probably cannot communicate with extraterrestrials, what would be formed by antimaterial. This hypothesis is not my own. It has been introduced in some hypotheses, where is asked is it possible, that every each of us has a duplicate.

That means that we have a twin version of us somewhere universe. That "another me" would be formed antimaterial, and that's why we ever cannot touch it. Those things are interesting, and the world is full of questions and hypothetical examples.

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

And what was the "Big Bang"?

And what was the "Big Bang"?

"Big Bang" is the creation of the material, time and Universe. Time existed before "Big Bang", but there was nothing where it can influence. When time faced material, the Universum started to form. And in the space, before "Big Bang" time was connected with the material. But because the form of the material was different time got influence on the material when it released in the "Big Bang". In the "Big Bang" the material and antimaterial electrons released at the same time, but somehow the form of material, what we are calling as "material" won the antimatter in the great annihilation, what happened in the begin of Universe.

When the "Big Bang" happened the first form of the material was released to the Universe. That first form of the material was actually the electrons and positrons, what was pulling together to the impact trajectories, and then happened the annihilation reaction, what is called as the "Great Inflation". Because there were a little bit more electrons than positrons, the form of material is, how we know it. In fact, we can think the "Big Bang" as the series of the phenomena were released very high energy levels. Maybe the "Dark Energy" is from that period, when giant annihilation has shaken the entire universe. 

So what caused this very high power explosion? One of the explanations for the "Big Bang" is that was some kind of erupting black hole. After the explosion formed a large number of electrons and positrons, and that caused the new explosions. When the material "won" antimatter, the universe was really hot, and electrons started to collide with another electron. If there would be the same number of positrons and electrons the annihilation continues forever until another type of particles would get a majority.

In this extremely hot universe, the protons and neutrons started to form in the collision of electrons. Another explanation for the "Big Bang" is that two clouds of electrons and positions collided, and this annihilation started the universe. The positron and electron are pulling each other in a colliding course because they have different polarity. But where those particles or black holes came?

Maybe they were remains of the elder universe, what has faced its end in the big crash, and then the black hole was in the totally empty space. And that caused the eruption because sometimes the photon would escape from the black hole, and if there is no replacement the black hole starts to vaporize faster and faster. Normally lose of the photon would mean anything, because the black hole would replace that in seconds. 

But in this case, there would not be any photon, electron or other material in the universe, and the black hole starts to vaporize forming the new universe. Or if the universe would lose its life in the great emptiness, the neutrons and protons start to break, and in the last in the universe would have only electrons existed. And suddenly some of those electrons start to rotate in the opposite direction than another, which means that it would transform to the anti-electron, and the electrons and positrons are starting to close together, and finally happens the great annihilation.