The thing, what somebody doesn't you want to know about Satan

The thing, what somebody doesn't you want to know about Satan

Satan is a creature, that is one of the most mysterious in history. The question is, why God doesn't destroy Satan? And some persons would suspect, that God is not omnipotent, because of that character was not able to destroy Satan. But then we can see things another way, and that way was the Satan has something to do with the Catholic Church and the early ages of Christianity.

That means that the way how Catholic Church deal with things that were against its policy were far away from the mercy. Inquisition was a really powerful tool when people were burned in bonfires because they have spoken something, what the Catholic Church didn't want to accept. This kind of action was totally against the letter of the Holy Bible. And people, of course, asked, what went wrong?

Why church, what promised mercy turned against the normal people, who it promised to defend? Why did the church turn to defend noblemen and warlords? And the most important question in this series is, that why the Catholic Church started to support kings and rulers by using the argument, that they got their power and authority from God?

Did some of the Apostles were body double? That means that there could be an undercover Roman agent in the nucleus of the proto-church.

That might open the road to the answer to the question, what somebody didn't want people to know bout Satan? There is a thing, what we haven't ever thought before. And that thing is that what if some Apostles were changed by Romans? That means that the Romans could assassinate one of the Group, what Jesus taught, and then that person could use the position for getting benefit to the leaders, who ruled that person. Or maybe they changed some other person. Here we must say, that there is a possibility, that some person, near Jesus or his group, could be the body double. Person, who took the place of some other person, and played that individual.

If we are thinking about things, like Apostle Paul's letters, we must understand, that some of those letters might be written by other persons. Or they might be faked by Romans. When we are thinking about the apostles and the leaders of the early ages of Christianity, which means the time before Christianity came to the official religion of the Roman Empire, there is a possibility, that there were some Roman spies or provocateurs hidden in the proto-church, and maybe some of them has been body switches. If some of them took the place as the leader or another high-ranking member of Christianity, that person might be used the Church as the tool for agitation.

The Roman strategy was to keep the friends far and enemies close.

The Roman strategy was to keep the friends far and enemies close.

The way to think that the Roman empire would want to keep the enemies close and friends far were very good for the military forces of the empire. That set was able to put the Roman enemies between two fronts if that actor attacks against Rome and the second thing in this kind of strategy was that the fights would happen in the enemy territory.

That denied the propaganda against Rome, where the propagandists claimed that all fights were happening at the Roman friend's territory, and claim that the friendship was one side. But the thing was also very practical. 

The Roman gladius units can raise the enemies against Rome if some legion commanders would think, that they were Emperors and that thing kept legions in the work, that those men would have no time to think about things like they were suitable for rule the state. Those things are really interesting.

The people who have control masses would always want more and more power and the things what made those people want the final rule was interesting. For those people the power is like a snowball, they always want to become more and more powerful, and get the higher and higher ranks. And the little war was a good place to end those willings. The end was an arrow to back, and that ended the dreams of that military leader. The Roman way was, that the military leaders were not too popular, and that guaranteed, that somebody would tell to the emperor if the person thinks something, what was not tolerated.

And the thing was that without sharing information taking the control in the empire was impossible. Or would you think, that the new emperor would get always the authorization for the ruling? 

But when the thing is moved to our world, there is always somebody, who needs to be better than somebody else. There is always unnecessary secrecy and the people, who are in charge are always deny the information from their henchmen.

Sharing the information to henchmen is somehow disgusting or shame, and that means that the henchmen would not even know, what they have to do. If we would transfer that thing to the Roman warlord, the ability to share the information would save their life because the henchmen could keep shield to protect their back.

But otherwise, that thing could inform the Emperor, what could cause execution. And the thing is that if the legion would be ordered to march inside the Roman city, that order would cause death.